Experimental Verification of Eccentrically Loaded Steel Joist Analysis with Nonsymmetric Sections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 5
Abstract
The nonsymmetric sections commonly found in open-web steel joists present difficulties when evaluating eccentric loads applied to a single chord angle, which result in additional bending moments and torsion that are not typically considered in standard design practice. This study presents an experimental and computational approach towards qualifying the response of a steel joist with nonsymmetric sections and eccentric loading. An experiment was conducted in which a joist was subjected to uniform top-chord loading with an eccentric hanging load applied to one chord angle, while displacements and strains along the bottom chord were recorded. A second-order structural analysis with a novel beam-element formulation that considers nonsymmetric sections was able to accurately estimate the deflections and rotations of the joist bottom chord. Several alternative computational models were created to determine the effects of common design assumptions on the analysis output. It was found that model variations including using a first-order analysis, simplifying the hanging load condition, and using doubly-symmetric section behavior only resulted in changes to the applied torsion and corresponding rotations, which led to worse predictions of stresses and deflections on the chord angle. Detailed measurements of each cross-section geometry in the joist were obtained using a handheld three-dimensional laser scanner. Despite the significant changes in torsional cross-section properties, the computational model with measured cross-section properties resulted in minimal variations compared to the model with nominal section properties. The work presented herein provides insight into the torsional response of steel joists with eccentric loads.
Practical Applications
This paper demonstrates how a novel line element, which is available for use in MASTAN2, can account for nonsymmetric cross-section behavior resulting in a reasonable prediction of steel joists subjected to nonstandard loading, specifically eccentric loading to one bottom chord angle. The modeling approach was based on joist modeling recommendations from the Steel Joist Institute to align with existing design practices. The analysis results are shown to capture the movement of the overall joist as well as the twisting of the individual chord angle when eccentrically loaded. Therefore, the novel line element could be used to determine a conservative prediction for the maximum normal stress supported by a joist chord under torsion. Details are provided on how the stress values were determined as well as implications of modeling assumptions and analysis types through a series of alternative modeling and analysis approaches. These alternative analyses indicated that accurately defining the torsion on the cross-section is a key factor in properly distributing the supported moment between strong- and weak-axis bending. Future design provisions and recommendations will need to address the disconnect between the standard design assumption that angles have no warping stiffness and the fact that minimal warping stiffness causes significant theoretical local stress concentrations at connections and locations of applied loads.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the AISI Standards Council Small Project program. This included financial support from New Millennium Building Systems, American Iron and Steel Institute, Steel Joist Institute, and Steel Deck Institute. The authors would also like to thank Joe Pote and Scott Morton of New Millennium Building Systems for their input and assistance related to this project including determination of the physical test configuration.
References
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016. Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: AISC.
Artec 3D. 2020. Artec studio 15. Luxembourg, Europe: Artec 3D.
Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. 2021. “Tutorials for MASTAN2 and related validation.” Accessed March 28, 2021. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ccfss-aisi-spec/227.
EN 1993-1-1. 2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardisation.
Fisher, J. M., and P. S. Green. 2007. Steel joist institute technical digest 12: Evaluation and modification of open-web steel joists and joist girders. Myrtle Beach, SC: Steel Joist Institute.
Liu, S.-W., W. L. Gao, and R. D. Ziemian. 2019. “Improved line-element formulations for the stability analysis of arbitrarily-shaped open-section beam-columns.” Thin-Walled Struct. 144 (6): 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106290.
Liu, S.-W., R. D. Ziemian, L. Chen, and S.-L. Chan. 2018. “Bifurcation and large-deflection analyses of thin-walled beam-columns with non-symmetric open-sections.” Thin-Walled Struct. 132 (135): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.044.
MATLAB. 2019. MATLAB (R2019a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.
Rinchen, H., and K. J. Rasmussen. 2016. Formulation and implementation of general thin-walled open-section beam-column elements in opensees research report. Sydney, Australia: Univ. of Sydney.
Rojahn, G. M. K., and R. D. Ziemian. 2021. “Finite element modeling of open-web steel joists comprised of nonsymmetric shapes.” In Proc., 2021 SSRC Annual Stabbing Conf., 1–12. Louisville, KY: Social Science Research Council.
Sippel, E. J., and H. B. Blum. 2021. “Structural analysis of steel structures with non-symmetric members.” Eng. Struct. 245 (11): 112739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112739.
Sippel, E. J., R. D. Ziemian, and H. B. Blum. 2021a. “Experimental verification of eccentrically loaded steel joists with non-symmetric sections.” In Proc., 2021 SSRC Annual Stability Conf., 1–28. Louisville, KY: Social Science Research Council.
Sippel, E. J., R. D. Ziemian, and H. B. Blum. 2021b. “Structural analysis using line elements to model members with non-symmetric cross sections.” Thin-Walled Struct. 169 (Dec): 108407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108407.
SJI (Steel Joist Institute). 2020. Standard specifications: Load tables and weight tables for steel joists and joist girders. Florence, SC: SJI.
Xia, Y., and H. B. Blum. 2020. “Geometric imperfection measurements of cold-formed steel members using a portable non-contact 3D laser scanner.” In Proc., 2020 SSRC Annual Stability Conf., 1–15. Atlanta: Social Science Research Council.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 19, 2022
Accepted: Nov 30, 2022
Published online: Feb 21, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 21, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.