Abstract
This research evaluated the traffic performance of two new service interchange designs—the synchronized design which is related to a superstreet intersection and the Milwaukee B design that is related to a parclo B design—as possible substitutes where existing interchanges are failing. The travel time of vehicles was selected as the criteria for operation evaluation. Over 1,000 simulation scenarios modeled the traffic operation of six different interchanges (two new and four existing interchanges) in different conditions of traffic volume, traffic distribution, left/right turning volume ratios, and heavy vehicle percentage. As simulation validation, real travel times at three interchanges were collected using probe vehicle data that compared fairly well to simulation outputs. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine the differences in mean values of travel time between the interchanges and to investigate the variables that affected the travel time of each design. Overall, the Milwaukee B showed the best performance among all the interchanges. The synchronized interchange looks promising as a substitute for a diamond interchange with dominant through traffic. The synchronized and diverging diamond interchanges showed almost the same results while handling moderate levels of turning volume.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AutoCAD [Computer software]. Autodesk, San Rafael, CA.
Bared, J., Edara, P., and Jagannathan, R. (2005). “Design and operational performance of double crossover intersection and diverging diamond interchange.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1912, 31–38.
Berry, C. M. (2011). “FRE interchange capacity and performance.” Tennessee Tech Univ., Cookeville, TN.
Chlewicki, G. (2003). “Variations of the diverging diamond interchange.” Second Urban Street Symp. of Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Chlewicki, G. (2010). “New interchange and intersection designs: The synchronized split phasing intersection and the diverging diamond interchange.” ITE 2010 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) Website. (2017). ⟨http://divergingdiamond.com⟩ (Feb. 8, 2017).
Dorothy, P., et al. (1998). “Operational aspects of the Michigan urban diamond interchange.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1612, 55–66.
Edara, P., Bared, J., and Jagannathan, R. (2005). “Diverging diamond interchange and double crossover intersection: Vehicle and pedestrian performance.” Third Int. Symp. on Highway Geometric Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Edara, P., Sun, C., and Breslow, S. (2013). “Evaluation of J-turn intersection design performance in Missouri.”, Missouri Dept. of Transportation, Jefferson City, MO.
Eyler, D. (2005). Arterial interchange, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 65–71.
Federal Highway Administration. (2017). ⟨https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/⟩ (Feb. 8, 2017).
Fitzpatrick, K., Schneider, W., and Park, E. (2006). “Predicting speeds in an urban right-turn lane.” J. Transp. Eng., 199–204.
Gingrich, M. (2012). “DCMI (double crossover merging interchange) design, operations, and application.” 2012 ITE Technical Conf. and Exhibit, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
Hale, R. (2014). “Crossover roundabouts: An alternative interchange design.” 93rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hughes, W., Jagannathan, R., Sengupta, D., and Hummer, J. (2010). “Alternative Intersection and Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR).”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Hummer, J., Haley, R., Ott, S., Foyle, R., and Cunningham, C. (2010). “Superstreet benefits and capacities.” North Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
IBM SPSS version 24 [Computer software]. IBM, Armonk, NY.
Inman, V. W., and Haas, R. P. (2012). “Field evaluation of a restricted crossing U-turn intersection.”, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Krause, C., Kronpraset, N., Bared, J., and Zhang, W. (2015). “Operational advantages of dynamic reversible left-lane control of existing signalized diamond interchanges.” J. Transp. Eng., 04014091.
Maji, A., Mishra, S., and Jha, M. (2013). “Diverging diamond interchange analysis: Planning tool.” J. Transp. Eng., 139(12), 1201–1210.
Molan, A. (2017). “Evaluation of Milwaukee B and synchronized as new service interchange designs.” Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State Univ., Detroit.
PTV VISSIM version 7 [Computer software]. PTV Group, Golden, London.
Schroeder, B., Salamati, K., and Hummer, J. (2014). “Calibration and field validation of four double-crossover diamond interchanges in VISSIM microsimulation.” J. Transp. Res. Rec., 2404, 49–58.
Shin, E., Lee, J., Kim, J., and Jeong, Y. (2008). “Two-level signalized intersection transport.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2060, 53–64.
Synchro version 8 [Computer software]. Trafficware Group. Inc., Sugar Land, TX.
Thompson, C. D., Hummer, J. E., and Kluckman, R. C. (2003). “Comparison of the new W-interchange to conventional interchanges.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1847, 42–51.
Yang, G., Xu, H., Tian, Z., and Wang, Z. (2015). “Vehicle speed and acceleration profile study for metered on-ramps in California.” J. Transp. Eng., 04015046.
Zhao, J., Liu, Y., and Yang, X. (2015). “Operation of signalized diamond interchanges with frontage roads using dynamic reversible lane control.” J. Transp. Res. Part C, 51(2015), 196–209.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 16, 2017
Accepted: Jul 13, 2017
Published online: Nov 28, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 28, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.