A Critical Assessment of Material Price Adjustment Clauses for Transportation Design–Build Projects
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
The transportation construction industry is experiencing a substantial risk of material price volatility impacting owners and contractors in successful delivery of projects on budget and on time. The risk is significant for design-build (DB) transportation projects as the entire risks for design and construction services are transferred to design-build teams. Unlike traditional design-bid-build (DBB) projects, the detailed quantities are not specified in DB transportation contracts that are typically fixed-priced contracts. Also, DB transportation projects are often large and multi-year, exacerbating the risk of material price uncertainty over the long project duration. Price adjustment clauses (PACs) have been introduced as a risk allocation mechanism to stabilize the bidding environment for transportation projects. While PACs have been employed in DBB projects for some time, the use of PACs for DB transportation projects is still at an early stage. Therefore, there is a need to better understand how various transportation agencies have incorporated the PAC into their DB transportation projects. The major objective of this research is to examine the current utilization of the PAC among state DOTs in their DB transportation projects. This study employs a combination of survey questionnaires and semistructured interviews involving subject matter experts from state departments of transportation (state DOTs) engaged in alternative project delivery to highlight the widespread adoption of PACs for four primary material line items: fuel, steel, asphalt, and portland cement. The main findings of this study show that while the PACs are adopted at varying levels across different states, they are not seen as critical deal-breakers, as their absence does not significantly deter industry participation in transportation DB projects. Rather, they are generally viewed as more beneficial in multiyear and large DB transportation projects, where price fluctuations and cost escalation are more likely. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on transportation DB projects by providing valuable insights into the thresholds and mechanisms used for price adjustments within PACs, showcasing how they enhance risk allocation. Additionally, this study recognizes the implications of recent events, such as increases in inflation and interest rates, on the consideration of PAC implementation and expansion. Finally, from a practical standpoint, these findings offer state DOTs invaluable guidance to enhance procurement strategies and contract provisions, and increase competition in the infrastructure market, ensuring successful project execution and financial feasibility in transportation DB projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All of the available data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding and primary authors upon reasonable request: survey questions, responses, and comments.
References
Works Cited
ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2023. Price adjustment: Guidance note on procurement. Mandaluyong, Philippines: ADB.
AGC (Associated General Contractors). 2022. “OMB releases guidance for ‘Build America, Buy America’ as part of the infrastructure and jobs acts.” Accessed July 23, 2023. https://www.agc.org/news/2022/04/21/omb-releases-guidance-build-america-buy-america-part-infrastructure-and-jobs-acts.
AGC (Associated General Contractors). 2023. “Percentage change in producer price indexes (PPIs) and employment cost indexes (ECIs) for construction, 2018–2023.” Accessed August 5, 2023. https://www.agc.org/news/2023/05/11/construction-materials-prices-rise-05-percent-april-while-bid-prices-slip-reversing-recent-pattern.
Bebernes, M. 2023. “Buy American’ is a popular slogan, but is it good policy?” Accessed July 23, 2023. https://news.yahoo.com/buy-american-is-a-popular-slogan-but-is-it-good-policy-210209646.html.
Buxbaum, J., and I. N. Ortiz. 2009. “Public sector decision making for public-private partnerships: A synthesis of highway practice.” Accessed November 29, 2023. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_391.pdf.
Chen, Q., Z. Jin, B. Xia, P. Wu, and M. Skitmore. 2015. “Time and cost performance of design–build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001056.
DBIA and FMI (Design-Build Institute of America and Fails Management Institute). 2021. Design-build utilization update: September 2021. Washington, DC: DBIA and FMI.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). 2023. Mid-cycle update report. Washington, DC: DBIA.
El-adaway, I. H., R. A. Vance, and I. S. Abotaleb. 2019. “Understanding extension of time under different standard design-build forms of contract.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000331.
El Asmar, M., D. Ramsey, G. E. Gibson Jr., and W. Bearup. 2019. “Design-build for transportation projects: Cost and schedule change performance analysis.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000335.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Design-build effectiveness study. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Georgia DOT. 2023. Design build manual. Atlanta, GA: Georgia DOT.
Gerrard, N. 2023. “Why contractors fear ‘Buy America’ policy could push up US construction prices.” Accessed July 23, 2023. https://www.international-construction.com/news/why-contractors-fear-buy-america-policy-could-push-up-us-construction-prices/8029731.article.
Hyun Lee, J., Y. Zhou, and B. Ashuri. 2020. “Key challenges to design professional liability in the design-build environment.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 04520031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000413.
Ichniowski, T. 2023. “Industry groups say inflation, ‘Buy America’ hamper IIJA impact.” Accessed July 23, 2023. https://www.enr.com/articles/56184-industry-groups-say-inflation-buy-america-hampers-iija-impact.
Ilbeigi, M., B. Ashuri, and S. Shayegh. 2015. “Price adjustment clauses and submitted bid prices for major asphalt line items in highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (5): 04015103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001097.
Ilbeigi, M., and D. Castro-Lacouture. 2017. “Effects of price-adjustment clauses on number of bidders and dispersion of bid prices in highway construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (4): 04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000533.
Jeong, H. D., D. Gransberg, and K. J. Shrestha. 2017. Advanced methodology to determine highway construction cost index (HCCI). Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Liu, L., J. Hyun Lee, and B. Ashuri. 2022. “Identifying gaps in the understanding of a quality assurance program in design–build quality management.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (3): 04522013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000544.
Maine DOT. 2012. Request for proposals: Book 1—Design-build low bid general conditions. Augusta, Maine: Maine DOT.
Martinez, S. E., A. Hall, and C. M. Walton. 2013. “Public-private partnerships in transportation infrastructure: Survey of experiences and perceptions.” Accessed November 29, 2023. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/swutc.tamu.edu/publications/technicalreports/600451-00072-1.pdf.
Mirzadeh, I., and B. Birgisson. 2015. “Evaluation of highway projects under government support mechanisms based on an option-pricing framework.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 04015094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001079.
Mirzadeh, I., O. Eriksson, and R. Lundström. 2020. Performance requirements in design-build contracts: Development of a risk assessment model. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.
Mishra, K., and P. S. Aithal. 2020. “Operation of price adjustment in construction projects.” Int. J. Case Stud. Bus. IT Educ. 4 (2): 229–249. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJCSBE.2581.6942.0093.
Missouri DOT. 2023. Category: 109 measurement and payment. Jefferson City, MI: Missouri DOT.
Mostaan, K., and B. Ashuri. 2016. “Challenges and enablers for private sector involvement in delivery of highway public–private partnerships in the United States.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000493.
Musarat, M. A., W. S. Alaloul, and M. S. Liew. 2021. “Impact of inflation rate on construction projects budget: A review.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 12 (1): 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.009.
Newcomb, D. E., R. Lenz, and J. Epps. 2012. Price adjustment clauses: Report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
Pierce, C. E., N. N. Huynh, and P. Guimaraes. 2012. Cost indexing and unit price adjustments for construction materials. Columbia, SC: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina.
Simonson, K. 2023. Percentage change in producer price indexes (PPIs) and employment cost indexes (ECIs) for construction, 2018–2023. Arlington, VA: Associated General Contractors.
Skolnik, J. 2011. Price indexing in transportation construction contracts. Bethesda, MD: Jack Faucett Associates.
Statistics Canada. 2022. “Industrial product and raw materials price indexes, December 2022.” Accessed November 29, 2023. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/230118.
Tennessee DOT. 2017. Design-build project: Request for qualifications (RFQ). Nashville, TN: Tennessee DOT.
Tennessee DOT. 2022. Design-build RFP contract Book 1: Instructions to design-builders (ITDB): I-75 interchange modification at I-24, Phase 2 (IA) Hamilton County. Nashville, TN: Tennessee DOT.
Virginia DOT. 2016. Request for proposals: I-95 safety improvements at Route 3. Fredericksburg, VA: Virginia DOT.
Weidman, J. E., K. R. Miller, J. P. Christofferson, and J. S. Newitt. 2011. “Best practices for dealing with price volatility in commercial construction.” Int. J. Construct. Educ. Res. 7 (4): 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2011.552936.
Wingate, P. F. J. 1966. Use of critical path method on road construction projects. Crowthorne, UK: Road Research Laboratory, Ministry of Transport.
WSP (Williams Sale Partnership). 2024. “Turcot interchange—Dynamic and smart stormwater management.” Accessed November 29, 2023. https://www.wsp.com/en-us/projects/turcot-interchange-stormwater-management.
Yamín, R. A., and D. J. Harmelink. 2001. “Comparison of linear scheduling model (LSM) and critical path method (CPM).” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (5): 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(374).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 19, 2023
Accepted: Jan 26, 2024
Published online: Apr 13, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.