Stress Distribution in a Railroad Track at the Crosstie–Ballast Interface
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 8
Abstract
Excessive crosstie wear and abrasion and ballast wear and fouling are fundamental problems contributing to inadequate railroad track performance. This adversely affects the attainment and long-term maintenance of desired track geometric requirements. The magnitudes and distribution of the stresses at the crosstie–ballast (CT-B) interface must be known to determine the stress distribution on and within the ballast. However, the track design recommendations to determine these pressures, which are largely based on a methodology from the 1980s, are currently valid for modern-day railroad applications for multiple reasons discussed in this study. This study analyzed CT-B interfacial pressure data measured on an active freight mainline in Mascot, Tennessee. Dynamic contact pressures at the CT-B interface were measured using hydraulic earth pressure cells for various wheel loads and train speeds. The test train was a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) test train consisting of a diesel electric locomotive, a test car that had different wheel loads based on the deployable axle load, and an inspection car. Although the maximum train speed was limited to , this research found that speed variation has a minimal effect on the CT-B interfacial pressures. From the measured data, a Gaussian stress distribution equation is proposed to determine longitudinal pressure distribution transmitted to the CT-B interface for static conditions. In addition, the stress distribution along the length of a crosstie was investigated via laboratory experimentation using a half-length crosstie. As a result of the experimentation, a dimensionless trilinear approximation was developed to estimate the stress distribution along the length of the crosstie. In general, this research recommends that the longitudinal and lateral stress distributions be considered together to design a better railroad track.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This research was primarily funded by the National University Rail Center (NURail). A special thanks to prior Graduate Assistants Ethan Russell and Travis J. Watts, Visiting Scholar Qinglie Liu, and Dr. David Clark for their significant contributions during the early phases of this research. The cooperation and contributions of Norfolk Southern Corporation during the test site installation activities and continued monitoring activities are greatly appreciated. The authors also acknowledge the contribution to this research by the Federal Railroad Administration Office of Research Development and Technology, ENSCO Inc., and the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. A special thanks to the Turkish government and the Ministry of Education for their financial support.
References
Al-Qadi, I. L., W. Xie, D. L. Jones, and R. Roberts. 2010. “Development of a time–frequency approach to quantify railroad ballast fouling condition using ultra-wide band ground-penetrating radar data.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 11 (4): 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298431003749766.
AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association). 2018. Manual for railway engineering. Lanham, MD: AREMA.
Clarke, D. B., J. G. Rose, T. J. Watts, and E. Russell. 2019. “In-track measurements of crosstie-ballast interfacial pressure magnitudes and distributions with varying train operational conditions.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Transportation and Development 2019: Smarter and Safer Mobility and Cities, 446–457. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hay, W. W. 1982. Railroad engineering. New York: Wiley.
Indraratna, B., N. T. Ngo, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, and J. S. Vinod. 2014. “Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: Discrete element simulation.” Int. J. Geomech. 14 (1): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000264.
Qian, Y., M. S. Dersch, Z. Gao, and J. R. Edwards. 2019. “Railroad infrastructure 4.0: Development and application of an automatic ballast support condition assessment system.” Transp. Geotech. 19 (Jun): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.002.
Russell, E., J. G. Rose, and D. B. Clarke. 2020. “In-track timber crosstie-ballast interfacial pressure measurements for revenue freight trains and DOTX 218/219 test train operating conditions.” In Proc., AREMA RRB20 Symp. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Railroad Road and Ballast. Kansas City, MO: American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association.
Song, W., B. Huang, X. Shu, J. Stránský, and H. Wu. 2019. “Interaction between railroad ballast and sleeper: A DEM-FEM approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (5): 04019030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001388.
Song, W., X. Shu, B. Huang, Y. Sun, H. Gong, and D. Clarke. 2017. “Pressure distribution under steel and timber crossties in railway tracks.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 143 (9): 04017046. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000075.
Stratman, B., Y. Liu, and S. Mahadevan. 2007. “Structural health monitoring of railroad wheels using wheel impact load detectors.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 7 (3): 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-007-9043-3.
Sun, Q. D., B. Indraratna, and S. Nimbalkar. 2016. “Deformation and degradation mechanisms of railway ballast under high frequency cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001375.
Talbot, A. N. 1980. Stresses in railroad track—The Talbot reports. The reports presented for the AREA bulletins of the Special Committee on Stress in Railroad Track, 1918 to 1940. Washington, DC: American Railway Engineering Association.
Thompson, B. D., D. B. Clarke, and J. G. Rose. 2020. “Modeling crosstie-ballast load distribution in a railroad trackbed using a linear-elastic analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (11): 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120937962.
Wang, H., L.-L. Zeng, X. Bian, and Z.-S. Hong. 2020. “Train moving load-induced vertical superimposed stress at ballasted railway tracks.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (Feb): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3428395.
Zeng, K., S. Zeng, T. Wang, and H. Huang. 2022. “Real-time evaluation of railroad ballast condition through change of contact stress using SmartRock.” Transp. Geotech. 37 (2022): 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100857.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 17, 2022
Accepted: Apr 5, 2023
Published online: Jun 5, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Habib A. Unluoglu, L. Sebastian Bryson, Jerry G. Rose, Predicting Dynamic Contact Stresses at Crosstie–Ballast Interface Based on Basic Train Characteristics, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8098, 150, 5, (2024).