Technical Papers
Sep 4, 2024

Biodegradation of Heterogeneous Pollutants in Hybrid MBBR System: Resilience Assessment under Different Shock Stress Conditions

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29, Issue 1

Abstract

The sudden increase in phenol concentrations is frequently observed in coke-oven, petrochemical, and petroleum refinery waste streams due to changes in process parameters, posing challenges for the biological treatment processes due to the combined toxic effects of phenol with other inorganic pollutants present in the same wastewater. Owing to that fact, the versatility of the designed biological treatment system against multiple shock loading conditions needs to be analyzed before field-scale implementation. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the stability of a continuous hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system against multiple and extreme phenol shock stress conditions and its impacts on the degradation of each pollutant (phenol, NH4–N, SO42, and NO3–N) present in the wastewater under different metabolic conditions. The continuous hybrid system comprises three different MBBR units, such as anaerobic (CM1), anoxic (CM2), and aerobic (CM3) units, connected in series and operated at 2.11 days. The system was exposed to 3,500, 4,000, and 5,000 mg/L of phenol shock loads in the presence of NH4–N (300 mg/L) and SO42 (200 mg/L) during Shock Phases I, II, and III, respectively. In Phase IV, the degradation performance of the system was further analyzed with 5,000 mg/L of phenol and two subsequent doses of NH4–N (350 and 400 mg/L) to assess the system’s stability under multiple pollutant stress conditions. The system was completely recovered from the 3,500 and 4,000 mg/L of phenol stress conditions within a recovery period of 14 days, in Phases I and II. However, the SO42 and NH4–N removal was inhibited in CM1 and CM3 reactors, respectively, due to the exposure of the high concentration of phenol (5,000 mg/L). The performance of CM1 and CM2 was severely affected in Phase IV, even after stopping the feed. Nonetheless, CM3 removed all the phenol from the wastewater in Phase IV, which reflects the dominance of heterotrophs. The hybrid MBBR system could withstand up to 4,000 mg/L of phenol shock load and achieved 100%, 97%, 69%, 93.51% of phenol, NH4–N, SO42, and NO3–N removal during the recovery period, respectively.

Practical Applications

An abrupt change in pollutant concentration in waste streams is often observed, which becomes a stumbling block for secondary biological treatment processes due to the toxic effect. However, studies related to the treatment of multiple pollutants and achieving stable removal efficiency using a biological treatment system under multiple shock loading conditions are limited. This study shows the potential of a continuously operated hybrid MBBR system for simultaneous removal of heterogeneous pollutants (phenol, NH4–N, NO3–N, and SO42) under various phenol and ammonia shock loading conditions. The results obtained from this lab-scale study could be helpful for the practitioners in designing integrated treatment systems to treat the real coke-oven and petroleum refinery effluent. The system achieved stable and higher removal efficiency for the multiple pollutants-bearing wastewater under various shock loading conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Science and Engineering Research Board (DST), Government of India (Project No. SB/EMEQ-107/2014), for providing financial support for this study.

References

Ahmed, W., X. Tian, and R. Delatolla. 2019. “Nitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor: Performance at low temperatures and response to cold-shock.” Chemosphere 229: 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.176.
Alves, A. P. A., P. S. Lima, M. Dezotti, and J. P. Bassin. 2017. “Impact of phenol shock loads on the performance of a combined activated sludge-moving bed biofilm reactor system.” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 123: 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.06.015.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: APHA.
Bajaj, M., C. Gallert, and J. Winter. 2009. “Treatment of phenolic wastewater in an anaerobic fixed bed reactor (AFBR)—Recovery after shock loading.” J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2–3): 1330–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.027.
Chu, H., X. Liu, J. Ma, T. Li, H. Fan, X. Zhou, Y. Zhang, E. Li, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Two-stage anoxic-oxic (A/O) system for the treatment of coking wastewater: Full-scale performance and microbial community analysis.” Chem. Eng. J. 417: 129204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129204.
Di Biase, A., T. R. Devlin, M. S. Kowalski, and J. A. Oleszkiewicz. 2018. “Performance and design considerations for an anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor treating brewery wastewater: Impact of surface area loading rate and temperature.” J. Environ. Manage. 216: 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.093.
Eiroa, M., A. Vilar, L. Amor, C. Kennes, and M. C. Veiga. 2005. “Biodegradation and effect of formaldehyde and phenol on the denitrification process.” Water Res. 39(2–3): 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.017.
Ghochlavi, N., A. A. Aghapour, and H. Khorsandi. 2022. “Biodegradation of 2-4-6 trichlorophenol by sequencing batch reactors (SBR) equipped with a rotating biological bed and operated in an anaerobic-aerobic condition.” Front. Environ. Sci. 10: 1015790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1015790.
Guha Thakurta, S., M. Aakula, J. Chakrabarty, and S. Dutta. 2018. “Bioremediation of phenol from synthetic and real wastewater using Leptolyngbya sp.: A comparison and assessment of lipid production.” 3 Biotech. 8: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1229-8.
Jaiswal, V. K., R. K. Sonwani, and R. S. Singh. 2023. “Construction and performance assessment of recirculating packed bed biofilm reactor (RPBBR) for effective biodegradation of p-cresol from wastewater.” Bioresour. Technol. 384: 129372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129372.
Kamali, M., T. Gameiro, M. E. Costa, I. Capela, and T. M. Aminabhavi. 2019. “Enhanced biodegradation of phenolic wastewaters with acclimatized activated sludge–A kinetic study.” Chem. Eng. J. 378: 122186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122186.
Kieu, H. T. Q., E. Müller, and H. Horn. 2011. “Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria.” Water Res. 45 (13): 3863–3870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.043.
Kumar, V., and P. Verma. 2023. “A critical review on environmental risk and toxic hazards of refractory pollutants discharged in chlorolignin waste of pulp and paper mills and their remediation approaches for environmental safety.” Environ. Res. 236: 116728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116728.
Li, J., H. Yan, Q. Chen, J. Meng, J. Li, Y. Zhang, and A. K. Jha. 2021. “Performance of anaerobic sludge and the microbial social behaviors induced by quorum sensing in a UASB after a shock loading.” Bioresour. Technol. 330: 124972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124972.
Li, J., L. Zheng, C. Ye, Z. Zhou, B. Ni, X. Zhang, and H. Liu. 2022. “Unveiling organic loading shock-resistant mechanism in a pilot-scale moving bed biofilm reactor-assisted dual-anaerobic-anoxic/oxic system for effective municipal wastewater treatment.” Bioresour. Technol. 347: 126339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126339.
Li, W., Q.-l. Zhao, and H. Liu. 2009. “Sulfide removal by simultaneous autotrophic and heterotrophic desulfurization–denitrification process.” J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2–3): 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.108.
Lin, Y.-H., and C.-L. Wu. 2011. “Sensitivity analysis of phenol degradation with sulfate reduction under anaerobic conditions.” Environ. Model. Assess. 16: 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-010-9243-1.
Liu, L.-Y., G.-J. Xie, D.-F. Xing, B.-F. Liu, J. Ding, G.-L. Cao, and N.-Q. Ren. 2021. “Sulfate dependent ammonium oxidation: A microbial process linked nitrogen with sulfur cycle and potential application.” Environ. Res. 192: 110282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110282.
Luo, D., J. Qian, X. Jin, L. Zhang, K. You, P.-f. Yu, and J.-x. Fu. 2022. “How phenol stresses anammox for the treatment of ammonia-rich wastewater: Phenomena, microbial community evolution and molecular modeling.” Bioresour. Technol. 347: 126747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126747.
Majumder, P. S., and S. K. Gupta. 2008. “Effect of carbon sources and shock loading on the removal of chlorophenols in sequential anaerobic–aerobic reactors.” Bioresour. Technol. 99 (8): 2930–2937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.024.
Mallick, S. K., and S. Chakraborty. 2021. “Effect of crude oil shock load on anoxic-aerobic sequential moving bed reactors during petroleum refinery wastewater treatment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 329: 129795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129795.
Metcalf and Eddy. 2003. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Muthukumaravel, K., et al. 2023. “Impact of sublethal phenol in freshwater fish Labeo rohita on biochemical and haematological parameters.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 195 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10554-2.
Panigrahy, N., A. Priyadarshini, M. M. Sahoo, A. K. Verma, A. Daverey, and N. K. Sahoo. 2022. “A comprehensive review on eco-toxicity and biodegradation of phenolics: Recent progress and future outlook.” Environ. Technol. Innovation 27: 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102423.
Panigrahy, N., M. Barik, and N. K. Sahoo. 2020. “Kinetics of phenol biodegradation by an indigenous Pseudomonas citronellolis NS1 isolated from coke oven wastewater.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 24 (3): 04020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000502.
Sahariah, B. P., A. Jayapal, and S. Chakraborty. 2018. “Stability of continuous and fed batch sequential anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic moving bed bioreactor systems at phenol shock load application.” Environ. Technol. 39 (15): 1898–1907. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1343388.
Satapathy, M., B. P. Sahariah, and A. Jayapal. 2022. “Biodegradation of highly concentrated phenol and ammonia in the presence of oxyanions in sequential A2/O MBBR system.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 26 (2): 04022006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000691.
Singh, R., R. K. Dutta, D. V. Naik, A. Ray, and P. K. Kanaujia. 2021. “High surface area Eucalyptus wood biochar for the removal of phenol from petroleum refinery wastewater.” Environ. Challenges 5: 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100353.
Song, J., W. Zhang, J. Gao, X. Hu, C. Zhang, Q. He, F. Yang, H. Wang, X. Wang, and X. Zhan. 2020. “A pilot-scale study on the treatment of landfill leachate by a composite biological system under low dissolved oxygen conditions: Performance and microbial community.” Bioresour. Technol. 296: 122344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122344.
Terreros-Mecalco, J., O. Guzmán-López, and L. García-Solorio. 2022. “Simultaneous aerobic-anaerobic biodegradation of an industrial effluent of polymeric resins with high phenol concentration at different organic loading rates in a non-conventional UASB type reactor.” Chem. Eng. J. 430: 133180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133180.
Tian, H., X. Xu, J. Qu, H. Li, Y. Hu, L. Huang, W. He, and B. Li. 2020. “Biodegradation of phenolic compounds in high saline wastewater by biofilms adhering on aerated membranes.” J. Hazard. Mater. 392: 122463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122463.
Tolêdo, C. S. S., M. C. Matheus, G. A. T. Fontoura, M. Dezotti, and S. B. Fiaux. 2022. “Impact of gradually-achieved high phenol loads on the nitrification and COD removal performance of an MBBR fed with synthetic wastewater.” Environ. Technol. 45 (7): 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2143286.
Wang, Y., Q. Liu, L. Yan, J. Li, G. Xie, S. Chen, and J. Wu. 2022. “From pollutant to valuable phenolic resin: A novel reutilization strategy of industrial semi-coking wastewater.” J. Cleaner Prod. 377: 134477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134477.
Yusoff, N., S.-A. Ong, L.-N. Ho, Y.-S. Wong, F.-N. Saad, W. Khalik, and S.-L. Lee. 2019. “Performance of the hybrid growth sequencing batch reactor (HG-SBR) for biodegradation of phenol under various toxicity conditions.” J. Environ. Sci. 75: 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.001.
Zhang, C., F. Cheng, H. Zhao, and J. Li. 2021. “Enhanced phenol degradation under different shock-stress in LAC/AS system: The combination effects of LAC toxicity mitigation and microbial community shift.” J. Water Process Eng. 40: 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101824.
Zhang, C., J. Li, F. Cheng, and Y. Liu. 2018. “Enhanced phenol removal in an innovative lignite activated coke-assisted biological process.” Bioresour. Technol. 260: 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.091.
Zhou, H., G. Wang, M. Wu, W. Xu, X. Zhang, and L. Liu. 2018. “Phenol removal performance and microbial community shift during pH shock in a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR).” J. Hazard. Mater. 351: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.055.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29Issue 1January 2025

History

Received: Dec 10, 2023
Accepted: Jun 3, 2024
Published online: Sep 4, 2024
Published in print: Jan 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Feb 4, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur 492010, Chhattisgarh, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6298-4064. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur 492010, Chhattisgarh, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-4903. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share