Technical Papers
Dec 12, 2023

Corporate Climate Pledges of High-Revenue Design Firms and Contractors

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 2

Abstract

To combat the industry’s contributions to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a rapidly increasing number of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms are making corporate climate pledges. The broader literature has shown that corporate carbon disclosures may correspond to measurable and statistically significant corporate emissions reductions. However, the literature has not yet targeted climate pledges in the AEC industry, making this a practically important topic for research. This paper documents the publicly available climate pledges made by the 100 largest civil design firms and the 100 largest contractors, in terms of 2020 revenue, to gauge their sustainability efforts. The authors describe corporate climate pledge attributes such as company climate targets, use of carbon credits, and reported Scope coverage (greenhouse gas emissions). As of February 2023, 42 design firms and 22 contractors had a formal climate commitment, including 7 duplicates (i.e., companies on both contractor and design firm lists). Although several companies have developed specific targets and reporting mechanisms, overall climate commitments vary due to differing company disclosures (e.g., different levels of Scope reporting) and the novelty of some companies’ climate pledges. Similarly, there is a lack of standardization for defining and using climate pledge targets (e.g., net zero and carbon neutral classifications). This paper provides a framework for improving climate commitment accounting for the AEC industry, with an explicit focus on AEC industry relevant GHG emissions accounting. This research makes a significant practical contribution to enabling AEC firms to leverage sector experience as they adopt and strengthen corporate climate pledges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including the complete data set of the Top 100 design and top 100 contractor firms ranked by revenue, and the key components of their climate pledges.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the researchers and contributors to the Net Zero Tracker for sharing information about the Net Zero Tracker as well as the codebook they used to quantify categories. The authors also acknowledge and thank Kara Gravert for her contributions to the intercoder reliability test.

References

Adams, M., V. Burrows, S. Richardson, J. Drinkwater, C. Gamboa, C. Collin, X. le Den, L. O. Riemann, S. Porterton, and A. Q. Secher. 2019. Bringing embodied carbon upfront. Markham, ON, Canada: WorldGBC.
AECOM (Architecture, Engineering, Construction, Operations, and Management). 2023. “Committing to significant decarbonization: ScopeX.” Sustainable legacies. Accessed December 6, 2023. https://publications.aecom.com/sustainable-legacies/product/solving-for-carbon-scope-x/.
Arcadis and CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). 2021. Arcadis - climate change 2021. London: CDP.
Armour, J., L. Enriques, and T. Wetzer. 2022. “Mandatory corporate climate disclosures: Now, but how?” Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 2021 (3): 1085. https://doi.org/10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9106.
Arup and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2021. Net zero buildings: Where do we stand? Accessed July 22, 2022. https://www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/12446/185553/1.
Avetisyan, H. G., E. Miller-Hooks, and S. Melanta. 2012. “Decision models to support greenhouse gas emissions reduction from transportation construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (5): 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000477.
Benjamin, L. 2016. “The responsibilities of carbon major companies: Are they (and is the law) doing enough?” Transnational Environ. Law 5 (2): 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000194.
Biello, D. 2014. “Climate change will be solved in cities–or not at all.” Scientific American, September 23, 2014.
Blitterswyk, N. 2015. “DPR construction earns EPA award.” The Vert, March 18, 2015.
Böhm, S., M. C. Misoczky, and S. Moog. 2012. “Greening capitalism? A Marxist critique of carbon markets.” Organ. Stud. 33 (11): 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463326.
Brander, M., M. Gillenwater, and F. Ascui. 2018. “Creative accounting: A critical perspective on the market-based method for reporting purchased electricity (scope 2) emissions.” Energy Policy 112 (Jun): 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.051.
Burns & McDonnell. 2021. What we do matters: 2021 corporate sustainability report. Kansas City, MO: Burns & McDonnell.
Carbon Leadership Forum. 2020a. “Embodied carbon 101.” Accessed June 19, 2022. https://carbonleadershipforum.org/embodied-carbon-101/.
Carbon Leadership Forum. 2020b. “Targeting net-zero embodied carbon.” Accessed June 19, 2022. https://carbonleadershipforum.org/targeting-net-zero-embodied-carbon/.
Cass, D., and A. Mukherjee. 2011. “Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for highway construction operations by using a hybrid life-cycle assessment approach: Case study for pavement operations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000349.
Chong, D., Y. Wang, L. Chen, and B. Yu. 2016. “Modeling and validation of energy consumption in asphalt mixture production.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001189.
Comello, S., J. Reichelstein, and S. Reichelstein. 2021. “Corporate carbon reduction pledges: An effective tool to mitigate climate change?” SSRN Electronic Journal, submitted April 29, 2021.
Crawley, D., S. Pless, and P. Torcellini. 2009. “Getting to net zero.” ASHRAE J. 51 (9): 18–25.
Dawson, C., P. Dargusch, and G. Hill. 2022. “Assessing how big insurance firms report and manage carbon emissions: A case study of Allianz.” Sustainability 14 (4): 2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042476.
Day, T., S. Mooldijk, S. Smit, E. Posada, F. Hans, H. Fearnehough, A. Kachi, C. Warnecke, T. Kuramochi, and N. Hohne. 2022. Corporate climate responsibility 2022: Assessing the transparency and integrity of companies’ emission reduction and net-zero targets. Berlin: New Climate Institute.
Delgado, L., T. Shealy, M. Garvin, and A. Pearce. 2018. “Framing energy efficiency with payback period: Empirical study to increase energy consideration during facility procurement processes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (5): 04018027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001464.
de Wolf, C., K. Simonen, and J. Ochsendorf. 2018. “Initiatives to report and reduce embodied carbon in North American buildings.” In Embodied carbon in buildings, 463–482. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Dietz, S., C. Fruitiere, C. Garcia-Manas, W. Irwin, B. Rauis, and R. Sullivan. 2018. “An assessment of climate action by high-carbon global corporations.” Nat. Clim. Change 8 (12): 1072–1075. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0343-2.
Engineering News-Record. 2021a. “The Top 400.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://www.enr.com/toplists/.
Engineering News-Record. 2021b. “The Top 500.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://www.enr.com/toplists/.
EPA. 2023. Scope 3 inventory guidance. Washington, DC: EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership.
Ernstsen, S. N., J. Whyte, C. Thuesen, and A. Maier. 2021. “How innovation champions frame the future: Three visions for digital transformation of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (1): 05020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001928.
Ferrovial. 2023. “Extension of the scope of indirect emissions (Scope 3).” Accessed January 3, 2023. https://www.ferrovial.com/en-us/sustainability/environment/carbon-footprint/reducing-emissions/emissions-3/.
Fluor. 2022. Accelerating sustainability: 2021 sustainability report. Irving, TX: Fluor Corporation.
Fuso Nerini, F., B. Sovacool, N. Hughes, L. Cozzi, E. Cosgrave, M. Howells, M. Tavoni, J. Tomei, H. Zerriffi, and B. Milligan. 2019. “Connecting climate action with other sustainable development goals.” Nat. Sustainability 2 (8): 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0334-y.
Gan, V. J. L. 2022. “BIM-based building geometric modeling and automatic generative design for sustainable offsite construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (10): 04022111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002369.
Giesekam, J., J. Norman, A. Garvey, and S. Betts-Davies. 2021. “Science-based targets: On target?” Sustainability 13 (4): 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041657.
Gipper, B., S. Ross, and S. Shi. 2022. “ESG assurance in the United States.” SSRN Electronic Journal. Submitted November 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4263085.
Gouldson, A., and R. Sullivan. 2013. “Long-term corporate climate change targets: What could they deliver?” Environ. Sci. Policy 27 (Jun): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.013.
Grove, H., and M. Clouse. 2021. “Renewable energy commitments versus greenwashing: Board responsibilities.” Corporate Ownership Control 18 (3): 423–437. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3siart15.
Haines, A., and K. Ebi. 2019. “The imperative for climate action to protect health.” N. Engl. J. Med. 380 (3): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1807873.
Hausfather, Z. 2022. “Analysis: What the new IPCC report says about how to limit warming to 1.5C or 2C.” Carbon Brief, June 4, 2022.
Haya, B., D. Cullenward, A. L. Strong, E. Grubert, R. Heilmayr, D. A. Sivas, and M. Wara. 2020. “Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: Insights from California’s standardized approach.” Climate Policy 20 (9): 1112–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1781035.
Hewa Welege, N. M., W. Pan, and M. M. Kumaraswamy. 2023. “Engaging stakeholders to overcome the common constraints for delivering low carbon buildings in high-rise high-density cities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (1): 04022157. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12327.
Hussein, M., A. Darko, A. E. E. Eltoukhy, and T. Zayed. 2022. “Sustainable logistics planning in modular integrated construction using multimethod simulation and Taguchi approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (6): 04022022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002273.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2022a. “Annex I: Glossary.” In Global warming of 1.5°C, 541–562. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2022b. Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: IPCC.
Jacobs. 2022. Climate action plan. Dallas, TX: Jacobs.
Jacobs. 2023. “About us.” Accessed October 4, 2022. https://www.jacobs.com/about.
Jesson, J., L. Matheson, and F. M. Lacey. 2011. Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Jewell, J., et al. 2016. “Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policies.” Nat. Energy 1 (6): 16073. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.73.
Jez, A. A., B. D. Alexander, and A. R. Shaikh. 2022. Carbon credit and carbon offset fundamentals. Boston: Mintz.
John Wood Group. 2023. Data and reporting. Aberdeen, UK: John Wood Group.
Kim, B., H. Lee, H. Park, and H. Kim. 2012. “Greenhouse gas emissions from onsite equipment usage in road construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (8): 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000515.
Kim, B., H. Lee, H. Park, and H. Kim. 2013. “Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from land-use changes due to road construction in the Republic of Korea.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (3): 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000620.
Lang, J., et al. 2023. “Data explorer.” Net Zero Tracker. Accessed December 6, 2023. https://zerotracker.net/.
Leidos. 2023. “ESG goals: Advancing sustainability through 2030.” Accessed December 10, 2022. https://www.leidos.com/company/responsibility-and-sustainability/esg-goals.
Levy, B. S., and J. A. Patz. 2015. “Climate change, human rights, and social justice.” Ann. Global Health 81 (3): 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.008.
Li, Y., L. Cao, J. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Han, and J. Wei. 2021. “Energy benchmarking in healthcare facilities: A comparative study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (11): 04021159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002183.
Littlewood, D., R. Decelis, C. Hillenbrand, and D. Holt. 2018. “Examining the drivers and outcomes of corporate commitment to climate change action in European high emitting industry.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 27 (8): 1437–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2194.
Liu, M., W.-C. Choo, and C.-C. Lee. 2020. “The response of the stock market to the announcement of global pandemic.” Emerging Mark. Finance Trade 56 (15): 3562–3577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1850441.
Lucko, G., and J. Kaminsky. 2015. “Construction engineering conference and workshop 2014: Setting an industry-academic collaborative research agenda.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 04015096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000108.
Mazutis, D., and A. Eckardt. 2017. “Sleepwalking into catastrophe: Cognitive biases and corporate climate change inertia.” Calif. Manage. Rev. 59 (3): 74–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617707974.
McGrath, M. 2018. “Final call to save the world from ‘climate catastrophe’.” BBC News, October 8, 2018.
Melanta, S., E. Miller-Hooks, and H. G. Avetisyan. 2013. “Carbon footprint estimation tool for transportation construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (5): 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000598.
Miles, M. N., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mustaffa, N. K. 2022. “Alternative configurations of earthmoving loading practices toward emissions reduction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (1): 04021177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002211.
Ozorhon, B. 2013. “Response of construction clients to low-carbon building regulations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (12): A5013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000768.
Patcharachavalit, N., C. Limsawasd, and N. Athigakunagorn. 2023. “Multiobjective optimization for improving sustainable equipment options in road construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (1): 04022160. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12544.
Qian, D., P. Dargusch, and G. Hill. 2022. “Carbon management behind the ambitious pledge of net zero carbon emission—A case study of PepsiCo.” Sustainability 14 (4): 2171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042171.
Schmidt, A., A. Ivanova, and M. S. Schäfer. 2013. “Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries.” Global Environ. Change 23 (5): 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020.
Science Based Targets. 2023. “Companies taking action.” Accessed November 1, 2022. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action.
Shealy, T., and L. Klotz. 2015. “Well-endowed rating systems: How modified defaults can lead to more sustainable performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (10): 04015031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001009.
Soergel, B., et al. 2021. “A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda.” Nat. Clim. Change 11 (8): 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3.
Song, L. 2019. “An even more inconvenient truth: Why carbon credits for forest preservation may be worse than nothing.” ProPublica, May 22, 2019.
Sotos, M. E. 2015. GHG protocol scope 2 guidance: An amendment to the GHG protocol corporate standard. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Spearing, L. A., A. Bakchan, L. C. Hamlet, K. K. Stephens, J. A. Kaminsky, and K. M. Faust. 2022. “Comparing qualitative analysis techniques for construction engineering and management research: The case of Arctic water infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (7): 04022058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002313.
Steg, L. 2018. “Limiting climate change requires research on climate action.” Nat. Clim. Change 8 (9): 759–761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0269-8.
Sullivan, R., and A. Gouldson. 2013. “Ten years of corporate action on climate change: What do we have to show for it?” Energy Policy 60 (Feb): 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.025.
Szamocki, N., M.-K. Kim, C. R. Ahn, and I. Brilakis. 2019. “Reducing greenhouse gas emission of construction equipment at construction sites: Field study approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (9): 05019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001690.
Tavakolifar, M., A. Omar, T. T. Lemma, and G. Samkin. 2021. “Media attention and its impact on corporate commitment to climate change action.” J. Cleaner Prod. 313 (Sep): 127833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127833.
Todaro, N. M., F. Testa, T. Daddi, and F. Iraldo. 2021. “The influence of managers’ awareness of climate change, perceived climate risk exposure and risk tolerance on the adoption of corporate responses to climate change.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 30 (2): 1232–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2681.
Turner Construction. 2023. “Our ESG strategy.” Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.turnerconstruction.com/about-us/sustainability.
United Nations. 2015a. “Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030.” In Proc., World Conf. on Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai, Japan: UN Nations General Assembly.
United Nations. 2015b. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Sendai, Japan: UN General Assembly.
United Nations and Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2015. “Adoption of the Paris Agreement.” In Proc., 21st Conf. of the Parties. Paris: United Nations.
Walenta, J. 2018. “The limits to private-sector climate change action: The geographies of corporate climate governance.” Econ. Geogr. 94 (5): 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1474078.
Willdan. 2020. Growing together: Sustainability report 2020. Anaheim, CA: Willdan.
WSP (Williams Sale Partnership Ltd.). 2022. Positive & bold change agents: 2021 global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) report. Montreal: WSP Global, Inc.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: Mar 2, 2023
Accepted: Sep 13, 2023
Published online: Dec 12, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 12, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 91895-2700 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-9316. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 91895-2700. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-7913. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share