Understanding Public Acceptability of Congestion Charging in Beijing
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 8
Abstract
Beijing, the capital city of China, currently experiences serious traffic congestion and extreme air pollution. To mitigate these issues, Beijing Municipality is currently considering implementing a congestion charging system that requires drivers to pay for entering congested areas. A stated preference survey of 5,468 Beijing residents was conducted mid-May 2016 to investigate public attitudes toward the proposal. This research analyzed the survey data using a multinomial logit (MNL) model and a cluster analysis to identify relationships between residents’ characteristics (including the basic socioeconomic and demographic attributes; and their workday travel characteristics) and their attitudes toward Beijing congestion charging. Women are more likely to remain neutral toward congestion pricing. Among employment categories, students are most likely to support, the retired/unemployed are most likely to oppose, and the employed tend to fall between students and the retired/unemployed when it comes to acceptability of congesting pricing. Travelers who use public transit, bicycle, or walk to work are more likely to support congestion charging than car commuters. Income and car ownership have nonlinear relationships with acceptability. High- and low-income commuters are more likely to support congestion charging than middle-income commuters. Residents with no access to cars, with access to one car, or to more than two cars are more likely to support congestion charging than people with access to two cars. There is also a nonlinear relationship between the monetary amount people are willing to pay for the charge and their acceptance of congestion pricing, which merits additional research. The perceived effectiveness of congestion charging strongly influences their acceptance, and so does a traveler’s familiarity with the general congestion charging concept and the specific plan to be implemented in Beijing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request, such as the stated preference survey.
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61903058, 61803284, and 71831002), Shanghai Yangfan Program (No. 18YF1424200), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1600600), and Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT_17R13).
References
Anable, J. 2005. “‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory.” Transp. Policy 12 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.11.004.
Barth, M., and K. Boriboonsomsin. 2008. “Real-world carbon dioxide impacts of traffic congestion.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2058 (1): 163–171. https://doi.org/10.3141/2058-20.
Bartley, B. 1995. “Mobility impacts, reactions and options, traffic demand management options in Europe: The MIRO project.” Traffic Eng. Control 36 (11): 596–603.
Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. 2014. “2014 Report on the state of environment in Beijing.” Accessed June 20, 2016. http://www.bjmemc.com.cn/g327/s921/t2206.aspx.
Beijing TRC (Transportation Research Center). 2016. Beijing transportation annual report 2015. Beijing: Beijing TRC.
Bell, M. G., M. A. Quddus, J.-D. Schmoecker, and A. Fonzone. 2004. “The impact of the congestion charge on the retail sector.” Accessed June 20, 2016. www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/assets/pdf/BellReport.pdf.
Bhatt, K., T. Higgins, J. T. Berg, and K. Analytics. 2008. Lessons learned from international experience in congestion pricing. Washington, DC: US Federal Highway Administration.
Bonsall, P. W., and W. F. Lythgoe. 2009. “Factors affecting the amount of effort expended in responding to questions in behavioural choice experiments.” J. Choice Model 2 (2): 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70011-3.
Börjesson, M., J. Eliasson, M. B. Hugosson, and K. Brundell-Freij. 2012. “The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt.” Transp. Policy 20 (Mar): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.001.
Börjesson, M., and I. Kristoffersson. 2015. “The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 75 (May): 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.011.
Carnovale, M., and M. Gibson. 2013. The effects of driving restrictions on air quality and driver behavior. San Diego: Univ. of California.
CfIT (Commission for Integrated Transport). 2002. Public attitudes to transport in England: The CfIT Report 2002. London: CfIT.
China Daily. 2016. Beijing sees slower population growth. Accessed June 22, 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-01/20/content_23160880.htm.
Clee, A. 2007. Driving away the traffic: What lessons can New York learn from London and Stockholm’s experiences with congestion charging. Medford, MA: Tufts Univ.
De Luca, S., and R. Di Pace. 2015. “Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 71 (Jan): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.001.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2004. “Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK.” Accessed June 21, 2016. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/documents/divisionhomepage/029709.hcsp.
Do, A. Q., and G. Grudnitski. 1992. “A neural network approach to residential property appraisal.” Real Estate Appraiser 58 (3): 38–45.
Eliasson, J. 2009. “A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system.” Transp. Res. Part A 43 (4): 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.014.
Eliasson, J. 2014. Vol. 7 of The Stockholm congestion charges: An overview. Stockholm, Sweden: Centre for Transport Studies CTS Working Paper.
Eliasson, J., and L. Jonsson. 2011. “The unexpected ’yes’: Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm.” Transp. Policy 18 (4): 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.006.
Eliasson, J., and L. G. Mattsson. 2006. “Equity effects of congestion pricing quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40 (7): 602–620.
Feng, S., and Q. Li. 2018. “Evaluating the car ownership control policy in Shanghai: A structural vector auto-regression approach.” Transportation 45 (1): 205–232.
Francke, A., and D. Kaniok. 2013. “Responses to differentiated road pricing schemes.” Transp. Res. Part A 48 (Feb): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.002.
Frey, B. S. 2003. “Why are efficient transport policy instruments so seldom used.” In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, 63–75. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Fujii, S., T. Gärling, C. Jakobsson, and R. C. Jou. 2004. “A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners’ acceptance of road pricing.” Transportation 31 (3): 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORT.0000025395.17250.49.
Gärling, T., C. Jakobsson, P. Loukopoulos, and S. Fujii. 2008. “Acceptability of road pricing.” In Pricing in road transport: A multi-disciplinary perspective, edited by E. Verhoef, 193. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Gaunt, M., T. Rye, and S. Allen. 2007. “Public acceptability of road user charging: The case of Edinburgh and the 2005 referendum.” Transp. Rev. 27 (1): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600831299.
Gensch, D. H., and W. W. Reeker. 1979. “The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model.” J. Marketing Res. 16 (1): 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600117.
Harrington, W., A. Krupnick, and A. Alberini. 2001. “Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing.” Transp. Res. Part A 35 (2): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00048-8.
Harsman, B. 2003. “Success and failure: Experiences from cities.” In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, edited by J. Schade and B. Schlag, 137–152. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Hårsman, B., S. Pädam, and B. Wijkmark. 2001. Ways and means to increase the acceptance of urban road pricing. PRIMA. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hennessy, D. A., and D. L. Wiesenthal. 1997. “The relationship between traffic congestion, driver stress and direct versus indirect coping behaviours.” Ergonomics 40 (3): 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397188198.
Huang, K., Z. Liu, T. Zhu, I. Kim, and K. An. 2019. “Analysis of the acceptance of park-and-ride by users: A cumulative logistic regression approach.” J. Transp. Land Use 12 (1): 637–647. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1390.
Ittner, H., R. Becker, and E. Kals. 2003. “Willingness to support traffic policy measures: The role of justice.” In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, 249–265. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Jaensirisak, S., M. Wardman, and A. D. May. 2005. “Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy 39 (2): 127–153.
Jakobsson, C., S. Fujii, and T. Gärling. 2000. “Determinants of private car users’ acceptability of road pricing.” Transp. Policy 7 (2): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00005-6.
Jones, P. 1998. “Urban road pricing: Public acceptability and barriers to implementation.” In Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment: Issues of efficiency and social feasibility, 263–284. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Jones, P. 2003. “Acceptability of road user charging: Meeting the challenge.” In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, 27–62. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kanungo, T., D. M. Mount, N. S. Netanyahu, C. D. Piatko, R. Silverman, and A. Y. Wu. 2002. “An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24 (7): 881–892.
Kolesnikov, A., E. Trichina, and T. Kauranne. 2015. “Estimating the number of clusters in a numerical data set via quantization error modeling.” Pattern Recognit. 48 (3): 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2014.09.017.
Kottenhoff, K., and K. B. Freij. 2009. “The role of public transport for feasibility and acceptability of congestion charging—The case of Stockholm.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43 (3): 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.004.
Larsen, J. E., and M. O. Peterson. 1988. “Correcting for errors in statistical appraisal equations.” Real Estate Appraiser Anal. 54 (3): 45–49.
Levy, J. I., J. J. Buonocore, and K. Von Stackelberg. 2010. “Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion: A health risk assessment.” Environ. Health 9 (1): 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-65.
Li, X., J. W. Shaw, D. Liu, and Y. Yuan. 2017. “Acceptability of Beijing congestion charging from a business perspective.” Transportation 46 (3): 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9820-0.
Litman, T. 2011. “Smart congestion relief: Comprehensive analysis of traffic congestion costs and congestion reduction benefits.” Accessed June 25, 2016. https://www.vtpi.org/cong_relief.pdf.
Litman, T. 2014. Vol. 8 of Evaluating transport equity guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transport planning, 50–65. Victoria, BC: Victoria Transportation Policy Institute.
Liu, W. 2016. “Beijing finalizes preliminarily work on congestion charge.” Accessed June 20, 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-05/27/content_25494002.htm.
Livingstone, K. 2004. “The challenge of driving through change: Introducing congestion charging in central London.” Plann. Theory Pract. 5 (4): 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293224.
Luk, J., and E. Chung. 1997. Public acceptance and technologies for road pricing. Vermont South, Australia: ARRB Transport Research.
MacQueen, J. 1967. “Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations.” In Proc., 5th Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 281–297. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Malhotra, N. K. 1984. “The use of linear logit models in marketing research.” J. Marketing Res. 21 (1): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378402100103.
Mark, J., and M. A. Goldberg. 1988. “Multiple regression analysis and mass assessment: A review of the issues.” Appraisal J. 56 (1): 89–110.
McQuaid, R., and M. Grieco. 2005. “Edinburgh and the politics of congestion charging: Negotiating road user charging with affected publics.” Transp. Policy 12 (5): 475–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.06.005.
Nikitas, A., E. Avineri, and G. Parkhurst. 2011. “Older people’s attitudes to road charging: Are they distinctive and what are the implications for policy?” Transp. Plann. Technol. 34 (1): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2011.530831.
Odeck, J., and S. Bråthen. 1997. “On public attitudes toward implementation of toll roads—The case of Oslo toll ring.” Transp. Policy 4 (2): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00008-5.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. “Data and metadata for OECD countries.” Accessed June 25, 2016. https://stats.oecd.org/.
Peng, Z. 2005. “Urban transportation in Chinese cities and their impacts on the urban poor.” In Proc., of the 85th TRB Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Phang, S. Y., and R. S. Toh. 1997. “From manual to electronic road congestion pricing: The Singapore experience and experiment.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 33 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(97)00006-9.
Richards, M. G. 2006. Congestion charging in London: The policy and the politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryley, T., and N. Gjersoe. 2006. “Newspaper response to the Edinburgh congestion charging proposals.” Transp. Policy 13 (1): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.08.004.
Schade, J., and M. Baum. 2007. “Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.008.
Schade, J., and B. Schlag. 2000. Acceptability of urban transport pricing. Helsinki, Finland: Valtion Taloudellinen Tutkimuskeskus.
Schade, J., and B. Schlag. 2003. Acceptability of transport pricing strategies. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Schaller, B. 2010. “New York City’s congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States.” Transp. Policy 17 (4): 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.013.
Schlag, B., and J. Schade. 2000. “Public acceptability of traffic demand management and pricing measures in Europe.” Traffic Eng. Control 41 (8): 314–318.
Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and S. Forward. 2010. “Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm.” Transp. Res. Part A 44 (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005.
Selmoune, A., Q. Cheng, L. Wang, and Z. Liu. 2020. “Influencing factors in congestion pricing acceptability: A literature review.” J. Adv. Transp. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4242964.
Sharma, N., A. Bajpai, and M. R. Litoriya. 2012. “Comparison the various clustering algorithms of weka tools.” Facilities 4 (7): 78–80.
Sikow-Magny, C. 2003. “Efficient pricing in transport–overview of European Commission’s transport research programme.” In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, 13–26. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Sochor, J., and A. Nikitas. 2016. “Vulnerable users’ perceptions of transport technologies.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plann. 169 (3): 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.14.00054.
Song, S. 2015. “Should China implement congestion pricing?” Chin. Economy 48 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2015.993200.
Steg, L. 2003. “Factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing.” Acceptability Transp. Pricing Strategies 27: 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781786359506-012.
Sun, X., S. Feng, and J. Lu. 2016. “Psychological factors influencing the public acceptability of congestion pricing in China.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 41 (Aug): 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.015.
Taylor, B., H. Iseki, and R. Kalauskas. 2010. “Addressing equity issues in political debates over road pricing.” In Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
The Jakarta Post. 2015. “Beijing has the worst traffic congestion in China.” Accessed June 25, 2016. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/08/27/beijing-has-worst-traffic-congestion-china.html.
Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van Amelsfort, D., and V. Swedish. 2015. “Introduction to congestion charging: A guide for practitioners in developing cities.” Accessed May 15, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/11540/4318.
Winslott-Hiselius, L., K. Brundell-Freij, Å. Vagland, and C. Byström. 2009. “The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43 (3): 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.006.
Yan, X., J. Levine, and X. Zhao. 2018. “Integrating ridesourcing services with public transit: An evaluation of traveler responses combining revealed and stated preference data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 105 (Aug): 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.029.
Yang, J., and R. Gakenheimer. 2007. “Assessing the transportation consequences of land use transformation in urban China.” Habitat Int. 31 (3–4): 345–353.
Zheng, Z., Z. Liu, C. Liu, and N. Shiwakoti. 2014. “Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach.” Trans. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70 (Dec): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.016.
Zhao, P. 2010. “Sustainable urban expansion and transportation in a growing megacity: Consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing.” Habitat Int. 34 (2): 236–243.
Zhao, P. 2013. “The impact of the built environment on individual workers’ commuting behavior in Beijing.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 7 (5): 389–415.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146 • Issue 8 • August 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 16, 2019
Accepted: Mar 2, 2020
Published online: Jun 10, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 10, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.