Unearthing the Difficulties in the Information Management of Disruption Claims
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
Information about disruption events and their impacts is of vital importance in substantiating and resolving disruption claims. However, difficulties in the management of required information create complexities for contracting parties during disruption claims. This study investigated existing difficulties in the collection, storage, access, analysis, and presentation of different categories of required information for disruption claims. For this purpose, semistructured interviews of 22 disruption claim experts in Australia were conducted; the experts have vast experience in the preparation, assessment, and resolution of disruption claims. A total of 56 difficulties were identified in the information management of disruption claims. The results showed that maximum number of difficulties exists in the information collection process (24) and in the category of progress, site, and resource information. There were fewer difficulties (13) in the information storage and access process and in the category of contract information. Site workers being occupied with construction tasks, construction staff leaving projects, extraction of relevant information, incorrect recordings, and time consumption were found to be the most common difficulties in managing the required information for disruption claims. Moreover, the identified difficulties often result in failure to demonstrate the cause and impact and in the rejection of disruption claims. Subsequently, this study sheds light on developing strategies and tools for improving the information management of disruption claims to reduce the complexities faced by contracting parties in the preparation, assessment, and resolution of disruption claims. Additionally, it also contributes to minimize the potential for and impact of disputes in construction projects due to disruption claims.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The financial support provided by the University of Melbourne through the Melbourne Research Scholarship (MRS) to undertake this research is gratefully acknowledged.
References
List of Cases
Centex-Bateson Construction Co., Inc., VABCA Nos. 4,613, 5,162 - 5,165, 99-1, BCA 30,153 (1998).
Clark Construction Co., Inc., VABCA No. 5674, 00-1 BCA 30,870 (2000).
Falkland Islands v. Gordon Forbes Construction (Falklands) Limited (No 2) (2003) Falklands Island Supreme Court.
Hoffman Construction Co. v. US, 40 Fed Cl. 184 (1998) aff’d in part, rev’d in part 178 F.3d 1313.
Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v. Frederick A Hammond & Others (2002) BLR 255.
Walter Lilly & Company Limited v. (1) Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay (2) DMW Developments Limited (2012) EWHC 1773 (TCC).
White Constructions Pty Ltd. v. PBS Holdings Pty Ltd. (2019) NSWSC 1166.
Works Cited
Abd El-Razek, M. E., H. A. Bassioni, and A. M. Mobarak. 2008. “Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (11): 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:11(831).
Aibinu, A. A. 2009. “Avoiding and mitigating delay and disruption claims conflict: Role of precontract negotiation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 1 (1): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1943-4162(2009)1:1(47).
Ali, B., H. Zahoor, A. Aibinu, A. R. Nasir, A. Tariq, U. Imran, and R. M. Khan. 2021. “BIM aided information and visualization repository for managing construction delay claims.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 26 (Dec): 1023–1040. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.054.
Ali, B., H. Zahoor, A. R. Nasir, A. Maqsoom, R. W. A. Khan, and K. M. Mazher. 2020. “BIM-based claims management system: A centralized information repository for extension of time claims.” Autom. Constr. 110 (Feb): 102937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102937.
Arcadis. 2022. “Global construction dispute report.” Accessed July 14, 2022. https://www.arcadis.com/en-au/knowledge-hub/perspectives/global/global-construction-disputes-report.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2020. “Construction work done, Australia, preliminary.” Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/building-and-construction/construction-work-done-australia-preliminary/dec-2020.
Australian Federal Budget. 2020. “Budget 2020-21.” Accessed October 30, 2021. https://budget.gov.au/2020-21/content/overview.htm.
Bilal, M., L. O. Oyedele, J. Qadir, K. Munir, S. O. Ajayi, O. O. Akinade, H. A. Owolabi, H. A. Alaka, and M. Pasha. 2016. “Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 30 (3): 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001.
Bölöni, L., and D. Turgut. 2017. “Value of information based scheduling of cloud computing resources.” Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 71 (Jun): 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.10.024.
Braimah, N., I. Ndekugri, and R. Gameson. 2007. “A systematic methodology for analysing disruption claims.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Conf. on Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2007. Leeds, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Cheung, S. O., and K. H. Y. Pang. 2013. “Anatomy of construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532.
Choo, C. W. 1995. “Information management for the intelligent organization: Roles and implications for the information professions.” In Proc., 1995 Digital Libraries Conf. Singapore: National Computer Board of Singapore.
Choo, C. W. 2002. Information management for the intelligent organization: The art of scanning the environment. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Critchlow, J., A. Farr, S. Briggs, K. Pickavance, and A. Lavers. 2005. “The great delay analysis debate.” In Proc., Society of Construction Law in Association with the Centre of Construction Law and Management. London: King’s College London.
Davison, P., and J. Mullen. 2009. Evaluating contract claims. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Elliott, V. 2018. “Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis.” Qual. Rep. 23 (11): 2850–2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560.
Ellis, P., and K. Desouza. 2009. “On information management, environmental sustainability, and cradle to cradle mentalities: A relationship framework.” Bus. Inf. Rev. 26 (4): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382109349639.
Etikan, I., S. A. Musa, and R. S. Alkassim. 2016. “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling.” Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Feather, J., and P. Sturges. 2003. International encyclopedia of information and library science. London: Routledge.
Gebken, R. J., and G. E. Gibson. 2006. “Quantification of costs for dispute resolution procedures in the construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 132 (3): 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(264).
Grattan Institute. 2020. “Cost overruns in transport infrastructure.” Accessed May 5, 2021. https://grattan.edu.au/report/cost-overruns-in-transport-infrastructure/.
Hanna, A. S., and D. G. Heale. 1994. “Factors affecting construction productivity: Newfoundland versus rest of Canada.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 21 (4): 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1139/l94-066.
Hanna, A. S., W. B. Lotfallah, and M. J. Lee. 2002. “Statistical-fuzzy approach to quantify cumulative impact of change orders.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 16 (4): 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:4(252).
Hewitt, A. 2016. Construction claims and responses: Effective writing and presentation. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hill, C. E., S. Knox, B. J. Thompson, E. N. Williams, S. A. Hess, and N. Ladany. 2005. “Consensual qualitative research: An update.” J. Counseling Psychol. 52 (2): 196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.
Ibbs, W. 1997. “Quantitative impacts of project change: Size issues.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 123 (3): 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(308).
Jaselskis, E. J., M. R. Anderson, C. T. Jahren, Y. Rodriguez, and S. Njos. 1995. “Radio-frequency identification applications in construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 121 (2): 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:2(189).
Klanac, G. P., and E. L. Nelson. 2004. “Trends in construction lost productivity claims.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 130 (3): 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:3(226).
Lavrakas, P. J. 2008. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Leonard, C., P. Fazio, and O. Moselhi. 1988. “Construction productivity: Major causes of impact.” AACE Int. Trans. 7: 101–107.
Li, Y., and C. Liu. 2019. “Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 19 (5): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452101.
Love, P. E., C. P. Sing, X. Wang, Z. Irani, and D. W. Thwala. 2014. “Overruns in transportation infrastructure projects.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (2): 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.715173.
Mayring, P. 2004. “Qualitative content analysis.” Companion Qual. Res. 1 (2): 159–176.
Mehany, M. S., M. Hashem, G. Bashettiyavar, B. Esmaeili, and G. Gad. 2018. “Claims and project performance between traditional and alternative project delivery methods.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000266.
Morse, J. M. 1994. “Designing funded qualitative research.” In Handbook of qualitative research, 220–235. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pickavance, K. 2005. Delay and disruption in construction contracts. Milton, UK: Routledge.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and J. M. de la Garza. 2012. “Comparative analysis of design-bid-build and design-build from the standpoint of claims.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World. Reston, VA: Construction Institute of ASCE.
Schwartzkopf, W. 1995. Calculating lost labor productivity in construction claims. New York: Aspen Publishers.
Schwartzkopf, W. 2004. Calculating lost labor productivity in construction claims. New York: Aspen Publishers.
SCL (Society of Construction Law). 2002. Society of construction law delay and disruption protocol. Leicestershire, UK: SCL.
SCL (Society of Construction Law). 2017. Society of construction law delay and disruption protocol. Leicestershire, UK: SCL.
Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 1998. Vol. 46 of Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Taylor, R. S., and R. S. Taylor. 1986. Value-added processes in information systems. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Turk, Ž., and R. Klinc. 2017. “Potentials of Blockchain technology for construction management.” Procedia Eng. 196: 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.
Turner and Townsend. 2020. “COVID-19 and the impact on Australian construction projects.” Accessed March 15, 2021. https://www.turnerandtownsend.com/en/perspectives/covid-19-and-the-impact-on-australian-construction-projects/.
Wiltshier, F. 2011. “Researching with NVivo.” Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1628.
Zhao, T., and J. M. Dungan. 2018. “Quantifying lost labor productivity in domestic and international claims.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000269.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 2 • May 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 24, 2022
Accepted: Sep 17, 2022
Published online: Jan 2, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 2, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Babar Ali, Ajibade A. Aibinu, Vidal Paton-Cole, Improving the Process of Disruption Claims: Identification of the Difficulties and Expectations, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5536, 40, 1, (2024).
- Shumank Deep, Thayaparan Gajendran, Marcus Jefferies, Kumar Neeraj Jha, Developing Subcontractor–General Contractor Relationships in the Construction Industry: Constructs and Scales for Analytical Decision Making, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13630, 149, 12, (2023).
- J. D. Thekinen, Nishchal Pandey, Sinem Mollaoglu, Meltem Duva, Kenneth Frank, Dong Zhao, Detecting Information Bottlenecks in Architecture Engineering Construction Projects for Integrative Project Management, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13019, 149, 12, (2023).