Technical Papers
Dec 14, 2023

Influencing Factors and Critical Paths of Virtual Reality Adoption by AEC Enterprises Based on TOE-SNA

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 2

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) holds significant potential for the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. However, its adoption by AEC enterprises remains relatively low. VR adoption is affected by many factors, and critical factors play essential roles and actively influence the adoption according to specific paths. Therefore, it is necessary to identify these critical factors and paths to improve VR adoption. However, there is currently a lack of research on key influencing factors and paths for AEC enterprises, which greatly hinders VR adoption. To bridge this gap, this study aims to identify the key influencing factors and critical paths for VR adoption in AEC enterprises, focusing on the organizational level. Drawing on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) theory, we categorize and analyze the factors affecting VR adoption. Through a questionnaire survey, we establish a direct connection between these factors and construct an adjacency matrix. Subsequently, we employ social network analysis (SNA) to visualize the social network relationship diagram and analyze network measures. Our findings reveal six critical factors and four critical paths that significantly influence VR adoption. By integrating the TOE-SNA method, this study quantifies the interaction relationship among various factors and identifies critical factors and paths, providing a theoretical foundation for VR adoption in AEC enterprises. Moreover, our research offers practical guidance for government, enterprises, and VR product suppliers to promote VR adoption, enhance adoption rates, and contribute to the long-term development of the industry in the digital transformation era.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the funding of the Key Project of Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (23692109200) and the many insightful suggestions from the anonymous reviewers and the editors. Authors Wenmin Gao and Xiaoli Yan contributed equally as the first authors of this article.

References

Alizadehsalehi, S., A. Hadavi, and J. C. Huang. 2020. “From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry.” Autom. Constr. 116 (Aug): 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254.
Al-Natour, S., and I. Benbasat. 2009. “The adoption and use of IT artifacts: A new interaction-centric model for the study of user-artifact relationships.” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10 (9): 661–685. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00208.
Badamasi, A. A., K. R. Aryal, U. U. Makarfi, and M. Dodo. 2022. “Drivers and barriers of virtual reality adoption in UK AEC industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (3): 1307–1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0685.
Balali, V., X. Guo, S. Fathi, and A. Heydarian. 2022. “Perceptions of augmented and virtual reality technologies adoption within the AEC Industry.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2022. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bijker, M., and M. Hart. 2013. “Factors influencing pervasiveness of organizational business intelligence.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Business Intelligence and Technology. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78831-7_61.
Castro-Lacouture, D. 2009. “Construction automation.” In Springer handbook of automation, edited by S. Y. Nof, 1063–1078. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Castronovo, F., D. Nikolic, Y. Liu, and J. Messner. 2013. “An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality. London: Teesside Univ.
Chatterjee, S., N. P. Rana, Y. K. Dwivedi, and A. M. Baabdullah. 2021. “Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 170 (Sep): 120880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880.
Chen, Z., K. Chen, and J. C. P. Cheng. 2022. “ISM-based analysis of VR-AEC adoption barriers and their inner mechanisms.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (9): 4271–4293. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0085.
Chokwitthaya, C., Y. Zhu, S. Mukhopadhyay, and E. Collier. 2020. “Augmenting building performance predictions during design using generative adversarial networks and immersive virtual environments.” Autom. Constr. 119 (Nov): 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103350.
Davila Delgado, J. M., L. O. Oyedele, T. H. Beach, and P. Demian. 2020. “Augmented and virtual reality in construction: Drivers and limitations for industry adoption.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 04020079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001844.
Dogan, S. Z., D. Arditi, S. Gunhan, and B. Erbasaranoglu. 2015. “Assessing coordination performance based on centrality in an e-mail communication network.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000255.
Eadie, R., M. Browne, H. Odeyinka, C. McKeown, and S. McNiff. 2015. “A survey of current status of and perceived changes required for BIM adoption in the UK.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 5 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2013-0023.
Fernandes, K. J., V. Raja, A. White, and C. D. Tsinopoulos. 2006. “Adoption of virtual reality within construction processes: A factor analysis approach.” Technovation 26 (1): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.013.
Freeman, L. 1977. “A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness.” Sociometry 40 (1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543.
Freeman, L. C. 1978. “Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Freeman, L. C., D. Roeder, and R. R. Mulholland. 1979. “Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results.” Social Networks 2 (2): 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(79)90002-9.
Gangwar, H., H. Date, and A. D. Raoot. 2014. “Review on IT adoption: Insights from recent technologies.” Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 27 (4): 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2012-0047.
Hayden, S., D. Ames, D. Turner, T. Keene, and D. Andrus. 2014. “Mobile, low-cost, and large-scale immersive data visualization environment for civil engineering applications.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (6): 05014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000428.
He, C., Q. Su, C. Li, Y. Liu, and N. Jia. 2020. “Research on the cause of building fire using social network analysis.” In Proc., IEEE 7th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 958–962. New York: IEEE.
Issa, R. R. A. 2000. “Virtual reality: A solution to seamless technology integration in the AEC industry.” In Proc., Construction Congress VI, 1007–1013. Gainesville, FL: School of Building Construction, Univ. of Florida. https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)107.
Jeelani, I., K. Han, and A. Albert. 2020. “Development of virtual reality and stereo-panoramic environments for construction safety training.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (8): 1853–1876. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0391.
Katz, L. 1953. “A new status index derived from sociometric analysis.” Psychometrika 18 (1): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289026.
Lai, P. C. 2017. “The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology.” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manage. 14 (Jan): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002.
Lewin, K. 1936. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.
Li, P., S. Zheng, H. Si, and K. Xu. 2019. “Critical challenges for BIM adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from China.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019 (Feb): 9482350. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9482350.
Li, X., W. Yi, H. L. Chi, X. Wang, and A. P. Chan. 2018. “A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety.” Autom. Constr. 86 (Feb): 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003.
Li, Y., M. Li, P. Sang, P. H. Chen, and C. Li. 2022. “Stakeholder studies of green buildings: A literature review.” J. Build. Eng. 54 (Aug): 104667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104667.
Low, C., Y. Chen, and M. Wu. 2011. “Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption.” Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 111 (7): 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111161262.
Luo, L., G. Qiping Shen, G. Xu, Y. Liu, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Stakeholder-associated supply chain risks and their interactions in a prefabricated building project: A case study in Hong Kong.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (2): 05018015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000675.
Mastrolembo Ventura, S., F. Castronovo, and A. Ciribini. 2020. “A design review session protocol for the implementation of immersive virtual reality in usability-focused analysis.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 25 (Apr): 233–253. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.014.
Mastrolembo Ventura, S., F. Castronovo, D. Nikolic, and A. Ciribini. 2022. “Implementation of virtual reality in construction education: A content-analysis based literature review.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 27 (Jul): 705–731. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.035.
Mohtaramzadeh, M., T. Ramayah, and C. Jun-Hwa. 2018. “B2B E-commerce adoption in Iranian manufacturing companies: Analyzing the moderating role of organizational culture.” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34 (7): 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1385212.
Mok, K. Y., G. Q. Shen, R. J. Yang, and C. Z. Li. 2017. “Investigating key challenges in major public engineering projects by a network-theory based analysis of stakeholder concerns: A case study.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (1): 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.017.
Ortega, J., H. A. Mesa, and L. F. Alarcón. 2023. “The interrelationship between barriers impeding the adoption of off-site construction in developing countries: The case of Chile.” J. Build. Eng. 73 (Aug): 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106824.
Paes, D., E. Arantes, and J. Irizarry. 2017. “Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems.” Autom. Constr. 84 (Dec): 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.016.
Parise, S. 2007. “Knowledge management and human resource development: An application in social network analysis methods.” Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 9 (3): 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307304106.
Park, H., S. H. Han, E. Rojas, J. Son, and W. Jung. 2011. “Social network analysis of collaborative ventures for overseas construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (5): 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000301.
Pour Rahimian, F., R. Ibrahim, R. Wirza, M. T. Abdullah, and M. S. Jaafar. 2011. “Mediating cognitive transformation with VR 3D sketching during conceptual architectural design process.” Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Arthit. Res. 5 (1): 99–113.
Qin, X., Y. Shi, K. Lyu, and Y. Mo. 2020. “Using a TAM-TOE model to explore factors of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (3): 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12176.
Ramilo, R., and M. R. B. Embi. 2014. “Critical analysis of key determinants and barriers to digital innovation adoption among architectural organizations.” Front. Archit. Res. 3 (4): 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.005.
Rogers, E. M., and Simon & Schuster. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Rousseau, R., and L. Zhang. 2008. “Betweenness centrality and Q-measures in directed valued networks.” Scientometrics 75 (3): 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1772-2.
Sacks, R., U. Gurevich, and B. Belaciano. 2013. “Hybrid discrete event simulation and virtual reality experimental setup for construction management research.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (1): 04014029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000366.
Sahyoune, L., and A. H. Ghapanchi. 2020. “Exploring factors impacting user adoption of virtual reality in projects: A literature survey.” In Proc., 24th Int. Conf. Information Visualisation (IV), 182–188. New York: IEEE.
Schiavi, B., V. Havard, K. Beddiar, and D. Baudry. 2022. “BIM data flow architecture with AR/VR technologies: Use cases in architecture, engineering and construction.” Autom. Constr. 134 (Feb): 104054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104054.
Sherman, W. R., and A. B. Craig. 2002. “Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design.” In Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments, 441–442. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tichy, N., M. Tushman, and C. Fombrun. 1979. “Social network analysis for organizations.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 4 (4): 507–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/257851.
Tornatzky, L. G., M. Fleischer, and A. K. Chakrabarti. 1990. The processes of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Tseng, F.-M., C.-W. Liang, and N. B. Nguyen. 2023. “Blockchain technology adoption and business performance in large enterprises: A comparison of the United States and China.” Technol. Soc. 73 (May): 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102230.
Wang, P., P. Wu, J. Wang, H. L. Chi, and X. Wang. 2018. “A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (6): 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204.
Wang, Y.-M., Y.-S. Wang, and Y.-F. Yang. 2010. “Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 77 (5): 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006.
Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wen, J., and M. Gheisari. 2020. “Using virtual reality to facilitate communication in the AEC domain: A systematic review.” Constr. Innov. 20 (3): 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0122.
Xu, W., P. Ou, and W. Fan. 2017. “Antecedents of ERP assimilation and its impact on ERP value: A TOE-based model and empirical test.” Inf. Syst. Front. 19 (1): 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9583-0.
Yan, X., T. Li, and Y. Zhou. 2022. “Virtual reality’s influence on construction workers’ willingness to participate in safety education and training in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 04021095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001002.
Yang, R. J., and P. X. W. Zou. 2014. “Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model.” Build. Environ. 73 (Mar): 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014.
Yoon, T. E., and J. F. George. 2013. “Why aren’t organizations adopting virtual worlds?” Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 (3): 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.003.
Yuan, M., Z. Li, X. Li, and X. Luo. 2021. “Managing stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in the life cycle of prefabricated building projects: A social network analysis approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 323 (Nov): 129102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129102.
Zhang, Z., X. Li, and H. Li. 2015. “A quantitative approach for assessing the critical nodal and linear elements of a railway infrastructure.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 8 (Jan): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.11.001.
Zhao, Y., and N. Taib. 2022. “Cloud-based building information modelling (Cloud-BIM): Systematic literature review and bibliometric-qualitative analysis.” Autom. Constr. 142 (Oct): 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104468.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: Oct 19, 2022
Accepted: Oct 6, 2023
Published online: Dec 14, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 14, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Master’s Candidate, School of Management, Shanghai Univ. of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China. Email: [email protected]
Xiaoli Yan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Management, Shanghai Univ. of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Consultant, Fujian Post and Telecom Planning and Designing Institute Co., Ltd., Yifa Building Five-four Rd., Gulou Zone Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, 350003, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share