Technical Papers
Feb 24, 2023

Wind Uplift Fragility Assessment Method of 360° Standing Seam Roof System and Its Application in Wind Damage Estimation of UHV Converter Station

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 5

Abstract

The 360° standing seam roof system (360° SSRS) often suffers structural damage or even failure under wind uplift pressure with varied strength ratings. Under the action of wind uplift pressure, the prediction of 360° SSRS damage degree plays an important role in the risk assessment and postdisaster measures for buildings. In this work, a wind-uplift fragility assessment method is proposed to forecast the damage degree of 360° SSRS, which considers the multistage performance levels in the whole wind-induced failure process of 360° SSRS. First, a refined finite-element (FE) model, including roof panels, sliding support, and purlin, is established to analyze the wind-induced failure process of 360° SSRS. Meanwhile, the existing experimental results are used to verify the correctness of the FE model. Second, according to the whole wind-induced failure process of 360° SSRS, the failure process is qualitatively classified into three-stage performance levels (i.e., PL I, PL II, and PL III) and four damage states (i.e., slight damage, moderate damage, severe damage, and tripping failure). On this basis, the damage indicator, which is the node relative displacement of the female buckle, is defined to quantitatively derive the three-stage performance levels. Thirdly, the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) technology in conjunction with derived multistage performance levels is employed to carry out the wind-uplift fragility assessment, which can reflect the probabilistic characterization between wind uplift pressure and damage state of 360° SSRS. Finally, the proposed method is applied to a 360° SSRS of an ultrahigh-voltage (UHV) converter station in actual engineering, in which wind tunnel tests are used to determine extreme wind pressure coefficients of 360° SSRS. The results demonstrate that the proposed method is feasible and suitable, and the obtained fragility curves can be applied as a reference for predicting wind-induced damage degree, failure probability, and wind-resistance capacity of 360° SSRS.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper is supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0703901) and NSFC-JSPS China-Japan Scientific Cooperation Project (NSFC Grant No. 51611140123). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Ahmad, S., and K. Kumar. 2002. “Effect of geometry on wind pressures on low-rise hip roof buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (7): 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00152-6.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 1975. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design: Basic principles. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Case, P. C., and N. Isyumov. 1998. “Wind loads on low buildings with 4: 12 gable roofs in open country and suburban exposures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 77 (Jun): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00136-6.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2014. Standard for wind tunnel test of buildings and structures. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2019a. Load code for the design of building structures. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2019b. Standard for wind loads on roof structures. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
China Planning Press. 2013. Technical code for application of profiled metal sheets. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Habte, F., M. A. Mooneghi, A. G. Chowdhury, and P. Irwin. 2015. “Full-scale testing to evaluate the performance of standing seam metal roofs under simulated wind loading.” Eng. Struct. 105 (3): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.006.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). 2001. Probabilistic model code-part 3-resistance models. Berlin: JCSS.
Ji, X., G. Huang, X. Zhang, and G. A. Kopp. 2018. “Vulnerability analysis of steel roofing cladding: Influence of wind directionality.” Eng. Struct. 156 (Jun): 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.068.
John, D. R. 1998. LS-DYNA examples manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Lee, K. H., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2005. “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.017.
Li, Y. 2012. “Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost–benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000204.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Lu, Q., M. Li, M. Zhang, Q. Min, Y. Zhang, and X. Liu. 2022. “Wind-resistance performance investigation of 360° vertical seam-locked roof system reinforced by sliding support and sandwich panel.” J. Build. Eng. 45 (Jun): 103689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103689.
Luan, W., and Y. Q. Li. 2019. “Experimental investigation on wind uplift capacity of single span Z-purlins supporting standing seam roof systems.” Thin Walled Struct. 144 (Sep): 106324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106324.
Nofal, O. M., J. W. van de Lindt, T. Q. Do, G. Yan, S. Hamideh, D. T. Cox, and J. C. Dietrich. 2021. “Methodology for regional multihazard hurricane damage and risk assessment.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (11): 04021185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003144.
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, H. K. Kim, and S. H. Kim. 2000. “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12): 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287).
Stewart, M. G., J. D. Ginger, D. J. Henderson, and P. C. Ryan. 2018. “Fragility and climate impact assessment of contemporary housing roof sheeting failure due to extreme wind.” Eng. Struct. 171 (Apr): 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.125.
Stewart, M. G., P. C. Ryan, D. J. Henderson, and J. D. Ginger. 2016. “Fragility analysis of roof damage to industrial buildings subject to extreme wind loading in non-cyclonic regions.” Eng. Struct. 128 (6): 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.053.
Sun, Y., T. Wu, and Z. Cao. 2021. “Wind vulnerability analysis of standing seam roof system with consideration of multistage performance levels.” Thin Walled Struct. 165 (Aug): 107942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107942.
Wang, J., W. Pang, S. Cao, Q. Zhou, and H. Liao. 2019. “Fragility analysis of the roof structure of low-rise buildings subjected to tornado vortices.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 189 (Jun): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.006.
Wang, T., W. Fan, A. H.-S. Ang, and Z. L. Li. 2021a. “Application of generalised equivalent extreme-value event in structural system reliability analysis.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2021 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1993935.
Wang, T., Z. L. Li, W. Fan, and A. H.-S. Ang. 2021b. “Structural reliability assessment based on enhanced conjugate unscented transformation and improved maximum entropy method.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (12): 04021213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003194.
Wu, T., Y. Sun, Z. Cao, Z. Yu, and Y. Wu. 2020. “Study on the wind uplift failure mechanism of standing seam roof system for performance-based design.” Eng. Struct. 225 (Dec): 111264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111264.
Xia, Y., and S. Chen. 2021. “Wind-induced damage processes of standing seam metal roof systems.” J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 53 (Apr): 4. https://doi.org/10.11918/202008089.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Aug 18, 2022
Accepted: Jan 3, 2023
Published online: Feb 24, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 24, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Master’s Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing Shaping St. 174, China; Junior Engineer, China Power Engineering Consulting Group, South West Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Dongfeng St. 18, Chengdu 610056, China. Email: [email protected]
Zhengliang Li [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Shaping St. 174, Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, China; Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Chongqing Research Institute of Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chongqing 401151, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor-Level Senior Engineer, China Power Engineering Consulting Group, South West Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610056, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share