Erratum for “Game Theory Approach for Concurrent Delay Analysis”

The following correction should be made to “Game Theory Approach for Concurrent Delay Analysis” by Huu T. Huynh, Gunnar Lucko, and Mohamed S. Eid, https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12947:

There are data errors in the original article that are corrected herein. The authors deeply regret any confusion that these errors may have caused to readers and the scholarly community.

In Table 6 of the original article, there was a regrettable error in the calculation of the Shapley value for Player A. The correct Shapley value for Player A is $-333.33$. This correction is essential to maintain the accuracy and integrity of our research findings. The corrected Table 6, with the accurate Shapley value, is presented herein.

Table 9 contained inaccuracies that require correction. First, the data in the column containing the contribution value for Coalition ABCD is incorrect. The correct contribution value is 2. Second, the value of ${\varphi }_C$ for Coalition ABCD is incorrect. The accurate value is $1/4\times 2$. To ensure the precision of our research, Table 9 is included herein with the corrected values.

Table 13 contained errors in data entry. The marginal contribution of Footing (FT) in its coalition with Off-site fabrication activities (OF) was inaccurately calculated. The value of the coalition of OF and FT (with the presence of FT) is 75, and the value of the coalition without FT is also 75. Therefore, the correct marginal contribution of FT in the coalition of OF and FT is 0, not 4 as previously stated. The corrected Table 13 is provided herein.

The authors thank Ms. Raha Hajiashrafi of Catholic University of America and Ms. Rouhi R. Samy of the Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport for detecting these errors.