Technical Papers
Nov 17, 2022

Construction and Demolition Waste as Valuable Resources for Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27, Issue 2

Abstract

In this study, the possible utilization of mixed construction and demolition waste (CDW) is evaluated for constructing geosynthetic-encased stone columns. A detailed geotechnical characterization is presented, including investigation of the physical, mechanical, and hydraulic properties of the CDW. Further, the performance of a group of 36 geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GECs) constructed using CDW (CDW-GECs) is investigated by 3D numerical modeling. Both the load-bearing ability and the settlement characteristics of the CDW-GECs showed similar performance to that of GECs made of natural crushed stone aggregates (CSA-GECs). Vertiсаl stresses imparted to the CDW-GEC were 3 times the tоtаl vertiсаl stresses imparted tо the surrоunding sоil, resulting in a stress concentration ratio of 3. This is due to the better stiffness оf the CDW-GECs compared with the surrounding soil and soil arching effect. The CDW-GECs helped in dissipating excess hydrostatic pressure developed in the clay by acting as a vertical drain. Around 65% of the total settlement happened during construction itself. Maximum hoop tension in geosynthetic encasement of the CDW-GECs was developed at a depth of 2.5 times the diameter of the column and was 15 kN/m. The maximum value of hoop tension decreases as the distance of the stone column from the center of the embankment increases. Tension mobilized in the basal geogrid was in agreement with the differential settlement pattern with a maximum value near to the center of the embankment, which is found to be 23 kN/m. The present study indicates that CDW can be considered as a sustainable and valuable resource for the construction of geosynthetic-encased stone columns.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the TDT division, Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India and their financial support is highly acknowledged (Project No. DST/TDT/WM/2022/118).

References

Agrawal, A., T. J. Saravanan, K. Bisht, and K. I. S. A. Kabeer. 2021. “Synthesis of cement composites utilizing ceramic waste as a partial replacement for Portland cement: Literature review.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 25 (4): 03121003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000637.
Ali, K., J. T. Shahu, and K. G. Sharma. 2012. “Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: A comparative study.” Geosynth. Int. 19 (4): 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00016.
Almeida, M. S. S., I. Hosseinpour, M. Riccio, and D. Alexiew. 2015. “Behavior of geotextile-encased granular columns supporting test embankment on soft deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (3): 04014116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001256.
Ambily, A. P., and S. R. Gandhi. 2007. “Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405).
Arulrajah, A., J. Piratheepan, M. M. Disfani, and M. W. Bo. 2013. “Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (8): 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652.
ASTM. 2005. Standard test method for measuring the pH of soil for use in corrosion testing. ASTM G51-95. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2009. Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM D6913-04. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011. Standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM D7181-11. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for density, relative density (specific gravity), and absorption of coarse aggregates. ASTM C127-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ayadat, T., and A. M. Hanna. 2005. “Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ground Improv. 9 (4): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2005.9.4.137.
Bae, W. S., B. W. Shin, B. C. An, and J. S. Kim. 2002. “Behaviors of foundation system improved with stone columns.” In Proc., 12th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. California, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).
Basack, S., S. Nimbalkar, M. Karakouzian, S. Bharadwaj, Z. Xie, and N. Krause. 2022. “Field installation effects of stone columns on load settlement characteristics of reinforced soft ground.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (4): 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002321.
BRE (Building Research Establishment). 2000. Specifying vibro stone columns. Report BR 391. Garston, UK: CRC Press.
Brown, R. E. 1977. “Vibroflotation compaction of cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (12): 1437–1451. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000538.
BS (British Standards). 1990. Testing aggregates. Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). BS 812-110. London: British Standards.
Cantero, B., M. Bravo, J. de Brito, I. F. Sáez del Bosque, and C. Medina. 2021a. “Assessment of the permeability to aggressive agents of concrete with recycled cement and mixed recycled aggregate.” Appl. Sci. 11 (9): 3856. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093856.
Cantero, B., J. Sainz-Aja, A. Yoris, C. Medina, and C. Thomas. 2021b. “Resonance fatigue behaviour of concretes with recycled cement and aggregate.” Appl. Sci. 11 (11): 5045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115045.
Cardoso, R., R. V. Silva, J. de Brito, and R. Dhir. 2016. “Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: A literature review.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 49: 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.021.
Chen, K., J. Wang, B. Yu, H. Wu, and J. Zhang. 2021. “Critical evaluation of construction and demolition waste and associated environmental impacts: A scientometric analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 287: 125071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125071.
Dash, S. K., and M. C. Bora. 2013. “Influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (7): 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0437.
Deb, K. 2008. “Modeling of granular bed-stone column-improved soft soil.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (10): 1267–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.672.
Deb, K. 2010. “A mathematical model to study the soil arching effect in stone column-supported embankment resting on soft foundation soil.” Appl. Math. Model. 34 (12): 3871–3883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.026.
Dheerendra Babu, M. R., S. Nayak, and R. Shivashankar. 2013. “A critical review of construction, analysis and behaviour of stone columns.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9555-9.
Ghazavi, M., and J. N. Afshar. 2013. “Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns.” Geotext. Geomembr. 38: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.04.003.
Gniel, J., and A. Bouazza. 2009. “Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (3): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001.
Gu, Z.-A., F.-J. Niu, J.-F. Chen, and X.-T. Wang. 2022. “Centrifuge tests on geosythetic-encased stone column supported embankment on seasonal frozen soil.” Geotext. Geomembr. 50 (5): 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.007.
Hardin, B. O. 1985. “Crushing of soil particles.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (10): 1177–1192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:10(1177).
Hosseinpour, I., M. S. S. Almeida, and M. Riccio. 2015. “Full-scale load test and finite-element analysis of soft ground improved by geotextile-encased granular columns.” Geosynth. Int. 22 (6): 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00023.
Hosseinpour, I., M. Riccio, and M. S. S. Almeida. 2014. “Numerical evaluation of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using encasement and laminated disks.” Geotext. Geomembr. 42 (4): 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.06.002.
Hosseinpour, I., C. Soriano, and M. S. S. Almeida. 2019. “A comparative study for the performance of encased granular columns.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 11 (2): 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.002.
ICE (Institution of Civil Engineers). 1987. Specification for ground treatment. Great Britain: ICE.
IS (Indian Standard). 2003. Indian standard-design and construction for ground improvement guidelines. Part-1 stone columns. IS 15284-Part1. New Delhi, India: IS.
Islam, R., T. H. Nazifa, A. Yuniarto, A. S. Uddin, S. Salmiati, and S. Shahid. 2019. “An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 95: 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.049.
Kashyap, R., M. Saxena, A. Gautam, S. Chauhan, A. Mourya, and P. Verma. 2022. “A study on recycled lightweight aggregate concrete.” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 7 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00168-z.
Khabbazian, M., V. N. Kaliakin, and C. L. Meehan. 2010. “Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behaviour of granular columns.” Geosynth. Int. 17 (3): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2010.17.3.132.
Malarvizhi, S. N., and K. Ilamparuthi. 2007. “Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column.” Soils Found. 47 (5): 873–885. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.873.
Mehrjardi, G. T., A. Azizi, A. Haji-Azizi, and G. Asdollafardi. 2020. “Evaluating and improving the construction and demolition waste technical properties to use in road construction.” Transp. Geotech. 23: 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100349.
Mitchell, J. K., and T. R. Huber. 1985. “Performance of a stone column foundation.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (2): 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:2(205).
Mohammadinia, A., A. Arulrajah, S. Horpibulsuk, and P. T. Shourijeh. 2019. “Impact of potassium cations on the light chemical stabilization of construction and demolition wastes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 203: 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.083.
Mohammadinia, A., M. Naeini, A. Arulrajah, S. Horpibulsuk, and M. Leong. 2020. “Shakedown analysis of recycled materials as railway capping layer under cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 139: 106423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106423.
Murugesan, S., and K. Rajagopal. 2010. “Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000187.
Ossa, A., J. L. García, and E. Botero. 2016. “Use of recycled construction and demolition waste (CDW) aggregates: A sustainable alternative for the pavement construction industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 135: 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.088.
Puthussery, J. V., R. Kumar, and A. Garg. 2017. “Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates for their suitability in construction activities: An experimental study.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 60: 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.008.
Revilla-Cuesta, V., M. Skaf, J. A. Chica, J. A. Fuente-Alonso, and V. Ortega-López. 2020a. “Thermal deformability of recycled self-compacting concrete under cyclical temperature variations.” Mater. Lett. 278: 128417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128417.
Revilla-Cuesta, V., M. Skaf, A. B. Espinosa, A. Santamaría, and V. Ortega-López. 2020b. “Statistical approach for the design of structural self-compacting concrete with fine recycled concrete aggregate.” Mathematics 8 (12): 2190. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122190.
Serridge, C. J. 2004. “The use of recycled aggregates in vibro stone column ground improvement techniques.” Sustainable waste management and recycling: Construction demolition waste, 213–224. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
Silva, R. V., J. De Brito, and R. K. Dhir. 2019. “Use of recycled aggregates arising from construction and demolition waste in new construction applications.” J. Cleaner Prod. 236: 117629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117629.
Sivakumar, V., D. Glynn, J. Black, and J. McNeill. 2007. “A laboratory model study of the performance of vibrated stone columns in soft clay.” In Proc., 17th Eur. Conf. Soil Mech. Geotech. Eng. London: ISSMGE.
Vibha, S., and P. V. Divya. 2021. “Geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with sustainable backfills.” Indian Geotech. J. 51 (6): 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00450-2.
Vibha, S., and P. V. Divya. 2022. “Performance of MSE walls with sustainable backfills subjected to differential settlements.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 16: 1116–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2022.2065954.
Vibhoosha, M. P., A. Bhasi, and S. Nayak. 2022. “Analysis of geocell-reinforced stone column-supported embankment considering soil-structure interaction.” Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 9: 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00158-7.
Vieira, C. S., and P. M. Pereira. 2015. “Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 103: 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.023.
Vieira, C. S., P. M. Pereira, and M. de Lurdes Lopes. 2016. “Recycled construction and demolition wastes as filling material for geosynthetic reinforced structures. interface properties.” J. Cleaner Prod. 124: 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.115.
Wu, C.-S., and Y.-S. Hong. 2009. “Laboratory tests on geosynthetic-encapsulated sand columns.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (2): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.003.
Wu, Y., C. Liu, H. Liu, H. Hu, C. He, L. Song, and W. Huang. 2022. “Pore structure and durability of green concrete containing recycled powder and recycled coarse aggregate.” J. Build. Eng. 53: 104584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104584.
Yang, H., J. Xia, J. R. Thompson, and R. J. Flower. 2017. “Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 63: 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.026.
Yoo, C., and D. Lee. 2012. “Performance of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft ground: Full-scale load tests.” Geosynth. Int. 19 (6): 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00033.
Zhang, J., F. Gu, and Y. Zhang. 2019. “Use of building-related construction and demolition wastes in highway embankment: Laboratory and field evaluations.” J. Cleaner Prod. 230: 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.182.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27Issue 2April 2023

History

Received: May 6, 2022
Accepted: Sep 22, 2022
Published online: Nov 17, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. Anita
Research Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, IIT Palakkad, Kerala 678557, India.
S. Karthika
Post Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, IIT Palakkad, Kerala 678557, India.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Environmental Sciences and Sustainable Engineering Center (Essence), Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Kerala 678557, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-6252. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share