Errors in Conventional Calculations of Soil Phase Relationships
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 7
Abstract
Soil physical properties derived from phase relationships such as void ratio, degree of saturation, water content, and unit weight conventionally are formulated and calculated under the implicit assumption that the volumes of the three soil phases (i.e., solid, water, and air) are independent and unaffected by interactions among phases. However, significant variations do occur, including variation in the unit weight of soil water resulting from adsorptive soil–water interactions and variation in void volume resulting from bulk swelling or shrinking with changes in moisture. The importance of accounting for soil–water interactions in calculating soil physical properties was examined by introducing a new variable-volume soil phase diagram, and was illustrated using experimental data from consolidation and shrinkage tests for silts, nonswelling clays, and swelling clays. Errors in calculating void ratio and soil unit weight in saturated consolidation tests using conventional phase relationships can be significant—as high as 48% relative error in void ratio and as high as 16% relative error in soil unit weight. Errors in calculating moisture ratio and saturation in shrinkage tests can be as high as 53% relative error in moisture ratio and 42% in saturation. The occurrence of maximum error is highly correlated with soil water content corresponding to the maximum amount of adsorbed water. Liquid limit (LL) and specific surface area (SSA) were identified as index properties that can be used to account for volume variations in phase calculations. Examples are provided to illustrate the implementation of the proposed variable-volume soil phase formulation using LL or SSA in practical problems. Analysis showed that for fine-grained soils, it is practically necessary to use general variable-volume phase relationships to define basic soil properties in lieu of the conventional phase relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF CMMI-1902045 and NSF CMMI-1902008).
References
Chen, F. H. 1988. Foundations on expansive soils: Developments in geotechnical engineering 12. New York: Elsevier.
De Wit, C. T., and P. L. Arens. 1950. “Moisture content and density of some clay minerals and some remarks on the hydration pattern of clay.” In Proc., 4th Int. Congress of Soil Science Transactions, 59–62. Groningen, Netherlands: Hoitesema Brothers.
Dong, Y., N. Lu, and P. J. Fox. 2020a. “Drying-induced consolidation in soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 4020092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002327.
Dong, Y., C. Wei, and N. Lu. 2020b. “Identifying soil adsorptive water by soil water density.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (7): 2820001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002289.
Leong, E. C., and M. Wijaya. 2015. “Universal soil shrinkage curve equation.” Geoderma 237-238 (Jan): 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.012.
Likos, W. J., N. Lu, and W. Wensel. 2011. “Performance of a dynamic dew point method for moisture isotherms of clays.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (4): 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102901.
Lu, N., and Y. Dong. 2017. “Correlation between soil-shrinkage curve and water-retention characteristics.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001741.
Lu, N., and W. J. Likos. 2006. “Suction stress characteristic curve for unsaturated soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(131).
Lu, N., W. J. Likos, S. Luo, and H. Oh. 2021. “Is the conventional pore water pressure concept adequate for fine-grained soils in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering?” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (6): 04022042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002612.
Lu, N., S. Luo, and B. Zhou. 2022. “Water adsorption-induced pore water pressure in soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (6): 04022042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002814.
Lu, N., and C. Zhang. 2019. “Soil sorptive potential: Concept, theory, and verification.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (4): 4019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002025.
Luo, S., and N. Lu. 2021. “Validating the generality of a closed-form equation for soil water isotherm.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (12): 04021138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002681.
Luo, S., B. Zhou, J. Peng, W. J. Likos, and N. Lu. 2023. “Unit weight of water in clayey soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 149 (3): 04022134. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10844.
Martin, R. T. 1960. “Adsorbed water on clay: A review.” Clays Clay Miner. 9 (4): 28–70. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1960.0090104.
Peng, X., and R. Horn. 2005. “Modeling soil shrinkage curve across a wide range of soil types.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69 (3): 584–592. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0146.
Peters, A. 2013. “Simple consistent models for water retention and hydraulic conductivity in the complete moisture range.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (10): 6765–6780. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20548.
Revil, A., and N. Lu. 2013. “Unified water isotherms for clayey porous materials.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (9): 5685–5699. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20426.
Vahedifard, F., T. D. Cao, S. K. Thota, and E. Ghazanfari. 2018. “Nonisothermal models for soil–water retention curve.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (9): 04018061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001939.
Wang, Y., L. Hu, S. Luo, and N. Lu. 2022. “Soil water isotherm model for particle surface sorption and interlamellar sorption.” Vadose Zone J. 21 (5): e20221. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20221.
Zhang, C., and N. Lu. 2018a. “Measuring soil-water density by helium pycnometer.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (9): 02818002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001929.
Zhang, C., and N. Lu. 2018b. “What is the range of soil water density? Critical reviews with a unified model.” Rev. Geophys. 56 (3): 532–562. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000597.
Zhang, C., and N. Lu. 2019. “Soil sorptive potential: Its determination and predicting soil water density.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (1): 04019118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002188.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 22, 2023
Accepted: Feb 22, 2024
Published online: May 10, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 10, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.