Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2023

Improving Supply Chain Logistics with Agent-Based Spatiotemporal Mechanistic Enumeration and Probe Vehicle Data

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 9

Abstract

Traditional methods of transportation performance and land use valuation rely on metrics that emphasize daily traffic volume and ideal travel speeds of transportation systems; however, enterprise logistics are better informed through data-driven models that identify reliable transportation routes between origin and destination. Enterprise and personal logistics are prone to disruptions from the variability of travel times across hours and days of the week. There is a critical need to assess and monitor the performance of global supply chains from the perspective of freight operations. In this work, a data-driven agent-based spatiotemporal mechanistic enumeration model was developed to evaluate the variability of completed round trips based on departure time, seasonality, and freight transaction times. The mechanistic enumeration methods utilize probe-vehicle travel time data that have been collected from devices equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. Based on the success criteria of completed round trips, the results were evaluated to explore how operating conditions for an origin site (e.g., distribution center) and destination (e.g., maritime port) are influenced by the inherent variability of highway traffic performance and freight handling times.

Practical Applications

Supply chain logistics often focus on average highway travel times between an origin and destination to investigate freight round-trip duration and planning. Although the average drive time is easy to measure and communicate, there is no information on how daily and weekly traffic patterns will influence logistics. Using recent advances in GPS data collection and data processing, this study demonstrated how a computer-based mechanistic enumeration method is used to investigate freight operations performance. The methods provide a tailored approach that affords more information than traditional methods that explore average conditions. The mechanistic enumeration uses high-resolution historical traffic data to determine how the successful number of round trips is influenced by departure times, days of the week, months of the year, and transaction handling times (e.g., truck turnaround time). This information can be used by operators and truck drivers making decisions about schedules, hours of operation, days of service, and initial site selection, by considering how variable highway traffic conditions will influence logistics.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This effort was supported in part by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Transportation and Mobility Planning Division (TMPD), the Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), and the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Logistics Systems (CCALS). This effort was supported in part with funding from Virginia International Terminals, LLC (VIT), a single-member limited liability company wholly owned by the Virginia Port Authority (VPA). In addition, Hampton Roads Chassis Pool (HRCP II), on behalf of and wholly owned by VIT, operates and manages the intermodal chassis and empty container yards. Collectively, the three entities are marketed as the Port of Virginia and referred to as such in this paper. All entities provided support with data acquisition and expert judgment.

References

AASHTO. 2011. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. 6th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 2012. “Analytical procedures for determining the impacts of reliability mitigation strategies.” In Analytical procedures for determining the impacts of reliability mitigation strategies. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Chen, Z., and W. Fan. 2019. “Data analytics approach for travel time reliability pattern analysis and prediction.” J. Mod. Transp. 27 (4): 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-019-00195-6.
Davidson, C. 2014. Insights into the scenario planning methodology. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Ministry of Transport.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. 2022. Interstate truck driver’s guide to hours of service. Washington, DC: USDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. “MAP-21 proposed measures for congestion, reliability, and freight.” Accessed June 1, 2021. https://www.apta.com/gap/fedreg/Documents/MAP-21_Proposed_Measures_for_Congestion%2C_Reliability%2C_and_Freight.pdf.
Fu, F., W. Qian, and H. Dong. 2019. “Estimation of route travel time distribution with information fusion from automatic number plate recognition data.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 145 (7): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000242.
Guo, R., W. Guan, and W. Zhang. 2018. “Route design problem of customized buses: Mixed integer programming model and case study.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 144 (11): 04018069. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000185.
Hall, R. W. 1986. “Fastest path through a network with random time-dependent travel times.” Transp. Sci. 20 (3): 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.20.3.182.
Heshami, S., L. Kattan, Z. Gong, and S. Aalami. 2019. “Deterministic and stochastic freeway capacity analysis based on weather conditions.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 145 (5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000232.
Hu, Q., and Z. Hu. 2014. “Resource balancing in the design of hub-and-spoke network for LTL logistics.” J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 8 (1): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000371.
INRIX. 2018. Transportation agencies turn to INRIX to get more out of NPMRDS. Kirkland, WA: INRIX.
INRIX. 2020. Global Traffic Scorecard 2019. Kirkland, WA: INRIX.
Kamga, C., and M. A. Yazici. 2014. “Temporal and weather related variation patterns of urban travel time: Considerations and caveats for value of travel time, value of variability, and mode choice studies.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 45 (Aug): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.020.
Lambert, J. H., S. A. Theckdi, and Q. Zhou. 2011. Land development risk analysis for multimodal transportation corridors, 74. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research.
Linthicum, A. S., J. H. Lambert, A. S. Linthicum, and J. H. Lambert. 2010. “Risk management for infrastructure corridors vulnerable to adjacent land development.” J. Risk Res. 13 (8): 983–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.486076.
List, G., B. Williams, and N. Rouphail. 2014. Establishing monitoring programs for travel time reliability. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Lomax, T., D. Schrank, S. Turner, and R. Margiotta. 2003. Selecting travel reliability measures. Arlington, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Mak, H. Y., and Z. J. M. Shen. 2016. “Integrated modeling for location analysis.” In Vol. 9 of Foundations and trends in technology, information and operations management. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers, Inc.
Mane, A. S., and S. S. Pulugurtha. 2018. “Effect of land developments on travel time reliability.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Transportation Development 2018, 39–47. Reston, VA: ASCE.
McIntyre, C., and M. K. Parfitt. 1998. “Decision support system for residential land development site selection process.” J. Archit. Eng. 4 (4): 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:4(125).
Muriel-Villegas, J. E., K. C. Alvarez-Uribe, C. E. Patiño-Rodríguez, and J. G. Villegas. 2016. “Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards: Insights from a Colombian case.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152 (Aug): 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.006.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2014a. “Incorporating travel time reliability into the highway capacity manual.” In Incorporating travel time reliability into the highway capacity manual, edited by W. Kittelson and M. Vandehey. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2014b. Value of travel time reliability in transportation decision making: Proof of concept Maryland. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
North American Council for Freight Efficiency. 2019. Regional haul: An opportunity for trucking? Fort Wayne, IN: North American Council for Freight Efficiency.
Olszewski, P., T. Dybicz, K. Jamroz, W. Kustra, and A. Romanowska. 2018. “Assessing highway travel time reliability using probe vehicle data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (15): 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118796716.
Pennetti, C. A., D. Andrews, M. D. Porter, and J. H. Lambert. 2020a. “Traveler perception of transportation system performance using kernel density estimation to prioritize infrastructure investments.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Transportation and Development 2020: Planning and Development—Selected Papers from the Int. Conf. on Transportation and Development 2020, 48–61. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Pennetti, C. A., M. D. Fontaine, J. Jun, and J. H. Lambert. 2020b. “Evaluating capacity of transportation operations with highway travel time reliability.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 204 (Jun): 107126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107126.
Pennetti, C. A., J. Jun, G. S. Jones, and J. H. Lambert. 2021. “Temporal disaggregation of performance measures to manage uncertainty in transportation logistics and scheduling.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (1): 04020047. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001096.
Puangprakhon, P., and S. Narupiti. 2017. “Allocating travel times recorded from sparse GPS probe vehicles into individual road segments.” Transp. Res. Procedia 25 (Jan): 2208–2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.423.
Rakha, H., H. Chen, A. Haghani, X. Zhang, and M. Hamedi. 2015. Use of probe data for arterial roadway travel time estimation and freeway medium-term travel time prediction. Washington, DC: USDOT.
RStudio Team. 2020. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston: RStudio, Inc.
Sadatsafavi, H., A. A. Kim, S. D. Anderson, and P. Bishop. 2019. “Scenario planning application in US highway transportation industry.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000474.
Thekdi, S. A., and J. H. Lambert. 2012. “Decision analysis and risk models for land development affecting infrastructure systems.” Risk Anal. 32 (7): 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01719.x.
Thekdi, S. A., and J. H. Lambert. 2015. “Integrated risk management of safety and development on transportation corridors.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138 (Jun): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.11.015.
Thorisson, H., M. Alsultan, D. Hendrickson, T. L. Polmateer, and J. H. Lambert. 2019a. “Addressing schedule disruptions in business processes of advanced logistics systems.” Syst. Eng. 22 (1): 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21471.
Thorisson, H., D. C. Hendrickson, T. L. Polmateer, and J. H. Lambert. 2019b. “Disaggregating uncertainties in operations analysis of intermodal logistics systems.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part B: Mech. Eng. 5 (1): 011007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040918.
Thorisson, H., C. A. Pennetti, D. J. Andrews, D. C. Hendrickson, T. L. Polmateer, and J. H. Lambert. 2019c. “Systems modeling and optimization of container ship berthing with various enterprise risks.” In Proc., SysCon 2019—13th Annual IEEE Int. Systems Conf., Proc. New York: IEEE.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2010. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2014. Traffic and transportation simulation. Issue Transportation Research Circular E-C195. Washington, DC: TRB.
Turner, S. M., W. L. Eisele, R. J. Benz, and J. Douglas. 1998. Travel time data collection handbook. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology Laboratory. 2021. The RITIS vehicle probe project suite. College Park, MD: Univ. of Maryland.
US Census Bureau. 2004. “Vehicle inventory and use survey: United States: 2002.” In 2002 economic census. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
USDOT. 2011. The value of travel time savings: Departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations revision 2. Washington, DC: USDOT.
VEDP (Virginia Economic Development Partnership). 2020. “Virginia economic development partnership.” Accessed June 1, 2021. https://www.vedp.org/about-vedp.
Virginia Transportation Research Council. 2017. Considerations for calculating arterial system performance measures in Virginia. Richmond, VA: Virginia DOT.
Wheeler, R. L., C. A. Pennetti, T. L. Polmateer, G. Jones, Y. Dhanpal, and J. H. Lambert. 2022. “Information management of a lifeline infrastructure for mobility of people and goods.” In Proc., SysCon 2022—16th Annual IEEE Int. Systems Conf., Proc., 3–6. New York: IEEE.
Xu, J., and J. H. Lambert. 2013. “Distributed travel time savings of a multiscale transportation access management program.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 33 (3): 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9459-0.
Xu, Z., S. E. Jabari, and E. Prassas. 2020. “Applying finite mixture models to New York City travel times.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 146 (5): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000351.
Zak, J., and S. Węgliński. 2014. “The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology.” Transp. Res. Procedia 3 (Jul): 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.034.
Zhang, J., M. Liu, and B. Zhou. 2019. “Analytical model for travel time-based BPR function with demand fluctuation and capacity degradation.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (Mar): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5916479.
Zhao, W., E. Mccormack, D. J. Dailey, and E. Scharnhorst. 2013. “Using truck probe GPS data to identify and rank roadway bottlenecks.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (Jan): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000444.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Apr 4, 2022
Accepted: May 1, 2023
Published online: Jul 11, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems, Dept. of Engineering Systems and Environment, Univ. of Virginia, Olsson Hall 112, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400736, Charlottesville, VA 22903. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-9081. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share