Technical Papers
May 22, 2023

Comparison of Erosion Control Products Using an ASTM D6459 Rainfall Simulator: Insights and Suggestions

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 8

Abstract

This study used a large-scale ASTM International D6459 rainfall simulator to evaluate performance of various types of erosion control products used in construction. Rolled erosion control products (RECPs), hydraulic erosion control products (HECPs), and soil amendments were tested and compared based on Cover factor (C factor), a parameter between 0 and 1 where 0 represents perfect erosion protection and 1 represents bare soil. All products behaved statistically similarly at the lowest rainfall intensity [5.1  cm/h (2  in./h)] with an average C factor of 0.03. At the next intensity of 10.2  cm/h (4  in./h), RECPs had significantly lower C factors than HECPs (0.11 and 0.41, respectively). Among the HECPs, Type 2 had worse C factors than other products, but all deteriorated at the highest 15.2  cm/h (6  in./h) intensity, reaching an average C factor of 0.48. Most (88%) products met their industry minimum specifications at the lowest rainfall intensity, but only 25% met them by the highest intensity. The soil amendments did not have published C factors, so their performance was compared to traditional products. Gypsum statistically matched the RECPs while Polyacrylamide (PAM) statistically matched the HECPs. Preliminary testing was performed on thee straw applications, but due to sampling differences only a soil loss ratio, or simple ratio of soil lost on the bare plot to soil lost on the treated plots, was calculated. A cost estimate obtained though local professionals revealed that the straw treatments appeared to be the most economical in terms of total dollars spent per reduction in sediment loss, and that the cost of premium hydraulic mulches did not appear to translate into improved performance. This study is useful because large-scale simulations more accurately reflect field erosion performance, but they are seldom performed due to time and cost considerations. In addition, varying intensities revealed performance differentiations, many product types were compared, and using an industry standard allows for confident comparison to other results.

Practical Applications

This study used a large-scale ASTM D6459 rainfall simulator to evaluate sediment loss performance of four types of erosion control products used on construction sites: rolled erosion control products (RECPs), hydraulic erosion control products (HECPs), straw mulch, and soil amendments. Under a 5.1  cm/h intensity, all products tested behaved statistically identically. As rainfall intensity increased to 10.2 and 15.2  cm/h, gypsum and RECPs performed better than polyacrylamide (PAM) and HECPs. Of the seven products that had available manufacturer specifications, all fell short of advertised performance. Preliminary results suggest that straw may be the most cost-effective erosion control measure of the methods tested. This study suggests that more adherence to nationally and internationally recognized testing standards is needed in the field of rainfall simulation. It also suggests that erosion performance data from large-scale simulators is more reliable than data obtained from small-scale simulators.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request: All ASTM D6459 test data including bare soil data, sediment loss, test conditions, and water quality, and cost spreadsheet from local contractors.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on a study sponsored by ALDOT. The authors gratefully acknowledge this financial support. The findings, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the sponsor.

References

Akbarzadeh, A., R. T. Mehrjardi, H. G. Refahi, H. Rouhipour, and M. Gorji. 2009. “Application of soil conditioners and man-made erosion control materials to reduce erosion risk on sloping lands.” Afr. J. Plant Sci. 3 (4): 74–84. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS.9000027.
Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Committee. 2018. Field guide for erosion and sediment control on construction sites in Alabama. Montgomery, AL: Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Committee.
Applied Polymer Systems, Inc. 2002. “Technical guidance for the use of polyacrylamides (PAM) and PAM blends for soil erosion control and storm water clarification.” Accessed June 1, 2020. https://www.siltstop.com/pictures/9-30-05%20APS%20Tech%20PAM.pdf.
ASTM. 2008. Standard index test method for determination of unvegetated rolled erosion control product (RECP) ability to protect soil from rain splash and associated runoff under bench-scale conditions. ASTM D7101. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method of rolled erosion control product (RECPs) performance in protecting hillslopes from rainfall induced erosion. ASTM D6459. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for determination of rolled erosion control product (RECP) performance in protecting hillslopes from rainfall induced erosion. ASTM D6459. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Auerswald, K., M. Kainz, H.-J. Wolfgarten, and J. Botschek. 1992. “Comparison of German and Swiss rainfall simulators—Influence of plot dimensions.” J. Plant Nutr. Sci. 155 (5): 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19921550524.
Ben-Hur, M., R. Stern, A. J. van der Merwe, and I. Shainberg. 1992. “Slope and gypsum effects on infiltration and erodibility of dispersive and nondispersive soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (5): 1571–1576. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600050039x.
Bowyer-Bower, T. A. S., and T. P. Burt. 1989. “Rainfall simulators for investigating soil response to rainfall.” Soil Technol. 2 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0933-3630(89)80002-9.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2021. Geosynthetics—Standard test for the simulation of rainfall-induced erosion on the surface of a slope protected by geosynthetic erosion control products. CEN/TS 17455. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Clopper, P., M. Vielleux, and A. Johnson. 2001. “Quantifying the performance of hillslope erosion control best management practices.” In Bridging the gap: Meeting the world’s water and environmental resource challenges, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Comino, J. R., et al. 2016. “Soil erosion processes in European vineyards: A qualitative comparison of rainfall simulation measurements in Germany, France, and Spain.” Hydrology 3 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010006.
Department of Energy and the Environment. 2017. “District of Columbia erosion and sediment control manual.” Prepared by the Center for Watershed Protection, Inc. Accessed June 1, 2020. https://doee.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ddoe/release_content/attachments/2017%20DC%20ESC%20Specifications%20Manual_08_2017.pdf.
Dunkerley, D. 2008. “Rain event properties in nature and in rainfall simulation experiments: A comparative review with recommendations for increasingly systematic study and reporting.” Hydrol. Processes 22 (22): 4415–4435. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7045.
ECTC (Erosion Control Technology Council). 2018. “Fact sheet: Hydraulic erosion control products.” Accessed May 1, 2020. https://www.ectc.org/assets/docs/HECPDocs/ectc_Y20_HECP%20EPA%20Fact%20Sheet%20FINAL.pdf.
ECTC (Erosion Control Technology Council). 2019a. “Product selection based upon ECTC specification categories.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.ectc.org/product-selection-by-category.
ECTC (Erosion Control Technology Council). 2019b. “Product selection based upon RECP specification categories.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.ectc.org/product-selection-recp.
Faucette, L. B., C. F. Jordan, L. M. Risse, M. Cabrera, D. C. Coleman, and L. T. West. 2005. “Evaluation of stormwater from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 60 (6): 288–297.
Faucette, L. B., B. Scholl, R. E. Beighley, and J. Governo. 2009. “Large-scale performance and design for construction activity erosion control best management practices.” J. Environ. Qual. 38 (3): 1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0415.
Gantzer, C. J., S. H. Anderson, and R. J. Miles. 2018. “The centennial of the first erosion plots.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 73 (3): 57A–59A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.3.57A.
Gascho, G. J., J. G. Davis, J. E. Hook, R. D. Wauchope, C. C. Dowler, A. W. Johnson, C. C. Truman, and H. R. Sumner. 1998. “Nitrate-nitrogen, soluble, and bioavailable phosphorous runoff from simulated rainfall after fertilizer application.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62 (6): 1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200060032x.
Geosynthetic Institute. 2020. “List of accredited laboratories and their accredited test methods.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://geosynthetic-institute.org/gai/methlist/d6459.html.
Grismer, M. E. 2012. “Standards vary in studies using rainfall simulators to evaluate erosion.” Calif. Agric. 66 (3): 102–107. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v066n03p102.
Iserloh, T., and J. B. Ries. 2010. “Comparability of different rainfall simulators—Relevance and chances for soil erosion research.” In Proc., EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts, 2758. Göttingen, Germany: Copernicus Publications.
Iserloh, T. J., et al. 2012. “Comparative measurements with seven rainfall simulators on uniform bare fallow land.” Z. Geomorphol. 57 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00085.
Jensen, D. W., E. Ashley Steel, A. H. Fullerton, and G. R. Pess. 2009. “Impact of fine sediment on egg-to-fry survival of Pacific Salmon: A meta-analysis of published studies.” Rev. Fish. Sci. 17 (3): 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260902716954.
Kibet, L. C., L. S. Saporito, A. L. Allen, E. B. May, P. J. A. Kleinmann, F. M. Hashem, and R. B. Bryant. 2014. “A protocol for conducting rainfall simulation to study soil runoff.” J. Visualized Exp. 3 (86): e51664.
Kontchou, J. A., M. Nachev, and B. Sures. 2021. “Ecotoxicological effects of traffic-related metal sediment pollution in Lumbriculus variegatus and Gammarus sp.” Environ. Pollut. 268 (Jan): 115884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115884.
Kuhn, N. J. 2007. “Erodibility of soil and organic matter: Interdependence of organic matter resistance to interrill erosion.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 32 (5): 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1486.
Lal, R. 1994. Soil erosion research methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Le Bissonnais, Y., H. Benkhadra, V. Chaplot, D. Fox, D. King, and J. Daroussin. 1997. “Crusting, runoff, and sheet erosion on silty loamy soils at various scales and upscaling from m2 to small catchments.” Soil Tillage Res. 46 (1–2): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)80109-8.
Lee, S. S., S. X. Chang, Y.-Y. Chang, and Y. S. Ok. 2013. “Commercial versus synthesized polymers for soil erosion control and growth of Chinese cabbage.” Springerplus 2 (Dec): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-534.
Lee, S. S., C. J. Gantzer, A. L. Thompson, and S. H. Anderson. 2010. “Polyacrylamide and gypsum amendments for erosion and runoff control on two soil series.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 65 (4): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.4.233.
Lee, S. S., H. S. Shah, Y. M. Awad, S. Kumar, and Y. S. Ok. 2015. “Synergy effects of biochar and polyacrylamide on plants growth and soil erosion control.” Environ. Earth Sci. 74 (3): 2463–2473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4262-5.
Lei, T. W., Q. W. Zhang, L. J. Yan, J. Zhao, and Y. H. Pan. 2008. “A rational method for estimating erodibility and critical shear stress of an eroding rill.” Geoderma 144 (3–4): 628–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.015.
Li, M.-H., J. McFalls, and Y.-J. Yi. 2013. “Comparing erosion control products’ performance results from field and large-scale laboratory testing.” Indian Geotech. J. 43 (4): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0058-2.
Long, R. P., and K. R. Demars. 2004. Feasibility study of an erosion control laboratory in New England. Maine, MA: The New England Transportation Consortium.
Lu, S., Z. Wang, Y. Hu, B. Liu, and J. Liu. 2018. “Effectiveness and durability of polyacrylamide (PAM) and polysaccharide (Jag C 162) in reducing soil erosion under simulated rainfalls.” Water 10 (3): 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030257.
McFalls, J., M.-H. Li, Y.-J. Yi, and H. C. Landphair. 2007. Cost performance index of temporary erosion control products. College Station, TX: Texas DOT, Texas Transportation Institute, and the Federal Highway Administration.
Meyerhofer, C., G. Meibl, K. Klebinder, B. Kohl, and G. Markart. 2017. “Comparison of the results of a small-plot and a large-plot rainfall simulator—Effects of land use and land cover on surface runoff in alpine catchments.” Catena 156 (Sep): 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.009.
Miller, W. P. 1987. “Infiltration and soil loss of three gypsum-amended ultisols under simulated rainfall.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51 (5): 1314–1320. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050040x.
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. 2011. “Erosion control, sediment control and stormwater management on construction sites and urban areas.” In Vol. 1 of Erosion and sediment control practices. Jackson, MS: Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center. 2017. “Atlas 14 precipitation data frequency server, Auburn, AL, USA.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html.
National Transportation Product Evaluation Program. 2015. “AASHTO/NTPEP erosion control products user guide.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://ntpep.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/66/2020/09/ECP-User-Guide_Feb-2015.pdf.
North American Green. 2009. “Material and performance specification sheet. S150 erosion control blanket.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://www.brockwhite.com/userfiles/documents/info/nag_s150_spec.pdf.
Novotny, V. 2003. Diffuse pollution and watershed management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Profile Products. 2014. “Terra-wood with tack.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://fibramulch.com/assets/Terra_Mulch_pdf.
Renard, K. G. 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Washington, DC: US Government Printing.
Ricks, M. D. 2020. “Comparative analysis of soil erosion using large-, intermediate- and small-scale test plots of bare soil and different hydromulch products under large-scale rainfall simulator.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ.
Ricks, M. D., M. A. Horne, B. Faulkner, W. C. Zech, X. Fang, W. N. Donald, and M. A. Perez. 2019. “Design of a pressurized rainfall simulator for evaluating performance of erosion control practices.” Water 11 (11): 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112386.
Ries, J. B., M. Seeger, T. Iserloh, S. Wistorf, and W. Fister. 2009. “Calibration of simulated rainfall characteristics for the study of soil erosion on agricultural land.” Soil Tillage Res. 106 (1): 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.07.005.
Ryan, A. P. 1991. “Environmental effects of sediment on New Zealand streams: A review.” N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 25 (2): 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1991.9516472.
Scarborough, J. A., G. M. Filz, J. K. Mitchell, and T. L. Brandon. 2000. Final contract report: Erosion protection for soil slopes along Virginia’s highways. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
SCDOT (South Carolina Department of Transportation). 2011. “Supplemental technical specification for hydraulic erosion control products.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.scdot.org/business/pdf/stormwater/SC-M-815-11.pdf.
Sharpley, A., and P. Kleinman. 2003. “Effect of rainfall simulator and plot scale on overland flow and transport.” J. Environ. Qual. 32 (6): 2172–2179. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2172.
Singer, M. J., and J. Blackard. 1982. “Slope angle-interrill soil loss relationships for slopes up to 50%.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46 (6): 1270–1273. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600060030x.
Sprague, C. J., P. Kemp, and J. E. Sprague. 2013. Performance testing of traditional slope erosion controls. San Diego: International Erosion Control Association.
Sprague, C. J., and J. Nelson. 2009. Correlation of bench-scale and large-scale performance testing of RECPs. Reno, NV: International Erosion Control Association.
Taucer, P. I., C. L. Munster, B. P. Wilcox, M. K. Owens, and B. P. Mohanty. 2008. “Large-scale rainfall simulation experiments on juniper rangelands.” Trans. ASABE 51 (6): 1951–1961. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25400.
Tyner, J. S., D. C. Yoder, B. J. Chonicki, and A. Tyagi. 2011. “A Review of construction site best management practices for erosion control.” Trans. ASABE 54 (2): 441–450. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36447.
United States Department of Agriculture, National Resource Conservation Service. 2000. Erosion and sedimentation on construction sites. Washington, DC: Natural Resource Conservation Service.
USEPA. 2008. “The homebuilders clean water settlement.” Accessed June 1, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/home-builders-clean-water-settlement.
Wacha, K. M., C.-H. Huang, P. L. O-Brien, A. N. Papanicolaou, and J. L. Hatfield. 2021. “Quantifying the time-specific kinetic energy of simulated rainfall using a dynamic rain gauge system.” Agric. Environ. Lett. 6 (1): e20042. https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20042.
Werner, K. J., and J. B. Zedler. 2002. “How sedge meadow soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to sedimentation.” Wetlands 22 (3): 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0451:HSMSMA]2.0.CO;2.
Xiubin, H., and H. Zhanbin. 2001. “Zeolite application for enhancing water infiltration and retention in loess soil.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 34 (1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00094-5.
Yakubu, M. L., and Z. Yusop. 2016. “Adaptability of rainfall simulators as a research tool on urban sealed surfaces—A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 62 (6): 996–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1267355.
Yao, C., T. Lei, W. J. Elliot, D. K. McCool, J. Zhao, and S. Chen. 2008. “Critical conditions for rill initiation.” Trans. ASABE 51 (1): 107–114. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24231.
Yu, J., T. Lei, I. Shainberg, A. I. Mamedov, and G. J. Levy. 2003. “Infiltration and erosion in soils treated with dry PAM and gypsum.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67 (2): 630–636. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.6300.
Zingg, A. W. 1940. “Degree and length of slope as it affects soil loss in runoff.” Agric. Eng. 21 (2): 59–64.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 149Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Apr 10, 2022
Accepted: Feb 8, 2023
Published online: May 22, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Industrial, Systems, and Manufacturing Engineering, Wichita State Univ., 1845 Fairmount St., Wichita, KS 67260 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-0065. Email: [email protected]
Brian Faulkner [email protected]
Staff Engineer, Keck and Wood, Inc., 3090 Premiere Pkwy. Suite 200, Duluth, GA 30097. Email: [email protected]
Wesley N. Donald, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., 238 Harbert Engineering, Auburn, AL 36849. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., 238 Harbert Engineering, Auburn, AL 36849. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-3922. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share