Abstract

Facing budgetary limitations and deteriorating infrastructure, government agencies and municipalities are contemplating a shift from reactive maintenance and repair (M&R) approaches to preventive M&R for road infrastructure. However, ambiguities concerning the long-term returns of preventive M&R for road systems deter their commitment to this transition. Although previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of preventive M&R, a comprehensive understanding of its value remains insufficient, particularly considering budget restrictions, varying levels of required serviceability, the types of preventive treatments, and the extent of preventive M&R. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the economic impact of preventive treatments over the lifespan of urban highways, taking an urban highway in South Korea as a case study. The analysis results reveal a significant decrease in costs beginning after the first decade of the systematic applications of preventive M&R, with potential savings ranging between 20% and 30% over a half-century period. The findings will inform road M&R agencies or municipalities about cost profiles when employing preventive treatment methods (PTMs) for road M&R, thereby facilitating PTM implementation to reduce long-term road M&R budgets.

Practical Applications

Government agencies and municipalities, grappling with limited budgets and aging road infrastructure, increasingly are considering preventive maintenance and repair (M&R) strategies over traditional reactive approaches. This shift, although promising, faces uncertainties regarding its long-term economic benefits. Prior research has underscored the advantages of preventive M&R, but a thorough understanding of its financial implications, particularly in the context of budget limitations, diverse serviceability needs, and various preventive measures, still is lacking. This study bridges this gap by evaluating the economic impact of preventive M&R on urban highways, using a South Korean urban highway as a case study. Our findings indicate a notable reduction in costs, especially after the first decade, with potential savings of 20%–30% over 50 years. These results offer crucial insights for road maintenance agencies and municipalities, presenting a clear cost–benefit analysis of implementing preventive M&R strategies. Such information is pivotal in aiding these entities to make informed decisions, potentially leading to significant reductions in long-term road maintenance budgets.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data, models, or codes used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The unit cost data for road pavement treatments can be accessed from the public on the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MoLIT)’s official website at http://www.molit.go.kr.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant Program (No. 2018R1A6A1A08025348) and the Basic Science Research Program (No. 2022R1I1A1A01063934) funded by the Ministry of Education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.

References

Abu-Samra, S., M. Ahmed, and L. Amador. 2020. “Asset management framework for integrated municipal infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (4): 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000580.
Ali, A., Y. Mehta, and G. Shackil. 2019. Laboratory performance evaluation of pavement preservation alternatives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ.
Amarasiri, S., and B. Muhunthan. 2020. “Evaluating cost effectiveness and optimal timing of pavement preventive-maintenance treatments in wet-freeze climates.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 146 (3): 04020050. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000199.
Anderson, R. M., P. B. Blankenship, A. Zeinali, G. N. King, and D. I. Hanson. 2014. Optimal timing of preventive maintenance for addressing environmental aging in hot-mix asphalt pavements, 1–124. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
APA (Asphalt Pavement Alliance). 2010. Pavement type selection, IM-45. Lanham, MD: APA.
Arif, F., M. E. Bayraktar, and A. G. Chowdhury. 2016. “Decision support framework for infrastructure maintenance investment decision making.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1): 04015030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000372.
ASCE. 2021. 2021 report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Babashamsi, P., N. I. Md Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N. G. Md Nor, and H. S. Jenatabadi. 2016. “Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: Review and analysis.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (4): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.004.
Badri, A., A. N. Niazi, and S. M. Hoseini. 2012. “Long term preventive generation maintenance scheduling with network constraints.” Energy Procedia 14 (Jan): 1889–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1184.
Cereceda, D., C. Medel-Vera, M. Ortiz, and J. Tramon. 2022. “Roughness and condition prediction models for airfield pavements using digital image processing.” Autom. Constr. 139 (Jul): 104325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104325.
Chen, X., H. Zhu, Q. Dong, and B. Huang. 2017. “Optimal thresholds for pavement preventive maintenance treatments using LTPP data.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 143 (6): 04017018. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000044.
del Campo Yañez, J. M., M. M. J. Lee, and O. Swei. 2023. “Sustainable infrastructure is a two-way street: Balancing environmental and condition performance goals.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (3): 05023004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5225.
Dong, Q., X. Chen, B. Huang, and X. Gu. 2018. “Analysis of the influence of materials and construction practices on slurry seal performance using LTPP data.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 144 (4): 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000069.
Federal Highway Administration. 2016. Measuring the economic benefits of transportation investments: Skills, data, and opportunities. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Guo, F., H. Azarijafari, J. Gregory, and R. Kirchain. 2021. “Environmental and economic evaluations of treatment strategies for pavement network performance-based planning.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 99 (Oct): 103016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103016.
Haider, S. W., and M. B. Dwaikat. 2011. “Estimating optimum timing for preventive maintenance treatment to mitigate pavement roughness.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2235 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2235-06.
Hall, K. D., S. Beam, and M. Lee. 2006. Pavement design guide design input evaluation study, 1–254. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Haylen, A. 2019. Local roads maintenance in England. London: House of Commons.
Heintz, J., P. Robert, and G.-P. Heidi. 2009. How infrastructure investments support the us economy: Employment, productivity and growth. Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute.
Hettiarachchi, C., J. Yuan, S. Amirkhanian, and F. Xiao. 2023. “Measurement of pavement unevenness and evaluation through the IRI parameter—An overview.” Measurement 206 (Mar): 112284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112284.
Hicks, R. G., J. S. Moulthrop, and J. Daleiden. 2000. Selecting a preventive maintenance treatment for flexible pavements, 1–43. Washington, DC: Foundation for Pavement Preservation.
IRF (International Road Federation). 2019. Value of transport infrastructure: How transportation infrastructure drives economic growth. Washington, DC: IRF.
Jackson, D. J. 2001. Pavement preventive maintenance guidelines. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ.
Jia, Y., X. Dai, S. Wang, Y. Gao, J. Wang, and W. Zhou. 2020. “Evaluation of long-term effectiveness of preventive maintenance treatments using LTPP SPS-3 experiment data.” Constr. Build. Mater. 247 (May): 118585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118585.
Jia, Y., S. Wang, A. Huang, Y. Gao, J. Wang, and W. Zhou. 2021. “A comparative long-term effectiveness assessment of preventive maintenance treatments under various environmental conditions.” Constr. Build. Mater. 273 (May): 121717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121717.
KICT (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology). 2022. Development of Jeju pavement maintenance and management technology for the regional characteristics of Jeju island, 1–176. Gyeonggi-do, South Korea: KICT.
KICT (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology). 2023. “KICT cost engineering & management center.” [In Korean.] Accessed May 24, 2023. https://cost.kict.re.kr/#/.
Kim, K. 2022. “Development of a pavement cutter for eco-friendly road excavation construction.” Korean J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 23 (6): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2022.23.6.111.
KRIHS (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements). 2011. A study on the improvement of the investment evaluation guidelines for transportation facilities (road sector) final report, 1–405. Sejong, South Korea: KRIHS.
Krogh, A. 2024. “Snazzy maps.” Accessed November 1, 2023. https://snazzymaps.com/.
Kwon, H. 2020. “Maintenance budget savings possible through preventive management of roads and other infrastructure.” Daehan News, November 28, 2023.
León Izeppi, E., A. Morrison, G. W. Flintsch, and K. K. McGhee. 2015. Best practices and performance assessment for preventive maintenance treatments for Virginia pavements. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research.
Li, J., F. Xiao, L. Zhang, and S. N. Amirkhanian. 2019. “Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 233 (May): 1182–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061.
Mamlouk, M. S., and M. Dosa. 2014. “Verification of effectiveness of chip seal as a pavement preventive maintenance treatment using LTPP data.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (10): 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.893318.
Mun, J., and S. Yun. 2023. “Analyzing planning performance of road construction projects using preliminary feasibility analysis data.” Korean J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 24 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2023.24.1.003.
NZ Transport Agency. 2009. The implications of discount rate reductions on transport investments and sustainable transport futures, 1–152. Wellington, New Zealand: NZ Transport Agency.
Peshkin, D. G., and T. E. Hoerner. 2005. Pavement preservation: Practices, research plans, and initiatives. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Piryonesi, S. M., and T. E. El-Diraby. 2021. “Examining the relationship between two road performance indicators: Pavement condition index and international roughness index.” Transp. Geotech. 26 (May): 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100441.
Pleeter, S. 1980. “Methodologies of economic impact analysis: An overview.” In Economic impact analysis: Methodology and applications, 7–31. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Prasad, J. R., S. Kanuganti, P. N. Bhanegaonkar, A. K. Sarkar, and S. Arkatkar. 2013. “Development of relationship between roughness (IRI) and visible surface distresses: A study on PMGSY roads.” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 104 (Dec): 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.125.
Rioja, F. 2013. “What is the value of infrastructure maintenance? A survey.” Infrastruct. Land Policies 13 (May): 347–365.
Ruiz, A., and J. Guevara. 2020. “Environmental and economic impacts of road infrastructure development: Dynamic considerations and policies.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000755.
Sayers, M. W. 1995. “On the calculation of international roughness index from longitudinal road profile.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1 (50): 1.
Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. 1998. The little book of profiling: Basic information about measuring and interpreting road profiles. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Seoul City. 2017. Seoul road pavement basic plan, 1–729. Seoul: Seoul City.
Shiboub, I., and G. J. Assaf. 2022. “System dynamic model for sustainable road rehabilitation integrating technical, economic, and environmental considerations.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (5): 04022041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001060.
Shin, J., S. Moon, B. Cho, S. Hwang, and B. Choi. 2022. “Extended technology acceptance model to explain the mechanism of modular construction adoption.” J. Cleaner Prod. 342 (May): 130963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130963.
Simões, D., A. Almeida-Costa, and A. Benta. 2017. “Preventive maintenance of road pavement with microsurfacing—An economic and sustainable strategy.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 11 (9): 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1302023.
Smith, T. M. 1994. “The impact of highway infrastructure on economic performance.” Public Roads 57 (4): 8–14.
Surbakti, M. S., and P. Ginting. 2020. “Comparison of road inequality values using roughometer III and roadroid applications.” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 801 (1): 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012026.
Torres-Machi, C., E. Pellicer, V. Yepes, and A. Chamorro. 2017. “Towards a sustainable optimization of pavement maintenance programs under budgetary restrictions.” J. Cleaner Prod. 148 (Mar): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.100.
Uhm, M., G. Shin, H. Kim, N. Kim, and H. Kim. 2023. “Evaluating the economic impact of preventive treatment strategies for municipal highways.” In Computing in civil engineering 2023, 1097–1104. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485248.13.
Walls, J., and R. M. Smith. 1998. “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: In search of better investment.” In Pavement devision interim technical bulletin. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Yepes, V., C. Torres-Machi, A. Chamorro, and E. Pellicer. 2016. “Optimal pavement maintenance programs based on a hybrid greedy randomized adaptive search procedure algorithm.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 22 (4): 540–550. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1120770.
Yoon, Y., H. Shah, M. Hastak, and J. Lee. 2014. “Leveling process of annual budgetary requirements for pavement preservation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (1): 04013004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000140.
Yu, Y., and L. Sun. 2018. “Effect of overlay thickness, overlay material, and pre-overlay treatment on evolution of asphalt concrete overlay roughness in LTPP SPS-5 experiment: A multilevel model approach.” Constr. Build. Mater. 162 (Feb): 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.039.
Zhang, Y., and L. Cheng. 2023. “The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK.” Transp. Policy 133 (Mar): 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 4July 2024

History

Received: Aug 29, 2023
Accepted: Feb 1, 2024
Published online: May 6, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 6, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei Univ., 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0922-2595. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei Univ., 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8825-2946. Email: [email protected]
Hyoungkwan Kim [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei Univ., 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., 574 Ross St., College Station, TX 77840. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-1869. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei Univ., 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-3785. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share