Abstract

In December 2021, an EF-4 tornado swept through several Midwest states in the United States, with Kentucky being the worst hit. Among the impacted towns was Mayfield, KY, where the historic buildings in downtown suffered significant damage. In response to this disaster, the authors conducted a reconnaissance mission to digitally document the affected historic structures. This involved capturing a series of three-dimensional (3D) point clouds, providing detailed spatial data about the impacted buildings. The resulting data set includes both the original raw data and processed information, now accessible via the DesignSafe open-access repository. This paper outlines the data collection process for the impacted buildings, and the steps undertaken to process it. The final product of this endeavor are the point clouds generated for the historic building typology, which included 10 historic buildings and 2 comparable religious buildings. These point clouds serve as invaluable resources for further analysis, aiding in understanding a disaster’s impact, and guiding restoration endeavors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The raw, processed, and final data mentioned in this study is available on DesignSafe repository under Project No. PRJ-3417 (https://www.designsafe-ci.org/data/browser/public/designsafe.storage.published/PRJ-3417).

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. IIS-2123343 and CMMI 2222849. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This material was also supported by the work done by Keely Patelski from Texas Tech University. The larger team that helped collect the data was Professor Thomas Boothby and graduate students from Penn State University including Daniele Melo Santos Paulino, Muhammad Rakeh Saleem, Mina Savaroliya, Alejandro Palacio-Bentacur, and David E. Caballero-Russi. The authors acknowledge the data collection by undergraduate student Garrett Demaree from the University of Kentucky. The authors also acknowledge the members of the RAPID team, Andrew Lyda, Karen Dedinsky, and Professor Jeffery W. Berman from the University of Washington, who helped collect and process the data.

References

Baltsavias, E. P. 1999. “A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54 (2–3): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00014-3.
Barrile, V., G. Candela, and A. Fotia. 2019. “Point cloud segmentation using image processing techniques for structural analysis.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 42 (May): 187–193. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-187-2019.
Besl, P., and N. McKay. 1992. “A method for registration of 3D shapes.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14 (2): 239. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791.
Biasion, A., T. Moerwald, B. Walser, and G. Walsh. 2019. “A new approach to the terrestrial laser scanner workflow: The RTC360 solution.” In FIG working week 2019: Geospatial information for a smarter life and environmental resilience. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Office for Cadaster and Land Records.
Brooks, H. E., G. W. Carbin, and P. T. Marsh. 2014. “Increased variability of tornado occurrence in the united states.” Science 346 (6207): 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257460.
Castellazzi, G., N. L. Presti, A. M. D’Altri, and S. de Miranda. 2022. “Cloud2FEM: A finite element mesh generator based on point clouds of existing/historical structures.” SoftwareX 18 (Jun): 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101099.
Cavalagli, N., M. Gioffrè, S. Grassi, V. Gusella, C. Pepi, and G. M. Volpi. 2020. “On the accuracy of UAV photogrammetric survey for the evaluation of historic masonry structural damages.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 29 (Mar): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.153.
Cuadros-Rojas, E., S. Saloustros, N. Tarque, and L. Pelà. 2024. “Photogrammetry-aided numerical seismic assessment of historical structures composed of adobe, stone and brick masonry. Application to the San Juan Bautista Church built on the Inca temple of Huaytará, Peru.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 158 (Aug): 107984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.107984.
Dai, F., S. Dong, V. R. Kamat, and M. Lu. 2011. “Photogrammetry assisted measurement of interstory drift for rapid post-disaster building damage reconnaissance.” J. Nondestr. Eval. 30 (Jun): 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-011-0108-6.
Girardeau-Montaut, D. 2016. Cloudcompare. Paris: EDF R&D Telecom ParisTech.
Kallas, J., and R. Napolitano. 2023. “Image-based 3D modeling as a damage prioritization tool for historic buildings in post-disaster areas: The case of the 2020 Beirut blast.” J. Cult. Heritage 62 (Nov): 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.06.007.
Kaushal, S., M. Gutierrez Soto, and R. Napolitano. 2023a. Processed data and the final point clouds for the historic masonry structures in Mayfield, Kentucky: RAPID: Mayfield, KY Post-Tornado Building Reconnaissance. Berkeley, CA: Designsafe-CI.
Kaushal, S., M. Gutierrez Soto, and R. Napolitano. 2023b. “Structural analysis of post-disaster masonry structures modeled using CLOUD2FEM software.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 48 (Jun): 827–834. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-827-2023.
Kaushal, S. S., M. Gutierrez Soto, and R. Napolitano. 2023c. “Understanding the Performance of Historic Masonry Structures in Mayfield, KY after the 2021 Tornadoes.” J. Cult. Heritage 63 (Sep): 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.07.002.
Leica Geosystems. 2022a. “Leica cyclone software.” Accessed June 15, 2022. https://leica-geosystems.com/en-us/products/laser-scanners/software/leica-cyclone.
Leica Geosystems. 2022b. “Leica R T C360 3d laser scanner.” Accessed June 30, 2022. https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/scanners/leica-rtc360.
McDonald, J. R., K. C. Mehta, D. A. Smith, and J. A. Womble. 2010. “The enhanced Fujita scale: Development and implementation.” In Forensic engineering 2009: Pathology of the built environment, 719–728. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41082(362)73.
Meng, X., N. Currit, and K. Zhao. 2010. “Ground filtering algorithms for airborne lidar data: A review of critical issues.” Remote Sens. 2 (3): 833–860. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2030833.
Munday, J. 1925. “The railroads of Kentucky 1861-1865.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of History, Univ. of Louisville.
National Register of Historic Places. 1984. National register of historic places nomination form: Mayfield downtown. Washington, DC: National Park Services.
National Register of Historic Places. 1996. National register of historic places nomination form: Mayfield downtown commercial district expansion. Washington, DC: National Park Services.
Over, J.-S. R., A. C. Ritchie, C. J. Kranenburg, J. A. Brown, D. D. Buscombe, T. Noble, C. R. Sherwood, J. A. Warrick, and P. A. Wernette. 2021. Processing coastal imagery with agisoft metashape professional edition, version 1.6-structure from motion workflow documentation. Reston, VA: USGS.
Pappas, S. 2021. Quad-state tornado may be longest-lasting ever (December). New York: Scientific American.
Pepe, M., and D. Costantino. 2021. “UAV photogrammetry and 3D modelling of complex architecture for maintenance purposes: The case study of the masonry bridge on the Sele River, Italy.” Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 65 (1): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.16398.
Pilkington, S., et al. 2021. StEER: 10 December 2021 Midwest Tornado outbreak joint preliminary virtual reconnaissance report and early access reconnaissance report (PVRR-EARR). Berkeley, CA: Designsafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-2b2k-ws96.
PIX4D. 2022. “PIX4D Mapper: Professional photogrammetry and drone mapping software.” Accessed May 15, 2022. https://www.pix4d.com/.
Roueche, D. B., et al. 2024. “Performance of hurricane-resistant housing during the 2022 Arabi, Louisiana, Tornado.” J. Struct. Eng. 150 (5): 04024029. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12986.
Roueche, D. B., and D. O. Prevatt. 2013. “Residential damage patterns following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO tornadoes.” J. Disaster Res. 8 (6): 1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2013.p1061.
Samenow, J. 2021. “December tornadoes aren’t rare, but Friday’s outbreak was something totally different.” Accessed May 14, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/12/12/december-tornadoes-quad-state-outbreak/.
Schreiner, B., and L. Dylan. 2021. “Kentucky tornado toll in dozens; less than feared at factory.” Accessed February 2, 2022. https://apnews.com/article/tornadoes-kentucky-illinois-arkansas-tennessee-missouri-e1ae21e0b7521c28411f8c360b756700.
Sparks, P. R., H. Liu, and H. S. Saffir. 1989. “Wind damage to masonry buildings.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 2 (4): 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1989)2:4(186).
Standohar-Alfano, C. D., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2016. “Tornado risk analysis for residential wood-frame roof damage across the United States.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (1): 04015099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001353.
Ursini, A., A. Grazzini, F. Matrone, and M. Zerbinatti. 2022. “From scan-to-BIM to a structural finite elements model of built heritage for dynamic simulation.” Autom. Constr. 142 (Mar): 104518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104518.
Wood, R., et al. 2020. “Early access reconnaissance report (EARR).” Accessed March 3, 2020. https://www.designsafe-ci.org/data/browser/public/designsafe.storage.published/PRJ-2723/details-2377181520534629910-242ac116-0001-012.
Zanini, M. A., L. Hofer, F. Faleschini, and C. Pellegrino. 2017. “Building damage assessment after the Riviera del Brenta Tornado, Northeast Italy.” Nat. Hazards 86 (3): 1247–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2741-6.
Zheng, X., F. Wang, and Z. Li. 2018. “A multi-UAV cooperative route planning methodology for 3D fine-resolution building model reconstruction.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 146 (Dec): 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Dec 23, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jul 27, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-7692. Email: [email protected]
Mariantonieta Gutierrez Soto, M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-5801 [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Engineering Design and Innovation, Pennsylvania State Univ., 307 Engineering Design and Innovation Bldg., University Park, PA 16802. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-5801. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-5998. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share