Technical Papers
Dec 29, 2022

Comparative Analysis of Blast-Load Models in Vapor Cloud Explosions

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37, Issue 2

Abstract

Vapor cloud explosions (VCEs) continually generate an extreme blast load and cause heavy casualties, property loss, and environmental pollution. It is therefore essential to evaluate and control the consequence of vapor cloud explosions. So far, the widely used models in vapor cloud explosions include the Trinitrotoluene (TNT) equivalency method (TNT EM), the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) multienergy method (TNO MEM), the Baker-Strehlow-Tang (BST) method, and FLACS. In this paper, a review and comparative analysis of vapor cloud explosion models were carried out. Combined with a realistic petrochemical plant with different obstacle blockage ratio, the side-on overpressure and duration were evaluated and analyzed with different vapor cloud explosion models. Based on the predicted blast load, the structural response of RC columns, including nonseismic columns and seismic columns with different cross sections, were studied through computer simulation. Vapor cloud explosion models were compared with each other from the perspective of the structural response. It was found that the selection of vapor cloud explosion models has a great influence on the dynamic response of RC columns; the TNO multienergy method was the most conservative method in all vapor cloud explosion models, but its failure mode was quite different from FLACS in the scenario with a high blocking ratio. The predicted results from the Baker-Strehlow-Tang method were closest to that of FLACS. The structural response of the TNT equivalency method was close to that of the TNO multienergy method with the influence of the blast wave shape in Scenario 1. This work points out the applicable characteristics of each load model, which can provide some suggestions for the blast-load evaluation of vapor cloud explosions in the RC column design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51878445, 51678405, and 51938011, the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Tianjin under Grant No. 17JCJQJC43900, and the Scientific Research Foundation for Graduate Students of Tianjin under Grant No. 2021YJSB124.

References

Ahumada, C. B., F.-I. Papadakis-Wood, P. Krishnan, S. Yuan, N. Quddus, M. S. Mannan, and Q. Wang. 2020. “Comparison of explosion models for detonation onset estimation in large-scale unconfined vapor clouds.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 66 (Jul): 104165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104165.
ASCE. 2010. Design of blast-resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baker, Q. A., M. J. Tang, E. A. Scheier, and G. J. Silva. 1996. “Vapor cloud explosion analysis.” Process Saf. Prog. 15 (2): 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680150211.
Bischoff, P. H., and S. H. Perry. 1991. “Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates.” Mater. Struct. 24 (6): 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472016.
Bjerketvedt, D., J. R. Bakke, and K. V. Wingerden. 1997. “Gas explosion handbook.” J. Hazard. Mater. 52 (1): 1–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-2.
CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety). 2010. Guidelines for vapor cloud explosion, pressure vessel burst, BLEVE and flash fire hazards. 2nd ed. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Drysdale, D., and R. Sylvester-Evans. 1998. “The explosion and fire on the Piper Alpha platform, 6 July 1988. A case study.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 356 (1748): 2929–2951. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0304.
Eggen, J. 1998. GAME: Development of guidance for the application of the multi-energy method, health and safety executive. Rijswijk, Netherlands: TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory.
Ferrara, G., A. Di Benedetto, E. Salzano, and G. Russo. 2006. “CFD analysis of gas explosions vented through relief pipes.” J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2): 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.037.
Gexcon. 2019. FLACS v10.9 user’s manual. Bergen, Norway: Gexcon AS.
Hansen, O. R., and M. T. Kjellander. 2016. “CFD modelling of blast waves from BLEVEs.” Chem. Eng. 48 (Apr): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1648034.
Hellas, M. S., R. Chaib, and I. Verzea. 2020. “Abacus to determine the probability of death or glass breakage to the overpressure effect by two methods: TNT and TNO multi-energy.” UPB Sci. Bull., Series D: Mech. Eng. 82 (1): 239–254.
Hjertager, B. H. 1984. “Computer-simulation of turbulent reactive gas-dynamics.” Model. Identif. Control. A Nor. Res. Bull. 5 (4): 211–236. https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.1984.4.3.
Hjertager, B. H. 1993. “Computer modeling of turbulent gas-explosions in complex2d and 3d geometries.” J. Hazard. Mater. 34 (2): 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(93)85004-X.
Hu, L., D. Xiaowei, and H. Ning. 2019. “Comparative analysis and research on the effect model of steam cloud explosion accident.” [In Chinese.] J. North China Inst. Sci. Technol. 16 (2): 61–66.
Hu, Y., L. Chen, Q. Fang, and H. Xiang. 2018. “Blast loading model of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder.” Eng. Struct. 175 (Nov): 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.013.
Kingery, C., and B. Pannill. 1964. Peak overpressure vs scaled distance for TNT surface bursts (hemispherical charges). Alexandria, VA: Defense Documentation Center.
Kinsella, K., 1993. “A rapid assessment methodology for the prediction of vapour cloud explosion overpressure.” In Proc., Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Safety, Health and Loss Prevention in the Oil, Chemical and Process Industries. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Lea, C. J., and H. S. Ledin. 2002. A review of the state-of-the-art in gas explosion modelling. Ascot, UK: Health and Safety Laboratory.
Li, J., M. Abdel-jawad, and G. Ma. 2014. “New correlation for vapor cloud explosion overpressure calculation at congested configurations.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 31 (Sep): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.013.
Li, J., G. Ma, M. Abdel-Jawad, and H. Hao. 2015. “Evaluation of gas explosion overpressures at configurations with irregularly arranged obstacles.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5): B4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000678.
Malvar, L. J. 1998. “Review of static and dynamic properties of steel reinforcing bars.” Mater. J. 95 (5): 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00088-1.
Paik, J. 2006. “Design of offshore facilities to resist gas explosion hazard, engineering handbook.” J. Czujko. Ships Offshore Struct. 1 (2): 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1533/saos.2006.0120.
Ree, S., T. H.-K. Kang, H. Lee, and M. Shin. 2020. “Empirical gas explosion models for onshore plant structures: Review and comparative analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (4): 04020075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001470.
Roberts, M., and W. Crowley. 2004. “Evaluation of flammability hazards in non-nuclear safety analysis.” In Proc., 14th EFOC Safety Analysis Workshop. Las Vegas: Energy Facility Contractors Group.
Sari, A. 2011. “Comparison of TNO multienergy and Baker–Strehlow–Tang models.” Process Saf. Prog. 30 (1): 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10424.
Shi, Y., H. Hong, and Z. X. Li. 2008. “Numerical derivation of pressure–impulse diagrams for prediction of RC column damage to blast loads.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 35 (11): 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.001.
Shi, Y., Y. Hu, L. Chen, Z.-X. Li, and H. Xiang. 2022. “Experimental investigation into the close-in blast performance of RC columns with axial loading.” Eng. Struct. 268 (Oct): 114688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114688.
Shi, Y., C. Xie, Z. Li, and Y. Ding. 2021. “A quantitative correlation of evaluating the flame speed for the BST method in vapor cloud explosions.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 73 (Nov): 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104622.
Steel Construction Institute for the Health and Safety Executive. 2009. Buncefield explosion mechanism phase 1, Vols. 1 and 2. Bootle, UK: Health and Safety Executive.
Strehlow, R., R. Luckritz, A. Adamczyk, and S. Shimpi. 1979. “The blast wave generated by spherical flames.” Combust. Flame 35: 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(79)90035-X.
Tang, M., and Q. Baker. 1999. “A new set of blast curves from vapor cloud explosion.” Process Saf. Prog. 18 (4): 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680180412.
Tu, Z., and L. Yong. 2009. “Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 36 (1): 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.010.
US Department of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force. 1990. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions (TM5-1300). Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense Explosives Safety Board.
USDOD (US Department of Defense). 2008. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Washington, DC: USACE, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency.
Van den Berg, A. 1985. “The multi-energy method: A framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction.” J. Hazard. Mater. 12 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(85)80022-4.
Van Wingerden, K., P. Middha, and O. R. Hansen. 2007. “On the possibility of DDT in vapor cloud explosions.” In Proc., 2008 AIChE Spring National Meeting. Houston: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Venart, J. 2004. “Flixborough: The explosion and its aftermath.” Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 82 (2): 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1205/095758204322972753.
Wang, J., G. Fu, and M. Yan. 2020. “Comparative analysis of two catastrophic hazardous chemical accidents in China.” Process Saf. Prog. 39 (1): e12137. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12137.
Wang, Z., L. Dong, and J. I. Wang. 2010. “Comparison of vapor cloud explosion (VCE) consequences prediction models.” [In Chinese.] Ind. Saf. Environ. Protect. 36 (3): 48–49.
Wei, W., Y. L. Zhang, J. J. Su, Y. Liu, and F. L. Huang. 2022. “Modification of SDOF model for reinforced concrete beams under close-in explosion.” Defence Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.01.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37Issue 2April 2023

History

Received: Jan 13, 2022
Accepted: Oct 26, 2022
Published online: Dec 29, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Changling Xie [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300350, China. Email: [email protected]
Yanchao Shi [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300350, China; Research Fellow, Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structural Safety of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300350, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Wentao Dai, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Shenzhen Municipal Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Sungang West St., No. 3007, Shenzhen 518029, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300350, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share