Scholarly Papers
Dec 21, 2023

Examining Low-Carbon Material Initiatives: Existing Policies, Impacts on the Procurement of Projects, Current Challenges, and Potential Solutions to Reduce Embodied Carbon in the Construction Industry

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 2

Abstract

Given the reinforced expectations of a carbon-constrained future and to address carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from construction materials, the construction industry has been seeking solutions for proactive climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Since more than 30% of all concrete materials in the United States (US) are procured by federal, state, and local governments, public procurement is an important mechanism that could be used for decarbonizing concrete and reducing its negative impacts. Therefore, many initiatives and policies have been introduced to reduce the carbon footprint of construction materials by considering sustainable or green procurement practices in construction projects. Despite that some policies have been introduced in different United States, there remain gaps in the goals, scope, and stipulations of these policies and barriers to the associated mass adoption by the industry/market; which hinders the applicability and effectiveness of these policies. Since these policies are considered to be relatively new as they were just introduced in the previous five years or so, there is a scarcity of research works on low-carbon construction material legislations and a lack of guidance, knowledge, training, and education on the requirements of these policies. Also, these policies differ from one jurisdiction to the other. Therefore, by following a mixed-approach methodology based on review of previous literature as well as existing bills and policies, case study analysis of 8 projects, and semistructured interviews conducted with 16 experts, this paper examined low-carbon concrete legislations by analyzing existing policies and initiatives, studying their impacts on the contractual relationships and procurement of construction projects, identifying current challenges associated with these legislations and programs, and proposing potential solutions. The paper’s results and findings offer insights into the current state of low-carbon concrete legislations, the different policies and initiatives that could potentially solve or address the urgent issue of embodied carbon in the construction sector, the needed key policy elements, the contractual relationships that could be used in low-carbon projects, and the challenges that still persist in current initiatives and that need to be addressed in the future. Ultimately, this paper educates practitioners and researchers on the different contractual and legal aspects related to low-carbon materials and adds to the body of knowledge by laying the foundation for developing a framework or program for low-carbon construction materials that takes advantage of the knowledge gathered in this topic as well as the identified challenges in the paper. This will help jurisdictions in developing better initiatives, policies, and legislations to efficiently reduce embodied carbon in the built environment, and ultimately promoting sustainable procurement practices as well as green procurement measures in the construction sector.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper.

References

Works Cited

Aldykiewicz, A., J. Hagerman, D. Hun, M. Lapsa, M. Salonvaara, and D. Silva. 2022. Sustainable low-carbon building materials workshop. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Bergman, R., and A. Taylor. 2011. “EPD-environmental product declarations for wood products—An application of life cycle information about forest products.” For. Prod. J. 61 (3): 192–201. https://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-61.3.192.
BlueGreen Alliance. 2022. “The buy clean and buy fair Washington act.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.bluegreenalliance.org/resources/the-buy-clean-and-buy-fair-washington-act/.
BPDA (Boston Planning & Development Agency). 2023. “Zero net carbon building zoning initiative: Final report.” Accessed September 25, 2023. https://www.bostonplans.org/getattachment/6b305862-b53a-4901-ae8a-56fdf1e56c6e.
Building Transparency. 2023. “How to get an EPD.” Accessed May 29, 2023. https://www.buildingtransparency.org/resources/how-get-epd/.
Butt, A. A., and J. Harvey. 2021. Lessons learned from Caltrans pilot program for implementation of EPDs. Davis, CA: Partnered Pavement Research Center.
C40 Knowledge. 2019. “Cities100: Honolulu’s concrete example utilises captured carbon.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Cities100-Honolulu-s-concrete-example-utilises-captured-carbon?language=en_US.
California Air Resources Board. 2021. “Assembly Bill 1365 (Bonta, Mia), Public contracts: Clean concrete (2-Year).” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/2021-assembly-bill-1365-bonta-mia-public-contracts-clean-concrete-2-year.
California Department of General Services. 2021. “Buy clean California Act (BCCA) requirements.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.dgs.ca.gov/RESD/Resources/Page-Content/Real-Estate-Services-Division-Resources-List-Folder/Buy-Clean-California-Act-BCCA-Requirements.
California Legislative Information. 2023a. “AB-1365 public contracts: Clean concrete.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB1365.
California Legislative Information. 2023b. “ARTICLE 5: Buy clean California act.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?division=2.&chapter=3.&part=1.&lawCode=PCC&article=5.
CarbonCure. 2020. “New York’s proposed low-carbon concrete policy.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.carboncure.com/concrete-corner/new-yorks-proposed-low-carbon-concrete-policy/.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2012. Sustainability of construction works, Environmental product declarations, Core rules for the product category of construction products. CEN 15804-2012. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
City and County of Honolulu. 2018. “Resolution 18-283.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://honolulu.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=461&meta_id=85271.
City of Portland. 2019. “Notice of new requirements for concrete.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://lpdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Concrete-EPD-Requirements-FINAL-20190515.pdf.
City of Portland. 2023. “Current sustainable procurement initiatives.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.portland.gov/omf/brfs/procurement/sustainable-procurement-program/sp-initiatives.
Colenbrander, S., P. Vaze, C. Vikas, S. Ayer, N. Kumar, N. Vikas, and L. Burge. 2023. “Low-carbon transition risks for India’s financial system.” Global Environ. Change 78 (Jun): 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102634.
Colorado Office of the State Architect. 2023. “Buy clean Colorado act.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://osa.colorado.gov/energy-environment/buy-clean-colorado-act.
Colton, M. 2023. “Buy clean California: Aligning public spending with our environmental goals.” Accessed May 27, 2023. https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/default/files/sce/sierra-club-california/PDFs/Buy_Clean_Factsheet.pdf.
Craig, M. 2021. “California legislature continues its push for ‘Clean concrete’.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://aci-ncawnv.org/Events/Events-Gallery/california-legislature-continues-its-push-for-clean-concrete.
Dunford, E., R. Niven, and C. Neidl. 2021. “Deploying Low carbon public procurement to accelerate carbon removal.” Front. Clim. 3 (Jun): 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.686787.
Durand, R. 2022. Low-carbon concretes in infrastructures: Applicability, potential and carbon footprint focusing on the Parisian Metro Line L18. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Ewerlöf, S., and D. Modig. 2019. Value creation and decreased environmental impact through circular economy-based offerings: A product-service system case study. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Univ.
Farr, M. 2023. “New Jersey governor signs low-carbon concrete law: First of its kind tax credit is passed for greener concrete.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.enr.com/articles/55829-new-jersey-governor-signs-low-carbon-concrete-law.
Firman, R. 2022. “EPDs: Tools for reporting environmental impact.” Accessed May 29, 2023. https://www.contractflooringjournal.co.uk/help-and-advice/epds-tools-for-reporting-environmental-impact/.
FPInnovations. 2023. “Environmental product declaration services.” Accessed May 29, 2023. https://web.fpinnovations.ca/environmental-product-declarations-services/.
Gangotra, A., K. Lebling, J. Feldmann, and K. Kennedy. 2023. “What does ‘green’ procurement mean? Initiatives and standards for cement and steel.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.wri.org/insights/green-procurement-initiatives.
Gursel, A. P. 2014. Life-cycle assessment of concrete: Decision-support tool and case study application. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Habert, G., et al. 2020. “Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries.” Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1 (11): 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3.
Hasanbeigi, A., D. Shi, and H. Khuta. 2021. “Federal buy clean for cement and steel: Policy design and impact on industrial emissions and competitiveness.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/federal-buy-clean-for-cement-and-steel.
Huntzinger, D. N., and T. D. Eatmon. 2009. “A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies.” J. Cleaner Prod. 17 (7): 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007.
Ingwersen, W. W., and M. J. Stevenson. 2012. “Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 24 (Jun): 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.040.
ISO. 2006. Environmental labels and declarations: Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures. ISO 14025:2006. Geneva: ISO.
Jacinto, C., and J. Anderson. 2022. “EPD: Achieving green goals with HSS.” Accessed May 29, 2023. https://steeltubeinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/HSS_Article_EPD-Achieving_Green_Goals_with_HSS_093022.pdf.
Jalaei, F., R. Masoudi, and G. Guest. 2022. “A framework for specifying low-carbon construction materials in government procurement: A case study for concrete in a new building investment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 345 (2): 131056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131056.
Kardish, C. 2022. A building block for climate action: Reporting on embodied emissions. Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.
Kluegge, J., L. Ambrosini, and A. Bernasconi. 2012. “Opportunities and challenges for a more sustainable concrete.” In Proc., 16th ERMCO Congress–Verona. Bruxelles, Belgium: FedBeton.
Lee, S., et al. 2023. “Low-carbon concrete tax incentives signed into law in New Jersey.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/low-carbon-concrete-tax-incentives-signed-into-law-in-new-jersey.
Lewis, M., M. Huang, K. Simonen, M. Torres, H. Waterstrat, I. Kinder-Pyle, P. Escarcega, and E. Escarcega. 2022. “Buy clean and buy fair Washington project: Final report.” Accessed May 30, 2023. https://carbonleadershipforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CLF-Commerce-Buy-Clean-Buy-Fair-Final-Report-Nov2022.pdf.
Li, S., H. Yan, J. Chen, and L. Shen. 2017. “A life cycle analysis approach for embodied carbon for a residential building.” In Proc., 20th Int. Symp. on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 1185–1196. Berlin: Springer.
Matayoshi, K. 2019. “Greening the concrete jungle.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.hawaiibusiness.com/greening-the-concrete-jungle/.
Meinshausen, M., and Z. Nicholls. 2022. “GWP* is a model, not a metric.” Environ. Res. Lett. 17 (4): e041002.
Miller, S. A., A. Horvath, and P. J. Monteiro. 2016. “Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%” Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (7): 074029.
Moser, A., and I. Korstjens. 2018. “Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.” Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 24 (1): 9–18.
Neidl, C., and C. M. Woodall. 2022. “A design guide to state and local low-carbon concrete procurement.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/low-carbon-concrete-procurement-guide.pdf.
New Jersey Legislature. 2023. “Bill S287 ScsSca (SCS/1R): Session 2022–2023.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2022/S287.
Nilimaa, J., and V. Zhaka. 2023. “Material and environmental aspects of concrete flooring in cold climate.” Constr. Mater. 3 (2): 180–201.
Open States. 2023. “AB 1365–Public contracts: Clean concrete.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20212022/AB1365/.
Ramsden, K. 2020. “Cement and concrete: The environmental impact.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://psci.princeton.edu/tips/2020/11/3/cement-and-concrete-the-environmental-impact.
RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). 2017. Whole life carbon assessment for the built environment. London: RICS.
Scholz, R., T. Dorndorf, R. Köster, and J. Tesch. 2022. “Impact measurement using the value balancing alliance (VBA) method.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.wifor.com/uploads/2022/06/WifOR_Methodological_Report_Impact_measeurement_using_the_VBA_method.pdf.
State of Minnesota Legislature. 2019. “Buy clean Minnesota act.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF2203&type=bill&version=0&session=ls91&session_year=2019&session_number=0.
Stiglitz, J. E., N. Stern, M. Duan, O. Edenhofer, G. Giraud, G. M. Heal, and H. Winkler. 2017. Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Stokke, R., F. S. Kristoffersen, M. Stamland, E. Holmen, H. Hamdan, and L. De Boer. 2022. “The role of green public procurement in enabling low-carbon cement with CCS: An innovation ecosystem perspective.” J. Cleaner Prod. 363 (Jun): 132451.
Stokke, R. A., and A. K. Kvellheim. 2020. “Strategies and business models to support the transition to low-carbon concrete.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2722944.
Strupp, J. 2022. “Biden signs Inflation Reduction Act, boosting low-carbon materials in civil projects.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.constructiondive.com/news/inflation-reduction-act-low-carbon-green-building-materials-civil-projects/629551/.
Talati, S., N. Merchant, and C. Neidl. 2020. “Paving the way for low-carbon concrete: Recommendations for a federal procurement strategy.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://carbon180.org/reports.
The New York State Senate. 2023. “Senate bill S542A.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/S542.
Thilakarathna, P. S. M., S. Seo, K. K. Baduge, H. Lee, P. Mendis, and G. Foliente. 2020. “Embodied carbon analysis and benchmarking emissions of high and ultra-high strength concrete using machine learning algorithms.” J. Cleaner Prod. 262 (Apr): 121281.
Urban Land Institute. 2023. “Reshaping the city: Zoning for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future.” Accessed September 25, 2023. https://knowledge.uli.org/-/media/files/research-reports/2023/uli_report_reshapingthecity_fin.pdf?rev=8325012541144e4f8a4c06f13451d920&hash=CF85A910902DB87638FA250696AA8892.
US Conference of Mayors. 2019. “Urging all cities to consider using carbon dioxide mineralized concrete for future city building and infrastructure projects utilizing concrete.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.usmayors.org/the-conference/resolutions/?category=a0D4N00000FDDPaUAP&meeting=87th%20Annual%20Meeting.
Washington State Legislature. 2023. “HB 1103: Improving environmental and social outcomes with the production of building materials.” Accessed May 23, 2023. https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=1103&Year=2021&Initiative=false.
World Green Building Council. 2023. “The net zero carbon buildings commitment.” Accessed September 25, 2023. https://worldgbc.org/thecommitment/.
Wuennenberg, L., and L. Casier. 2018. “Low-carbon innovation for sustainable infrastructure: The role of public procurement.” Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/low-carbon-innovation-sustainable-infrastructure-role-public-procurement.
Zareei, S. A., F. Ameri, N. Bahrami, P. Shoaei, H. R. Moosaei, and N. Salemi. 2019. “Performance of sustainable high strength concrete with basic oxygen steel-making (BOS) slag and nano-silica.” J. Build. Eng. 25 (Jun): 100791.
Zhu, W., W. Feng, X. Li, and Z. Zhang. 2020. “Analysis of the embodied carbon dioxide in the building sector: A case of China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 269 (Oct): 122438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122438.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 2May 2024

History

Received: May 30, 2023
Accepted: Oct 5, 2023
Published online: Dec 21, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 21, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor of Construction and Civil Infrastructure, Founding Director of the Smart Construction and Intelligent Infrastructure Systems (SCIIS) Lab, John A. Reif, Jr. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-5656. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6072, 40, 5, (2024).
  • Modeling the Impact of Low-Carbon Procurement on Bidding Dynamics, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5997, 40, 4, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share