Abstract

The goal of this study is to develop a framework for the life-cycle understanding of flexible pavements. New advancements in data analytics allow for the utilization of pavement life-cycle data (historical, environmental, and structural) to evaluate the effects of material, construction, and loading parameters on the in-service performance of the pavements. In this study, the data were georeferenced to establish a connection between pavement parameters such as construction and production quality factors, traffic loading, material properties, pavement structure, and climate conditions to the long-term performance of flexible pavements. The data used in this paper were sampled from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT). Data were filtered to include pavement sections of comparable traffic load and environmental conditions to avoid potential bias in the analysis. Information on 42 highways with a total length of 260.5 mi was collected and analyzed for this study. Pavement deterioration metamodels were developed on high-resolution data using three machine learning (ML) techniques. For the purpose of construction of the metamodels, ML techniques including decision tree regression (DTR), random forest (RF), and gene-expression programming (GEP) were utilized by using coded subroutines in Python. The outcomes of DTR, RF, and GEP approaches showed promising results in the modeling of pavement performance by considering the effects of mix production quality factors such as air voids of the mixture (VA), individual lots voids in mineral aggregates (VMA), in-place density of asphalt mixture (%Gmm), asphalt content (AC), surface thickness, and age of pavements. This approach provides a basis for comprehensive life-cycle evaluation of the highway network without disrupting the state of practice. It relies on connecting data already being collected by the transportation agencies. The relational connection of such data allows for a pavement management system that is capable of continuously reflecting the pavement network performance on design, control, and maintenance activities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on two studies funded by the Wisconsin Highway Program (WHRP) with project IDs of 0092-18-05 and 0092-15-05. The authors are grateful for the support received from the WHRP staff. Wisconsin DOT engineers provided significant support to this study, namely Daniel Kopacz, Barry Paye, Erik Lyngdal, Carl Johnson, and Judith Rayan. Brett Williams and Stacy Glidden of Payne and Dolan Inc. and Ervin Dukatz of Mathy Construction Company provided vital information and data to this research effort. Temple University Undergraduate students Ashley Richman, Meghan Guerrera, and Gregory Robbins provided instrumental help in the digitization of documents and data georeferencing.

References

Apté, C., and S. Weiss. 1997. “Data mining with decision trees and decision rules.” Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 13 (2–3): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(97)00021-6.
Arhin, S. A., L. N. Williams, A. Ribbiso, and M. F. Anderson. 2015. “Pavement condition index, international roughness index, ride quality, prediction, urban areas; pavement condition index, international roughness index, ride quality, prediction, urban areas.” J. Civ. Eng. Res. 2015 (1): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150501.02.
Ashtiani, R. S., D. N. Little, and M. Rashidi. 2018. “Neural network based model for estimation of the level of anisotropy of unbound aggregate systems.” Transp. Geotech. 15 (Jun): 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.02.002.
ASTM. 2021. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. ASTM D6433-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Attoh-Okine, N. O. 1999. “Analysis of learning rate and momentum term in backpropagation neural network algorithm trained to predict pavement performance.” Adv. Eng. Software 30 (4): 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00071-4.
Attoh-Okine, N. O., K. Cooger, and S. Mensah. 2009. “Multivariate adaptive regression (MARS) and hinged hyperplanes (HHP) for doweled pavement performance modeling.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (9): 3020–3023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.04.010.
Batioja-Alvarez, D., S. F. Kazemi, E. Y. Hajj, R. V. Siddharthan, and A. J. Hand. 2018. “Statistical distributions of pavement damage associated with overweight vehicles: Methodology and case study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (9): 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118793243.
Bazzaz, M., M. K. Darabi, D. N. Little, and N. Garg. 2019. “Effect of evotherm-M1 on properties of asphaltic materials used at NAPMRC testing facility.” J. Test. Eval. 48 (3): 2256–2269. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20190446.
Bozorgzad, A., S. Farzan Kazemi, and F. Moghadas Nejad. 2018. “Evaporation-induced moisture damage of asphalt mixtures: Microscale model and laboratory validation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 171 (May): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.171.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Ceylan, H., M. Bayrak, and K. Gopalakrishnan. 2014. “Neural networks applications in pavement engineering: A recent survey.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 7 (6): 434. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(6).434.
Chandra, S., C. Ravi Sekhar, A. Kumar Bharti, and B. Kangadurai. 2013. “Relationship between pavement roughness and distress parameters for Indian highways.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (5): 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000512.
Choi, J.-H. H., T. M. Adams, and H. U. Bahia. 2004. “Pavement roughness modeling using back-propagation neural networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 19 (4): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00356.x.
Darabi, M. K., C. W. Huang, M. Bazzaz, E. A. Masad, and D. N. Little. 2019. “Characterization and validation of the nonlinear viscoelastic-viscoplastic with hardening-relaxation constitutive relationship for asphalt mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 216 (Aug): 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.239.
Dong, Q., and B. Huang. 2014. “Evaluation of influence factors on crack initiation of LTPP resurfaced-asphalt pavements using parametric survival analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (2): 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000409.
Ferreira, A., L. D. Picado-Santos, Z. Wu, and G. Flintsch. 2011. “Selection of pavement performance models for use in the Portuguese PMS.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12 (1): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2010.506538.
France-Mensah, J., W. J. O’Brien, N. Khwaja, and L. C. Bussell. 2017. “GIS-based visualization of integrated highway maintenance and construction planning: A case study of Fort Worth, Texas.” Visualization Eng. 5 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0046-1.
Galin, D. 1981. “Speeds on two-lane rural roads—A multiple regression analysis.” Traffic Eng. Control 22 (Aug): 453–460.
Gandomi, A. H., and A. H. Alavi. 2012. “A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to non-linear system modeling. Part II: Geotechnical and earthquake engineering problems.” Neural Comput. Appl. 21 (1): 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0735-y.
Gong, H., Y. Sun, X. Shu, and B. Huang. 2018. “Use of random forests regression for predicting IRI of asphalt pavements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 189 (Nov): 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.017.
Gopalakrishnan, K., S. K. Khaitan, A. Choudhary, and A. Agrawal. 2017. “Deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning for computer vision-based data-driven pavement distress detection.” Constr. Build. Mater. 157 (Dec): 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110.
Gordon, A. D., L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 1984. “Classification and regression trees.” Biometrics 40 (3): 874. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530946.
Hong, F., and J. A. Prozzi. 2006. “Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(77)).
Horak, E., H. Sebaaly, J. W. Maina, and S. Varma. 2017. “Rational Bailey ratios and dominant aggregate size range porosity correlated with rutting and mixture strength parameters.” In Proc., 36th Southern African Transport Conf. Pretoria, South Africa: Minister of Transport (South Africa).
Hosseini, A., A. Faheem, H. Titi, and S. Schwandt. 2019. “Developing a geo-relational framework for assessing influence of quality control data on long-term performance of flexible pavements.” In Proc., Conf. of Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hosseini, A., A. Faheem, H. Titi, and S. Schwandt. 2020. “Evaluation of the long-term performance of flexible pavements with respect to production and construction quality control indicators.” Constr. Build. Mater. 230 (Jan): 116998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116998.
Kargah-Ostadi, N., S. M. Stoffels, and N. Tabatabaee. 2010. “Network-level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2155 (1): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/2155-14.
Kaur, D., and H. Pulugurta. 2008. “Comparitive analysis of fuzzy decision tree and logistic regression methods for pavement treatment predictions.” WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 5 (6): 979–990.
Koza, J. R. 1990. “Genetically breeding populations of computer programs to solve problems in artificial intelligence.” In Proc., 2nd Int. IEEE Conf. on Tools for Artificial Intelligence, 819–827. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.1990.130444.
Lee, J. S., N. Gibson, and Y. Richard Kim. 2015. “Use of mechanistic models to investigate fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures: Effects of asphalt mix design targets and compaction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2507 (1): 108–119. https://doi.org/10.3141/2507-12.
Lin, J.-D. 2003. “Correlation analysis between international roughness index (IRI) and pavement distress by neural network.” In Proc., 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Liu, Q., L. Sun, A. Kornhauser, J. Sun, and N. Sangwa. 2019. “Road roughness acquisition and classification using improved restricted Boltzmann machine deep learning algorithm.” Sensor Rev. 39 (6): 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1108/SR-05-2018-0132.
Mazari, M., and D. D. Rodriguez. 2016. “Prediction of pavement roughness using a hybrid gene expression programming-neural network technique.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 3 (5): 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2016.09.007.
Morgan, J. N., and J. A. Sonquist. 1963. “Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58 (302): 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500855.
Nemati, R., and E. V. Dave. 2018. “Nominal property based predictive models for asphalt mixture complex modulus (dynamic modulus and phase angle).” Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (Jan): 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.144.
Park, E. S., R. E. Smith, T. J. Freeman, and C. H. Spiegelman. 2008. “A Bayesian approach for improved pavement performance prediction.” J. Appl. Stat. 35 (11): 1219–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760802318651.
Perera, R. W., and S. D. Kohn. 2002. Issues in pavement smoothness: A summary report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Prasad, A. M., L. R. Iverson, and A. Liaw. 2006. “Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction.” Ecosystems 9 (2): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1.
Quinlan, J. R. 1993. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Saha, P., K. Ksaibati, and R. Atadero. 2017. “Developing pavement distress deterioration models for pavement management system using markovian probabilistic process.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8292056.
Sandra, A. K., and A. K. Sarkar. 2013. “Development of a model for estimating international roughness index from pavement distresses.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (8): 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.703322.
Sharma, S., Y. Cui, Q. He, R. Mohammadi, and Z. Li. 2018. “Data-driven optimization of railway maintenance for track geometry.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 90 (May): 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.019.
Sollazzo, G., T. F. Fwa, and G. Bosurgi. 2017. “An ANN model to correlate roughness and structural performance in asphalt pavements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 134 (Mar): 684–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.186.
Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1): 1929–1958. https://doi.org/10.5555/2627435.2670313.
Svetnik, V., A. Liaw, C. Liaw, J. C. Culberson, R. P. Sheridan, and B. P. Feuston. 2003. “Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.” J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (6): 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034160g.
TaghaviGhalesari, A., and C. M. Chang-Albitres. 2019. “Sustainable design of rigid pavements using a hybrid GP and OLS method.” In Geo-Congress 2019: Geotechnical Materials, Modeling, and Testing. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482124.033.
Wang, X., J. Zhao, Q. Li, N. Fang, P. Wang, L. Ding, and S. Li. 2020. “A hybrid model for prediction in asphalt pavement performance based on support vector machine and grey relation analysis.” J. Adv. Transp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7534970.
Wang, Y. 2013. “Ordinal logistic regression model for predicting AC overlay cracking.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000327.
Zeiada, W., K. Hamad, M. Omar, B. S. Underwood, M. A. Khalil, and A. S. Karzad. 2019. “Investigation and modelling of asphalt pavement performance in cold regions.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (8): 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1373391.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 148Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Mar 24, 2021
Accepted: Jan 23, 2022
Published online: Mar 24, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Pavement and Geotechnical Engineer, Terracon Consultants, Inc., 4685 South Ash Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85044 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-9209. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., 1947 N 12th St., Philadelphia, PA 19122. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2571-1648. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 3200 N. Cramer St., Milwaukee, WI 53211. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-0861. Email: [email protected]
Scot Schwandt, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Pavement Engineer, Kiewit Infrastructure Engineers, 9780 Mount Pyramid Ct., Englewood, CO 80112. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Artificial intelligence-based gene expression programming (GEP) model for assessing sprayed seal performance, Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10.1080/14680629.2022.2115940, 24, 8, (1977-1994), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share