Technical Papers
Jun 10, 2024

Predicting Damages to Remainder Parcels in Right-of-Way Acquisitions for Expanding Transportation Infrastructure: Using a Truncated Finite-Mixture Model

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

Right-of-way acquisition is a critical component of transportation infrastructure development. Transportation infrastructure projects cannot proceed without proper right-of-way acquisition or may face significant delays. State Departments of Transportation frequently acquire parcels of land for roadway expansion projects. A majority of these acquisitions can be partial takings, referring to a portion of a parcel that is acquired. The remainder of the property usually suffers economic changes due to the partial acquisition, which can be calculated as damage percentages. The damage percentage represents the extent to which the remaining land or property value has been diminished due to the acquisition. It reflects the remaining property value percentage that may have been lost or compromised due to the acquisition. This study aims to provide a robust model to estimate damage percentages to the remainder parcels that may help state Departments of Transportation appraisers make early predictions about the damages in cases involving partial takings. The research uses 509 appraisal reports from the Tennessee Department of Transportation to identify the key parcel attributes that influence the percentage of damages. Three regression models are developed: a linear regression model, a finite-mixture model (FMM), and a truncated FMM with two latent classes. The modeling results show that the truncated FMM with two classes outperforms the other models. To validate the models, actual sales data is collected and analyzed for 59 properties, and the results suggest that the model predictions are fairly accurate. A predictive tool is developed based on the models to help appraisers anticipate right-of-way damages under different scenarios and can provide early predictions about the damages.

Practical Applications

A predictive tool called Right-of-Way Damage Assessment (ROWDA) is developed, which can utilize the coefficients of the linear regression model or the truncated finite-mixture model (FMM) based on the user’s preference. The tool can allow state departments of transportation (DOTs) to anticipate right-of-way damages/costs under varying conditions. This tool is created to assess and study inputs from right-of-way acquisitions to determine the estimated percentage of damage. ROWDA provides DOT appraisals to check the cases where the estimations may be out of range. This Microsoft Excel Macro tool serves as a link between a group of attributes and regression equations. It allows the user to input multiple parcel characteristics and compute a prediction of the estimated damage percentage. All user inputs are saved in the worksheet within the workbook on which the tool is based. The tool boasts numerous potential applications, one of which involves estimating damages prior to initiating a project, even before comprehensive appraisals are conducted. Consequently, the tool aids in evaluating project feasibility, considering adjustments in the project’s execution, and recognizing damage estimations from actual appraisals that deviate from previous assessments utilized to create the model’s predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models used/generated during the study were provided by a third party, TDOT. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Tennessee Department of Transportation (Grant No. RES 2020-05). The authors thank the Tennessee Department of Transportation for their support and guidance. The authors also thank Mr. Jon Norton, Dr. Melany Noltenious, and Dr. Thomas Boehm for their support and guidance.

References

Akaike, H. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 (6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
Appraisal-Institute. 2015. The dictionary of real estate appraisal. 6th ed. Chicago: Appraisal-Institute.
Buffington, J. L., M. Chui, J. Memmott, and F. Saad. 1995. Characteristics of remainders of partial takings significantly affecting right-of-way costs. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.
Chang-Albitres, C., R. Feldman, P. E. Krugler, and I. Ibarra. 2014. “Simulation model to prioritize right-of-way acquisitions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (1): 05013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000141.
Cramér, H. 2016. Mathematical methods of statistics (PMS-9), volume 9. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cushman and Wakefield Inc. 2003. Severance damage study, Phase I. Albany, NY: New York State DOT.
Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and inference in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fountas, G., P. C. Anastasopoulos, and F. L. Mannering. 2018. “Analysis of vehicle accident-injury severities: A comparison of segment-versus accident-based latent class ordered probit models with class-probability functions.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 18 (Jun): 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2018.03.003.
Haque, A. M., I. Mahdinia, A. L. Patwary, and A. J. Khattak. 2023. “Are damages to remainder parcels in right-of-way acquisitions stationary? A spatial analysis of appraisal report data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2677 (1): 1510–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221105073.
Heiner, J. D., and K. M. Kockelman. 2005. “Costs of right-of-way acquisition: Methods and models for estimation.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (3): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:3(193).
Kamrani, M., B. Wali, and A. J. Khattak. 2017. “Can data generated by connected vehicles enhance safety? Proactive approach to intersection safety management.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2659 (1): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.3141/2659-09.
Kim, S. H., and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2023. “Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 172 (Mar): 134–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2023.03.001.
Mahdinia, I., N. Moradloo, A. Mohammadnazar, and A. Khattak. 2023. “Enhancing bicyclist survival time in fatal crashes: Investigating the impact of faster crash notification time through explainable machine learning.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 16 (Nov): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2023.2276195.
Mohammadnazar, A., A. L. Patwary, N. Moradloo, R. Arvin, and A. J. Khattak. 2022. “Incorporating driving volatility measures in safety performance functions: Improving safety at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 178 (Dec): 106872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106872.
Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it.” Eur. Sociological Rev. 26 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006.
Moradloo, N., I. Mahdinia, and A. J. Khattak. 2024. “Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 203 (Aug): 107607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107607.
Saltsman, J. B., H. Scott, M. L. Kennedy, R. H. Jenkins, and T. D. Weaver. 1995. Remainder sales study. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Transportation.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” In Vol. 6 of The annals of statistics, 461–464. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
STATA. 2021. User’s guide, StataCorp. Stata: Release 17: Statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
Ten Siethoff, B., and K. M. Kockelman. 2002. “Property values and highway expansion: Timing, size, location, and use effects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1812 (1): 191–200. https://doi.org/10.3141/1812-24.
Wali, B., A. J. Khattak, J. Waters, D. Chimba, and X. Li. 2018. “Development of safety performance functions: Incorporating unobserved heterogeneity and functional form analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (30): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118767409.
Westerfield, H. R., A. V. Gallego, J. Jarrett, R. Machemehl, and R. Harrison. 1993. A model for estimating the value of property access rights. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Wilson, A. R. 2006. “Real property damages and rubber rulers.” Real Estate Issues 31 (1): 25–32.
Xiong, X., and K. Kockelman. 2014. “Cost of right-of-way acquisition: Recognizing the impact of condemnation via a switching regression model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (4): 04014021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000195.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Feb 19, 2023
Accepted: Mar 14, 2024
Published online: Jun 10, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 10, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-7398. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Rd., Oak Ridge, TN 37830. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8917-4928. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0790-7794. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share