Technical Papers
Apr 17, 2024

Structural Behavior of Segmental Tunnel Linings Based on In Situ Measurements

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38, Issue 4

Abstract

Segmental tunnel linings have a complex structural behavior that is difficult to predict. Full-scale in situ structural monitoring allows us to gain access to these structures, observe the acting mechanisms, and better understand the actual structural behavior under realistic boundary conditions. In a recent structural monitoring project in Frankfurt, Germany, strains, deformations, and temperatures were measured at the segmental lining of a twin-tube tunnel boring machine (TBM) tunnel. Hereby, internal forces were back-calculated from the strain measurements. The results of the monitoring are presented and discussed in this paper. The measurements began immediately after the assembly of the segments and have been performed continuously over several years. Because of that, it was possible to observe that the internal forces differ significantly between the construction stage and the final state. During the construction stage, the internal forces develop quickly within hours after ring assembly, showing a distribution along the lining’s circumference that is hard to predict. Almost all radial deformations occur during this period and remain unchanged afterward. After this first early phase, a period of stress redistribution follows, including significant changes in the internal forces. At its end, the stable, final state is reached. In this state, the internal forces match better with expectations. In the monitored areas, the stresses during the construction stage slightly exceeded those of the final state, which should be avoided for economic reasons. Additional investigations regard the temperature development within the lining, the influence of the second tube construction on the already built tube, and the development of longitudinal ring interaction over time. The latter significantly influences the structural behavior, but its development is often subject to uncertainties. In this case, it was observed that the longitudinal interaction decreases considerably over time.

Practical Applications

In the structural design of segmental tunnel linings, structural or geotechnical engineers have various options regarding the available calculation methods and modeling strategies. All of these options are part of the state of the art, and the selection is up to the engineer. However, the results can be quite different depending on the chosen option. Consequently, uncertainties remain regarding the real linings’ internal forces and structural reliability. The actual mechanisms can be identified by investigating the real structural behavior of segmental tunnel linings with in situ structural monitoring. Then, with back-analyses, on the one hand, it can be tested to determine how well different calculation methods and modeling strategies correspond to reality. On the other hand, the monitoring data can contribute to improving existing calculation methods, developing new modeling approaches, and establishing more detailed recommendations or optimizations regarding the design and construction of segmental tunnel linings. This paper presents findings derived from a structural monitoring project on a segmental lining. Different mechanisms and aspects, sometimes uncertain or debatable in tunnel design, are discussed regarding their real in situ appearance. The gained data will also be used for further back-analyses and investigations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The structural monitoring project at the U5 metro line in Frankfurt (Main), Germany, was commissioned by “Stadtbahn Entwicklung und Verkehrsinfrastrukturprojekte Frankfurt GmbH” (SBEV), a subsidiary of “Stadt Frankfurt am Main” and “Stadtwerke Verkehrsgesellschaft Frankfurt am Main mbH” (VGF).

References

Arnau, O., M. Climent, C. B. M. Blom, and J. Walraaven. 2011. “Longitudinal time-dependent response of segmental tunnel linings.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 28 (1): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.002.
Arnau, O., and C. Molins. 2011. “Experimental and analytical study of the structural response of segmental tunnel linings based on an in situ loading test. Part 2: Numerical simulation.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 26 (6): 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.04.005.
Behnen, G., O. Fischer, and G. Schmidt-Thrö. 2016. “Scheibenbemessung der Pressenkraftdurchleitung bei TVM-Vortrieben” [Design of segmental linings for longitudinal force application]. [In German.] Beton-Stahlbetonbau 111 (11): 694–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.201600045.
Behnen, G., T. Nevrly, and O. Fischer. 2013. “Bettung von Tunnelschalen” [Bedding of tunnel linings]. [In German.] In Taschenbuch für den Tunnelbau 2013, 235–282. Essen, Germany: VGE Verlag.
Behnen, G., T. Nevrly, and O. Fischer. 2015. “Soil-structure interaction in tunnel lining analyses.” Geotechnik 38 (2): 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/gete.201400010.
Bergmeister, K., E. Saurer, T. Marcher, and S. Höser. 2014. “Empfehlungen zur Ermittlung der Nutzungsdauer, der Einwirkungen und zur Bemessung von Tunnelbauten.” [Recommendations on durability, loading and design of tunnels]. [In German.] In Betonkalender 2014, 9–36. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433603352.ch2.
Bezuijen, A., A. M. Talmon, F. J. Kaalberg, and R. Plugge. 2004. “Field measurements of grout pressures during tunnelling of the Sophia Rail Tunnel.” Soils Found. 44 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.44.39.
Bilotta, E., and G. Russo. 2012. “Backcalculation of internal forces in the segmental lining of a tunnel: The experience of Line 1 in Naples.” In Proc., Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Soil. London: CRC Press.
Bilotta, E., and G. Russo. 2013. “Internal forces arising in the segmental lining of an earth pressure balance-bored tunnel.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (10): 1765–1780. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000906.
Bilotta, E., G. Russo, and C. Viggiani. 2006. “Ground movements and strains in the lining of a tunnel in cohesionless soil.” In Proc., Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Soil. London: Taylor & Francis.
Blom, C. B. M. 2002. “Design philosophy of concrete linings for tunnels in soft soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Technische Universiteit Delft.
Blom, C. B. M., E. van der Horst, and P. Jovanovic. 1999. “Three-dimensional structural analyses of the shield-driven ‘green heart’ tunnel of the high-speed line South.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 14 (2): 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(99)00035-8.
BMVI (Bundesministerium für Digitales und Verkehr). 2022. Zusätzliche Technische Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien für Ingenieurbauten. Berlin: BMVI.
Budach, C., R. Kulkarni, T. Weiner, and S. Kirchner. 2020. “Geotechnical and tunneling aspects during the construction of the U5 in Frankfurt am Main.” Geotechnik 43 (4): 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/gete.202000028.
CDM Smith Consult GmbH. 2017. Geotechnisches Gesamtgutachten—Zusammenfassende Darstellung der Baugrund- und Grundwasserverhältnisse. [In German.]. Chennai, India: CDM Smith Consult GmbH.
DAUB (Deutscher Ausschuss für Unterirdisches Bauen). 2013. Recommendations for the design, production and installation of segmental rings. Cologne, Germany: DAUB.
DAUB (Deutscher Ausschuss für Unterirdisches Bauen). 2023. Recommendations for the design, production and installation of segmental rings. Cologne, Germany: DAUB.
DB Netz AG. 2023. “DB Netz AG.” Accessed December 25, 2023. https://www.fernbahntunnel-frankfurt.de/home.html.
Dias, T. G. S., and A. Bezuijen. 2018. “Grout pressure distribution during TBM tunnelling.” In Proc., Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 153–160. London: CRC Press.
Do, N. A. 2014. “Numerical analyses of segmental tunnel lining under static and dynamic loads analyses.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, INSA de Lyon.
Do, N. A., D. Dias, P. Oreste, and I. Djeran-Maigre. 2014a. “2D numerical investigations of twin tunnel interaction.” Geomech. Eng. 6 (3): 263–275. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.3.263.
Do, N. A., P. Oreste, D. Dias, A. Croce, I. Djeran-Maigre, and L. Locatelli. 2014b. “Stress and strain state in the segmental linings during mechanized tunneling.” Geomech. Eng. 7 (1): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.1.075.
Duddeck, H. 1980. “Empfehlungen zur Berechnung von Tunneln im Lockergestein.” [Recommendations for the design of tunnels in soft soil]. [In German.] Die Bautechnik 57 (10): 349–356.
DWD (Deutscher Wetter Dienst). 2023. “CDC climate data center. Station 1420 Frankfurt am Main.” Accessed August 2, 2023. https://cdc.dwd.de/portal/.
Fabozzi, S. 2017. “Behaviour of segmental tunnel lining under static and dynamic loads.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Naples Federico II.
fib (Fédération Internationale du Béton). 2013. fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Fischer, O., T. Nevrly, and G. Behnen. 2014. “Fertigteile im Tunnelbau.” [Segments for tunnel linings]. [In German.] In Betonkalender 2014, 233–302. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433603352.ch.
Gehwolf, P., C. Schulte-Schrepping, G. Behnen, C. Camos-Andreu, A. L. Hammer, D. Zougou, R. Breitenbücher, O. Fischer, and M. Thewes. 2022. “Erfahrungsstand zur Ringspaltverfüllung bei einschaligen Tunneln mit Schwerpunkt deutsche Eisenbahntunnel.” [Experiences regarding annular gap grouting for segmental tunnel linings]. [In German.] In Taschenbuch für den Tunnelbau 2022, 53–136. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433611043.ch2.
Gil Lorenzo, S. 2018. “Structural behaviour of concrete segmental lining tunnels: Towards design optimization.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge.
Gil Lorenzo, S., M. Elshafie, K. Soga, R. J. Mair, P. Wright, and M. Clegg. 2015. “Structural monitoring of concrete segmental lining tunnels during construction with conventional and fibre optic instrumentation.” In Proc., SMAR 2015-3rd Conf. on Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures. Perth, Australia: Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
Hashimoto, T., H. J. Brinkman, T. Konda, Y. Kano, and A. Feddema. 2006. “Simultaneous backfill grouting, pressure development in construction phase and in the long-term.” In Proc., Decade of Progress, 101–107. Delf, Netherlands: GeoDelft.
Hashimoto, T., J. Nagaya, T. Konda, and T. Tamura. 2002. “Observation of lining pressure due to shield tunneling.” In Proc., Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. Lyon, France: Specifique.
Heimeshoff, B. 1967. “Praktische Spannungsberechnung für den gekrümmten Träger mit Rechteckquerschnitt.” [Calculation of stresses in curved beams with rectangular cross section]. [In German.] Die Bautechnik 44 (4): 135–140.
ITA (International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association). 2019. Guidelines for the design of segmental tunnel linings. Geneva: ITA.
Janßen, P. 1983. “Tragverhalten von Tunnelausbauten mit Gelenktübbings. [Structural behavior of segmental linings with longitudinal joints]. [In German.] Ph.D. dissertation, Institut für Statik, Technische Universität BraunSchweig.
Kämper, C., T. Putke, C. Zhao, A. A. Lavasan, T. Barciaga, P. Mark, and T. Schanz. 2016. “Comparative analyses of modeling alternatives of tunnels with concrete lining segments.” [In German.] Die Bautechnik 93 (7): 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.201500064.
Lee, K. M., X. Y. Hou, X. W. Ge, and Y. Tang. 2001. “An analytical solution for a jointed shield-driven tunnel lining.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 25 (4): 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.134.
Maidl, B., M. Herrenknecht, U. Maidl, and G. Wehrmeyer. 2012. Mechanised shield tunnelling. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433601051.
Marwan, A. 2019. “Computational analysis of segmental linings in mechanized tunneling.” Ph.D. dissertation, Institute for Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Meschke, G. 2014. “Numerische Simulation im Tunnelbau.” [Numerical simulation in tunneling]. [In German.] In Betonkalender 2014, 171–232. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433603352.ch7.
Molins, C., and O. Arnau. 2011. “Experimental and analytical study of the structural response of segmental tunnel linings based on an in situ loading test. Part 1: Test configuration and execution.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 26 (6): 764–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.05.002.
Möller, S. 2006. “Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in linings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Institute für Geotechnik, Univ. of Stuttgart.
Oreste, P. 2007. “A numerical approach to the hyperstatic reaction method for the dimensioning of tunnel supports.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 22 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.05.002.
Pätzold, J. 1972. “Empfehlungen für Messungen im Zusammenhang mit schildvorgetriebenen Tunneln.” [Recommendations regarding monitoring of segmental tunnel linings]. [In German.] Die Bautechnik 49 (9): 296–301.
Pätzold, J., and G. Petersen. 1978a. “Messungen an einem schildvorgetriebenen Tunnel der City-S-Bahn Hamburg” [Measurements at a segmental lining of a suburban train tunnel in Hamburg].” [In German.] Die Bautechnik 55 (9): 290–294.
Pätzold, J., and G. Petersen. 1978b. “Messungen an einem schildvorgetriebenen Tunnel der City-S-Bahn Hamburg (Fortsetzung).” [Measurements at a segmental lining of a suburban train tunnel in Hamburg (continued)]. [In German.] Die Bautechnik 55 (10): 350–357.
Pepe, G. 2008. “Rivestimenti di gallerie in conci prefabbricati.” [Tunnel linings with prefabricated segments]. [In Italian.] Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Univ. of Naples Federico II.
Rauch, F., and O. Fischer. 2022. “Structural monitoring of segmental tunnel linings: Towards safer and more resource-efficient tunnels.” Civ. Eng. Des. 4 (1–3): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202100053.
Rauch, F., and O. Fischer. 2023. “Application of a structural monitoring on segmental tunnel linings.” Struct. Concr. 24 (6): 7779–7793. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300141.
Sargin, M. 1971. “Stress-strain relationship for concrete and the analysis of structural concrete sections.” Ph.D. dissertation, Solid Mechanics Division, Univ. of Waterloo.
Schmidt-Thrö, G., B. Tabka, M. Smarslik, W. Scheufler, O. Fischer, and P. Mark. 2019. “Experimental analysis of concrete elements under partial area strip loading.” Civ. Eng. Des. 1 (1): 8–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.201900001.
Schotte, K. 2016. “Verification of the performance of segmental tunnel linings using strain and ovalisation monitoring.” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Architecture, Univ. of Ghent.
Schotte, K., T. Nuttens, A. De Wulf, P. Van Bogaert, and H. De Backer. 2016. “Monitoring the structural response of the liefkenshoek rail tunnel to tidal level fluctuations.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000863.
Smarslik, M., T. Putke, A. Marwan, V. E. Gall, G. Meschke, and P. Mark. 2018. “Berechnungsmodelle für Bau- und Endzustände von Tübbingtunneln.” [Calculation methods for segmental linings during construction stages and in the final state]. [In German.] In Taschenbuch für den Tunnelbau 2018, 101–135. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433608753.ch5.
Springenschmid, R. 2007. Betontechnologie für die Praxis. [Concrete technology for practical application]. [In German.] Berlin: Bauwerkverlag.
Thienert, C. 2011. “Zementfreie Mörtel für die Ringspaltverpressung beim Schildvortrieb mit flüssigkeitsgestützter Ortsbrust.” [Annular gap grouting material without cement for slurry shield tunneling]. [In German.] Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Wuppertal.
Winselmann, D., A. Städing, L. Babendererde, and J. Holzhäuser. 2000. “Aktuelle Berechnungsmethoden für Tunnelauskleidungen mit Tübbingen und deren verfahrenstechnische Voraussetzungen.” [Current calculation methods for segmental tunnel linings and their requirements]. [In German.] In Proc., DGGT Baugrundtagung Hannover 2000. Essen, Germany: DGGT Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geotechnik.
Wood, A. M. M. 1975. “The circular tunnel in elastic ground.” Geotechnique 25 (1): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.115.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38Issue 4August 2024

History

Received: Oct 4, 2023
Accepted: Jan 29, 2024
Published online: Apr 17, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fabian Rauch [email protected]
Research Associate and Chair of Concrete and Masonry Structures, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical Univ. of Munich, Theresienstraße 90, Munich 80333, Germany (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Oliver Fischer [email protected]
Full Professor and Chair of Concrete and Masonry Structures, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical Univ. of Munich, Theresienstraße 90, Munich 80333, Germany. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share