Technical Papers
Dec 30, 2023

Stakeholders’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions of Adopting Modular Integrated Construction for Sustainable Development in Hong Kong

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 2

Abstract

Modular construction has been hailed as an innovative construction approach for overcoming labor shortages, the aging workforce, and low productivity in the construction industry. Previous studies focused on the technical aspects, but few contextualized modular construction in sustainable development (SD), nor analyzed stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward adopting modular construction for SD. This paper develops a three-level knowledge-attitude-intention model to examine stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and intentions from technical, economic, social, and environmental aspects. The empirical research was conducted through a questionnaire survey with 197 stakeholders in the Hong Kong construction industry. The results indicate inconsistent knowledge, polarized attitudes, and high intention of stakeholders toward modular construction for SD in Hong Kong. The statistical analysis results show stakeholder differentials lead to differences in stakeholders’ knowledge and attitudes about modular construction for SD, but no statistically significant difference was found in behavioral intentions. Besides, knowledge and attitudes were found to be significantly correlated to intention on modular construction for SD. The stakeholder knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward modular construction for SD were considered to be complex sociotechnical systems, which led to varied articulations of the dialectics and complexities of modular construction for SD. The study contributes to the literature with systems thinking by scrutinizing institution-demand-supply-regulatory collaborations and partnerships, integrating the ontological, axiological, and epistemological understanding of stakeholders, revealing dialectic of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes and intentions, and reviewing multifaceted and interwoven technical, economic, social, and environmental aspects of modular construction for SD. Practical implications are provided to enable the exchange of knowledge on innovative modular construction for SD with institutions and industry, shape the attitude of industry and society stakeholders toward sustainability, and encourage the practice of innovation-driven SD.

Practical Applications

Practical applications could be further imposed to enhance the knowledge, shape the attitudes, and encourage the intentions about adopting modular construction for SD in Hong Kong as follows: To enhance the knowledge of modular construction for SD, the understanding of sociotechnical systems of modular construction coupled with economic, social, and environmental sustainability of modular construction is recommended. Industry councils are recommended to publish guidelines on the technical solutions for achieving a sustainable built environment through modular construction. Industry pioneers and practitioners are encouraged to demonstrate and share the feasibility and benefits of applying modular construction for the public and other industry stakeholder groups. Regarding knowledge acquisition-sharing-application mechanism, the relationships between institutions and other stakeholder groups should be enhanced and strengthened by an institution-demand-supply-regulatory partnership. This enhancement would be beneficial for knowledge transfer and able to bridge academic outcomes with industry needs. In terms of attitudes, the government and developers are encouraged to collaborate with universities and professionals to raise awareness of the sustainability of modular construction for SD in urban development. Government departments should formulate more legislation and initiatives to change current unwillingness and negative attitudes toward modular construction for SD, especially social sustainability. Thus, promoting corporate social responsibilities of adopting modular construction for SD through public media should be considered to raise the industry’s interests and the general public’s awareness. Enhancing stakeholders’ intentions should be addressed and emphasized at the current stage to guide and encourage the adoption of modular construction for SD in the future. Engaging a policy mix that includes carrot, cusp, and stick policies is recommended to achieve feasible and effective enhancement toward stakeholders’ intentions and practices of modular construction for SD. The policy mix includes carrot policies (tax incentives, rebates, and grants), cusp policies, which are neither clearly carrot nor stick, but often have a leaning toward one or other (loans and improved rental/selling rights), and stick policies (minimum standards and mandatory disclosure).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Collaborative Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Project No. C7047-20G) and the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Exchange Project Fund of the University of Hong Kong (Project No. 007300010). Also acknowledged are participants in the questionnaire survey.

References

Adams, W. M. 2006. “The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century.” IUCN. Accessed January 29, 2006http://www.iucn.org/members/future_sustainability/docs/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf.
Ajzen, I. 1985. “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior.” In Action control, 11–39. Berlin: Springer.
Ajzen, I. 1991. “The theory of planned behavior.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 2000. “Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes.” Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 11 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116.
Ali, A. H., A. F. Kineber, A. Elyamany, A. H. Ibrahim, and A. O. Daoud. 2023. “Modelling the role of modular construction’s critical success factors in the overall sustainable success of Egyptian housing projects.” J. Build. Eng. 71 (Jul): 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106467.
Altheide, D. L. 1987. “Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis.” Qual. Sociol. 10 (1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269.
Arshad, H., and T. Zayed. 2022. “Critical influencing factors of supply chain management for modular integrated construction.” Autom. Constr. 144 (Dec): 104612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104612.
Backer, T. E. 1991. “Knowledge utilization.” Knowledge 12 (3): 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709101200303.
Bagozzi, R. P., H. Baumgartner, and Y. Yi. 1992. “State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage.” J. Consum. Res. 18 (4): 505. https://doi.org/10.1086/209277.
Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change.” Psychol. Rev. 84 (Jun): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
BCA (Building and construction Authority). 2023. “The PPVC acceptance framework, building construction authority, Singapore.” Accessed December 2, 2023. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/ppvc-acceptance-framework.
Berardi, U. 2012. “Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings” Sustainable Dev. 20 (6): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.532.
Blismas, N. G., M. Pendlebury, A. Gibb, and C. Pasquire. 2005. “Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 1 (3): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2005.9684590.
Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our common future, World commission on environment and development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Building Department. 2019a. Exemption of gross floor area for buildings adopting modular integrated construction. Hong Kong: Building Department.
Building Department. 2019b. Second package of incentives to promote green and innovative buildings. Hong Kong: Building Department.
Cao, X., X. Li, Y. Zhu, and Z. Zhang. 2015. “A comparative study of environmental performance between prefabricated and traditional residential buildings in China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 109 (Jun): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.120.
Chen, Y., G. E. Okudan, and D. R. Riley. 2010. “Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings.” Autom. Constr. 19 (2): 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004.
CIC (Consruction Industry Council). 2019. Guidelines on the statutory requirements for modular integrated construction projects. Nappanee, IN: International Code Council.
Dodge, Y. 2008. “Kruskal-Wallis test.” In Concise encyclopedia statistics, 288–290. New York: Springer.
Fazio, R. H., and M. P. Zanna. 1981. “Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency.” Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 14 (Aug): 161–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X.
Fishbein, M. A., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison Wesley.
Flohr, B. 2009. The relationship between knowledge and experience in the nineteenth century, 1–12. Hanover, Germany: Leibniz Universität Hannover.
Friedman, A. L., and S. Miles. 2002. “Developing stakeholder theory.” J. Manage. Stud. 39 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280.
Haskell, R. E. 2021. Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hulme, M. 2018. “‘Gaps’ in climate change knowledge.” Environ. Humanit. 10 (1): 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4385599.
Hungerford, H. R., and T. L. Volk. 1990. “Changing learner behavior through environmental education.” J. Environ. Educ. 21 (3): 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743.
International Code Council and Modular Building Institute. 2021. Standard for off-site construction: Planning, design, fabrication and assembly. Nappanee, IN: International Code Council.
Javed, A., W. Pan, L. Chen, and W. Zhan. 2018. “A systemic exploration of drivers for and constraints on construction productivity enhancement.” Built. Environ. Project Asset Manage. 8 (3): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0099.
Jiang, Y., M. Li, M. Li, X. Liu, R. Y. Zhong, W. Pan, and G. Q. Huang. 2022. “Digital twin-enabled real-time synchronization for planning, scheduling, and execution in precast on-site assembly.” Autom. Constr. 141 (Jun): 104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104397.
Locke, J. 1997. An essay concerning human understanding. Edited by R. W. House. London: Penguin.
Luo, L. Z., C. Mao, L. Y. Shen, and Z. D. Li. 2015. “Risk factors affecting practitioners’ attitudes toward the implementation of an industrialized building system a case study from China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (6): 622–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2014-0048.
MacDonald, M. A., and L. W. Green. 2001. “Reconciling concept and context: The dilemma of implementation in school-based health promotion.” Health Educ. Behav. 28 (6): 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810102800607.
Mao, C., F. Xie, L. Hou, P. Wu, J. Wang, and X. Wang. 2016. “Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China.” Habitat Int. 57 (Jun): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.002.
McFerran, B. 2015. “Social norms, beliefs, and health.” In Behavior economics public health, 133–160. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
MHURD (The Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development). 2017. “Standard for Assessment of Prefabricated Building.” [In Chinese.] The Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development, China. Accessed December 2, 2023. http://zjj.ordos.gov.cn/ywgz_123518/jnkj_123558/202006/P020200627407807094782.pdf.
Missonier, S., and S. Loufrani-Fedida. 2014. “Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.010.
Modular Building Institute. 2015. Improving construction efficiency and productivity with modular construction. Charlottesville, VA: Modular Building Institute.
Mulej, M., M. Bastic, J. Belak, J. Knez-Riedl, M. Pivka, V. Potocan, M. Rebernik, D. Urⓢiⓒ, Z. Zenko, and N. Mulej. 2003. “Informal systems thinking or systems theory.” Cybern. Syst. 34 (2): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969720302868.
Musa, M. F., M. F. Mohammad, M. R. Yusof, and R. Mahbub. 2015. “The way forward for industrialised building system (IBS) in Malaysia.” In Proc., CIEC 2014, 163–175. Berlin: Springer.
Pan, M., and W. Pan. 2020. “Knowledge, attitude and practice towards zero carbon buildings: Hong Kong case.” J. Cleaner Prod. 274 (Dec): 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122819.
Pan, W., L. Chen, and W. Zhan. 2019a. “PESTEL analysis of construction productivity enhancement strategies: A case study of three economies.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 05018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000662.
Pan, W., A. F. Gibb, and A. R. J. Dainty. 2007. “Perspective of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (2): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600827058.
Pan, W., and Y. Ning. 2015. “The dialectics of sustainable building.” Habitat Int. 48 (Jun): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.004.
Pan, W., D. Parker, and M. Pan. 2023. “Problematic interfaces and prevention strategies in modular construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (2): 05023001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5083.
Pan, W., and R. Sidwell. 2011. “Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (11): 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.637938.
Pan, W., Y. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Luo, and S. Chan. 2019b. Modularisation for modernisation: A strategy paper rethinking Hong Kong construction. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
Pan, W., and Z. Zhang. 2023. “Benchmarking the sustainability of concrete and steel modular construction for buildings in urban development.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 90 (2): 104400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104400.
Pan, W., Z. Q. Zhang, M. C. Xie, and T. Ping. 2020a. Modular integrated construction performance measurement: Guidebook. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
Pan, W., Z. Q. Zhang, M. C. Xie, and T. Y. Ping. 2020b. Modular integrated construction for high-rises: Measured success. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
Pan, W., Z. Q. Zhang, and Y. Yang. 2020c. A glossary of modular integrated construction. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
Ping, T., W. Pan, and B. Mou. 2022. “An innovative type of module-to-core wall connections for high-rise steel modular buildings.” J. Build. Eng. 62 (5): 105425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105425.
Policy Address. 2023. “The chief executive’s 2023 policy address, Hong Kong SAR.” Accessed December 2, 2023. https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2023/en/policy.html.
Rodríguez-Rey, M., et al. 2016. “A comprehensive database of quality-rated fossil ages for Sahul’s Quaternary vertebrates.” Sci. Data 3 (1): 1–7.
Rogan, A. L., R. M. Lawson, and N. Bates-Brkljac. 2000. Value and benefits assessment of modular construction. Ascot, UK: Steel Construction Institute.
Rogers, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Shan, S., and W. Pan. 2022. “Collapse mechanisms of multi-story steel-framed modular structures under fire scenarios.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 196 (Sep): 107419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107419.
Shen, W., B. Choi, S. Lee, W. Tang, and C. T. Haas. 2018. “How to improve interface management behaviors in EPC projects: Roles of formal practices and social norms.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 04018032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000639.
Sheskin, D. J. 2020. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. London: CRC Press.
Sterman, J. D. 2004. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Toh, Y. Z., Y. M. Goh, and B. H. W. Guo. 2017. “Knowledge, attitude, and practice of design for safety: Multiple stakeholders in the Singapore construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (5): 04016131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001279.
Tsz Wai, C., P. Wai Yi, O. Ibrahim Olanrewaju, S. Abdelmageed, M. Hussein, S. Tariq, and T. Zayed. 2023. “A critical analysis of benefits and challenges of implementing modular integrated construction.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 23 (4): 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1907525.
Tugwell, P. 2006. “Systematic reviews and knowledge translation.” Bull. World Health Organ. 84 (8): 643–651. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.05.026658.
United Nations. 2022. The sustainable development goals: Report 2022. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Valente, T. W., P. Paredes, and P. R. Poppe. 1998. “Matching the message to the process the relative ordering of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in behavior change research.” Hum. Commun. Res. 24 (3): 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00421.x.
Wessman, W. L. 2006. The nature of thought: Maturity of mind. New York: University Press of America.
Wiederhold, M., and L. F. Martinez. 2018. “Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: The attitude-behaviour gap in the green apparel industry.” Int. J. Consum. Stud. 42 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12435.
Wuni, I. Y., and G. Q. Shen. 2020a. “Barriers to the adoption of modular integrated construction: Systematic review and meta-analysis, integrated conceptual framework, and strategies.” J. Cleaner Prod. 249 (Jan): 119347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119347.
Wuni, I. Y., and G. Q. Shen. 2020b. “Fuzzy modelling of the critical failure factors for modular integrated construction projects.” J. Cleaner Prod. 264 (Jun): 121595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121595.
Wuni, I. Y., and G. Q. Shen. 2022. “Towards a decision support for modular integrated construction: An integrative review of the primary decision-making actors.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 22 (5): 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1668633.
Wuni, I. Y., G. Q. Shen, and R. Osei-Kyei. 2020. “Quantitative evaluation and ranking of the critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 10 (Jun): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1766190.
Xu, Z., T. Zayed, and Y. Niu. 2020. “Comparative analysis of modular construction practices in mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore.” J. Cleaner Prod. 245 (Aug): 118861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118861.
Yang, Y., M. Pan, and W. Pan. 2019. “Co-evolution of innovative building technologies through interaction: The case of modular integrated construction and robotics.” Autom. Constr. 2018 (1): 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102932.
Yang, Y., M. Pan, and W. Pan. 2022. “Integrated offsite logistics scheduling approach for high-rise modular building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (6): 04022032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002280.
Yang, Y., M. Pan, W. Pan, and Z. Zhang. 2021. “Sources of uncertainties in offsite logistics of modular construction for high-rise building projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000905.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research design and methods. New York: SAGE.
Zhang, Z., M. O. Wong, and W. Pan. 2023. “Virtual reality enhanced multi-role collaboration in crane-lift training for modular construction.” Autom. Constr. 150 (Jun): 104848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104848.
Zheng, L., K. Chen, and L. Ma. 2021. “Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward COVID-19 among construction industry practitioners in China.” Front. Public Health 8 (Jan): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.599769.
Zhu, A., Z. Zhang, and W. Pan. 2023. “Technologies, levels and directions of crane-lift automation in construction.” Autom. Constr. 153 (Sep): 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104960.
Zlokovich, M. S., D. P. Corts, and M. M. Rogers. 2023. “Descriptive and inferential statistics.” In Cambridge handbook research methods statistics social behavior science, 468–493. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 2March 2024

History

Received: Apr 19, 2023
Accepted: Oct 11, 2023
Published online: Dec 30, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 30, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Wenting Zhan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Business School, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-3073. Email: [email protected]
Winnie Law, Ph.D. [email protected]
Deputy Director and Principal Lecturer, Centre for Civil Society and Governance, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. Email: [email protected]
Haipeng Shen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Business and Economics, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share