Technical Papers
May 23, 2024

Improving Construction Meeting Effectiveness: Trade-Offs between Reactive and Proactive Site-Level Planning Discussions

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 5

Abstract

Despite the adage “hope for the best, plan for the worst,” site-level proactive plans produced by construction planning meetings show planning for the best. Planning meetings comprise both proactive and reactive discussions. Although not all the information provided during meetings is useful, limited efforts have been made to measure the amount of useful information embedded in reactive versus proactive discussions. This research aims to determine the appropriate trade-offs between the number of reactive and proactive discussions at each site-planning level. By utilizing information theory and the Chow–Liu tree, the authors demonstrate to what extent and in what order meeting participants should address site-planning level reactivity and proactivity to obtain more useful information effectively through a case study. The results indicate that proactive planning discussions improve percent plan complete (PPC) 20% more than reactive ones in general. However, missing information due to not undertaking reactive planning could put PPC at greater risk (2% more) than proactive planning, implying high uncertainty at the lowest level of site planning. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by innovatively developing an information theory-based approach to quantify the uncertainty in proactive and reactive discussions for construction planning. Using the information theory approach, this research enables project managers to quantify the uncertainty in reactive and proactive planning discussions. By adjusting the framework and parameters, the approach can have general applications in planning meetings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Specific data include a summary of meeting minutes and codes for information theory analysis.

References

Abbasian-Hosseini, S. A., G. Howell, and M. Liu. 2016. “Relationship between onsite planning efforts and workplan reliability.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 2129–2138. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Abdelmegid, M. A., V. A. González, M. O’Sullivan, C. G. Walker, M. Poshdar, and L. F. Alarcón. 2023. “Exploring the links between simulation modelling and construction production planning and control: A case study on the last planner system.” Prod. Plann. Control 34 (5): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1934588.
Allen, J. A., N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, and S. J. Sands. 2016. “Meetings as a positive boost? How and when meeting satisfaction impacts employee empowerment.” J. Bus. Res. 69 (10): 4340–4347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.011.
Al-Musali, M. A. K. M., and K. N. I. Ku Ismail. 2015. “Board diversity and intellectual capital performance: The moderating role of the effectiveness of board meetings.” Account. Res. J. 28 (3): 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-01-2014-0006.
Arashpour, M., and M. Arashpour. 2015. “Analysis of workflow variability and its impacts on productivity and performance in construction of multistory buildings.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000363.
Ballard, G. 2000. “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 1998. “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(11).
Brownlee, D. 2008. “The secrets to running project status meetings that work!” In Proc., PMI Global Congress 2008. Denver: Project Management Institute.
Buehler, R., and D. Griffin. 2015. “The planning fallacy: When plans lead to optimistic forecasts.” In The psychology of planning in organizations, edited by M. D. Mumford and M. Frese, 47–73. New York: Routledge.
Buehler, R., D. Griffin, and M. Ross. 1994. “Exploring the ‘planning fallacy’: Why people underestimate their task completion times.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 67 (3): 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366.
Carlsson, B., P. E. Josephson, and B. Larson. 2001. “Communication in building projects; Empirical results and future needs.” In Proc., CIB World Building Congress: Performance in Product and Practice. Wellington, New Zealand: BRANZ.
Chang, A. S., and F. Y. Shen. 2013. “Effectiveness of coordination methods in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (3): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000222.
Chang, M. C., S. G. Shih, and G. Schmitt. 2017. “Information theory-based approach for constructability assessment in truss structural systems.” Autom. Constr. 82 (Apr): 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.010.
Chen, G., C. He, S. Hsiang, M. Liu, and H. Li. 2023. “A mechanism for smart contracts to mediate production bottlenecks under constraints.” In Proc., 31st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), 1232–1244. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Chow, C., and C. Liu. 1968. “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14 (3): 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1968.1054142.
Ding, G., R. F. Lax, J. Chen, P. P. Chen, and B. D. Marx. 2007. “Comparison of greedy strategies for learning Markov networks of Treewidth k.” In Proc., MLMTA, 294. Wadern, Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl.
Fernandez-Solis, J. L., V. Porwal, S. Lavy, A. Shafaat, Z. K. Rybkowski, K. Son, and N. Lagoo. 2013. “Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of last planner system users.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (4): 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606.
Garcia, A. J., S. Mollaoglu, K. A. Frank, M. Duva, and D. Zhao. 2021. “Emergence and evolution of network structures in complex interorganizational project teams.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000951.
Gazula, H., C. C. Chang, M. L. Lu, and S. M. Hsiang. 2015. “Using mutual information to capture major concerns of postural control in a tossing activity.” J. Biomech. 48 (6): 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.022.
Gorse, C., S. Emmitt, and M. Lowis. 1999. “Problem solving and appropriate communication medium.” In Proc., ARCOM, 15th Annual Conf., 511–517. Liverpool, UK: John Moores Univ.
Gorse, C. A., and S. Emmitt. 2007. “Communication behaviour during management and design team meetings: A comparison of group interaction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (11): 1197–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701567413.
Gorse, C. A., and S. Emmitt. 2009. “Informal interaction in construction progress meetings.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (10): 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903179710.
Greitemeyer, T., and S. Schulz-Hardt. 2003. “Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 84 (2): 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322.
Hamzeh, F. R., G. El Samad, and S. Emdanat. 2019. “Advanced metrics for construction planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001702.
Hamzeh, F. R., E. Zankoul, and C. Rouhana. 2015. “How can ‘tasks made ready’ during lookahead planning impact reliable workflow and project duration?” Construct. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1047878.
Hartmann, S., and D. Briskorn. 2010. “A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.11.005.
He, C., M. Liu, T. C. L. Alves, N. M. Scala, and S. M. Hsiang. 2022a. “Prioritizing collaborative scheduling practices based on their impact on project performance.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 40 (7–8): 618–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2048042.
He, C., M. Liu, S. M. Hsiang, and N. Pierce. 2024. “Synthesizing ontology and graph neural network to unveil the implicit rules for us bridge preservation decisions.” J. Manage. Eng. 40 (3): 04024007. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5803.
He, C., M. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. M. Hsiang, G. Chen, W. Li, and G. Dai. 2023. “Space–time–Workforce visualization and conditional capacity synthesis in uncertainty.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (2): 04022071. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4991.
He, C., M. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, M. H. Simon, G. Chen, and J. Chen. 2022b. “Exploit social distancing in construction scheduling: Visualize and optimize space–time–workforce tradeoff.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 4022027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001037.
Henttu-Aho, T. 2018. “The role of rolling forecasting in budgetary control systems: Reactive and proactive types of planning.” J. Manage. Control 29 (3–4): 327–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-00273-6.
Herroelen, W., and R. Leus. 2005. “Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 165 (2): 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.002.
Jackson, J. 2016. “Are you practicing reactive or proactive scheduling?” Accessed May 29, 2018. http://encgrp.com/en-react-vs-proact/.
Jain, A. K. 2010. “Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means.” Pattern Recognit. Lett. 31 (8): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011.
Jalayer, F., J. L. Beck, and F. Zareian. 2011. “Analyzing the sufficiency of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking based on information theory.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (3): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000327.
Javanmardi, A., C. He, S. M. Hsiang, S. A. Abbasian-Hosseini, and M. Liu. 2023. “Enhancing construction project workflow reliability through observe–plan–do–check–react cycle: A bridge project case study.” Buildings 13 (9): 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092379.
Ju, C., and Y. Ning. 2023. “Time pressure and coordinating project design in inter-functional teams: A configurational approach.” Prod. Plann. Control 34 (4): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1926567.
Kriegel, H. P., P. Kröger, J. Sander, and A. Zimek. 2011. “Density-based clustering.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 1 (3): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.30.
Kwon, W., I. Clarke, and R. Wodak. 2014. “Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings.” J. Manage. Stud. 51 (2): 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12036.
Lagos, C. I., and L. F. Alarcón. 2021. “Assessing the relationship between constraint management and schedule performance in Chilean and Colombian construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000942.
Laufer, A., and G. A. Howell. 1993. “Construction planning: Revising the paradigm.” Project Manage. J. 24 (3): 23–33.
Laufer, A., G. A. Howell, and Y. Rosenfeld. 1992. “Three modes of short-term construction planning.” Constr. Manag. Econ. 10 (3): 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199200000021.
Laufer, A., and R. L. Tucker. 1987. “Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 5 (3): 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198700000023.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., and J. A. Allen. 2020. “Well, now what do we do? Wait… A group process analysis of meeting lateness.” Int. J. Bus. Commun. 57 (3): 302–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417696725.
Liu, Y., F. Castronovo, J. Messner, and R. Leicht. 2020. “Evaluating the impact of virtual reality on design review meetings.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 34 (1): 04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000856.
Meredith, J. 1998. “Building operations management theory through case and field research.” J. Oper. Manage. 16 (4): 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0.
Montoya, A., D. Carter, J. Martin, and L. DeChurch. 2015. “The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications.” In The five Perils of team planning: Regularities and remedies. New York: Routledge.
Mumford, M. D., R. A. Schultz, and H. K. Osburn. 2002. “Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon.” In Vol. 1 of Research in multilevel issues, edited by F. J. Yammarino and F. Dansereau, 3–65.
Oh, E. H., N. Naderpajouh, M. Hastak, and S. Gokhale. 2016. “Integration of the construction knowledge and expertise in front-end planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001050.
Petrides, I., E. Rokou, and K. Kirytopoulos. 2014. “Reactive scheduling in practice.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. and 24th National Conf. on Operational Research. Athens, Greece: HELORS.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Ponton, H., A. Osborne, N. Thompson, and D. Greenwood. 2020. “The power of humour to unite and divide: A case study of design coordination meetings in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 38 (1): 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1656339.
Pousette, A., and M. Törner. 2016. “Effects of systematic work preparation meetings on safety climate and psychosocial conditions in the construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 34 (6): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1189584.
Schneider, K., J. Klünder, F. Kortum, L. Handke, J. Straube, and S. Kauffeld. 2018. “Positive affect through interactions in meetings: The role of proactive and supportive statements.” J. Syst. Software 143 (Jan): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.001.
Schwartzman, H. 1989. The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Springer.
Shannon, C. 1948. “A mathematical theory of communication.” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (3): 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
Spector, L., and J. Grafman. 1994. “Planning, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence: Cross fertilization.” In Vol. 9 of Handbook of neuropsychology, edited by F. Boller and J. Grafman, 377–392. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Stone, J. V. 2015. Information theory: A tutorial introduction. Sheffield, UK: Sebtel Press.
Van Gassel, F. J. M., T. Láscaris-Comneno, and G. J. Maas. 2014. “The conditions for successful automated collaboration in construction.” Autom. Constr. 39 (Jun): 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.001.
Yassien, Y., M. Ezzeldin, M. Mohamed, and W. El-Dakhakhni. 2020. “Air transportation infrastructure robustness assessment for proactive systemic risk management.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 04020037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000789.
Yoerger, M., J. A. Allen, and J. Crowe. 2018. “The impact of premeeting talk on group performance.” Small Group Res. 49 (2): 226–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417744883.
Zegarra, O., and L. F. Alarcón. 2019. “Coordination of teams, meetings, and managerial processes in construction projects: Using a lean and complex adaptive mechanism.” Prod. Plann. Control 30 (9): 736–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1578905.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 5September 2024

History

Received: Dec 11, 2023
Accepted: Mar 14, 2024
Published online: May 23, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 23, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ashtad Javanmardi [email protected]
Lead Data Scientist, FDH Infrastructure Services, 6521 Meridien Dr., Raleigh, NC 27616. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY 13244. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-7109. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY 13244 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0482-6243. Email: [email protected]
Simon M. Hsiang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Department Chair, Dept. of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223. Email: [email protected]
Alireza Abbasian-Hosseini [email protected]
Project Manager, Kokosing Construction Company, 12001 Guilford Rd., Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share