Technical Papers
May 24, 2018

Policy Implications of Work-Trip Mode Choice Using Econometric Modeling

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144, Issue 8

Abstract

Transportation agencies seek comprehensive policies and planning to overcome urban congestion and manage transportation demand with due cognizance of traveler behavior. This research develops a travel behavioral model for work-trip mode using revealed and stated choice data collected through a survey questionnaire in the city of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The multinomial logit model specification is found best suited to develop a modal-split model and estimate travelers’ perceived expectation utility functions. The model is used to calculate elasticities and demand response to the policies of improvement in transit/bus rapid transit (BRT) and implement congestion pricing on major arterials of an urban road network. Travel demand is found elastic with respect to congestion pricing and out-of-vehicle travel time. It is concluded that improvement in transit services by introducing BRT alone does not induce a major change in the share proportion of automobile demand; however, congestion pricing has a significant effect on the reduction of automobile demand. Furthermore, the combination of two policies induces more modal-split than does congestion pricing alone. This research highlights traffic congestion pricing as one of the means of traffic demand management by demonstrating its contribution to improving urban traffic congestion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and cooperation of individuals who participated in the stated and revealed preference survey for this research study. The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data and results presented herein. This is a technical article and does not constitute a standard or a regulation. The authors were grateful to anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which certainly improved the quality of the paper.

References

Ahern, A. A., and N. Tapley. 2008. “The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices on interurban trips in Ireland.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 42 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.005.
Ashalatha, R., V. Manju, and A. B Zacharia. 2013. “Mode choice behavior of commuters in Thiruvananthapuram city.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (5): 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000533.
Basso, L. J., C. A. Guevara, A. Gschwender, and M. Fuster. 2011. “Congestion pricing, transit subsidies and dedicated bus lanes: Efficient and practical solutions to congestion.” Transp. Policy 18 (5): 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002.
Ben-Akiva, M., and T. Morikawa. 1990. “Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions.” Transp. Res. Part A: General 24 (6): 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(90)90037-7.
Berkovec, J., and J. Rust. 1985. “A nested logit model of automobile holdings for one vehicle households.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 19 (4): 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(85)90036-0.
Bhat, C. R. 1997. “Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 31 (1): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00016-1.
Bhat, C. R., and S. Castelar. 2002. “A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 36 (7): 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00020-0.
Brownstone, D., A. Ghosh, T. F. Golob, C. Kazimi, and D. Van Amelsfort. 2003. “Drivers’ willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: Evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 37 (4–37): 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(02)00021-6.
Caussade, S., J. De Dios Ortúzar, L. I. Rizzi, and D. A Hensher. 2005. “Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 (7): 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006.
Cheng, S., and J. S Long. 2007. “Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model.” Sociol. Methods Res. 35 (4): 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292361.
De Palma, A., M. Kilani, and R. Lindsey. 2005. “Congestion pricing on a road network: A study using the dynamic equilibrium simulator METROPOLIS.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 39 (7–39): 588–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.018.
Eliasson, J. 2008. “Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial.” Transp. Policy 15 (6): 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.004.
Espino, R., J. De Dios Ortúzar, and C. Román. 2007. “Understanding suburban travel demand: Flexible modelling with revealed and stated choice data.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 41 (10–41): 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.03.002.
Forsey, D., K. N. Habib, E. J. Miller, and A. Shalaby. 2013. “Evaluating the impacts of a new transit system on commuting mode choice using a GEV model estimated to revealed preference data: A case study of the VIVA system in York Region, Ontario.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 50 (C): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.033.
Habib, K. M. N., and A. Sasic. 2014. “A GEV model with scale heterogeneity for investigating the role of mobility tool ownership in peak period non-work travel mode choices.” J. Choice Model. 10 (Mar): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.003.
Hausman, J., and D. Mcfadden. 1984. “Specification tests for the multinomial logit model.” J. Econometric Soc. 52 (5): 1219–1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910997.
Hensher, D. A. 1994. “Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice.” Transportation 21 (2): 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098788.
Hensher, D. A. 2006. “How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load.” J. Appl. Econometrics 21 (6): 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255.
Hensher, D. A., and M. Bradley. 1993. “Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models.” Marketing Lett. 4 (2): 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072.
Hensher, D. A., and W. H Greene. 2003. “The mixed logit model: The state of practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350.
Hensher, D. A., and P. R. Stopher. 1979. Behavioural travel modeling. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Hunt, J. D., and D. Patterson. 1996. “A stated preference examination of time of travel choice for a recreational trip.” J. Adv. Transp. 30 (3): 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.v30:3.
Jara-Díaz, S. R., J. De Dois Ortúzar, and J. De Dios Ortúzar. 1989. “Introducing the expenditure rate in the estimation of mode choice models.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy 23 (3): 293–308.
Koehne, J., F. Mannering, and M. Hallenbeck. 1996. “Analysis of trucker and motorist opinions toward truck-lane restrictions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1560: 73–82. https://doi.org/10.3141/1560-11.
Kottenhoff, K., and K. B Freij. 2009. “The role of public transport for feasibility and acceptability of congestion charging—The case of Stockholm.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 43 (3–43): 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.004.
Li, M., J. Wu, and X. Deng. 2013. “Identifying drivers of land use change in China: A spatial multinomial logit model analysis.” Land Econ. 89 (4): 632–654. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.4.632.
Li, Z., D. A. Hensher, and J. M Rose. 2010. “Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 46 (3): 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.12.005.
Litman, T. 2006. London congestion pricing: Implications for other cities. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Lo, H. K., and W. Szeto. 2005. “Road pricing modeling for hyper-congestion.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 39 (7–39): 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.019.
Lu, X.-S., T.-L. Liu, and H.-J Huang. 2015. “Pricing and mode choice based on nested logit model with trip-chain costs.” Transp. Policy 44 (Nov): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.014.
Mannering, F., J. Koehne, and S.-G Kim. 1995. “Statistical assessment of public opinion toward conversion of general-purpose lanes to high-occupancy vehicle lanes.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1485: 168–176.
Odeck, J., and S. Bråthen. 2002. “Toll financing in Norway: The success, the failures and perspectives for the future.” Transp. Policy 9 (3): 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00030-6.
Papacostas, C. S., and P. D. Prevedouros. 1993. Transportation engineering and planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Papakostas, N., P. Papachatzakis, V. Xanthakis, D. Mourtzis, and G. Chryssolouris. 2010. “An approach to operational aircraft maintenance planning.” Decis. Support Syst. 48 (4): 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.11.010.
Park, Y., and H.-K Ha. 2006. “Analysis of high rail-speed railroad service on air transport demand.” Transp. Res. Part E 42 (2): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.003.
Phanikumar, C., and B. Maitra. 2007. “Willingness-to-pay and preference heterogeneity for rural bus attributes.” J. Transp. Eng. 133 (1): 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(62).
Polak, J., and P. Jones. 1997. “Using stated-preference methods to examine traveller preferences and responses.” In Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and S. Forward. 2010. “Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44 (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005.
Shafabakhsh, G., M. Hadjihoseinlou, and S. A Taghizadeh. 2014. “Selecting the appropriate public transportation system to access the Sari International Airport by fuzzy decision making.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 6 (3): 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-013-0128-7.
Small, K. A., and K. Van Dender. 2007. “Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect.” Energy J. 28 (1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/41323081.
Swait, J., J. J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1994. “A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice.” Transportation 21 (2): 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098789.
Train, K., and W. W Wilson. 2008. “Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 42 (3): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.04.012.
Tseng, Y. Y., P. Koster, J. Knockaert, and E. Verhoef. 2011. “Discrete choice analysis for trip timing decisions of morning commuters: Estimations from joint SP/RP-GPS data.” In Proc., Int. Choice Modelling Conf. Leeds, UK.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., and C. Antoniou. 2013. “Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 5 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0088-3.
Wangtu, X. U., H. E. Shiwei, S. Rui, and L. I. Juan. 2008. “Disaggregate modal-split model considering congestion pricing.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 8 (3): 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60028-8.
Wichiensin, M., M. G. H. Bell, and H. Yang. 2007. “Impact of congestion charging on the transit market: An inter-modal equilibrium model.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41 (7): 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.014.
Zhang, J., Y. Sugie, and A. Fujiwara. 2001. “A mode choice model separating taste variation and stated preference reporting bias.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 4 (3): 23–38.
Zhang, Z., H. Guan, H. Qin, and Y. Xue. 2013. “A traffic mode choice model for the bus user groups based on SP and RP data.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 96 (Nov): 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.045.
Zheng, Z., Z. Liu, C. Liu, and N. Shiwakoti. 2014. “Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70 (Dec): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.016.
Zheng, Z., S. Washington, P. Hyland, K. Sloan, and Y. Liu. 2016. “Preference heterogeneity in mode choice based on a nationwide survey with a focus on urban rail.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 91 (Sep): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.032.
Zhong, S., L. Zhang, and Y. Ge. 2014. Optimal congestion pricing for both efficiency and safety. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Zhou, B., and K. M Kockelman. 2008. “Neighborhood impacts on land use change: A multinomial logit model of spatial relationships.” Ann. Reg. Sci. 42 (2): 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0149-z.
Zhou, Z., W. Wang, and Q. Hu. 2015. “An application of hierarchical structure model for trip mode choice forecasting in China.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2015 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925963.
Zito, P., and G. Salvo. 2011. “Toward an urban transport sustainability index: An European comparison.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 3 (4): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Apr 10, 2017
Accepted: Jan 30, 2018
Published online: May 24, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 24, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Muhammad Irfan, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Head of Department, Military College of Engineering, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]
Ahmed N. Khurshid [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, National Institute of Transportation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]
Muhammad B. Khurshid [email protected]
Associate Professor, National Institute of Transportation, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, National Institute of Transportation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-0062. Email: [email protected]
Aemal Khattak, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Nebraska Transportation Center, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share