Hydromechanics of the Asymmetric Trapezoidal Piano Key and Labyrinth Weirs
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 11
Abstract
This paper presents the results of experimental measurements and numerical simulations on the hydromechanics of trapezoidal asymmetric piano key weirs and compares the performance of piano key weirs and labyrinth weirs with the same crest lengths and layouts. The results show that gradually increasing the sidewall angle from 0° to 6° for labyrinth weirs continuously increases the discharge capacity of the weir. In contrast, for piano key weirs, increasing the sidewall angle from 0° to 3° significantly increases the efficiency of the weir at low to medium heads, but further increasing the sidewall angle does not significantly change the efficiency of the hydraulically optimal asymmetric piano key weir. The high angle of the lateral spilling jet to the outlet keys, along the downstream half of the side crests and the widening of the outlet keys increase the discharge efficiency of the trapezoidal piano-key weir with 3° of sidewall angle and 4 unit keys, compared to the identical weir with 6° of sidewall angle. Despite the wider outlet keys at the downstream of the trapezoidal piano key weir with 6° of sidewall angle, the narrower width of the inlet key, results in a higher streamwise inertia and thus the lower discharge at the outlet keys. Discretization of the discharge along the crest of the tested weirs confirms these results.
Practical Applications
In this research, the discharge capacity of trapezoidal piano key and labyrinth weirs were examined under various conditions and their performance was compared. The authors suggest an optimal ratio of weir height to unit width for rectangular piano key weirs, which increases the discharge coefficient by 6%. This finding can be applied to new dam projects to design cost-effective and highly efficient weirs. The study also showed that increasing the sidewall angle from 0° to 6° in trapezoidal labyrinth weirs improves the discharge coefficient by an average of 10.3%. However, in trapezoidal piano key weirs, increasing the sidewall angle from 0° to 3° has a significant impact on discharge coefficient, but further increase reverses the trend. Overall, piano key weirs perform better than their labyrinth counterparts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Amanian, N. 1987. “Performance and design of labyrinth spillway.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Anderson, R. M., and B. P. Tullis. 2012. “Piano key weir hydraulics and labyrinth weir comparison.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (3): 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000530.
Bhukya, R. K., M. Pandey, M. Valyrakis, and P. Michalis. 2022. “Discharge estimation over piano key weirs: A review of recent developments.” Water 14 (19): 3029. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193029.
Cicero, G. M., J. R. Delisle, V. Lefebvre, and J. Vermeulen. 2013. “Experimental and numerical study of the hydraulic performance of a trapezoidal piano key weir.” In Proc., Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II (PKW 2013), 265–272. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Crookston, B. M. 2010. “Labyrinth weirs.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Crookston, B. M., R. M. Anderson, and B. P. Tullis. 2018. “Free-flow discharge estimation method for piano key weir geometries.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 19 (Mar): 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.003.
Erpicum, S., F. Laugier, M. Pfister, M. Pirotton, G. M. Cicero, and A. J. Schleiss, eds. 2013. Labyrinth and piano key weirs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Flow Science, Inc. 2008. FLOW-3D user’s manual, version 9.3. Los Alamos, NM: Flow Science.
Henderson, L. F. 1966. “Experiments on the impingement of a supersonic jet on a flat plate.” Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 17 (Sep): 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597237.
Hirt, C. W., and B. D. Nichols. 1981. “Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.” J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1): 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.
Hu, H., Z. Qian, W. Yang, D. Hou, and L. Du. 2018. “Numerical study of characteristics and discharge capacity of piano key weirs.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 62 (Aug): 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.05.004.
Hunt, J. C. R., S. Leibovich, and K. J. Richards. 1988. “Turbulent shear flows over low hills.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 114 (484): 1435–1470. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711448405.
Karaderen, D. 2014. “Comparision of linear, labyrinth and piano key weirs to increase the discharge capacity of existing spillways for a given head.” Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical Univ.
Khassaf, S. I., and M. B. Al-Baghdadi. 2015. “Experimental study of non-rectangular piano key weir discharge coefficient.” Int. J. Energy Environ. 6 (2): 425–436.
Kilic, Z., and M. Emin Emiroglu. 2022. “Study of hydraulic characteristics of trapezoidal piano key side weir using different approaches.” Water Supply 22 (8): 6672–6691. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.264.
Kumar, M., P. Sihag, N. K. Tiwari, and S. Ranjan. 2020. “Experimental study and modelling discharge coefficient of trapezoidal and rectangular piano key weirs.” Appl. Water Sci. 10 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1104-8.
Laugier, F., A. Lochu, C. Gille, M. Leite Ribeiro, and J.-L. Boillat. 2009. “Design and construction of a labyrinth PKW spillway at Saint-Marc dam, France.” Int. J. Hydropower Dams 16 (5): 100–107.
Laugier, F., J. Pralong, and B. Blancher. 2011. “Influence of structural thickness of sidewalls on PKW spillway discharge capacity.” In Proc., Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs-PKW 2011, 159–165. London: CRC Press.
Laugier, F., J. Vermeulen, and V. Lefebvre. 2013. “Overview of piano key weirs experience developed at EDF during the past few years.” In Proc., Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, 213. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Le Doucen, O., M. Leite Ribeiro, J. L. Boillat, A. Schleiss, and F. Laugier. 2009. “Etude paramétrique de la capacité des PK-Weirs.” In Proc., Modèles Physiques Hydrauliques—Outils Indispensables du XXIe Siècle, SHF. Paris: Hydrotechnical Society of France.
Leite Ribeiro, M., J. L. Boillat, and A. J. Schleiss. 2011. “Experimental parametric study for hydraulic design of PKWs.” In Labyrinth and piano key weirs-PKW 2011, 183–190. London: CRC Press.
Leite Ribeiro, M., M. Pfister, and A. J. Schleiss. 2013. “Overview of piano key weir prototypes and scientific model investigations.” In Labyrinth and piano key weirs II, 273. London: CRC Press.
Leite Ribeiro, M., M. Pfister, A. J. Schleiss, and J. L. Boillat. 2012. “Hydraulic design of A-type piano key weirs.” J. Hydraul. Res. 50 (4): 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.695041.
Machiels, O. 2012. “Experimental study of the hydraulic behavior of piano key weirs.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Applied Science, Univ. of Liège.
Machiels, O., M. Pirotton, A. Pierre, B. Dewals, and S. Erpicum. 2014. “Experimental parametric study and design of piano key weirs.” J. Hydraul. Res. 52 (3): 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.875070.
Mehboudi, A., J. Attari, and S. A. Hosseini. 2016. “Experimental study of discharge coefficient for trapezoidal piano key weirs.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 50 (Aug): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.06.005.
Noroozi, B., J. Bazargan, and A. Safarzadeh. 2021. “Introducing the T-shaped weir: A new nonlinear weir.” Water Supply 21 (7): 3772–3789. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.144.
Novák, P., and J. Čabelka. 1981. “Models in hydraulic engineering: Physical principles and design applications.” In Monographs & surveys in water resources engineering. London: Pitman.
Ouamane, A., and F. Lempérière. 2006. “Design of a new economic shape of weir.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Dams in the Societies of the 21st Century, 463–470. Paris: International Committee on Large Dams.
Roache, P. 1994. “Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies.” J. Fluids Eng. 116 (3): 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2910291.
Safarzadeh, A., and B. Noroozi. 2017. “3D Hydrodynamics of trapezoidal piano key spillways.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (Jan): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs40999-016-0100-8.
Shen, X., and M. Oertel. 2021. “Comparative study of nonsymmetrical trapezoidal and rectangular piano key weirs with varying key width ratios.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 147 (11): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001942.
Tullis, J. P., N. Amanian, and D. R. Waldron. 1995. “Design of labyrinth spillways.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (3): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1995)121:3(247).
Willmore, C. 2004. “Hydraulic characteristics of labyrinth weirs.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 6, 2022
Accepted: Jun 26, 2023
Published online: Sep 12, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 12, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Asymmetry
- Barriers (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Head (fluid mechanics)
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydraulic structures
- Hydraulics
- Hydrologic engineering
- Hydromechanics
- Inlets (waterway)
- Mathematics
- Models (by type)
- Numerical models
- Protective structures
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Symmetry
- Water and water resources
- Water discharge
- Waterways
- Weirs
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.