Influence of Aircraft Physical Characteristics on Landing Comfort on Runways
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
The evaluation of the comfort of landing operations through pilot scores may be a viable quality indicator to be adopted in airport runway management. However, some factors, such as the aircraft model, can influence this perception. This paper aims to evaluate the physical characteristics of aircraft that affect the pilots’ assessment related to comfort during landing operations at runways. We analyzed 11 runways with different conditions of roughness and measured using the International Roughness Index (IRI), associated with the scores given by pilots in the same runways. In addition, we performed a statistical analysis of four physical characteristics of the aircraft: wingspan, length, base, and gauge. The results indicate a relationship between pilot scores and runway roughness, where the gauge is the physical characteristic with the greatest influence on pilot scores. More specifically, for IRI values between 2.0 and , these characteristics influenced the perception, with better comfort during landings attributed to smaller aircraft.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Cearense Foundation for Scientific and Technological Development (FUNCAP) for the financial support granted to carry out this research and to the Civil Aviation Authority of Brazil for providing the data used.
References
ANAC (Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil). 2021. Regulamento Brasileiro da Aviação Civil RBAC N° 153 Emenda N° 06. Brasília, Brazil: ANAC.
Cereceda, D., C. Medel-Vera, M. Ortiz, and J. Tramon. 2022. “Roughness and condition prediction models for airfield pavements using digital image processing.” Autom. Constr. 139 (2022): 104325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104325.
Chaves, J. W. R., R. C. Pereira, L. C. de Almeida, and F. H. L. de Oliveira. 2020. “Análise comparativa da irregularidade longitudinal de pavimento rodoviário em serviço por meio de aplicativos para smartphone.” Rev. Tecnol Fortaleza 41 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5020/23180730.0.10756.
da Sousa, E. S., R. S. de Carneiro, and F. H. L. de Oliveira. 2022. “Verificação da relação IRI e BBI na avaliação da irregularidade longitudinal de pavimentos aeroportuários.” Transportes 30 (1): 2022. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v30i1.2590.
de Almeida, L. C., F. H. L. de Oliveira, and J. W. R. Chaves. 2019. “Analysis of the alteration in the IRI threshold on the functional quality of takeoff and landing runways at Brazilian airports.” Rev. Tecnol. Fortaleza 40 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5020/23180730.2019.8633.
de Almeida, L. C., F. H. L. de Oliveira, and S. P. Ramos. 2018. “Estudo da condição de superfície em rodovias por meio do uso de aplicativo para smartphone.” Transportes 25 (2): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v25i2.1406.
de Carvalho, A. F. C., and L. G. P. Santos. 2019. “Maintenance of airport pavements: The use of visual inspection and IRI in the definition of degradation trends.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (4): 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1309189.
de Guedes, K. G., and F. H. L. Oliveira. 2018. “Análise comparativa entre índices de medida de conforto ao rolamento no Anel Viário de Fortaleza.” Rev. Tecnol. Fortaleza 39 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5020/23180730.2018.7491.
de Luca, M. 2020. “Evaluation of runway bearing capacity using international roughness index.” Transp. Res. Procedia 45 (2020): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.096.
de Oliveira, F. H. L. L. C. de Almeida, and S. P. de Ramos. 2016. “Estudo do comportamento da aderência e do conforto ao rolamento em pistas de pouso e decolagem.” Transportes 24 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4237/transportes.v24.i2/1059.
Di Mascio, P., and L. Moretti. 2019. “Implement a pavement management system for the maintenance and rehabilitation of airport surfaces.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 11 (2019): e00251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00251.
Durán, J. B. C., and J. L. Fernandes Júnior. 2020. “Airport pavement roughness evaluation based on cockpit and center of vertical gravity acceleration.” Transportes 28 (1): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v28i1.1932.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2009. Guidelines and Procedures for Measuring Airfield Pavement Roughness. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Filarski, J. D. 2001. “Runway roughness criteria.” In Proc., 27th Int. Air Transportation Conference. Chicago: Airfield Pavement Committee of the Air Transport Division of ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40579(271)14.
Hachiya, Y., J. Yin, O. Takahashi, and K. Himeno. 1999. “Aircraft response based on airport pavement roughness evaluation.” J. Mater. Concr. Struct. Pavements 634 (45): 403–411.
Hofmann, R. M. 2020. “Os Vieses Cognitivos e suas Implicações para Educação Financeira: o caso do ‘efeito Brumadinho’ na construção de gráficos.” Bolema: Bol. de Educação Mat. 34 (67): 564–582 https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v34n67a11.
Kanazawa, H.; K. Su, T. Noguchi, Y. Hachiya, and M. Nakano. 2010. “Evaluation of airport runway pavement based on pilots’subjective judgment.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 11 (3): 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430903311792.
Loprencipe, G., and P. Zoccali. 2017. “Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (7): 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1345554.
Magalhães, L. M., D. R. Bisconsini, J. B. C. Durán, and F. H. L. de Oliveira. 2021. “Revisão da literatura de estudos sobre índices de irregularidade aplicados a pavimentos aeroportuários.” In Proc., Anais do 23° Encontro Nacional de Conservação Rodoviária (ENACOR). 46a Reunião Anual de Pavimentação (RAPv). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Pavimentação.
Magalhães, L. M., and F. H. L. de Oliveira. 2022. “Avaliação da Percepção de Pilotos Comerciais em Relação à Irregularidade Longitudinal de Pavimentos Aeroportuários.” In Proc., Anais do 24° Encontro Nacional de Conservação Rodoviária (ENACOR). 47a Reunião Anual de Pavimentação (RAPv). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Pavimentação.
Maia, C. L., J. L. C. de Sousa, N. P. Alexandre, and F. H. L. de Oliveira. 2022. “Avaliação qualitativa e funcional de pistas de pouso e decolagem brasileira.” In Proc., Anais do 36° Congresso de Ensino e Pesquisa em Transportes (ANPET). São Paulo, Brazil: Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes.
Merighi, L. F. 2017. “Functional evaluation of airport asphalt pavements in order to establish goals for their maintenance.” Masters’ dissertation, Univ. of São Paulo, Polytechnic School (USP).
Santhier, A. J., and G. Luvizão. 2022. “Análise da irregularidade longitudinal do pavimento por meio de comparação de dois métodos: perfilômetro a laser e aplicativo de smartphone SmartIRI–Estudo de caso SC-355.” Conhecimento em Construção, Joaçaba 9 (Jun): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.18593/cc.v9.30050.
Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. 1998. “The little book of profiling.” In Basis information about measuring an interpreting road profiles. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan.
Tian, Y., S. Liu, L. Liu, and P. Xiang. 2021. “Optimization of international roughness index model parameters for sustainable runway.” Sustainability 13 (4): 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042184.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 8, 2023
Accepted: Feb 16, 2024
Published online: May 2, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 2, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.