Method to Estimate the Level of Service in Elongated Roundabouts Located on Two-Lane Rural Highways
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 7
Abstract
In Brazil, roadway intersections are designed based on the precepts contained in manuals prepared by official government agencies and documents such as the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). However, some types of intersections, termed alternative intersections, are not included in these documents, such as elongated roundabouts (ERs). This study proposed a method to estimate the level of service of this type of intersection located on two-lane rural highways. For this purpose, traffic data were collected in the field to obtain diverse traffic patterns and to characterize the desired speeds at sites with ERs. The Aimsun Next traffic simulator was used to create several hypothetical scenarios, which allowed the development of models to estimate the chosen performance measures for ER analysis (the average delay, , and extra distance travel time, EDTT) as a function of traffic and geometry parameters. The validation of the proposed method was performed, and it was observed that the traffic models produced values of and EDTT close to those found in the field.
Practical Applications
The results obtained in this work allow the reader to evaluate the operational quality of an intersection constantly implemented in Brazil, an elongated roundabout (ER). No methods were found in the national and international literature aimed exclusively at this type of intersection, which justifies the need for this work. The multilinear models that make up the method serve to estimate performance measures aimed to evaluate the ERs, the average delay, , and the extra distance travel time, EDTT. To estimate these two performance measures, the user of the proposed method needs to obtain, around the ERs, simple information, such as the traffic flow of the primary road; the traffic flow of the secondary road; the free flow speed; and the percentage of heavy vehicles. The method can reproduce values of these performance measures close to the data collected in the field, considering the conditions observed on Brazilian highways. This may indicate that the method could also be applied in other countries if the proposed multilinear models are appropriately adjusted based on local traffic data.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG Grant No. APQ-03818-18), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Grant Nos. 315001/2021-6 and 439250/2018-8), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).
References
AASHTO. 2001. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2004. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. 5th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Aimsun. 2020. Aimsun 20: Dynamic simulators user’s manual. Barcelona, Spain: Aimsun.
Al-Masaeid, H. R. 1999. “Capacity of U-turns at median openings.” ITE J. 69 (6): 28–34.
Autey, J., T. Sayed, and M. El Esawey. 2012. “Operational performance comparison of four unconventional intersection designs.” J. Adv. Transp. 47 (5): 536–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.181.
Bared, J. G., and E. I. Kaisar. 2002. “Median U-turn design as an alternative treatment for left turns at signalized intersections.” ITE J. 72 (2): 50–54.
Bessa, J. E., Jr., and J. R. Setti. 2018. “Evaluating measures of effectiveness for quality of service estimation on two-lane rural highways.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A. Syst. 144 (9): 04018056. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000178.
Bulla-Cruz, L. A., A. Laureshyn, and L. Lyons. 2020. “Event-based road safety assessment: A novel approach towards risk microsimulation in roundabouts.” Measurement 165 (Dec): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108192.
Dash, S. S. M., and P. P. Dey. 2017. “Estimation of critical gap of U-turns at uncontrolled median openings.” Transp. Lett. 11 (5): 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1288890.
Dhatrak, A., P. Edara, and J. Bared. 2010. “Performance analysis of parallel flow intersection and displaced left turn intersection designs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2171 (1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.3141/2171-04.
DNIT (National Department of Transport Infrastructure). 2005. Manual de Projeto de Interseções. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: DNIT.
DNIT (National Department of Transport Infrastructure). 2006. Manual de Estudos de Tráfego. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: DNIT.
Dorothy, P. W., T. L. Maleck, and S. E. Nolf. 1997. Operational aspects of Michigan design for divided highways. Transportation Research Record 1579, 18–26. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
El Esawey, M., and T. Sayed. 2007. “Comparison of two unconventional intersection schemes: Crossover displaced left-turn and upstream signalized crossover intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2023 (1): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2023-02.
El Esawey, M., and T. Sayed. 2011. “Operational performance analysis of the unconventional median U-turn intersection design.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 38 (11): 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1139/l11-085.
El Esawey, M., and T. Sayed. 2013. “Analysis of unconventional arterial intersection designs (UAIDs): State-of-the-art methodologies and future research directions.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci. 9 (10): 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2012.672344.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014a. “EDC-2 intersection and interchange geometrics website.” Accessed May 5, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/edctwo/2012/.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014b. Median U-turn informational guide. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Hollander, Y., and R. Liu. 2008. “The principles of calibrating traffic microsimulation models.” Transportation 35 (3): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9156-2.
Hughes, W., R. Jagannathan, D. Sengupta, and J. Hummer. 2010. Alternative intersections/interchanges: Informational report (AIIR). Washington, DC: FHWA, USDOT.
Hummer, J. E. 1998. “Unconventional left-turn alternative for urban and suburban arterials—Part one.” ITE J. 68 (9): 26–29.
Mohamed, A. I. Z., Y. Ci, and T. Tan. 2020. “A novel methodology for estimating the capacity and level of service for the new mega elliptical roundabout intersection.” J. Adv. Transp. 2020 (Mar): 8467152. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8467152.
Oliveira, J. K. S. 2021. “Adaptação do HCM-6 para análise de rodovias de pista simples sem faixas adicionais em Minas Gerais.” Dissertação de Mestrado, em Geotecnia e Transportes–Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Reid, J., and J. Hummer. 1999. “Analyzing system travel time in arterial corridors with unconventional designs using microscopic simulation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1678 (1): 208–215. https://doi.org/10.3141/1678-25.
Rodegerdts, L. A., et al. 2004. Signalized intersections: Informational guide. Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-04-091. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Shahi, J., and A. Choupani. 2009. “Modelling the operational effects of unconventional U-turns at a highway intersection.” Transportmetrica 5 (3): 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128600902795042.
Silva, F. A., J. E. Bessa, A. L. Costa, A. L. Cunha, and D. M. C. Velho. 2022. “Analysis of no-passing zones to assess the level of service on two-lane rural highways in Brazil.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 10 (1): 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.006.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2000. Highway capacity manual 2000. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2010. Highway capacity manual 2010. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2016. Highway capacity manual sixth edition: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2022. Highway capacity manual 7th edition: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. Washington, DC: TRB.
Triola, M. F. 2017. Elementary statistics. 12th ed., 792. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
Washburn, S. S., D. Watson, Z. Bian, T. Luttinen, A. Al-Kaisy, A. Jafari, R. Downling, and A. Elias. 2018. Improved analysis of two-lane highway capacity and operational performance. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, TRB.
Zhou, H., J. Lu, X. Yang, S. Dissanayake, and K. M. Williams. 2002. “Operational effects of U-turns as alternatives to direct left turns from driveways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1796 (1): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.3141/1796-08.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150 • Issue 7 • July 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 8, 2023
Accepted: Jan 31, 2024
Published online: May 3, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.