Abstract
Artificial open-channel junctions have sharp corners and a smaller width-to-depth ratio. Despite numerous studies on channel junctions, knowledge on turbulent structures and their role in mixing at artificial junctions is lacking. To fill this research gap, the present study uses a large-eddy simulation (LES) model to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) turbulent structures and their role in pollutant transport at a right-angled laboratory open-channel junction with a deformed bed. The deformed-bed junction represents a quasi-equilibrium condition and consists of a scour zone and deposition bar. The numerical model is validated against experimental data of the velocity field and turbulent kinetic energy. Comparisons of the flow field between the flat-bed condition and quasi-equilibrium deformed-bed condition showed a reduced flow separation zone and less developed recirculating gyre in the latter case because of the strong secondary currents. The coherence of the turbulent structures was drastically disrupted at the deformed-bed junction because the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability results in more randomly oriented residuals. In contrast, the breakdown of the shear layer at a flat-bed junction displayed the trail of the arch-shaped vortices. The role of turbulent structures in pollutant transport is elucidated by using a neutrally buoyant conservative tracer. Large turbulent structures associated with the KH instability help the tracer evolve faster at the deformed-bed junction.
Practical Applications
The open-channel junctions of artificial systems (e.g., drainage networks) have sharp corners and a smaller with-to-depth ratio (compared with natural river junctions). This paper describes the detailed three-dimensional (3D) flow field and pollutant transport at a laboratory-scale right-angled channel junction with a quasi-equilibrium deformed bed to elucidate the hydraulics of the artificial channel junction. Right-angled channel junctions are a common feature of artificial channel junctions. Given the limitations of the experimental studies, a 3D numerical model, namely large-eddy simulation, is used in the present study. The quasi-equilibrium deformed bed of the junction was obtained from the initial flat-bed condition. The flow field, including the 3D turbulent structures, was modified remarkably at the deformed-bed junction compared with the field under the initial flat-bed condition. The study shows that bed topography plays a major role in controlling turbulent structures. The role of the 3D turbulent structures in pollutant transport is investigated. The present study improves the understanding of the flow field and mixing patterns at artificial open-channel junctions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The anonymous reviewers and Associate Editor are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable suggestions. We acknowledge the financial help from the Research Grant (Sanction No. BT/IN/Indo-UK/AMR-Env/03/ST/2020-21, Dated December 11, 2020) by the Department of Biotechnology under the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India. The authors also acknowledge the financial help of the Prime Minister Research Fellowship and IIT Gandhinagar to conduct this study.
References
ANSYS. 2019. ANSYS Fluent theory guide release 19.3. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys, Inc.
Arnold, U., J. Hottges, and G. Rouv. 1989. “Turbulence and mixing mechanisms in compound open channel flow.” In Proc., 23th IAHR Congress. Tamil Nadu, India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Best, J. L. 1985. “Flow dynamics and sediment transport at river channel confluences.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of London.
Biron, P., J. L. Best, and A. G. Roy. 1996. “Effects of bed discordance on flow dynamics at open channel confluences.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 122 (12): 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:12(676).
Biron, P. M., T. Buffin-Bélanger, and N. Martel. 2019. “Three-dimensional turbulent structures at a medium-sized confluence with and without an ice cover.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 44 (15): 3042–3056. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4718.
Biron, P. M., A. S. Ramamurthy, and S. Han. 2004. “Three-dimensional numerical modeling of mixing at river confluences.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (3): 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:3(243).
BSI (British Standard Institute). 1980. Determination of water content, dry density relation using light compaction (second revision). IS 2720 Part7. London: BSI.
Cheng, Z., and G. Constantinescu. 2020a. “Near-and far-field structure of shallow mixing layers between parallel streams.” J. Fluid Mech. 904 (Dec): A21. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.638.
Cheng, Z., and G. Constantinescu. 2020b. “Stratification effects on hydrodynamics and mixing at a river confluence with discordant bed.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (4): 843–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09725-6.
Cheng, Z., and G. Constantinescu. 2021. “Shallow mixing layers between non-parallel streams in a flat-bed wide channel.” J. Fluid Mech. 916 (Jun): A41. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.254.
Constantinescu, G., S. Miyawaki, B. Rhoads, and A. Sukhodolov. 2012. “Numerical analysis of the effect of momentum ratio on the dynamics and sediment-entrainment capacity of coherent flow structures at a stream confluence.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 117 (F4): F04028. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002452.
Constantinescu, G., S. Miyawaki, B. Rhoads, and A. Sukhodolov. 2014. “Numerical evaluation of the effects of planform geometry and inflow conditions on flow, turbulence structure, and bed shear velocity at a stream confluence with a concordant bed.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 119 (10): 2079–2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003244.
Constantinescu, G., S. Miyawaki, B. Rhoads, and A. Sukhodolov. 2016. “Influence of planform geometry and momentum ratio on thermal mixing at a stream confluence with a concordant bed.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 16 (4): 845–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9457-0.
Constantinescu, G., S. Miyawaki, B. Rhoads, A. Sukhodolov, and G. Kirkil. 2011. “Structure of turbulent flow at a river confluence with momentum and velocity ratios close to 1: Insight provided by an eddy-resolving numerical simulation.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (5): W05507. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010018.
Deng, Z. Q., V. P. Singh, and L. Bengtsson. 2001. “Longitudinal dispersion coefficient in straight rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (11): 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:11(919).
Duguay, D., P. M. Biron, and J. Lacey. 2021. “Direct observations of density-driven streamwise oriented vortices at a river confluence.” ESS Open Archive. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10508854.1.
Duguay, J., P. Biron, and T. Buffin-Bélanger. 2022. “Large-scale turbulent mixing at a mesoscale confluence assessed through drone imagery and eddy-resolved modeling.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 47 (1): 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5251.
Guillén-Ludeña, S., M. J. Franca, A. H. Cardoso, and A. J. Schleiss. 2015. “Hydro-morphodynamic evolution in a 90° movable bed discordant confluence with low discharge ratio.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 40 (14): 1927–1938. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3770.
Guillén-Ludeña, S., M. J. Franca, A. H. Cardoso, and A. J. Schleiss. 2016. “Evolution of the hydromorphodynamics of mountain river confluences for varying discharge ratios and junction angles.” Geomorphology 255 (Feb): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.006.
Hsu, C. C., F. S. Wu, and W. J. Lee. 1998. “Flow at 90 equal-width open-channel junction.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (2): 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(186).
Hunt, J. C., A. A. Wray, and P. Moin. 1988. “Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows.” In Proc., Summer Program. Stanford, CA: Center for Turbulence Research.
Kim, W. W., and S. Menon. 1997. “Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows.” In Proc., 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Leite Ribeiro, M. L., K. Blanckaert, A. G. Roy, and A. J. Schleiss. 2012. “Flow and sediment dynamics in channel confluences.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 117 (F1): F01035. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002171.
Luo, H., D. K. Fytanidis, A. R. Schmidt, and M. H. García. 2018. “Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses.” Adv. Water Resour. 117 (Jul): 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.012.
Miyawaki, S., G. Constantinescu, B. Rhoads, and A. Sukhodolov. 2010. “Changes in three-dimensional flow structure at a river confluence with changes in momentum ratio.” River Flow 2010: 225–232.
Miyawaki, S., S. G. Constantinescu, G. Kirkil, B. Rhoads, and A. Sukhodolov. 2009. “Numerical investigation of three-dimensional flow structure at a river confluence.” In Proc., 33rd IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment. Vancouver, Canada: International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research.
Mosley, M. P. 1976. “An experimental study of channel confluences.” J. Geol. 84 (5): 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1086/628230.
Nicoud, F., and F. Ducros. 1999. “Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor.” Flow Turbul. Combust. 62 (3): 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995426001.
Pandey, A. K., and P. K. Mohapatra. 2021. “Reduction of the flow separation zone at combining open-channel junction by applying alternate suction and blowing.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 147 (10): 06021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001611.
Pope, S. B. 2004. “Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows.” New J. Phys. 6 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/035.
Precht, E., F. Janssen, and M. Huettel. 2006. “Near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV)—A comparative study.” Aquat. Ecol. 40 (4): 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-8059-y.
Schindfessel, L., S. Creëlle, and T. De Mulder. 2017. “How Different cross-sectional shapes influence the separation zone of an open-channel confluence.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (9): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001336.
Sukhodolov, A. N., and T. A. Sukhodolova. 2019. “Dynamics of flow at concordant gravel bed river confluences: Effects of junction angle and momentum flux ratio.” J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 124 (2): 588–615. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004648.
Szupiany, R. N., M. L. Amsler, D. R. Parsons, and J. L. Best. 2009. “Morphology, flow structure, and suspended bed sediment transport at two large braid-bar confluences.” Water Resour. Res. 45 (5): W05415. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007428.
Tang, H., H. Zhang, and S. Yuan. 2018. “Hydrodynamics and contaminant transport on a degraded bed at a 90-degree channel confluence.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 18 (2): 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9562-8.
Weber, L. J., E. D. Schumate, and N. Mawer. 2001. “Experiments on flow at a 90 open channel junction.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (5): 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:5(340).
Yu, Q., S. Yuan, and C. D. Rennie. 2020. “Experiments on the morphodynamics of open channel confluences: Implications for the accumulation of contaminated sediments.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 125 (9): 2019JF005438. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005438.
Yuan, S., H. Tang, Y. Xiao, X. Qiu, and Y. Xia. 2018. “Water flow and sediment transport at open-channel confluences: An experimental study.” J. Hydraul. Res. 56 (3): 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2017.1354932.
Yuan, S., H. Tang, Y. Xiao, X. Qiu, H. Zhang, and D. Yu. 2016. “Turbulent flow structure at a 90-degree open channel confluence: Accounting for the distortion of the shear layer.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 12 (Sep): 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.05.006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 149 • Issue 4 • April 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 18, 2022
Accepted: Nov 17, 2022
Published online: Feb 14, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Abhishek K. Pandey, Pranab K. Mohapatra, 3D Numerical Simulations of the Bed Evolution at an Open-Channel Junction in Flood Conditions, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10321, 150, 3, (2024).
- Wahidullah Hakim Safi, Pranab K. Mohapatra, Effects of Bed Material and Downstream Flow Depth on the Evolution of Bed in a Right-Angled Open-Channel Confluence, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10184, 150, 1, (2024).