Abstract

Production planners in construction face several problems related to the lack of information regarding construction project status, changes to resource availability, instability in production rates, design changes, and limited situational awareness (SA). Poor SA leads to uninformed and suboptimal resource allocation decisions. As a result, the construction workflow is negatively affected, degrading project performance. This study focuses specifically on possible relationships between production planners’ SA and the resulting workflow quality. Such understanding can lead to the development of measures to improve production management in construction. Interviews with diverse production planners highlighted the nature of the information needed, issues related to the lack of SA, and the effect on workflow. A serious roleplaying game was devised to measure the correlation between production planners’ SA and workflow, and 14 live simulation experiments were conducted with two teams of nine players each. Finally, a qualitative analysis of the information flow configurations applied in the experiments evaluated the expected effects of information flows in the live experiment. The study found a positive correlation between the quality of information flow and workflow in construction, indicating causation in line with theoretical expectations. Specifically, free communication among planners together with management tools such as formal weekly work planning and a digital planning tool reduced the assembly time, working time, and non-value-added time of the subcontractors in the experiments. Good information flows among production planners and an up-to-date jobsite status diminish uncertainty and increase SA, which lead to improved workflow and productivity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (photos, interviews, and raw data from experiments).

References

Alizadehsalehi, S., and I. Yitmen. 2016. “The impact of field data capturing technologies on automated construction project progress monitoring.” Procedia Eng. 161: 97–103.
AlSehaimi, A. O., P. T. Fazenda, and L. Koskela. 2014. “Improving construction management practice with the last planner system: A case study.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 21 (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2012-0032.
Ballard, G. 2000. “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Calderón, A., and M. Ruiz. 2015. “A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: An application to software project management.” Comput. Educ. 87 (Sep): 396–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.011.
Craig, C. 2012. “Improving flight condition situational awareness through human centered design.” Supplement, Work 41 (S1): 4523–4531. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0031-4523.
Dallasega, P., A. Revolti, P. C. Sauer, F. Schulze, and E. Rauch. 2020. “BIM, augmented and virtual reality empowering lean construction management: A project simulation game.” Procedia Manuf. 45 (May): 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.059.
Doloi, H., A. Sawhney, K. C. Iyer, and S. Rentala. 2012. “Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (4): 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004.
Endsley, M. R. 1988. “Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement.” In Proc., Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 97–101. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10/gfkv93.
Endsley, M. R. 1995. “Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems.” Hum. Factors 37 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049499.
Forcael, E., I. Ferrari, A. Opazo-Vega, and J. A. Pulido-Arcas. 2020. “Construction 4.0: A literature review.” Sustainability 12 (22): 9755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229755.
García-Mundo, L., M. Genero, and M. Piattini. 2015. “Towards a construction and validation of a serious game product quality model.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games), 1–8. New York: IEEE.
González, V. A., F. Orozco, B. Senior, J. Ingle, E. Forcael, and L. F. Alarcón. 2015. “LEBSCO: Lean-based simulation game for construction management classrooms.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 141 (4): 04015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000243.
Görsch, C., O. Seppänen, A. Peltokorpi, and R. Lavikka. 2020. “Construction workers’ situational awareness—An overlooked perspective.” In Proc., 28th Annual Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction, 937–948. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Gosling, J., M. Naim, and D. Towill. 2013. “Identifying and categorizing the sources of uncertainty in construction supply chains.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000574.
Herroelen, W., and R. Leus. 2004. “Robust and reactive project scheduling: A review and classification of procedures.” Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (8): 1599–1620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540310001638055.
Hinze, J., and A. Tracey. 1994. “The contractor-subcontractor relationship: The subcontractor’s view.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120 (2): 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(274).
Howell, G., and G. Ballard. 1998. “Implementing lean construction: understanding and action.” In Proc., 6th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Howell, G., A. Laufer, and G. Ballard. 1993. “Uncertainty and project objectives.” Project Appraisal 8 (1): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1993.9726884.
Jarkas, A., and M. Horner. 2011. “Revisiting the applicability of learning curve theory to formwork labour productivity.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (5): 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.562911.
Javanmardi, A., S. A. Abbasian-Hosseini, S. M. Hsiang, and M. Liu. 2018. “Constraint removal and work plan reliability: A bridge project case study.” In Proc., 26th Annual Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction, 807–817. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Karshenas, S., and D. Haber. 2012. “Developing a serious game for construction planning and scheduling education.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.205.
Korb, S., and R. Sacks. 2021. “Agent-based simulation of general contractor-subcontractor interactions in a multi-project environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (1): 04020151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001944.
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Koskela, L., and L. Koskela. 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Lappalainen, E. M., O. Seppänen, A. Peltokorpi, and V. Singh. 2021. “Transformation of construction project management toward situational awareness.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (8): 2199–2221. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1053.
Laufer, A. 2009. Breaking the code of project management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, B., H.-S. Lee, M. Park, and H. Kim. 2015. “Influence factors of learning-curve effect in high-rise building constructions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (8): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000997.
Loch, C. H., and C. Terwiesch. 1998. “Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering.” Manage. Sci. 44 (8): 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1032.
Marcelino, E., and L. Domingues. 2022. “An analysis of how well serious games cover the PMBOK.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 196 (Jan): 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.104.
Martinez, J. R., T. Yeung, and R. Sacks. 2022. “Scope of action of production planners in the context of digital twin construction.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Construction in the 21st Century, 12. Amman, Jordan: Al-Zaytoonah Univ.
Melzer, J. E. 2012. “HMDs as enablers of situation awareness: The OODA loop and sense-making.” In Proc., SPIE 8383, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVII; and Display Technologies and Applications for Defense, Security, and Avionics VI. Baltimore: SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.920844.
Morgan, J., and J. K. Liker. 2006. The Toyota product development system: Integrating people, process and technology. New York: Productivity Press.
Oloufa, A. A., M. Ikeda, and H. Oda. 2003. “Situational awareness of construction equipment using GPS, wireless and web technologies.” Autom. Constr. 12 (6): 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00057-8.
Olugboyega, O., and A. Windapo. 2019. Model of information sharing and exchange in a building information modelling supply chain, 117–129. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Osunsanmi, T. O., C. Aigbavboa, and A. Oke. 2018. “Construction 4.0: The future of the construction industry in South Africa.” Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 12 (3): 206–212.
Priven, V., and R. Sacks. 2016. “Impacts of the social subcontract and last planner system interventions on the trade-crew workflows of multistory residential construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (7): 04016013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001102.
Ravinder, H., and N. Kollikkathara. 2017. “Project management in operations management textbooks: Closing the gap.” J. Acad. Bus. Educ. 18 (Dec): 307–324.
Reinbold, A., O. Seppänen, and A. Peltokorpi. 2020. “The role of digitalized visual management to empower self-managed crews in construction projects.” In Proc., 28th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 925–935. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction. https://doi.org/10.24928/2020/002.
Reinbold, A., O. Seppänen, A. Peltokorpi, V. Singh, and E. Dror. 2019. “Integrating indoor positioning systems and BIM to improve situational awareness.” In Proc., 27th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 1141–1150. Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Sacks, R. 2016. “What constitutes good production flow in construction?” Construct. Manage. Econ. 34 (9): 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1200733.
Sacks, R., A. Esquenazi, and M. Goldin. 2007. “LEAPCON: Simulation of lean construction of high-rise apartment buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (7): 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:7(529).
Sacks, R., and M. Harel. 2006. “An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behavior.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 24 (8): 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600631856.
Sacks, R., O. Seppänen, V. Priven, and J. Savosnick. 2017. “Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 35 (1–2): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274417.
Salazar, L. A., P. Arroyo, and L. F. Alarcón. 2020. “Key indicators for linguistic action perspective in the last planner system.” Sustainability 12 (20): 8728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728.
Salem, O., and E. Zimmer. 2005. “Application of lean manufacturing principles to construction.” Lean Constr. J. 2 (2): 51–54.
Sawhney, A., M. Riley, and J. Irizarry. 2020. Construction 4.0: An innovation platform for the built environment. New York: Routledge.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E. 2020. “Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for online education: A case of construction management and engineering.” Appl. Sci. 10 (13): 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134678.
Serpell, A., and L. F. Alarcón. 1998. “Construction process improvement methodology for construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 16 (4): 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00052-5.
Smith, K., and P. A. Hancock. 1995. “Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness.” Hum. Factors 37 (1): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049444.
Srour, F. J., D. Kiomjian, and I. M. Srour. 2016. “Learning curves in construction: A critical review and new model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 06015004. https://doi.org/10/f8f25d.
Stanton, N. A., P. R. G. Chambers, and J. Piggott. 2001. “Situational awareness and safety.” Saf. Sci. 39 (3): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00010-8.
Taleb, M. S., S. Belayutham, and C. K. I. C. Ibrahim. 2021. “Applications of serious games in construction: The current state, classifications and a proposed process framework.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.2006416.
Tetik, M., A. Peltokorpi, O. Seppänen, M. Leväniemi, and J. Holmström. 2021. “Kitting logistics solution for improving on-site work performance in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (1): 05020020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001921.
Vaardini, S., S. Karthiyayini, and P. Ezhilmathi. 2016. “Study on cost overruns in construction projects: A review.” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11 (3): 356–363.
Wambeke, B. W., S. M. Hsiang, and M. Liu. 2011. “Causes of variation in construction project task starting times and duration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (9): 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000342.
Wang, Z., Z. Jiang, and A. Blackman. 2021. “Linking emotional intelligence to safety performance: The roles of situational awareness and safety training.” J. Saf. Res. 78 (Sep): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.005.
Warcup, R., and E. Reeve. 2014. “Using the Villego simulation to teach the last planner system.” Lean Constr. J. 2014: 1–15.
Winch, G. M., and J. Kelsey. 2005. “What do construction project planners do?” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (2): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.002.
Wojakowski, P. 2015. “Plant performance calculation in automotive industry using ANDON system.” Res. Logist. Prod. 5 (4): 361–370.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Mar 31, 2022
Accepted: Sep 28, 2022
Published online: Dec 27, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6715-4440. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-0801. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-5053. Email: [email protected]
Yasuer Shahaf [email protected]
Civil Engineer and Software Developer, WePromotion, Beersheva, Israel. Email: [email protected]
M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-3290. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share