Hydrologic Performance of a Multicell Vegetated Basin with Different Soil and Outlet Structure Characteristics
Publication: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 8, Issue 3
Abstract
Green stormwater infrastructure, also known as stormwater control measures (SCMs), is a sustainable solution that has been widely used in controlling stormwater runoff in developed areas. Stormwater intensity and land use control the water quality and quantity in urban areas, while soil conditions and the functionality of the outlet structure control enhancement of the water quality and quantity in vegetated basins. The soil conditions and the outlet structure are dubbed geotechnical design characteristics. These parameters impact the basin’s infiltration capacity, volume, and peak flow. In this study, a multistage basin with three cells located at the Pennypack Creek headwaters in Pennsylvania was simulated using the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM). The investigated characteristics of the basin were the gate condition and pipe diameter of the outlet structure and the compaction condition of the soil. The model was calibrated considering opened- and closed-gate setup of the basin. The basin was unintentionally compacted during construction, and this compaction changed the infiltration properties of the basin from sandy loam soil (preconstruction) to sandy clay loam. After basin calibration, it was found that the closed-gate setup induced a high outflow reduction compared to the inflow. A parametric study considering both the outlet pipe diameter and soil type was conducted under both gate setups. The reduction of the outlet pipe diameter was the most effective characteristic in the outflow volume and flow peak reduction under the opened-gate setup, while the soil type was the most effective characteristic in the outflow volume and flow peak reduction under the closed-gate setup.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data of the storm events and the basin’s land elevation survey, preconstruction soil exploration, outflow, and SWMM model that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the William Penn Foundation, which supported this work as part of the Delaware River Watershed Initiative (DRWI). The authors would also like to thank Temple University, Wetlands & Ecology, Inc., and Villanova Center for Resilient Water Systems. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the William Penn Foundation.
References
ASCE. 1992. Design and construction of urban stormwater management systems. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2012. PVC pipe and PVC socket fittings according to ASTM D 2672. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Birch, G., M. Fazeli, and C. Matthai. 2005. “Efficiency of an infiltration basin in removing contaminants from urban stormwater.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 101 (1–3): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9126-0.
Carpenter, J. F., B. Vallet, G. Pelletier, P. Lessard, and P. A. Vanrolleghem. 2014. “Pollutant removal efficiency of a retrofitted stormwater detention pond.” Water Qual. Res. J. 49 (2): 124–134. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2013.020.
Cronshey, R. 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division.
de Saint-Venant, A. B. 1871. “Theory of unsteady water flow, with application to river floods and to propagation of tides in river channels.” French Acad. Sci. 73: 148–154.
Green, W. H., and G. Ampt. 1911. “Studies on soil physics.” J. Agric. Sci. 4 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600001441.
Gregory, J. H., M. D. Dukes, P. H. Jones, and G. L. Miller. 2006. “Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 61 (3): 117–124.
Hancock, G. S., J. W. Holley, and R. M. Chambers. 2010. “A field-based evaluation of wet retention ponds: How effective are ponds at water quantity control?” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46 (6): 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00481.x.
Horst, M., A. L. Welker, and R. G. Traver. 2010. “Multiyear performance of a pervious concrete infiltration basin BMP.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137 (6): 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000302.
Lee, R. S., R. G. Traver, and A. L. Welker. 2013. “Continuous modeling of bioinfiltration storm-water control measures using Green and Ampt.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (12): 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000651.
Lucas, W. C. 2010. “Design of integrated bioinfiltration-detention urban retrofits with design storm and continuous simulation methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 15 (6): 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000137.
Malcom, H. R. 1980. A study of detention in urban stormwater management. Raleigh, NC: Water Resources Research Institute of the Univ. of North Carolina.
McCuen, R. H., and G. E. Moglen. 1988. “Multicriterion stormwater management methods.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 114 (4): 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:4(414).
Mohammed, W., and A. L. Welker. 2020. “Impact of soil compaction on vegetated basin transition.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2020: Modeling, Geomaterials, and Site Characterization, 256–264. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Natarajan, P., and A. P. Davis. 2015a. “Hydrologic performance of a transitioned infiltration basin managing highway runoff.” J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 1 (3): 04015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000797.
Natarajan, P., and A. P. Davis. 2015b. “Performance of a ‘transitioned’ infiltration basin Part 1: TSS, metals, and chloride removals.” Water Environ. Res. 87 (9): 823–834. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14362865226112.
Natarajan, P., and A. P. Davis. 2016a. “Ecological assessment of a transitioned stormwater infiltration basin.” Ecol. Eng. 90 (May): 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.029.
Natarajan, P., and A. P. Davis. 2016b. “Performance of a ‘transitioned’ infiltration basin Part 2: Nitrogen and phosphorus removals.” Water Environ. Res. 88 (4): 291–302. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14362865226077.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2004. New Jersey stormwater best management practices manual. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection.
NOAA Atlas 14. 2004. Precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States. NOAA: Silver Spring, MD.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2006. Pennsylvania stormwater best management practices manual. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Rawls, W. J., D. L. Brakensiek, and N. Miller. 1983. “Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 109 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:1(62).
Sandvik, A. 1985. “Proportional weirs for stormwater pond outlets.” Civ. Eng. 55 (3): 54–56.
Tullis, B. P., E. C. Olsen, and K. Gardner. 2008. “Reducing detention volumes with improved outlet structure.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 134 (6): 824–830. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(824).
Urbonas, B. 2006. “Stormwater detention outlet control structures.” In Great works on urban water resources (1962–2001), edited by J. E. Jones. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Wu, J. S., R. E. Holman, and J. R. Dorney. 1996. “Systematic evaluation of pollutant removal by urban wet detention ponds.” J. Environ. Eng. 122 (11): 983–988. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:11(983).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 19, 2021
Accepted: Jan 1, 2022
Published online: Mar 16, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 16, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.