Mitigating Project Schedule Risks by Identifying Subcritical Paths and Variance-Critical Activities
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 8
Abstract
Significant risks in project completion delay could be buried in the development of project schedules because of theoretical flaws in project schedule risk analysis. Major project delays hamper infrastructure development endeavors and cause negative consequences to project finance, the public interest, and socioeconomic growth. This research critically reviews the theoretical foundation of the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and identifies two major flaws: (1) failing to account for variances of activities on subcritical paths; and (2) lacking the functionality of characterizing variance-criticality for activities in a project network. Further, the path variance-criticality index and the activity variance-criticality index are formalized for defining the subcritical path(s) and identifying the variance-critical activities. Reducing time duration variances in the identified variance-critical activities exerts a significant impact on mitigating project schedule delay risks. A case study is given to illustrate the analytical steps for identifying variance-critical activities in a project. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed analytical approach. The enhanced PERT for project schedule risk analysis is instrumental in (1) identifying critical and subcritical paths in the project network model; (2) clarifying the notion of variance-criticality for prioritization of activities based on the impact of activity time variance on project time variance; and (3) reining in project schedule risks by reducing time duration variances on those variance-critical activities in project planning.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the published article.
References
Adlakha, V. G., and V. G. Kulkarni. 1989. “Classified bibliography of research on stochastic PERT networks: 1966-1987.” INFOR: Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 27 (3): 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1989.11732098.
Ahuja, H. N., S. P. Dozzi, and S. M. Abourizk. 1995. Project management: Techniques in planning and controlling construction projects. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Ang, A. H. S., J. Abdelnour, and A. A. Chaker. 1975. “Analysis of activity networks under uncertainty.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 101 (4): 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002028.
Aras, R. M., and J. Surkis. 1964. “PERT and CPM techniques in project management.” J. Constr. Div. 90 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEAZ.0000087.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P. 2017. “M-PERT: Manual project-duration estimation technique for teaching scheduling basics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (9): 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001358.
Chang, A., C. Hatcher, and J. Kim. 2013. “Temporal boundary objects in megaprojects: Mapping the system with the integrated master schedule.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.007.
Clark, C. E. 1961. “The greatest of a finite set of random variables.” Oper. Res. 9 (2): 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.2.145.
Cottrell, W. D. 1999. “Simplified program evaluation and review technique (PERT).” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:1(16).
Enshassi, A., R. M. Choudhry, and S. El-Ghandour. 2009. “Contractors’ perception towards causes of claims in construction projects.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 9 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2009.10773123.
Farag, M. A. M. 2014. “A bridge between increasing reliability and reducing variability in construction work flow: A fuzzy-based sizing buffer model.” J. Adv. Manage. Sci. 2 (4): 287–294. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.2.4.287-294.
Francis, A. 2017. “Simulating uncertainties in construction projects with chronographical scheduling logic.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (1): 04016085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001212.
Fu, M. C. 2006. “Sensitivity analysis in Monte Carlo simulation of stochastic activity networks.” In Vol. 36 of Perspectives in operations research. Operations research/ computer science interfaces series, 351–366. Boston: Springer.
Gong, D., and R. Hugsted. 1993. “Time-uncertainty analysis in project networks with a new merge-event time-estimation technique.” Int. J. Project Manage. 11 (3): 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(93)90049-S.
Hajdu, M. 2013. “Effects of the application of activity calendars on the distribution of project duration in PERT networks.” Autom. Constr. 35 (Nov): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.025.
Hegazy, T., and W. Menesi. 2010. “Critical path segments scheduling technique.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (10): 1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000212.
Hulett, D. 2009. Practical schedule risk analysis. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Kikwasi, G. J. 2023. “Claims in construction projects: How causes are linked to effects?” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 21 (6): 1710–1724. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2021-0312.
Kwak, S. G., and J. H. Kim. 2017. “Central limit theorem: The cornerstone of modern statistics.” Korean J. Anesthesiol. 70 (2): 144–156. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144.
Lichtenberg, S., and L. B. Moller. 1979. “Three types of biases in scheduling and solutions applicable in practice.” In Proc., Int. Project Management Association, IPMA World Congress, Garmisch-Patenkirchen, 26–27. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Project Management Association.
Liu, M., G. Ballard, and W. Ibbs. 2011. “Work flow variation and labor productivity: Case study.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (4): 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000056.
Lu, M., and S. M. AbouRizk. 2000. “Simplified CPM/PERT simulation model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (3): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(219).
Lu, M., and H. Li. 2003. “Resource-activity critical-path method for construction planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (4): 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(412).
Lu, M., J. Liu, and W. Ji. 2017. “Formalizing a path-float-based approach to determine and interpret total float in project scheduling analysis.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 17 (4): 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1207366.
Malcolm, D. G., J. H. Roseboom, C. E. Clark, and W. Fazar. 1959. “Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation.” Oper. Res. 7 (5): 646–669. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.5.646.
Mummolo, G. 1997. “Measuring uncertainty and criticality in network planning by PERT-path technique.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (6): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00088-9.
Murray, J. E. 1963. “Consideration of PERT assumptions.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. EM-10 (3): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1963.6434311.
Nicholas, J. M., and H. Steyn. 2017. Project management for engineering, business and technology. 5th ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676319.
Nicholas, J. M., and H. Steyn. 2020. Project management for engineering, business and technology. New York: Routledge.
Ökmen, Ö., and A. Öztaş. 2008. “Construction project network evaluation with correlated schedule risk analysis model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (1): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:1(49).
Park, J. E. 2021. “Schedule delays of major projects: What should we do about it?” Transport Rev. 41 (6): 814–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1915897.
Roman, D. D. 1962. “The PERT system: An appraisal of program evaluation review technique.” Acad. Manage. J. 5 (1): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/254602.
Rubinstein, R. Y., and D. P. Kroese. 2016. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Salhab, D., D. E. Møller, S. M. Lindhard, F. Hamzeh, M. Randrup, and A. Pilgaard. 2022. “Accounting for variability: Identifying critical activities as a supplement to the critical path.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (5): 04022019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002266.
Sculli, D. 1983. “The completion time of PERT networks.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 34 (2): 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.27.
Stauber, B. R., H. M. Douty, W. Fazar, R. H. Jordan, W. Weinfeld, and A. D. Manvel. 1959. “Federal statistical activities.” Am. Stat. 13 (2): 9–12.
Tatterson, J. W., and D. F. Wood. 1974. “PERT, CPM and the export process.” Omega 2 (3): 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(74)90036-X.
Tavares, L. V. 2002. “A review of the contribution of operational research to project management.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 136 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00097-2.
Van Slyke, R. M. 1963. “Monte Carlo methods and the PERT problem.” Oper. Res. 11 (5): 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.11.5.839.
Woolf, C. R., W. Cass, and J. McElroy. 1968. “The use of “Program Evaluation and Review Technique” (PERT) in the design and control of a medical research project.” Comput. Biomed. Res. 2 (2): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(68)90036-0.
Yang, J. B., and C. K. Kao. 2012. “Critical path effect-based delay analysis method for construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (3): 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.003.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150 • Issue 8 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 26, 2023
Accepted: Mar 18, 2024
Published online: Jun 11, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 11, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.