Guidelines for Using a Case Study Approach in Construction Culture Research: Application to BIM-Enabled Organizations
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 9
Abstract
This article seeks to improve the understanding of applying case studies in qualitative research in construction culture. Being a soft and method-complex research strategy, the case study approach is challenging to implement in practice. This issue is exacerbated when the case study approach is incorporated with the inherited complexity of the construction culture. Thus, when studying construction culture through a case study approach, it is critical to establish concise guidelines that can be referred to and followed. The proposed methodology is described in detail, from conceptualizing the research problem to reporting the findings, and is illustrated with an example application to a building information modeling (BIM)-enabled construction organization. The ensuing discourse elucidates upon how the philosophical and methodological issues can be addressed by systematically designing the case study to secure optimal research outcomes. From the study, it was found that beyond the scope of typical case studies, a cultural case study must establish its cultural philosophical position, whether it sees culture as a variable or a root metaphor. Given the necessity of indirect questioning in culture research, the data collection protocols should be developed to allow for a more in-depth exploration of the core construction culture. Consequently, questions about difficult and critical situations are essential for eliciting appropriate responses from interviewees and making the process more effective. Furthermore, asking interviewees for examples to back up their answers adds justifications and credibility to their responses. The paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge by proposing a systematic approach to identify hidden cultural beliefs, and by demonstrating the process of developing coding levels using NVivo software. The proposed methodology can be applied to other cultural domains such as safety and lean and can help organizations to identify the underlying cultural beliefs that may impact their performance and develop targeted interventions. The guidelines help novice researchers identify critical steps in designing qualitative case studies in cultural research, and future research could deductively and quantitatively test the theories developed in this paper to confirm validity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the University of South Australia’s financial support through the UniSA scholarship (USAIGR) for Ph.D. studies.
References
Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, and R. Rameezdeen. 2021. “Exploring BIM-triggered organisational and professional culture change: A systematic literature review.” Constr. Innov. 23 (1): 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2021-0084.
Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, and A. Samaraweera. 2022. “Organisational BIM maturity models and their applications: A systematic literature review.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 2022 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2022.2068496.
Alasuutari, P. 1996. “Theorizing in qualitative research: A cultural studies perspective.” Qual. Inq. 2 (4): 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049600200401.
Baskarada, S. 2014. “Qualitative case study guidelines.” Qual. Rep. 19 (40): 1–25.
Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers.” Qual. Rep. 13 (4): 544–559.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic analysis.” In Vol. 2 of APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
Brundrett, M., and C. Rhodes. 2010. Leadership for quality and accountability in education. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Brundrett, M., and C. Rhodes. 2013. Researching educational leadership and management: Methods and approaches. New York: SAGE.
Burns, E., and W. Groove. 2014. “Research method.” Ergonomics 32 (3): 237–248.
Collis, J., and R. Hussey. 2013. Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. New York: Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W. 2018. Qualitative inquiry & research design. Ankara, Turkey: Siyasal Yayın Dağıtım.
Deal, T. E. 1985. “The symbolism of effective schools.” Elementary School J. 85 (5): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1086/461424.
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. New York: SAGE.
Doody, O., and C. M. Doody. 2015. “Conducting a pilot study: Case study of a novice researcher.” Br. J. Nurs. 24 (21): 1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.21.1074.
Douglas, D. 2003. “Inductive theory generation: A grounded approach to business inquiry.” Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2 (1): 47–54.
Easterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe, and P. R. Jackson. 2012. Management research. New York: SAGE.
Ebneyamini, S., and M. R. Sadeghi Moghadam. 2018. “Toward developing a framework for conducting case study research.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 17 (1): 160940691881795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954.
Edwards, D. J., and G. D. Holt. 2010. “The case for “3D triangulation” when applied to construction management research.” Constr. Innov. 10 (1): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171011018292.
Edwards, D. J., I. Rillie, and N. Chileshe. 2020. “A field survey of hand–arm vibration exposure in the UK utilities sector.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (9): 2179–2198. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2019-0518.
Fellows, R., and A. Liu. 2020. “Culture in supply chains.” Successful Constr. Supply Chain Manage. Concepts Case Stud. 2020 (1): 167–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119450535.ch9.
Fellows, R., and A. M. Liu. 2013. “Use and misuse of the concept of culture.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 31 (5): 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.794296.
Fellows, R. F., and A. M. Liu. 2015. Research methods for construction. New York: Wiley.
Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 5 (1): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.
Flick, U. 2018. An introduction to qualitative research. New York: SAGE.
Fusch, G. E., C. J. Fusch, and P. I. Fusch. 2016. “Why culture matters in business research.” J. Soc. Change 8 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2016.08.1.04.
Gajendran, T., G. Brewer, A. R. Dainty, and G. Runeson. 2012. “A conceptual approach to studying the organisational culture of construction projects.” Australas. J. Const. Econ. Build. 12 (2): 1–26.
Gee, M. K., and C. Ullman. 1998. Teacher/ethnographer in the workplace: Approaches to staff development. Grayslake, IL: Lake County College.
Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology.” Organ. Res. Methods 16 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.
Hammal, G. 2006. “Task and relationship orientations of organizational culture in the framework of metaphorical perspective.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Univ. of Tartu.
Hilal, A. H., and S. S. Alabri. 2013. “Using NVivo for data analysis in qualitative research.” Int. Interdiscip. J. Educ. 2 (2): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.12816/0002914.
Hofman, B., G. de Vries, and G. van de Kaa. 2022. “Keeping things as they are: How status quo biases and traditions along with a lack of information transparency in the building industry slow down the adoption of innovative sustainable technologies.” Sustainability 14 (13): 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138188.
Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. New York: SAGE.
Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Houghton, C., K. Murphy, and D. Shaw. 2015. “Qualitative case study data analysis: An example from practice.” Nurse Res. 22 (5): 1307. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.5.8.e1307.
Kahkonen, A. K. 2014. “Conducting a case study in supply management.” Oper. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 4 (1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm090054.
Kluckhohn, F. R., and F. L. Strodtbeck. 1961. Variations in value orientations. Topeka, KS: Peterson.
Knobel, M., V. Ahmed, and S. Saboor. 2021. “A socio-cultural perspective to BIM adoption: A case study in South Africa.” In Collaboration and integration in construction, engineering, management and technology, 405–412. Berlin: Springer.
Kulatunga, U., D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh. 2006. “Measuring performance and the impact of research and development in the construction industry: Research methodological perspectives.” In Proc., 6th Int. Postgraduate Research Conf. in the Built and Human Environment. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ.
Kulatunga, U., D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh. 2008. “Performance measurement in construction research & development: The use of case study research approach.” In Proc., Int. Conf. in Building Education and Research. Kanata, ON, Canada: CIB.
Martin, J. 2001. Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. New York: SAGE.
Mason, M. 2010. “Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews.” Forum: Qual. Social Res.11 (3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New York: Wiley.
Morgan, G., and L. Smircich. 1980. “The case for qualitative research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 5 (4): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/257453.
Newman, C., D. Edwards, and I. Martek. 2020. “Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: A bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 10 (4): 557–580.
Noor, K. B. M. 2008. “Case study: A strategic research methodology.” Am. J. Appl. Sci. 5 (11): 1602–1604.
Odor, H. O. 2018. “Organisational culture and dynamics.” Global J. Manage. Bus. Res. 18 (1): 23–29.
Ormston, R., L. Spencer, and M. Barnard. 2014. “The foundations of qualitative research.” Qual. Res. Pract. Guide Soc. Sci. Stud. Res. 2 (7): 52–55.
Patton, E., and S. H. Appelbaum. 2003. “The case for case studies in management research.” Manage. Res. News 26 (5): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170310783484.
Patton, M. Q. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. New York: SAGE.
Proverbs, D., and R. Gameson. 2008. “Case study research.” Adv. Res. Methods Built Environ. 2008 (1): 99–110.
Rameezdeen, R., and N. Gunarathna. 2003. “Organisational culture in construction: An employee perspective.” Const. Econ. Build. 3 (1): 19–30.
Rashid, Y., A. Rashid, and M. A. Warraich. 2019. “Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 18 (Jun): 160940691986242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424.
Roberts, C., and D. Edwards. 2022. “Post-occupancy evaluation: Identifying and mitigating implementation barriers to reduce environmental impact.” J. Cleaner Prod. 2022 (1): 133957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133957.
Rooke, J., and D. Seymour. 2002. Ethnography in the construction industry: Competing bodies of knowledge in civil engineering. Kanata, ON, Canada: CIB.
Samaraweera, A., S. Senaratne, and Y. Sandanayake. 2017. “Conceptualising construction project culture: Culture as a root metaphor as opposed to the culture as a variable.” Int. J. Constr. Project Manage. 9 (1): 19–35.
Samaraweera, A., S. Senaratne, and Y. G. Sandanayake. 2018. “Methodology to extract underlying basic assumptions of a public sector construction project culture: An exploratory case study.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 18 (6): 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1338130.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2009. Research methods for business students. London: Pearson Education.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2019. Research methods for business students. London: Pearson Education.
Schein, E. H. 1983. “The role of the founder in creating organizational culture.” Organ. Dyn. 12 (1): 13–28.
Schein, E. H. 2010. Organizational culture and leadership. New York: Wiley.
Seymour, D., and J. Rooke. 1995. “The culture of the industry and the culture of research.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 13 (6): 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199500000059.
Smircich, L. 1983. “Concepts of culture and organizational analysis.” Admin. Sci. Q. 1983 (1): 339–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392246.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications. New York: SAGE.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 24, 2023
Accepted: Apr 24, 2023
Published online: Jun 22, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Building information modeling
- Building management
- Business management
- Case studies
- Computer programming
- Computer software
- Computing in civil engineering
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Construction methods
- Ecosystems
- Engineering fundamentals
- Environmental engineering
- Methodology (by type)
- Organizations
- Practice and Profession
- Research methods (by type)
- Vegetation
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Sonali Alankarage, Nicholas Chileshe, Aparna Samaraweera, Raufdeen Rameezdeen, David J. Edwards, Diagnosing Organizational BIM Culture: A Qualitative Case Study Using Schein’s Model, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5672, 40, 3, (2024).