Abstract

The paper proposes useful indicators and tools to improve the civic monitoring of public procurement implemented through digital procedures in the construction sector. Despite the construction industry is a key pillar of the global economy, the protection and integrity of public procurement are often exposed to various challenges. To revolutionize the monitoring of public procurement, national and transnational regulations have been issued to supervise the adoption of digital technologies and tools to ensure operations transparency and continuous monitoring of the progress. The presented definition of useful indicators to promote civic monitoring is based on a replicable methodology that starts from the analysis of the state of the art and best practices in the European and Italian context, including the last provisions about digitalization in public procurement. The indicators were created through multiple revisions in agreement with civic monitoring experts to ensure transparency and data continuous accessibility by common citizens. Although the presented indicators are still theoretical, were designed to reduce long execution times and public funding waste, in addition to ensure greater compliance with expected project performance and quality. The indicators will be validated through future pilot case studies and included in the civic monitoring purposes of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan projects. The outcomes of the validation will support the definition of a civic monitoring approach that could be replicated in other international contexts.

Practical Applications

The paper presents a set of indicators exploitable by non-experts for civic monitoring of public procurement. It focuses on the construction sector, a key pillar of the global economy, which is most affected by several critical issues such as corruption. The monitoring of public procurement is key to ensure the efficient use of public resources and is facilitated by the digitalization of information and procurement procedures, which enable or make it easier for citizens to access, consult, and process data on public procurement. Thus, the indicators were identified with particular attention to digitalizing procedures in all stages of public procurement, aiming at guaranteeing data transparency and accessibility, as well as the shared management and traceability of information. They have been identified in the Italian context, but can be replicated in other ones, including international ones, with critical issues requiring indicators to monitor the correct, efficient, and transparent execution of public procurements. They will be used to monitor projects funded by the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (adopted in 2021 as part of the Next Generation EU).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data used: Gruppo di lavoro dell’Universitã Cattolica S.C. sulle linee guida per il monitoraggio del PNRR italiano, “Il monitoraggio del Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza (PNRR) a cura di comunitã, associazioni, cittadini. Una proposta per la tutela della trasparenza, dell’integritã e della realizzazione degli investimenti pubblici” 2022. Accessible at https://libenteritalia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/sistema-monitoraggio-investimenti.pdf.

References

List of Statutes

European Commission (2017), “Communication from the Commission to the Institutions: Making Public Procurement work in and for Europe”.
European Commission, “EU Cohesion Policy 2014–2020: legislative proposals”, 2011–2012. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/proposals_2014_2020_en.cfm.
European Parliament (2014), Directive 2014/24/EU, Official Journal of the European Union.
Italian Government (2016), Legislative Decree. 18 April 2016, no. 50–Public Procurement Code.
Italian Government (2017), Ministerial Decree. no. 560 December 1, 2017.
Italian Government (2021), National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP).

Works Cited

Abdou, A., O. E. Basdevant, and M. Fazekas. 2022. Assessing vulnerabilities to corruption in public procurement and their price impact. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Altieri, A. 2019. “L’istituto dell’accesso civico generalizzato nelle procedure di affidamento e negli appalti pubblici.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.contabilita-pubblica.it.
Amati, C., S. De Luca, and L. Reggi. 2012. “European Cohesion policy opens up to open data.” In Proc., W3C/JRC-IPTS workshop using open data: Policy modeling, citizen empowerment, data journalism. Wakefield, MA: World Wide Web Consortium.
ANAC (National Anti-Corruption Authority). 2019. “La corruzione in Italia (2016-2019).” In Numeri, luoghi e contropartite del malaffare. Rome: ANAC.
Brenzel, K. 2018. The anatomy of construction corruption. The real deal. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2018. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling—Information management using building information modelling. BS EN ISO 19650-1:2018. London: BSI.
Cagliari City Rail. n.d. “Metropolitana leggera di Cagliari.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://monitorappalti.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Gagara_Cagliari_Sintesi.pdf.
Chase, M. 2018. “Standardization of BIM implementation in the United States.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.troutman.com/insights/standardization-of-bim-implementation-in-the-united-states.html.
CIOB (Chartered Institute of Building). 2013. “Corruption in the UK construction industry.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.ciob.org/industry/research/Corruption-UK-Construction-Industry.
Cittadini Reattivi. n.d. “Cittadini Reattivi association: Clean land, sky, and water for all.” Cittadinireattivi website. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://www.cittadinireattivi.it.
Cravero, C. 2019. “Rethinking the role of civil society in public procurement.” Eur. Procure. Public Private Partnership Law Rev. 14 (1): 30–42.
Di Giuda, G. M., and G. M. Racca. 2019. “From works contracts to collaborative contracts: The challenges of building information modeling (BIM) in public procurement.” Joint Public Procure. Innov. Lessons Across Borders 27 (Jun): 223–271.
ECSO (European Cyber Security Organisation). 2020. Late payment in the construction sector. Bruxelles, Belgium: ECSO.
ECSO (European Cyber Security Organisation). 2021. Digitalisation in the construction sector. Bruxelles, Belgium: ECSO.
EU Project. 2023. “Civic monitoring for the future of Europe.” Accessed November 20, 2023. https://civicmonitoringeurope.eu/.
European Commission. 2017. Communication from the commission to the institutions: Making public procurement work in and for Europe. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
European Commission. 2020. “EU cohesion policy: Commission and EBRD promote innovative use of data in public procurement involving EU funds.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/pt/ip_20_2209.
European Parliament. 2014. Official journal of the European Union. Strasbourg, France: European Parliament.
Farmer, M. 2016. “The farmer review of the UK construction labour model.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/construction-labour-market-in-the-uk-farmer-review.
Feenstra, R. A., and A. Casero-Ripollés. 2014. “Democracy in the digital communication environment: A typology proposal of political monitoring processes.” Int. J. Commun. 8 (1): 2448–2468.
Fondazione Etica. n.d. “Main page.” Fondazionetica website. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://www.fondazionetica.it.
HM Government. 2013. “Construction 2025.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/construction-2025-strategy.
Kahn, T., A. Baron, and J. C. Vieyra. 2018. Digital technologies for transparency in public investment. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Libera. n.d. “Libera: Associations, names and numbers against the mafias.” Libera website. Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.libera.it.
Locatelli, G., G. Mariani, T. Sainati, and M. Greco. 2017. “Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room!” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.010.
McKinsey and Company. 2017. “Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/reinventing-construction-through-a-productivity-revolution.
Monitoring Marathon. n.d. “Monitoring marathon.” Monithon website. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://www.monithon.eu/en/.
Moore, T. 2011. Cohesion policy 2014–2020. Bruxelles, Belgium: Council of the European Union.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. Preventing corruption in public procurement. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2017. “Compendium of good practices on the use of open data for Anti-corruption: Towards data-driven public sector integrity and civic auditing.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/g20-oecd-compendium.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019. “G20 compendium of good practices for promoting integrity and transparency in infrastructure development.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.oecd.org/g20/summits/osaka/G20-Compendium-of-Good-Practices-in-Infrastructure-Development.pdf.
OICE (Italian Engineering and Consulting Organizations). 2020. Rapporto sulle gare BIM 2019 per opere pubbliche. Analisi del mercato e delle gare. Rome: OICE.
Openpolis. n.d. “What the European Parliament is and what it does.” Openpolis website. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://www.openpolis.it.
Pellegrini, L., M. Locatelli, S. Meschini, G. Pattini, E. Seghezzi, L. C. Tagliabue, and G. M. Di Giuda. 2021. “Information modelling management and green public procurement for waste management and environmental renovation of brownfields.” Sustainability 13 (15): 1–31.
Preda, I. 2019. “Analysis of centralized public procurement in the European Union, the United States of America and Romania.” Revista de Manage. Comparat Int. 20 (4): 459–472.
PwC. 2014. Fighting corruption and bribery in the construction industry, 1–12. London: PwC.
Reggi, L. 2012. Transparency on the beneficiaries of structural funds in Italy and Europe. Rome: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo e la Coesione Economica.
Schwartz, G., M. Fouad, T. Hansen, and G. Verdier. 2020. Well spent international monetary fund. Torino, Italy: Giappichelli.
Scomparin, L. 2016. Corruzione e infiltrazioni criminali negli appalti pubblici. Strumenti di prevenzione e contrasto. Torino, Italy: Giappichelli.
Singh, I. 2017. “BIM adoption and implementation around the world: Initiatives by major nations.” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://www.geospatialworld.net/blogs/bim-adoption-around-the-world/.
Stevens-Finlayson, B. 2019. EU vs US: Comparing the EU and US federal systems. London: Gold Mercury International.
Transparency International. 2021. Corruption perceptions index. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International. 2022. Monitoring public contracting: Experience from 18 integrity pactsin the EU. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International Italia. 2020. Metropolitana leggera di Cagliari—Documento di sintesi. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International Italia. 2021. I patti di integrità negli appalti pubblici: Strumenti per la legalità e la cittadinanza attiva. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International US. 2012. Procurement monitoring guide: A tool for civil society. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International US. 2015. Transparency international procurement monitoring project final report. Berlin: Transparency International.
World Economic Forum. 2016. This is why construction is so corrupt. Cologny, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Jul 20, 2022
Accepted: May 5, 2023
Published online: Nov 25, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction, Politecnico di Milano, Milano Via Ponzio 31 20133, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-2369. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction, Politecnico di Milano, Milano Via Ponzio 31 20133, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9247-3539. Email: [email protected]
Emanuela Andreis [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Law, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino Lungo Dora Siena 100/A 10153, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Law, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino Lungo Dora Siena 100/A 10153, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-636X. Email: [email protected]
Giuseppe Martino Di Giuda [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Management, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino Via Verdi 8 - 10124, Italy. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share