Technical Papers
Aug 2, 2023

Efficient Response Estimation Approach for As-Built Bridges Based on Multisupport Response Spectrum Method

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149, Issue 10

Abstract

Assessing the postdisaster seismic responses of the as-built bridges based on their real-time status is critical to maintaining their seismic capacity and planning retrofits. This task requires a fast and accurate identification and response estimation method, whereas existing methods either adopt model updating requiring detailed design archives or request sophisticated site testing, both of which are time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, approaches combining system identification methods with response spectrum methods for bridges are investigated. A general state-space representation for bridges considering multisupport excitation is developed for model identification. The assumption of the boundary damping matrix in the multisupport response spectrum (MSRS) method is investigated and proved to eliminate pseudo-damping for general viscous-damping structures. A hybrid frequency fitting method (HFF) and subspace system identification method (SSI) in the time and frequency domains, respectively, are examined, and approaches to extracting equivalent boundary stiffness and damping from the identified structural models are studied. The MSRS method is adapted to both identification methods. Numerical simulations and experiments are used to validate the identification approaches in the estimation of boundary conditions. The models identified from the shake table experiments are further used in evaluating its seismic responses. The results of the MSRS method are compared with those from the spectral analysis method showing that the HFF method performs well both in identifying the bridge model and estimating the structural responses. Whereas, the SSI-based methods fail to give a good estimation of boundary damping, and thus cannot directly apply to the MSRS method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the 8th Session of the China-Croatia Inter-governmental Committee on Science and Technology Cooperation exchange project.

References

Arici, Y., and K. M. Mosalam. 2003. “System identification of instrumented bridge systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (7): 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.259.
Ates, S. 2012. “Seismic behaviour of isolated multi-span continuous bridge to nonstationary random seismic excitation.” Nonlinear Dyn. 67 (1): 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-9976-7.
Bayraktar, A., Y. Bilici, and M. Akköse. 2010. “The effect of the spatially varying earthquake ground motion on random hydrodynamic pressures.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 13 (6): 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.13.6.1153.
Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., F. Cotton, and P. Y. Bard. 2006. “The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: A literature review.” Earth Sci. Rev. 79 (3–4): 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004.
Catbas, F. N., and A. E. Aktan. 2002. “Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (8): 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1026).
Catbas, F. N., D. L. Brown, and A. E. Aktan. 2006. “Use of modal flexibility for damage detection and condition assessment: Case studies and demonstrations on large structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (11): 1699–1712. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1699).
Chaudhary, M. T. A., M. Abe, Y. Fujino, and J. Yoshida. 2000. “System identification of two base-isolated bridges using seismic records.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1187).
Davis, N. T., and M. Sanayei. 2020. “Foundation identification using dynamic strain and acceleration measurements.” Eng. Struct. 208 (Apr): 109811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109811.
Derkevorkian, A., S. F. Masri, Y. Fujino, and D. M. Siringoringo. 2014. “Development and validation of nonlinear computational models of dispersed structures under strong earthquake excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (7): 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2389.
Falamarz-Sheikhabadi, M. R., and A. Zerva. 2017a. “Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforced-concrete bridge. Part I: Numerical modeling and input excitation.” J. Earthquake Eng. 21 (8): 1305–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1211565.
Falamarz-Sheikhabadi, M. R., and A. Zerva. 2017b. “Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforced-concrete bridge. Part II: Structural response.” J. Earthquake Eng. 21 (8): 1335–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1211566.
Faraonis, P., A. Sextos, C. Papadimitriou, E. Chatzi, and P. Panetsos. 2019. “Implications of subsoil-foundation modelling on the dynamic characteristics of a monitored bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (2): 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1503689.
Feng, M. Q., S. Lee, S. J. Kwon, and S. H. Hong. 2010. “Equivalent modal damping of short-span bridges subjected to strong motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (2): 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000149.
Franklin, G. F., J. D. Powell, and M. L. Workman. 1998. Digital control of dynamic systems. Boston: Addison-Wesley Reading.
Gomez, H. C., H. S. Ulusoy, and M. Q. Feng. 2013. “Variation of modal parameters of a highway bridge extracted from six earthquake records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (4): 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2227.
Harichandran, R. S. 1991. “Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings.” Struct. Saf. 10 (1–3): 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90016-3.
Harichandran, R. S., A. Hawwari, and B. N. Sweidan. 1996. “Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (5): 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:5(476).
Harichandran, R. S., and E. H. Vanmarcke. 1986. “Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time.” J. Eng. Mech. 112 (2): 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154).
Heylen, W., S. Lammens, and P. Sas. 1997. Modal analysis theory and testing. Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Igusa, T., A. D. Kiureghian, and J. L. Sackman. 1984. “Modal decomposition method for stationary response of non-classically damped systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 12 (1): 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290120109.
Juang, J. N. 1997. “System realization using information matrix.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 20 (3): 492–500. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4068.
Juang, J. N., and R. S. Pappa. 1985. “An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 8 (5): 620–627. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20031.
Kim, S. B., B. Spencer Jr., and C. B. Yun. 2005. “Frequency domain identification of multi-input, multi-output systems considering physical relationships between measured variables.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (5): 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:5(461).
Kiureghian, A. D. 1980. “Structural response to stationary excitation.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 106 (6): 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002659.
Kiureghian, A. D. 1996. “A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1%3C99::AID-EQE540%3E3.0.CO;2-C.
Kiureghian, A. D., and A. Neuenhofer. 1992. “Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21 (8): 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210805.
Kollar, I., G. Franklin, and R. Pintelon. 1996. “On the equivalence of z-domain and s-domain models in system identification.” In Proc., Quality Measurement: The Indispensable Bridge between Theory and Reality (No Measurements? No Science! Joint Conf. 1996: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf. and IMEKO Tec. New York: IEEE.
Leger, P., I. Ide, and P. Paultre. 1990. “Multiple-support seismic analysis of large structures.” Comput. Struct. 36 (6): 1153–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(90)90224-P.
Liang, Z., and G. Lee. 1991. “Representation of damping matrix.” J. Eng. Mech. 117 (5): 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:5(1005).
Loh, C. H., and Z. K. Lee. 1997. “Seismic monitoring of a bridge: Assessing dynamic characteristics from both weak and strong ground excitations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (2): 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199702)26:2%3C269::AID-EQE644%3E3.0.CO;2-H.
Luco, J., and H. Wong. 1986. “Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 14 (6): 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140606.
Magalhães, F., E. Caetano, and Á. Cunha. 2007. “Challenges in the application of stochastic modal identification methods to a cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (6): 746–754. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(746).
Mao, Q., J. Devitis, M. Mazzotti, I. Bartoli, F. Moon, K. Sjoblom, and E. Aktan. 2015. “Boundary condition identification for a grid model by experimental and numerical dynamic analysis.” In Structural health monitoring and inspection of advanced materials, aerospace, and civil infrastructure 2015. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers.
Mao, Q., M. Mazzotti, J. DeVitis, J. Braley, C. Young, K. Sjoblom, E. Aktan, F. Moon, and I. Bartoli. 2019. “Structural condition assessment of a bridge pier: A case study using experimental modal analysis and finite element model updating.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (1): e2273. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2273.
Mao, Q., M. Mazzotti, M. Furkan, A. Hicks, I. Bartoli, and E. Aktan. 2021. “Characterization of bridge substructures explored by leveraging structural identification of a scaled bridge model.” Eng. Struct. 246 (Nov): 112953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112953.
Maser, K. R., M. Sanayei, A. Lichtenstein, and S. B. Chase. 1998. “Determination of bridge foundation type from structural response measurements.” In Proc., Structural Materials Technology III: An NDT Conf. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers.
Mezouer, N., K. Silhadi, and H. Afra. 2010. “Importance of spatial variability of seismic ground motion effects on long beams response.” J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Technol. 1 (1): 1–13.
Mosquera, V., A. W. Smyth, and R. Betti. 2012. “Rapid evaluation and damage assessment of instrumented highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (4): 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1155.
Nakamura, Y., A. Der Kiureghian, and D. Liu. 1993. Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the golden gate bridge. Los Angeles: Univ. of California.
Obregón-Pulido, G., E. Nuño, and A. de-la-Mora. 2010. “On the equivalence of z-domain and s-domain: The inverse of convolution integral and its application to systems identification.” In Proc., 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. on Industrial Technology. New York: IEEE.
Park, Y. S., S. Kim, N. Kim, and J. J. Lee. 2017. “Finite element model updating considering boundary conditions using neural networks.” Eng. Struct. 150 (Nov): 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.032.
Qin, H., and L. Li. 2020. “Error caused by damping formulating in multiple support excitation problems.” Appl. Sci. 10 (22): 8180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228180.
Qin, H., L. Li, and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2019. “Efficient estimation of seismic response of large-span structures considering the effect of multiple-support excitation.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (12): 04019096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001667.
Rahimi, M. R., G. J. Yun, and S. Shang. 2012. “Inverse estimations of dynamic stiffness of highway bridge embankment from earthquake records.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (8): A4014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000463.
Samizo, M., S. Watanabe, A. Fuchiwaki, and T. Sugiyama. 2007. “Evaluation of the structural integrity of bridge pier foundations using microtremors in flood conditions.” Q. Rep. RTRI 48 (3): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.48.153.
SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 1999. Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. Sacramento, CA: SEAOC.
Shen, J., R. Li, J. Shi, and G. Zhou. 2019. “Modified multi-support response spectrum analysis of structures with multiple supports under incoherent ground excitation.” Appl. Sci. 9 (9): 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091744.
Siringoringo, D. M., and Y. Fujino. 2008. “System identification applied to long-span cable-supported bridges using seismic records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (3): 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.758.
Siringoringo, D. M., and Y. Fujino. 2018. “Seismic response of a suspension bridge: Insights from long-term full-scale seismic monitoring system.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 25 (11): e2252. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2252.
Smyth, A. W., J. S. Pei, and S. F. Masri. 2003. “System identification of the Vincent Thomas suspension bridge using earthquake records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (3): 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.226.
Soyluk, K. 2004. “Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges.” Eng. Struct. 26 (11): 1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.016.
Van Overschee, P., and B. De Moor. 2012. Subspace identification for linear systems: Theory—Implementation—Applications. Berlin: Springer.
Wang, N., A. Elgamal, and J. Lu. 2022. “Seismic response of the Eureka Channel bridge-foundation system.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 152 (Jan): 107015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107015.
Wang, Z., and A. D. Kiureghian. 2015. “Multiple-support response spectrum analysis using load-dependent Ritz vectors.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (15): 2283–2297. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2447.
Yu, R. F., and X. Y. Zhou. 2008. “Response spectrum analysis for non-classically damped linear system with multiple-support excitations.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 6 (2): 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9048-z.
Zerva, A. 2016. Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: Modeling and engineering applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zhan, J., C. Wang, Y. Yan, L. Deng, W. Zhu, and J. Liu. 2022. “Modal analysis and condition evaluation of substructures for simply supported high-speed railway bridge based on a simplified model.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (8): 04022058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001900.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149Issue 10October 2023

History

Received: Jan 16, 2023
Accepted: Jun 7, 2023
Published online: Aug 2, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 2, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoc, School of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-9921
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-9769
Luyu Li, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share