Scholarly Papers
Dec 29, 2022

The Compatibility of Dispute Resolution with Power Distance in the Construction Industry: A Perspective Based on the Statutory Adjudication Regime

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

Recognizing the importance of cash flow in construction, the Malaysian government has introduced the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA), which represents a significant development to improve cash flow and payment disputes. Power distance is a national culture dimension that measures the extent to which less powerful members of the country expect and accept that power is unequally distributed. Malaysia scores very high on power distance dimension, which indicates people accept a hierarchical order that needs no further justification. The introduction of yet another form of adversarial dispute resolution like adjudication raises the question of cultural compatibility between dispute resolution and the society’s power distance. The purpose of this paper is to assess the compatibility of power distance on dispute resolution through a qualitative study from the perspective of CIPAA. The research draws data from 15 semistructured interviews. Through thematic analysis, data were coded and categorized to support the inquiry. Patterns from the data illustrated that adversarial dispute resolution like adjudication is found to be less desirable to the Malaysian construction industry because it creates social frictions to the hierarchy values embedded within a high power value society. The study presents an analysis of a result that power struggle is a problem to a successful dispute resolution process in a high power distance society. It is hoped that the finding will foster awareness of societal implications among policy makers when implementing dispute resolution mechanisms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Codes generated during the study are confidential in nature and may be provided with restrictions. Interview transcripts that contain identity details of the respondents are confidential.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation for the generous support of the sponsor Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under UTM Encouragement Research Q.J130000.3852.19J83.

References

List of Statutes

Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, Housing Grants.
Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.

Works Cited

Abdullah, A. 1996. Going glocal: Cultural dimensions in Malaysian management. Selangor, Malaysia: Malaysian Institute of Management.
Abdullah, A. 2001. “The influence of Malay cultural values on management in Malaysia.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Abdullah, A., and A. H. Low, eds. 2001. Understanding the Malaysian workforce: Guidelines for managers. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Malaysian Institute of Management.
Ameer Ali, N. A. N. 2006. “A ‘construction industry payment and adjudication act’: Reducing payment-default and increasing dispute resolution efficiency in construction.” In Vol. 13 of Proc., Int. Forum Construction Industry Payment Act and Adjudication. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Master-Builders Malaysia.
Aminuddin, F. A. B., and P. Chynoweth. 2019. The compatibility of dispute resolution mechanisms with national culture in the construction industry-a case study of the Malaysian statutory adjudication regime. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Azman, M. N. A., N. Dzulkalnine, Z. Abd Hamid, K. A. Mohd Kamar, and M. N. Mohd Nawi. 2013. “Payment scenario in the Malaysian construction industry prior To CIPAA.” In Proc., 19th CIB World Publishing Congress. Johor Bahru, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Coleman, P. T. 2014. “Power and conflict.” In The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, edited by P. T. Coleman, M. Deutsch, and E. C. Marcus, 137–167. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Deutsch, M. 1994. “Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research.” J. Social Issues 50 (1): 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02395.x.
Ghosh, A. 2011. “Power distance in organizational contexts—A review of collectivist cultures.” Indian J. Ind. Relat. 4 (1): 89–101.
Goh, B. C. 2016. Law without lawyers, justice without courts: On traditional Chinese mediation. New York: Routledge.
Gunkel, M., C. Schlägel, and R. L. Engle. 2014. “Culture’s influence on emotional intelligence: An empirical study of nine countries.” J. Int. Manage. 20 (2): 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.10.002.
Hofstede, G. 2001. “Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research.” Int. J. Cross Cult. Manage. 1 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111002.
Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hooker, M. B. 2002. Law and the Chinese outside China. Law and the Chinese in Southeast Asia, 1–31. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Ishak, M. F., K. Alauddin, and M. S. H. Ibrahim. 2019. “Late and non-payments issues in the Malaysian construction industry: Perspective of building material suppliers.” Malaysian J. Sustainable Environ. 6 (1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v6i1.8674.
Javidan, M., and R. J. House. 2001. “Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE.” In Organizational dynamics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kirkbride, P. S., S. F. Tang, and R. I. Westwood. 1991. “Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behaviour: Cultural and psychological influences.” Organ. Stud. 12 (3): 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069101200302.
Lachman, R., A. Nedd, and B. Hinings. 1994. “Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework.” Manage. Sci. 40 (1): 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.1.40.
McClelland, D. C. 1975. Power: The inner experience. Irvington, NY: Irvington.
Mendoza, G. A. 1991. Management the Asian way. Manila, Philippines: Asian Institute of Management.
Merriam, S. B., and M. Mohamad. 2000. “How cultural values shape learning in older adulthood: The case of Malaysia.” Adult Educ. Q. 51 (1): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171360005100104.
S. Mohammad Hasanzadeh, M. Hosseinalipour, and M. Hafezi. 2014. “Collaborative procurement in construction projects performance measures, case study: Partnering in Iranian construction industry.” Procedia Social Behav. Sci. 119 (Mar): 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.091.
Newman, K. L., and S. D. Nollen. 1996. “Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture.” J. Int. Bus. Stud. 27 (4): 753–779. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490152.
Purohit, Y. C., and C. A. Simmers. 2006. “Power distance and uncertainty avoidance: A cross-national examination of their impact on conflict management modes.” J. Int. Bus. Res. 5 (1): 1.
Rahim, M. A. 1983. “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.” Acad. Manage. J. 26 (2): 368–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/255985.
Rashid, M. Z. A., and J. A. Ho. 2003. “Perceptions of business ethics in a multicultural community: The case of Malaysia.” J. Bus. Ethics 43 (1–2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022963232042.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2003. Research methods for business students. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shao, R., D. E. Rupp, D. P. Skarlicki, and K. S. Jones. 2013. “Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review.” J. Manage. 39 (1): 263–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311422447.
Teo, P. J. 2008. “Adjudication: Singapore perspective.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (2): 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(224).
Tsai, J.-S., and C. S. F. Chi. 2009. “Influences of Chinese cultural orientations and conflict management styles on construction dispute resolving strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (10): 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:10(955).
Uher, T. E., and M. C. Brand. 2008. “Claimants’ view of the performance of adjudication in New South Wales.” In Engineering, construction and architectural management. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Wall, J. A., Jr., and R. R. Callister. 1999. “Malaysian community mediation.” J. Conflict Resolut. 43 (3): 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002799043003004.
Yang, J., K. W. Mossholder, and T. K. Peng. 2007. “Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross-level interaction effects.” J. Appl. Psychol. 92 (3): 681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681.
Yong, Y. C., and N. E. Mustaffa. 2013. “Critical success factors for Malaysian construction projects: An empirical assessment.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 31 (9): 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.828843.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Apr 8, 2022
Accepted: Oct 7, 2022
Published online: Dec 29, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-0393. Email: [email protected]
Nur Emma Mustaffa
Associate Professor, Dept. of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share