Technical Papers
Oct 24, 2023

Analyzing the Optimization of Subsidies for PPP Urban Rail Transit Projects: A Choice between Passenger Demand, Vehicle Kilometer, or an Improved Efficiency-Oriented Framework

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 1

Abstract

Prior to designing detailed subsidy contract terms for public–private partnerships (PPPs), local governments often face the challenge of selecting the basic modes of a subsidy (in this case, passenger demand subsidy or vehicle-kilometer subsidy). However, most studies do not discuss the reasons for choosing a particular mode or its applicability. This paper addresses this gap by constructing Stackelberg game models to analyze the characteristics of two subsidy modes: vehicle-kilometer subsidy and passenger demand subsidy. Four situations derived from these two subsidy modes are then modeled and analyzed, exploring the relationships among parameters and clarifying the strategies of local governments. Additionally, a comparison is made between the two subsidy modes to demonstrate the optimal utilization of subsidies. Based on this analysis, an efficiency-oriented subsidy framework is proposed to overcome the shortcomings of existing subsidies and provide new insights into subsidy design for PPPs. The results indicate that the vehicle-kilometer subsidy loses its incentive or regulatory effects on the private sector when the vehicle-kilometer is predetermined. Furthermore, the subsidy mode, the local government’s goals, and financial stress will influence key parameters (price and vehicle-kilometer); further, the preference of both parties for subsidy modes is closely related to price. The proposed efficiency-oriented subsidy framework offers significant advantages in reducing prices, increasing consumer surplus and efficiency, conserving social resources, and strengthening cost control. This paper contributes to the literature by emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate subsidy modes, exploring the differences between two common modes, and further providing a novel and effective subsidy mode. Further, this paper can also guide mutual parties to optimize their strategies and enhance the overall efficiency and performance in PPP urban rail transit projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71772136, 72204244, and 72271183), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 2022CDJSKJC30 and E1E40811X2), and the China Scholarship Council (No. 202106250037).

References

Abe, R., and H. Kato. 2017. “What led to the establishment of a rail-oriented city? Determinants of urban rail supply in Tokyo, Japan, 1950–2010.” Transp. Policy 58 (8): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.05.004.
Basso, L. J., and S. R. Jara-Diaz. 2012. “Integrating congestion pricing, transit subsidies and mode choice.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46 (6): 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.013.
Carbonara, N., and R. Pellegrino. 2018. “Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: A win-win model.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 36 (10): 584–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1467028.
Chen, A., and K. Subprasom. 2007. “Analysis of regulation and policy of private toll roads in a build-operate-transfer scheme under demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41 (6): 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.11.009.
Chen, B., F. M. Liou, and C. P. Huang. 2012. “Optimal financing mix of financially non-viable private-participation investment project with initial subsidy.” Eng. Econ. 23 (5): 452–461. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.23.5.3130.
China Association of Metros. 2022. “China urban rail transit statistics and analysis report 2021.” Accessed September 29, 2022. https://www.camet.org.cn/tjxx/9944.
Currie, G., M. Burke, and A. Delbosc. 2014. “Performance of Australian light rail and comparison with US trends.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2419 (1): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.3141/2419-02.
Engel, E., R. Fischer, and A. Galetovic. 2007. “The basic public finance of public-private partnerships.” J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11 (1): 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01105.x.
Fearnley, N., J. T. Bekken, and B. Norheim. 2004. “Optimal performance-based subsidies in Norwegian intercity rail transport.” Int. J. Transp. Manage. 2 (1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtm.2004.04.003.
Feng, K., W. Xiong, S. Wang, and C. Wu. 2017. “Optimizing an equity capital structure model for public–private partnership projects involved with public funds.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (9): 04017067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001349.
Feng, Z., S. B. Zhang, Y. Gao, and S. J. Zhang. 2016. “Subsidizing and pricing private toll roads with noncontractible service quality: A relational contract approach.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 91 (9): 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.017.
Feng, Z., Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J. Song. 2018. “Contracting and renegotiating with a loss-averse private firm in BOT road projects.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 112 (Jun): 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.04.004.
Gupta, S., and A. Mukherjee. 2013. “Utilization of passenger transport subsidy in Kolkata: A case study of Calcutta State Transport Corporation.” Res. Transp. Econ. 38 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.011.
Guzman, A., and J. Vassallo. 2013. “Methodology for assessing regional economic impacts of charges for heavy-goods vehicles in Spain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2378 (1): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3141/2378-14.
Jin, L., Z. Zhang, and J. Song. 2020. “Profit allocation and subsidy mechanism for public–private partnership toll road projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000766.
Kato, H., Y. Kaneko, and Y. Soyama. 2014. “Economic benefits of urban rail projects that improve travel-time reliability: Evidence from Tokyo, Japan.” Transp. Policy 35 (9): 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.06.004.
Li, Z. C., W. H. Lam, S. C. Wong, and K. Choi. 2012a. “Modeling the effects of integrated rail and property development on the design of rail line services in a linear monocentric city.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46 (6): 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.01.004.
Li, Z. C., W. H. Lam, S. C. Wong, and A. Sumalee. 2012b. “Design of a rail transit line for profit maximization in a linear transportation corridor.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 48 (1): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.003.
Liao, X. 2008. “A comparative study of government taxation cost and tax efficiency.” [In Chinese.] Acad. Forum 1: 73–78. https://doi.org/10.16524/j.45-1002.2008.01.044.
Liu, H. J., P. E. D. Love, J. Smith, Z. Irani, N. Hajli, and M. C. P. Sing. 2017a. “From design to operations: A process management life-cycle performance measurement system for public-private partnerships.” Prod. Plann. Control 29 (1): 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1382740.
Liu, J., R. Gao, and C. Y. J. Cheah. 2017b. “Pricing mechanism of early termination of PPP projects based on real option theory.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (6): 04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000556.
Liu, Y., X. Wang, S. Guo, and J. Chen. 2020. “Using bargaining game model to negotiate government subsidy for PPP infrastructure projects.” In Construction Research Congress 2020, 186–195. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lv, J., G. Ye, W. Liu, and L. Shen. 2015. “Alternative model for determining the optimal concession period in managing BOT transportation projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (4): 04014066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000291.
Meng, Q., and Z. Lu. 2017. “Quantitative analyses of highway franchising under build-operate-transfer scheme: Critical review and future research directions.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 102 (Aug): 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.009.
Ministry of Finance of People’s Republic of China. 2022. “The responsible comrade of the Ministry of Finance attended the press conference of the Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee to introduce the transcript of the relevant situation of fiscal and tax reform and development.” Accessed October 6, 2023. https://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengxinwen/202205/t20220517_3811138.htm.
Narbaev, T., O. Hazir, and M. Agi. 2022. “A review of the use of game theory in project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (6): 03122002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001092.
Niu, B., and J. Zhang. 2013. “Price, capacity and concession period decisions of Pareto-efficient BOT contracts with demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 53 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.012.
Pellegrino, R. 2021. “Effects of public supports for mitigating revenue risk in public-private partnership projects: Model to choose among support alternatives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (12): 04021167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002098.
Pellegrino, R., N. Carbonara, and N. Costantino. 2019. “Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 9 (2): 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0012.
Schepper, S. D., D. Michaël, and E. Haezendonck. 2014. “Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in public–private partnerships: A mixed experience.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1210–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006.
Shang, L., and A. M. A. Aziz. 2020. “Stackelberg game theory-based optimization model for design of payment mechanism in performance-based PPPs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (4): 04020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001806.
Sharafi, A., M. S. Amalnick, and A. A. Taleizadeh. 2021. “Outcome of financial conflicts in the operation phase of public-private partnership contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (6): 04021047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002011.
Shi, S., Q. An, and K. Chen. 2020. “Optimal choice of capacity, toll, and subsidy for build-operate transfer roads with a paid minimum traffic guarantee.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 139 (Sep): 228–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.023.
Shi, S., Y. Yin, and X. Guo. 2016. “Optimal choice of capacity, toll and government guarantee for build-operate-transfer roads under asymmetric cost information.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 85 (Mar): 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.12.019.
Song, D., J. Song, H. Yuan, and Y. Fan. 2021. “An evolutionary game analysis of user-pay public–private partnership projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (7): 2042–2062. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2020-0460.
Song, J., L. Jin, Y. Zhao, and W. Hu. 2017. “Using bargaining-game model to negotiate compensation for the early termination of bot highway projects.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 105 (11): 197–209. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.tra.2017.06.017.
Song, J., D. Song, and D. Zhang. 2015. “Modeling the concession period and subsidy for BOT waste-to-energy incineration projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (10): 04015033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001005.
Spasovic, L., M. P. Boile, and A. Bladikas. 1994. “Bus transit service coverage for maximum profit and social welfare.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1451: 12–22.
Sun, Y., and P. M. Schonfeld. 2015. “Optimization models for public transit operations under subsidization and regulation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2530 (1): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.3141/2530-06.
Ubbels, B., and E. T. Verhoef. 2008. “Auctioning concessions for private roads.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 42 (1): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.001.
Van Vuuren, D. 2002. “Optimal pricing in railway passenger transport: Theory and practice in the Netherlands.” Transp. Policy 9 (2): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00005-7.
Wang, F., M. Xiong, B. Niu, and X. Zhuo. 2018. “Impact of government subsidy on BOT contract design: Price, demand, and concession period.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 110 (Apr): 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.006.
Wang, Q., and L. Deng. 2019. “Integrated optimization method of operational subsidy with fare for urban rail transit.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 127 (1): 1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.003.
Yang, J., H. Zhou, and M. Zhou. 2019. “Bus transit subsidy under China’s transit metropolis initiative: The case of Shenzhen.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 14 (1): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1519088.
Yu, M. M., L. H. Chen, and B. Hsiao. 2018. “A performance-based subsidy allocation of ferry transportation: A data envelopment approach.” Transp. Policy 68 (9): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.004.
Yue, X., and Y. Lin. 2019. “Effectiveness of punishment and operating subsidy in supervision of China’s pension PPP projects: An evolutionary game and simulation analysis.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (Nov): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9641429.
Zhang, H., R. Jin, H. Li, and M. J. Skibniewski. 2018. “Pavement maintenance–focused decision analysis on concession periods of PPP highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 04017047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000568.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Dec 22, 2022
Accepted: Aug 14, 2023
Published online: Oct 24, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., No. 92 Weijin Rd., Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, PR China; Special Research Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-3896. Email: [email protected]
Xueqing Wang [email protected]
Professor, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., No. 92 Weijin Rd., Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Special Research Assistant, School of Economics and Management, Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 3 Zhongguancun Nanyitiao, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-9395. Email: [email protected]
Xiaowei Shi [email protected]
Commissioner, Agricultural Bank of China, No. 69 Jianguomennei St., Dongcheng District, Beijing 100005, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing Univ., No. 174 Shazheng St., Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share