Technical Papers
Aug 20, 2024

Evaluating the Status of Wetland Conservation Integration with Multitype State Action Plans in the 50 US States

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29, Issue 1

Abstract

The protection of wetlands plays a critical role in ecosystem health and human welfare. This research paper explores the role of major types of state action plans, including climate action plans (CAPs), hazard mitigation plans (HMPs), nonpoint source pollution management plans (NPSPs), long range transportation plans (LRTPs), and state wildlife action plans (SWAPs), to evaluate how well wetland conservation efforts have been integrated in these state-level plans in the 50 US states. A plan evaluation protocol with 15 indicators was developed to evaluate the plan integration across the 196 state-level action plans. The findings suggest that, even though various wetland conservation initiatives operate within the realm of environmental protection, a considerable number of these plans dedicate limited direct focus to wetland preservation. While the primary emphasis of these plans may not be explicitly on wetland conservation, the results unveil the degree of integration between wetland conservation and other state-level planning endeavors. The indicators show that the SWAPs obtained the highest grade among the five types of plans due to the closest natural connections of wildlife with wetland habitat. The LRTPs received the lowest score among all the plans, as expected, due to low scope of covering environmental issues. HMPs, NPSPs, and CAPs have considered wetland conservation as a useful mitigation tool in hazard risk reduction, water quality improvement, and climate adaptations, but large variations still exist among the different states. Additionally, among the indicators, coordination and policy development received relatively lower scores, suggesting that state agencies should work more proactively and collaboratively to improve wetland conservation. Incorporating wetland protection and restoration efforts in the state-level planning mechanisms is an important step toward achieving the national goal of no net loss of wetlands and improving the quantity and quality of wetlands in the United States.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research team sincerely appreciates the valuable guidance and professional technical support from the US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, the US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. This paper is supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Wetland Program Development Grant (WD 84036401). The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the funding agencies and do not mention the trade names or commercial products that constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Author contributions: Rabah Khan: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Methodology; Writing—original draft; contributed to the data collection, data analysis. Jahangeer Jahangeer: Formal analysis; Methodology; Data validation; Visualization; Writing—review and editing. Ruhma Khan: Formal analysis; Writing—review and editing. Zhenghong Tang: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Project administration; Supervision; Writing—review and editing.

References

Acreman, M., A. Smith, L. Charters, D. Tickner, J. Opperman, S. Acreman, F. Edwards, P. Sayers, and F. Chivava. 2021. “Evidence for the effectiveness of nature-based solutions to water issues in Africa.” Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (6): 063007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0210.
Bacher-Gresock, B., and J. S. Schwarzer. 2009. “Eco-logical: An ecosystem approach to developing transportation infrastructure projects in a changing environment.” UC Davis Road Ecology Center. Accessed December 20, 2022. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0qb987s5.
Baker, L. A. 1992. “Introduction to nonpoint source pollution in the United States and prospects for wetland use.” Ecol. Eng. 1 (1–2): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(92)90023-U.
Bengston, D. N., J. O. Fletcher, and K. C. Nelson. 2004. “Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States.” Landscape Urban Plann. 69 (2–3): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007.
Berke, P., and D. Godschalk. 2009. “Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies.” J. Plann. Lit. 23 (3): 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412208327014.
Burkett, V., and J. Kusler. 2000. “Climate change: Potential impacts and interactions in wetlands of the United States.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36 (2): 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04270.x.
Burt, T. P., et al. 2002. “Water table fluctuations in the riparian zone: Comparative results from a pan-European experiment.” J. Hydrol. 265 (1–4): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00102-6.
Cai, Z. 2012. “Greenhouse gas budget for terrestrial ecosystems in China.” Sci. China Earth Sci. 55: 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4309-8.
Clare, S., N. Krogman, L. Foote, and N. Lemphers. 2011. “Where is the avoidance in the implementation of wetland law and policy?” Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 19: 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9209-3.
Darnell, R. M. 1976. “US environmental protection agency, office of research and development, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory.” Impacts of construction activities in wetlands of the United States (No. 3143). Accessed December 20, 2022. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20012TKE.TXT.
Darrah, S. E., Y. Shennan-Farpón, J. Loh, N. C. Davidson, C. M. Finlayson, R. C. Gardner, and M. J. Walpole. 2019. “Improvements to the Wetland Extent Trends (WET) index as a tool for monitoring natural and human-made wetlands.” Ecol. Indic. 99: 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.032.
Davenport, M. A., C. A. Bridges, J. C. Mangun, A. D. Carver, K. W. J. Williard, and E. O. Jones. 2010. “Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: A case study of the Cache River wetlands in southern Illinois, USA.” Environ. Manage. 45: 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9446-x.
Dungan, P. J. 1990. “Wetland conservation: A review of current issues and required action, The World Conservation Union.” Accessed January 1, 2024. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/1990-011-En.pdf.
Erwin, K. L. 2009. “Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world.” Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 17 (1): 71–84.
Fontaine, J. J. 2011. “Improving our legacy: Incorporation of adaptive management into state wildlife action plans.” J. Environ. Manage. 92 (5): 1403–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.015.
Gibbs, J. P. 2000. “Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation.” Conserv. Biol. 14 (1): 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98608.x.
Glicksman, R. L. 2014. “Regulatory safeguards for accountable ecosystem service markets in wetlands development.” Univ. Kansas Law Rev. 62: 943.
Guyadeen, D., and M. Seasons. 2018. “Evaluation theory and practice: Comparing program evaluation and evaluation in planning.” J. Plan. Educ. Res. 38 (1): 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675930.
He, J., C.-K. Bao, T.-F. Shu, X.-X. Yun, D. Jiang, and L. Brown. 2011. “Framework for integration of urban planning, strategic environmental assessment and ecological planning for urban sustainability within the context of China.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31 (6): 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.09.002.
Horney, J., C. Dwyer, M. Aminto, P. Berke, and G. Smith. 2017. “Developing indicators to measure post-disaster community recovery in the United States.” Disasters 41 (1): 124–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12190.
Houck, O. A., and M. Rolland. 1995. “Federalism in wetlands regulation: A consideration of delegation of Clean Water Act Section 404 and related programs to the states.” Maryland Law Rev. 54: 1242.
Hu, Q., Z. Tang, M. Shulski, N. Umphlett, T. Abdel-Monem, and F. E. Uhlarik. 2018. “An examination of midwestern US cities’ preparedness for climate change and extreme hazards.” Nat. Hazards 94: 777–800.
Iacob, O., J. S. Rowan, I. Brown, and C. Ellis. 2014. “Evaluating wider benefits of natural flood management strategies: An ecosystem-based adaptation perspective.” Hydrol. Res. 45 (6): 774–787. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2014.184.
Jahangeer, J., L. Zhang, and Z. Tang. 2024a. “Evaluating wetland hydrological performance under three different conservation programs in Nebraska, United States, during 2018–2021.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 60 (1): 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13160.
Jahangeer, J., L. Zhang, and Z. Tang. 2024b. “Assessing salinity dynamics of saline wetlands in eastern Nebraska using continuous data from wireless sensors.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 28 (1): 04023035. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1263.
Kingsford, R. T., et al. 2021. “Ramsar wetlands of international importance–improving conservation outcomes.” Front. Environ. Sci. 9: 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367.
Krippendorff, K. 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lawson, C. T., and A. Tobey. 2022. “The role of natural hazard mitigation plans in an age of pandemics.” Prog. Disaster Sci. 16: 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100267.
Lyles, W., P. Berke, and G. Smith. 2014. “A comparison of local hazard mitigation plan quality in six states, USA.” Landscape Urban Plann. 122: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.010.
Marsalek, J., and H. Schreier. 2009. “Innovation in stormwater management in Canada: The way forward.” Water Qual. Res. J. 44 (1): v–x. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2009.001.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Mortsch, L. D. 1998. “Assessing the impact of climate change on the Great Lakes shoreline wetlands.” Clim. Change 40: 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005445709728.
Newell, R., A. Dale, and M. Roseland. 2018. “Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning: Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs.” Int. J. Clim. Change: Impacts Responses 10 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v10i04/1-23.
Novellie, P., H. Biggs, and D. Roux. 2016. “National laws and policies can enable or confound adaptive governance: Examples from South African national parks.” Environ. Sci. Policy 66: 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.08.005.
Park, E., S. Lee, and D. J. Peters. 2017. “Iowa wetlands outdoor recreation visitors’ decision-making process: An extended model of goal-directed behavior.” J. Outdoor Recreat. Tourism 17: 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.01.001.
Randolph, J. 2004. Vol. 17 of Environmental land use planning and management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Richardson, C. J. 2005. “Highway construction and mitigation: On the road to increasing wetland function.” Natl. Wetlands Newsl. 27 (5): 17–20.
Rockström, J., et al. 2009. “A safe operating space for humanity.” Nature 461 (7263): 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
Salimi, S., S. A. Almuktar, and M. Scholz. 2021. “Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands.” J. Environ. Manage. 286: 112160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112160.
Semlitsch, R. D., and J. R. Bodie. 2003. “Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles.” Conserv. Biol. 17 (5): 1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x.
Stevens, M. R., W. Lyles, and P. R. Berke. 2014. “Measuring and reporting intercoder reliability in plan quality evaluation research.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 34 (1): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13513614.
Tang, Z., Z. Dai, X. Fu, and X. Li. 2013. “Content analysis for the US coastal states’ climate action plans in managing the risks of extreme climate events and disasters.” Ocean Coast. Manag. 80: 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.04.004.
Tang, Z., T. LaGrange, L. Zhang, J. Cyboron, Q. Hu, T. Wei, and J. Henson. 2020. “Integrating wetland conservation into local planning, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska.” Accessed December 20, 2022. https://water.unl.edu/documents/Wetland-Planning-Guidebook-2020.pdf.
Thomas, R. 2008. “State wetland protection: Status, trends & model approaches: A 50-state study by the environmental law institute.” Environmental Law Institute. Accessed December 20, 2023. https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/d18__06.pdf.
Tiner, R. W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: Current status and recent trends. St. Petersburg, FL: National Wetlands Inventory, Fish and Wildlife Service.
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2015. Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence. Final Rep. EPA/600/R-14. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Woodruff, S. C., and M. Stults. 2016. “Numerous strategies but limited implementation guidance in US local adaptation plans.” Nat. Clim. Chang. 6 (8): 796–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3012.
Xu, T., B. Weng, D. Yan, K. Wang, X. Li, W. Bi, M. Li, X. Cheng, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Wetlands of international importance: Status, threats, and future protection.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (10): 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101818.
Zebardast, L., S. Akbarpour, H. R. Jafari, and M. Bagherzadeh Karimi. 2021. “Sustainable wetland management through bridging the communication gap between conservation projects and local communities.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 23: 11098–11119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01082-5.
Zedler, J. B. 2003. “Wetlands at your service: Reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale.” Front. Ecol. Environ. 1 (2): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0065:WAYSRI]2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, L., Q. Hu, M. Hayes, M. Burbach, T. Messer, Y. Zhou, and Z. Tang. 2022. “Evaluating Nebraska’s local comprehensive plans to achieve the national wetland conservation missions in the USA.” Ecosyst. Health Sustainability 8 (1): 2070550. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/20964129.2022.2070550.
Zollitsch, B., and J. Christie. 2016. “Status and trends report on state wetland programs in the United States.” Association of State Wetland Managers. Accessed December 20, 2022. https://www.nawm.org/pdf_lib/state_summaries/status_and_trends_report_on_state_wetland_programs_in_the_united_states_102015.pdf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29Issue 1January 2025

History

Received: Jan 31, 2024
Accepted: May 14, 2024
Published online: Aug 20, 2024
Published in print: Jan 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Jan 20, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Community and Regional Planning Program, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE. Email: [email protected]
Community and Regional Planning Program, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-1265. Email: [email protected]
Community and Regional Planning Program, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE. Email: [email protected]
Zhenghong Tang [email protected]
Community and Regional Planning Program, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share