Abstract

The construction project information for FM team control and maintenance is vital. However, current practices indicate significant data drops during the handover stage, leading to rework during FM systems integration of inaccurate, delivered information. Although challenges in BIM implementation are well studied, there is a current lack of best practices from FM industry experts highlighting challenges with a specific focus on the areas of the data drop. Therefore, the aim is to develop a framework that can reduce data loss and improve data management. The objectives include robust literature review on challenges of information loss during handover phase, management and frameworks; Adopting case study and workshops to identify information loss challenges, framework development and validation with industry experts. This paper adopted a grounded theory approach to explore literature and conducted case studies, including a series of semistructured interviews and a workshop with FM industry experts. The findings show the areas and causes of information loss and how to manage them through the developed information loss management framework (ILMF).

Practical Applications

With the start of any type of project, planning and establishing rules from the beginning facilitates the smooth transition between different phases. Similarly, in construction projects, this research provides guidelines on how facility managers can manage information loss when exchanged through projects’ stages. Furthermore, with the continuing advancements in the construction world, the facility management should be equipped with management and leadership guidelines as presented in the proposed framework to reduce data loss during handover. However, there are cost and contractual issues that prohibit any involvement of the facility manager in early project stages. The results of this study provide an identification of professional practices do’s and do not’s that facilitate the management and development of projects with the support of the latest technologies in the market. Ultimately, developing a guide that adapts international standards. The study’s contribution to knowledge includes the development of a new information loss management framework that adopts BIM and ISO standards after exploring the existing data management frameworks in the literature that lack data loss management as a focus. The framework works as a guide for various stakeholders such as designers, contractors with a focus on FM to facilitates data coordination and management to reduce information loss, its creation and validation were conducted in collaboration with industry experts. Furthermore, its novelty lies in integrating FM role, information management, information loss, address project life cycle, and adopts the ISO 19650 series.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by Qatar University, College of Engineering (CENG) with project number QUCP-CENG-2020-1; and Qatar Foundation with Project number NPRP12S-0304-190230. The content of the paper is solely the view of the authors, and has not be shared or published elsewhere.

References

Abeysooriya, S. 2022. “Information governance and management framework.” Accessed September 25, 2021. https://coo.uq.edu.au/files/6966/information-governance-management-framework.pdf.
Ahmad, A. M., M. Hafeez, A. Ahmad, A. Aliyu, S. Rodriguez, and N. Dawood. 2016a. “BIM: A disruptive process towards traditional practice.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, 11th-13th of December 2016, Hong Kong, 80–93. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology.
Ahmad, A. M., A. Mian, K. Naji, N. Dawood, S. Rodriguez, and V. Vuckovic. 2016b. “Investigating the use of BIM models for BIM work streams in traditional construction contracting in Qatar.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. Applications of Virtual Reality, 338–350. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology.
Ahmad, A. M., S. Rodriguez, A. Mian, N. Dawood, M. Kassem, and K. Naji. 2022. “Drivers for energy analysis towards a BIM-enabled information flow.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 12 (3): 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2021-0129.
Ait-Lamallam, S., R. Yaagoubi, I. Sebari, and O. Doukari. 2021. “Extended the IFC standard to enable road operation and maintenance management through openBIM.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 10 (8): 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080496.
Akcamete, A., X. Liu, B. Akinci, and J. Garrett. 2011. “Integration and visualization maintenance and repair work orders in BIM: Lessons learned from a prototype.” Accessed July 25, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260056152_Integrating_and_Visualizing_Maintenance_and_Repair_Work_Orders_in_BIM_Lessons_Learned_from_a_Prototype.
Aldowayan, A., F. Dweiri, and S. Venkatachalam. 2020. “A review on current status of facility management practices in building industry and prospective BIM intervention to manage the facilities effectively during its service life.” Accessed July 20, 2021. http://www.ieomsociety.org/detroit2020/papers/196.pdf.
Arayici, Y., T. Onyenobi, and C. Egbu. 2012. “Building information modelling (BIM) for facilities management (FM): The mediacity case study approach.” Int. J. 3-D Info. Model. 1 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/ij3dim.2012010104.
Ashworth, S., and M. Tucker. 2020. “FM-BIM mobilization framework critical success factors to help deliver successful BIM projects.” Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348650724_FM-BIM_Mobilisation_Framework_Critical_Success_Factors_to_Help_Deliver_Succesful_BIM_Projects_Simon_Ashworth_-_PhD_230720.
Aziz, F., J. Rankin, and L. Waugh. 2015. “Construction organizational-level information management framework.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (2): 04015043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000407.
Becerik-Gerber, B., F. Jazizadeh, N. Li, and G. Calis. 2012. “Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (3): 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000433.
Benghi, C. 2019. “Automated verification for collaborative workflows in a digital plan of work.” Autom. Constr. 107 (Nov): 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102926.
Crook, C., and R. Kumar. 1998. “Electronic data interchange: A multi-industry investigation using grounded theory.” Inf. Manage. 34 (2): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00040-8.
Ding, L., K. Li, Y. Zhou, and P. Love. 2017. “An IFC-inspection process model for infrastructure projects: Enabling real-time quality monitoring and control.” Autom. Constr. 84 (Dec): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.029.
Eastman, C., P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2011. “BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers.” In Engineers and contractors. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Gao, X., and P. Pishdad-Bozorgi. 2019. “BIM-enabled facilities operation and maintenance: A review.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 39 (Jan): 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.005.
Gerbino, S., L. Cieri, C. Rainieri, and G. Fabbrocino. 2021. “On BIM interoperability via the IFC standard: An assessment from the structural engineering and design viewpoint.” Appl. Sci. 11 (23): 11430. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311430.
Gnanarednam, M., and H. Jayasena. 2013. “Ability of BIM to satisfy CAFM information requirements.” Accessed July 10, 2021. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC26696.pdf.
Goulielmos, M. 2004. “Systems development approach: Transcending methodology.” Inf. Syst. J. 14 (4): 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00175.x.
Gu, N., and K. London. 2010. “Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry.” Autom. Constr. 19 (8): 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002.
Hijazi, S. 2016. “Developing a framework to enhance building handover practices in public sector construction projects in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Ph.D. thesis, School of the Built Environment, Univ. of Salford.
Hwang, B., X. Zhao, and K. Yang. 2018. “Effect of BIM on rework in construction projects in Singapore: Status quo, magnitude, impact, and strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001600.
Hyun, S., L. Marjanovic-Halburd, R. Raslan, and D. Rovas. 2018. “Bridging the performance gap: Information delivery manual framework to improve life-cycle information availability.” Accessed August 15, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311495556_Bridging_The_Performance_Gap_Information_Delivery_Manual_Framework_To_Improve_Life-Cycle_Information_Availability.
ISO. 2018a. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 1: Concept and principles. ISO 19650-1. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2018b. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 2: Delivery phase of the assets. ISO 19650-2. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2019. Transition guidance to BS EN ISO 19650. ISO 19650-0. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2020a. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 3: Operational phase of the assets. ISO 19650-3. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2020b. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 5: Security-minded approach to information management. ISO 19650-5. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2022. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 4: Information exchange. ISO 19650-4. Geneva: ISO.
Jang, R., and W. Collinge. 2020. “Improving BIM asset and facilities management processes: A mechanical and electrical (M&E) contractor perspective.” J. Build. Eng. 32 (Nov): 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101540.
Jordani, D. 2008. “BIM: A healthy disruption to a fragmented and broken process.” J. Build. Inf. Modell. (Apr): 24–26.
Kang, T. W., and H. S. Choi. 2015. “BIM perspective definition metadata for interworking facility management data.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 29 (4): 958–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.09.004.
Kassem, M., G. Kelly, N. Dawood, M. Serginson, and S. Lockley. 2015. “BIM in facilities management applications: A case study of a large university complex.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 5 (3): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2014-0011.
Kim, K., H. Kim, W. Kim, C. Kim, J. Kim, and J. Yu. 2018. “Integration of IFC objects and facility management work information using semantic web.” Autom. Constr. 87 (Mar): 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.019.
Kim, K. P., and K. S. Park. 2016. “Implication of quantity surveying practice in a BIM enabled environment.” In Paper Presented at the PAQS Congress. Singapore: Pacific Association of Quantity Surveyors.
Kim, S., E. A. Poirier, and S. Staub-French. 2020. “Information commissioning: Bridging the gap between digital and physical built assets.” J. Facil. Manage. 18 (3): 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2020-0024.
Kivits, R. A., and C. Furneaux. 2013. “BIM: Enabling sustainability and asset management through knowledge management.” Sci. World J. 2013 (Aug): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/983721.
Kučera, A., and T. Pitner. 2018. “Semantic BMS: Allowing usage of building automation data in facility benchmarking.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 35 (Jan): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.01.002.
Le, T., C. Le, and H. Jeong. 2018. “Lifecycle data modeling to support transferring project-oriented data to asset-oriented systems in transportation projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (4): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000620.
Malla, V., M. Tummalapudi, and V. Delhi. 2023. “Perceptions of built-environment professionals on using ISO 19650 standards for information management.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 16 (1): 04523045. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1076.
Marmo, R., F. Polverino, M. Nicolella, and A. Tibaut. 2020. “Building performance and maintenance information model based on IFC schema.” Autom. Constr. 118 (Oct): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103275.
Matarneh, S., M. Danso-Amoako, S. Al-Bizri, and M. Gaterell. 2019a. “BIM-based facilities information: Streamlining the information exchange process.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 17 (6): 1304–1322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2019-0048.
Matarneh, S., M. Danso-Amoako, S. Al-Bizri, M. Gaterell, and R. Matarneh. 2019b. “Building information modeling for facilities management: A literature review and future research directions.” J. Build. Eng. 24 (Jul): 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100755.
Miettinen, R., H. Kerosuo, T. Metsälä, and S. Paavola. 2018. “Bridging the lifecycle: A case study on facility management infrastructures and uses of BIM.” J. Facil. Manage. 16 (1): 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2017-0017.
Motamedi, A., I. Iordanova, and D. Forgues. 2018. “FM-BIM preparation method and quality assessment measures.” Accessed August 4, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325905180_FM-BIM_Preparation_Method_and_Quality_Assessment_Measures.
Muhammad, M., and M. Mustapa. 2019. “A review of facilities information requirements towards enhancing building information modeling (BIM) for facilities management (FM).” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 884 (1): 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/884/1/012033.
Naghshbandi, S. 2016. “BIM for facility management: Challenges and research gaps.” Civ. Eng. J. 2 (12): 679–684. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2016-00000067.
NSW Government. 2018. “Information management framework.” Accessed September 25, 2021. https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/IM%20Framework%20infographic_0.pdf.
Ogwueleka, A. 2015. “Upgrading from the use of 2D CAD systems to BIM technologies in the construction industry: Consequences and merits.” Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 28 (8): 403–411. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V28P277.
Patacas, J., N. Dawood, and M. Kassem. 2020. “BIM For facilities management: A framework and a common data environment using open standards.” Autom. Constr. 120 (Dec): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103366.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., X. Gao, C. Eastman, and A. Self. 2018. “Planning and developing facility management-enabled building information model (FM-enabled BIM).” Autom. Constr. 87 (Mar): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.004.
Pulla, V. 2016. “An introduction to the grounded theory approach in social research.” Int. J. Social Work Hum. Serv. Pract. 4 (4): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.13189/ijrh.2016.040401.
RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects). 2020. “RIBA plan of work.” Accessed December 23, 2022. https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/riba-plan-of-work.
Ruiz-Zafra, A., K. Benghazi, and M. Noguera. 2022. “IFC+: Towards the integration of IoT into early stages of building design.” Autom. Constr. 136 (Apr): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104129.
Shalabi, F., and Y. Turkan. 2016. “IFC BIM-based facility management approach to optimize data collection for corrective maintenance.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (1): 04016081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000941.
Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 1–456. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.
Vanlande, R., C. Nicolle, and C. Cruz. 2008. “IFC and building lifecycle management.” Autom. Constr. 18 (1): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.001.
Victoria State Government, Premier and Cabinet 2019. “Information management framework.” Accessed September 25, 2021. https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-07/IM-FMW-01-Information-Management-Framework.pdf.
Wang, K., C. Zhang, F. Guo, and S. Guo. 2022. “Toward efficient construction process: What drives BIM professionals to collaborate in BIM-enabled projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001056.
Whyte, J., C. Lindkvist, and N. Ibrahim. 2013. “From projects into operations: Lessons for data handover.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Manage. Procure. Law 166 (2): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.11.00028.
Xu, J., W. Lu, and E. Papadonikolaki. 2022. “Human-organization-technology (HOT) fit model for BIM adoption in construction project organizations: Impact factor analysis using social network analysis and comparative case study.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001013.
Yang, X., and S. Ergan. 2017. “BIM for FM: Information requirements to support HVAC-related corrective maintenance.” J. Archit. Eng. 23 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000272.
Zadeh, P., G. Wang, H. Cavka, S. Staub-French, and R. Pottinger. 2017. “Information quality assessment for facility management.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 33 (Aug): 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.003.
Zhang, T. 2019. “Investigating the effectiveness of BIM-BMS integration on managing existing building facilities: A New Zealand educational building case.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland Univ. of Technology.
Zou, Y., B. H. W. Guo, E. Papadonikolaki, J. Dimyadi, and L. Hou. 2023. “Lessons learned on adopting automated compliance checking in AEC industry: A global study.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (4): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5051.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 5September 2024

History

Received: Apr 5, 2023
Accepted: Dec 22, 2023
Published online: May 24, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Architect, Dept. of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2270-0126. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-2873. Email: [email protected]
Khalid Naji, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share