Technical Papers
Oct 24, 2023

Managing On-Site Production Using an Activity and Flow–Based Construction Model

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 1

Abstract

Schedule conformance depends on construction activities starting and finishing on time. However, construction activities are often delayed because construction flows necessary to start their execution are unavailable. Construction flows can be classified into: labor, equipment, workspace, materials, precedence, information, and external. Current construction models do not formally represent, measure, and track all flow types. Hence, field managers lack formal methods for managing flows and instead rely on their intuition and experience managing them. This paper presents a construction model based on activities and flows called the activity–flow model (AFM). The AFM formally represents the activities, the flows, and their interactions. The AFM was validated prospectively through its implementation on three building projects that were in different phases (foundations, core and shell, and finishing), at different geographic locations (Bogota, Copenhagen, and Lima), and used different planning and control methods (master schedule and weekly planning, last planner system, and location-based management system). The AFM was able to represent all the activities and flows in the test projects, track variations of activities and flows, and quantify activity and flow variability. Field managers can use the metrics enabled by the AFM to plan and control the project. Such proactive flow management can help field managers improve flow readiness, which should reduce activity delays and improve schedule conformance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Center for Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE) for its financial support of this work.

References

Aalami, F. 1998. “Using construction method models to generate four-dimensional production models.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Akbas, R. 2003. “Geometry-based modeling and simulation of construction processes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Akinci, B. H. 2000. “Automatic generation of work spaces and analysis of time-space conflicts at construction sites.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Akintoye, A. S., and M. J. MacLeod. 1997. “Risk analysis and management in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X.
Antunes, R., V. A. González, K. Walsh, and O. Rojas. 2017a. “Dynamics of project-driven production systems in construction: Productivity function.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (5): 04017053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000703.
Antunes, R., V. A. González, K. Walsh, O. Rojas, M. O’Sullivan, and I. Odeh. 2017b. “Benchmarking project-driven production in construction using productivity function: Capacity and cycle time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (3): 04017118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001438.
Arashpour, M., and M. Arashpour. 2015. “Analysis of workflow variability and its impacts on productivity and performance in construction of multistory buildings.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000363.
Ballard, G. 2000. “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 1998. “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(11).
Bertelsen, S., G. Heinrich, L. Koskela, and J. Rooke. 2007. “Construction physics.” In Proc., 15th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, edited by C. L. Pasquire and P. Tzortzopoulos, 13–26. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Univ.
Bertelsen, S., L. Koskela, G. Henrich, and J. Rooke. 2006. “Critical flow—Towards a construction flow theory.” In Proc., 14th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, edited by R. Sacks and S. Bertelsen, 31–40. Santiago, Chile: International Group for Lean Construction.
Bhargav, D., J.-P. Hämäläinen, and L. Koskela. 2015. “Exploring the recurrent problems in the last planner implementation on construction projects.” In Proc., Indian Lean Construction Conference (ILCC 2015), 1–9. Mumbai, India: Institute for Lean Construction Excellence.
Binninger, M., J. Dlouhy, and S. Haghsheno. 2019. “Flow in takted projects—A practical analysis of flow and resource efficiency.” In Proc., 27th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), 1271–1282. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Brodetskaia, I., R. Sacks, and A. Shapira. 2011. “A workflow model for systems and interior finishing works in building construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (12): 1209–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.647829.
Chapman, C. 1997. “Project risk analysis and management—PRAM the generic process.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (5): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00079-8.
Darwiche, A., R. Levitt, and B. Hayes-Roth. 1988. “OARPLAN: Generating project plans by reasoning about objects, actions and resources.” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 2 (3): 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060400000639.
Dodge Data and Analytics. 2021. Modeling, scheduling and field/project management for civil construction. Hamilton, NJ: Dodge Data & Analytics.
Echeverry, D., C. W. Ibbs, and S. Kim. 1991. “Sequencing knowledge for construction scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 117 (1): 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1991)117:1(118).
Fireman, M. C. T., T. A. Saurin, C. T. Formoso, L. Koskela, and I. D. Tommelein. 2022. “Slack in production planning and control: A study in the construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 41 (3): 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2135749.
Fischer, M., N. P. Garcia-Lopez, and R. Morkos. 2018. “Making each workhour count: Improving the prediction of construction durations and resource allocations.” In Vol. 10863 of Advanced computing strategies for engineering. EG-ICE 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, edited by I. Smith and B. Domer, 273–295. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Garcia-Lopez, N. P. 2017. “An activity and flow-based construction model for managing on-site work.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Garcia-Lopez, N. P., and M. Fischer. 2016. “A construction workflow model for analyzing the impact of in-project variability.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 1998–2007. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Garcia-Lopez, N. P., M. A. Fischer, and L. F. Alarcón. 2019. “Work structuring for flow.” In Proc., 27th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), edited by C. Pasquire and F. R. Hamzeh, 311–322. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
González, V., L. F. Alarcón, S. Maturana, and J. A. Bustamante. 2011. “Site management of work-in-process buffers to enhance project performance using the reliable commitment model: Case study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (9): 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000346.
Gruber, T. R. 1993. “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.” Knowl. Acquis. 5 (2): 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
Hamzeh, F. R. 2009. Improving construction workflow—The role of production planning and control. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Hopp, W. J., and M. L. Spearman. 2001. Factory physics: Foundations of manufacturing management. Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
Horman, M. J., and H. R. Thomas. 2005. “Role of inventory buffers in construction labor performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (7): 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(834).
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Koskela, L. J. 1999. “Management of production in construction: A theoretical view.” In Proc., 7th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 241–252. Berkeley, CA: International Group for Lean Construction.
Levitt, R. E., and J. C. Kunz. 1987. “Using artificial intelligence techniques to support project management.” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 1 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060400000111.
Lin, J. J., and M. Golparvar-Fard. 2021. “Visual and virtual production management system for proactive project controls.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (7): 04021058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002045.
Maraqa, M. J., R. Sacks, and S. Spatari. 2021. “Quantitative assessment of the impacts of BIM and lean on process and operations flow in construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (8): 2176–2198. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1068.
Morkos, R. 2014. “Operational efficiency frontier visualizing, manipulating, and navigating the construction scheduling state space with precedence, discrete, and disjunctive constraints.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Poshdar, M., V. A. González, G. M. Raftery, F. Orozco, and G. G. Cabrera-Guerrero. 2018. “A multi-objective probabilistic-based method to determine optimum allocation of time buffer in construction schedules.” Autom. Constr. 92 (Aug): 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.025.
Sacks, R. 2016. “What constitutes good production flow in construction?” Construct. Manage. Econ. 34 (9): 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1200733.
Sacks, R., O. Seppänen, V. Priven, and J. Savosnick. 2017. “Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 35 (1–2): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274417.
Saurin, T. A., and N. J. B. Werle. 2017. “A framework for the analysis of slack in socio-technical systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (Nov): 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.023.
Shingo, S., and A. Dillon. 1989. A study of the Toyota production system: From an industrial engineering viewpoint. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Thomas, H. R., M. J. Horman, U. E. L. de Souza, and I. Zavřski. 2002. “Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (2): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(144).
Tommelein, I. D. 1998. “Pull-driven scheduling for pipe-spool installation: Simulation of lean construction technique.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (4): 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(279).
Tommelein, I. D., D. R. Riley, and G. A. Howell. 1999. “Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (5): 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(304).
Wambeke, B. W., S. M. Hsiang, and M. Liu. 2011. “Causes of variation in construction project task starting times and duration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (9): 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000342.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Feb 8, 2023
Accepted: Aug 29, 2023
Published online: Oct 24, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 110111, Colombia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-0897. Email: [email protected]
Martin Fischer, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305; Director, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share