Turning Pressure into Power: The Configuration Effect of Antecedents on the Digital Transformation of Engineering Enterprises
Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 1
Abstract
Institutional environment shapes the success of enterprise digital transformation, but its impact pathways, to our best knowledge, have received relatively little investigation, particularly in the fields of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC). Grounded in neoinstitutional theory, this study conducted a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of the effects of institutional pressure on digital transformation. The study yielded three results. First, the interaction of coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures can drive the digital transformation of AEC enterprises. For example, facing the digital delivery requirements of stakeholders and the pressure of digital collaboration in the supply chain, digital leaders in an enterprise will quickly apply internal pressure to raise the digitalization level. Also, in a highly competitive industry environment, the pressure to imitate the excellent digital transformation strategies of other enterprises comes with it. In a less competitive environment, however, digital leaders are the main pressure source to promote the digital transformation of enterprises. Second, we find that stakeholder vision, supply chain collaboration needs, and digital leaders are the key sources of digital transformation pressure. Third, high or low digitization levels cannot simply be explained by the opposite cause. Offering a new understanding of coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures on the complex digital transformation pathways of AEC enterprises, this study has implications for enterprises formulating digital transformation strategies.
Practical Applications
The findings point to the importance of corporate strategic change in the current digital environment, identify the institutional factors driving digital transformation, and will help AEC industry enterprises with different main businesses to respond to institutional pressures and improve the effectiveness of digital transformation through more targeted measures. This study can assist engineering enterprises around the world to develop digital transformation strategies. By exploring the complex causal relationships between the institutional environment and the digital transformation of engineering enterprises, this study provides a strong empirical foundation for new initiatives and policies to achieve high digitalization levels.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the following funding sources: 2022 Shenzhen University Stability Support Plan, China (20220618105642001), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72174140).
References
Aaltonen, K., and R. Sivonen. 2009. “Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (2): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.007.
Adner, R., P. Puranuam, and F. Zhu. 2019. “What is different about digital strategy? From quantitative to qualitative change.” Strategy Sci. 4 (4): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0099.
Adomako, S., and M. D. Tran. 2022. “Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 31 (4): 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2977.
Ahn, Y. H., Y. H. Kwak, and S. J. Suk. 2016. “Contractors’ transformation strategies for adopting building information modeling.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1): 05015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000390.
Alnuaimi, B. K., S. K. Singh, S. Ren, P. Budhwar, and D. Vorobyev. 2022. “Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy.” J. Bus. Res. 145 (Jun): 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038.
Badewi, A., and E. Shehab. 2016. “The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: Neo-institutional theory perspective.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (3): 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.002.
Bhakoo, V., and T. Choi. 2013. “The iron cage exposed: Institutional pressures and heterogeneity across the healthcare supply chain.” J. Oper. Manage. 31 (6): 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.016.
Campbell, J. T., D. G. Sirmon, and M. Schijven. 2016. “Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements.” Acad. Manage. J. 59 (1): 163–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0663.
Cao, D., H. Li, and G. Wang. 2014. “Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (12): 04014056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903.
Chedrawi, C., A. Osta, and S. Osta. 2020. “CSR in the Lebanese banking sector: A neo-institutional approach to stakeholders’ legitimacy.” J. Asia Bus. Stud. 14 (2): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2018-0093.
Chen, H., and Z. Tian. 2022. “Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach.” J. Bus. Res. 139 (Jun): 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.048.
Chen, Y. S., and C. H. Chang. 2013. “The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity.” J. Bus. Ethics 116 (Aug): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x.
Chizema, A., and T. Buck. 2006. “Neo-institutional theory and institutional change: Towards empirical tests on the ‘Americanization’ of German executive pay.” Int. Bus. Rev. 15 (5): 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.05.007.
Criado-Perez, C., G. A. Shinkle, M. A. Höllerer, A. Sharma, C. Collins, N. Gardner, M. H. Haeusler, and S. Pan. 2022. “Digital transformation in the Australian AEC industry: Prevailing issues and prospective leadership thinking.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (1): 05021012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002214.
Dimaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1991. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” Am. Sociol. Rev. 48 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
Du, Y., and L. Jia. 2017. “Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): A new way of management research.” [In Chinese.] J. Manage. World. 6 (12): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2017.06.012.
Eadie, R., M. Browne, H. Odeyinka, C. McKeown, and S. McNiff. 2013. “BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis.” Autom. Constr. 36 (1): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001.
Eastman, C., P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2008. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. New York: Wiley.
Ernstsen, S. N., J. Whyte, and C. Thuesen. 2021. “How innovation champions frame the future: Three visions for digital transformation of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (1): 05020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001928.
Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research.” Acad. Manage. J. 54 (2): 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120.
Ganah, A. A., and G. A. John. 2014. “Achieving level 2 BIM by 2016 in the UK.” In Proc., 2014 Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, edited by I. I. Raymond and I. Flood, 143–150. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.019.
Greckhamer, T. 2016. “CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions.” Strategy Manage. J. 37 (4): 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2370.
Gupta, K., D. Crilly, and T. Greckhamer. 2020. “Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective.” Strategy Manage. J. 41 (10): 1869–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3204.
Han, Y., Y. Li, J. E. Taylor, and J. Zhong. 2018. “Characteristics and evolution of innovative collaboration networks in architecture, engineering, and construction: Study of national prize-winning projects in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001499.
Hanelt, A., R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. A. Marante. 2020. “A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change.” J. Manage. Stud. 58 (5): 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639.
He, J., and H. Su. 2022. “Digital transformation and green innovation of Chinese firms: The moderating role of regulatory pressure and international opportunities.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19 (20): 13321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013321.
Hinings, B., T. Gegenhuber, and R. Greenword. 2018. “Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective.” Inf. Organ. 28 (1): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
Ho, S. P., R. Dahal, and H. P. Tserng. 2023. “A contingency model of strategic responses to the institutional challenges in emerging countries: Evidence and findings from least developed countries.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (4): 04023015. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5102.
Hwang, B. G., J. Ngo, and J. Z. K. Teo. 2022. “Challenges and strategies for the adoption of smart technologies in the construction industry: The case of Singapore.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 05021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000986.
Jaworski, B. J., and A. K. Kohli. 1993. “Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences.” J. Mark. 57 (3): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304.
Jha, K. N., and K. C. Lyer. 2006. “Critical determinants of project coordination.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (4): 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.005.
Jiang, R., C. Wu, X. Lei, A. Shemery, K. D. Hampson, and P. Wu. 2022. “Government efforts and roadmaps for building information modeling implementation: Lessons from Singapore, the UK and the US.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (2): 782–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2019-0438.
Judge, W. Q., S. Fainshmidt, and J. L. Brown. 2020. “Institutional systems for equitable wealth creation: Replication and an update of judge et al. (2014).” Manage. Organ. Rev. 16 (Jun): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.1.
Kauppi, K. 2013. “Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research: Review and research suggestions.” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 33 (10): 1318–1345. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2011-0364.
Klos, C., P. Spieth, T. Clauss, and C. Klusmann. 2021. “Digital transformation of incumbent firms: A business model innovation perspective.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 70 (6): 2017–2033. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075502.
Koolwijk, J. S. J., C. J. Van Oel, J. W. F. Wamelink, and R. Vrijhoef. 2018. “Collaboration and integration in project-based supply chains in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000592.
Lee, S., J. Yu, and D. Jeong. 2015. “BIM acceptance model in construction organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252.
Leppänen, P., G. George, and O. Alexy. 2023. “When do novel business models lead to high performance? A configurational approach to value drivers, competitive strategy, and firm environment.” Acad. Manage. J. 66 (1): 164–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.0969.
Li, H., Y. Wu, D. Cao, and Y. Wang. 2021. “Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility.” J. Bus. Res. 122 (Jan): 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.036.
Li, L., F. Su, W. Zhang, and J. Y. Mao. 2017. “Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective.” Inf. Syst. J. 28 (6): 1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12153.
Liao, L., and E. A. L. Teo. 2018. “Organizational change perspective on people management in BIM implementation in building projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000604.
Lines, B. C., K. T. Sullivan, J. B. Smithwick, and J. Mischung. 2015. “Overcoming resistance to change in engineering and construction: Change management factors for owner organizations.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (5): 1170–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.008.
Lu, W., J. Xu, and J. Söderlund. 2020. “Exploring the effects of building information modeling on projects: Longitudinal social network analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (5): 04020037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001823.
Maali, O., N. Kepple, and B. M. Lines. 2022. “Strategies to achieve high adoption of organizational change initiatives within the AEC industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 04022021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001051.
Mahalingam, A., A. K. Yadav, and J. Varaprasad. 2015. “Investigating the role of lean practices in enabling BIM adoption: Evidence from two Indian cases.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (7): 05015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000982.
Matt, C., T. Hess, and A. Benlian. 2015. “Digital transformation strategies.” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57 (Jun): 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” Am. J. Sociol. 83 (2): 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.
Misangyi, V. F., T. Greckhamer, S. Furnari, P. C. Fiss, D. Crilly, and R. Aguilera. 2017. “Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective.” J. Manage. 43 (1): 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2016. The outline of construction informatization development (2016–2020). [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
Nambisan, S. 2017. “Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of a digital culture.” Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 22 (2): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254.
Oliver, J. J., and E. Parrett. 2018. “Managing future uncertainty: Reevaluating the role of scenario planning.” Bus. Horiz. 61 (2): 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.013.
Ozorhon, B., and U. Karahan. 2017. “Critical success factors of building information modeling implementation.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000505.
Porfírio, J. A., T. Carriho, J. A. Felicio, and J. Jardim. 2021. “Leadership characteristics and digital transformation.” J. Bus. Res. 124 (Jan): 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.058.
Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rajendra, S. D., C. K. H. Hon, K. Manley, F. Lamari, and M. Skitmore. 2022. “Key dimensions of the technical readiness of small construction businesses that determine their intention to use ICTs.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (6): 04022055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001078.
Rezgui, Y., and A. Zarli. 2006. “Paving the way to the vision of digital construction: A strategic roadmap.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (7): 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:7(767).
Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2008. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. New York: SAGE.
Samagaio, A., N. F. Crespo, and R. Rodrigues. 2018. “Management control system in high-tech start-ups: An empirical investigation.” J. Bus. Res. 89 (Aug): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.028.
Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2010. “Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets.” Comp. Sociol. 9 (3): 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793.
Schneider, M. R., C. Schulze-Bentrop, and M. Paunescu. 2010. “Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance.” J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41 (2): 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36.
Sezer, A. A., M. Thunberg, and B. Wernicke. 2021. “Digitalization index: Developing a model for assessing the degree of digitalization of construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (10): 04021119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002145.
Shan, B., X. Liu, R. Zhao, and X. Lyu. 2022. “How do organizational capability, organizational innovation and digital transformation stimulate new product development performance?–Configuration effect based on fsQCA.” Res. Dev. Manage. [In Chinese.] 34 (3): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211523.
Sharfman, M. P., and J. W. Dean Jr. 1991. “Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach.” J. Manage. 174 (4): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700403.
Singh, A., P. Klarner, and T. Hess. 2020. “How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters.” Long Range Plan. 53 (3): 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.07.001.
Singh, D., C. Pattnaik, A. S. Gaur, and E. Ketencioglu. 2018. “Corporate expansion during pro-market reforms in emerging markets: The contingent value of group affiliation and unrelated diversification.” J. Bus. Res. 82 (Jan): 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.043.
Skaaning, S. E. 2011. “Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results.” Sociol. Methods Res. 40 (Aug): 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912411140481.
Tavallaei, R., A. Mashayekhi, N. Harrison, M. Talebian, and R. Moser. 2022. “BIM adoption: A case of institutional pressures and top management support.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (9): 04022084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002331.
Tsamenyi, M., J. Cullen, and J. M. G. González. 2006. “Changes in accounting and financial information system in a Spanish electricity company: A new institutional theory analysis.” Manage. Account Res. 17 (4): 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.002.
Wang, T., X. Lin, and F. Sheng. 2022. “Digital leadership and exploratory innovation: From the dual perspectives of strategic orientation and organizational culture.” Front. Psychol. 13 (Sep): 902693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902693.
Wei, F., N. Feng, R. D. Evans, R. Zhao, and S. Yang. 2021. “How do innovation types and collaborative modes drive firm performance? An FsQCA analysis based on evidence from software ecosystems.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 69 (6): 3648–3659. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3102321.
Won, J., G. Lee, C. Dossick, and J. Messner. 2013. “Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000731.
Wong, A. K. D., and R. Zhang. 2013. “Implementation of web-based construction project management system in China projects by Hong Kong developers.” Constr. Innov. 13 (1): 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171311296048.
Xing, M., J. Cao, and D. Cao. 2023. “Impacts of policy mix comprehensiveness on BIM implementation: Moderating effects of environmental state and response uncertainty.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (2): 4022171. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12716.
Xu, J., and W. Lu. 2022. “Developing a human-organization-technology fit model for information technology adoption in organizations.” Technol. Soc. 70 (Aug): 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102010.
Xu, J., W. Lu, and E. Papadonikolaki. 2022. “Human-organization-technology fit model for BIM adoption in construction project organizations: Impact factor analysis using SNA and comparative case study.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001013.
Yeow, A., C. Soh, and R. Hansen. 2018. “Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach.” J. Strategy Inf. Syst. 27 (1): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001.
Ying, Y., X. Zhang, X. Kong, and C. Hu. 2022. “Digital transformation process of manufacturing enterprises: A longitudinal case study.” Res. Dev. Manage. [In Chinese.] 34 (1): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211093.
Yuan, H., and Y. Yang. 2020. “BIM adoption under government subsidy: Technology diffusion perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 04019089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001733.
Zhang, M., and Y. Du. 2019. “Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in management and organization research: Position, tactics, and direction.” Chin. J. Manage. [In Chinese.] 16 (9): 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005.
Zulu, S. L., and F. Khosrowshahi. 2021. “A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 39 (7): 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1930080.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40 • Issue 1 • January 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 12, 2023
Accepted: Aug 25, 2023
Published online: Oct 24, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Comparative studies
- Construction engineering
- Continuum mechanics
- Dynamic pressure
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Energy engineering
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Environmental engineering
- Field tests
- Freight transportation
- Infrastructure
- Logistics
- Methodology (by type)
- Pressure (type)
- Research methods (by type)
- Solid mechanics
- Supply chain management
- Tests (by type)
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.