Experimental Assessment of Shear Transfer Capacity of GFRP Reinforcement Using the Push-Off Test
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 6
Abstract
The interface shear transfer mechanism in concrete structures has been studied for several decades and its investigation has served as the basis for the provisions of current design specifications. However, most of the studies on interface shear transfer have used steel bars as interface shear reinforcement, with minimal experimental and analytical research conducted on glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement. In this study, tests were conducted to quantify the contribution of GFRP rebars to interface shear transfer by using the push-off test. A total of 27 specimens were built and tested using a single concrete compressive strength of 36.5 MPa (5,300 psi); 9 of them included no reinforcement crossing the shear plane, 6 had steel stirrups, and 12 had GFRP stirrups with two quantities of reinforcement. Additionally, during the construction process, six of the specimens were built in two stages to simulate a cold joint condition at the interface. The experimental results showed that GFRP reinforcement contributes substantially to the interface shear strength with ultimate resistance values higher than the results from specimens without reinforcement. Furthermore, once the ultimate strength is reached, the GFRP reinforcement allows the specimen to deform and prevent sudden failure. As for the theoretical capacities estimated by current codes, the experimental tests for GFRP showed an overestimation in the calculation of these capacities. Therefore, the research findings will be helpful in the development and improvement of design guide specifications for concrete structures reinforced with GFRP stirrups where interface shear effects are significant.
Practical Applications
Numerous concrete structures depend on the effective transfer of shear forces at joints where concrete sections may slide past one another. This is particularly crucial in scenarios such as bridge construction, where a precast, prestressed concrete girder must seamlessly integrate with the reinforced concrete deck. Ensuring this connection can adequately handle shear forces is vital for the structure’s overall stability and integrity. While the shear-friction mechanism, a key aspect of the design of reinforced concrete structures, has been extensively explored with steel reinforcement, research on GFRP reinforcement has been limited. This study focuses on experimental investigations to understand how GFRP influences shear-friction behavior. Although numerous factors can affect shear-friction performance, this research primarily aims to clarify the fundamental behavior of shear-friction when using GFRP reinforcement. The findings suggest that it is important to consider the effect of reinforcement stiffness in tension, rather than its strength.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted as part of a project titled “Guidelines for the Design of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Using FRP Auxiliary Reinforcement (NCHRP12-121)” funded by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). The authors are grateful to The Structures and Materials Laboratory (SML) at the University of Miami for their assistance in the construction and testing of the specimens and to Owens Corning for providing the GFRP stirrups. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Acv
- area of concrete considered to be engaged in interface shear transfer;
- Avf
- area of interface shear reinforcement crossing the shear plane;
- c
- cohesion factor;
- Ef
- modulus of elasticity of GFRP reinforcement;
- Es
- modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement;
- compressive strength of the weaker concrete on either side of the interface;
- ffd
- design tensile strength of GFRP reinforcement considering reductions for service environment;
- ffu
- ultimate tensile strength of GFRP reinforcement;
- fy
- yield stress of steel reinforcement; design value not to exceed 420 MPa (60 ksi);
- Pc
- permanent net compressive force normal to the shear plane; if force is tensile, Pc = 0;
- Sn−1
- standard deviation;
- Vni
- nominal interface shear resistance;
- Vu
- maximum (peak) experimental load;
- Vu Avg
- average of the maximum load reached during the test;
- tensile strain of GFRP reinforcement;
- nominal tensile strain of GFRP reinforcement;
- ρf
- GFRP reinforcement ratio;
- ρs
- steel reinforcement ratio; and
- μ
- friction factor.
References
AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specification. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars—Code and commentary. ACI CODE-440.11-22. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Al-Kaimakchi, A., and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2022. “Structural assessment of AASHTO type II prestressed concrete girder with GFRP or stainless-steel shear reinforcement.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (7): 04022056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001899.
Alkatan, J. 2016. “FRP shear transfer reinforcement for composite concrete construction.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor.
ASTM. 2021a. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the field. ASTM C31/C31M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021b. Standard practices for force calibration and verification of testing machines. ASTM E4-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021c. Standard test, method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2022. Standard specification for solid round glass fiber reinforced polymer bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM D7957/D7957M-22. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Birkeland, P. W., and H. W. Birkeland. 1966. “Connections in precast concrete construction.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 63 (3): 345–368. https://doi.org/10.14359/7627.
Connor, A. B., and Y. H. Kim. 2016. “Shear-transfer mechanisms for glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (6): 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689034.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6:19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2012. Fib bulletin 65: Model code 2010 final draft volume 1. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
Hofbeck, J. A., I. O. Ibrahim, and A. H. Mattock. 1969. “Shear transfer in reinforced concrete.” ACI J. Proc. 66 (2): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.14359/7349.
Hsu, T. T., S. T. Mau, and B. Chen. 1987. “Theory of shear transfer strength of reinforced concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 84 (2): 149–160. https://doi.org/10.14359/2834.
Loov, R. E., and A. K. Patnaik. 1994. “Horizontal shear strength of composite concrete beams with a rough interface.” PCI J. 39: 48–69. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011994.48.69.
Lucas, W., D. J. Oehlers, M. M. Ali, and M. C. Griffith. 2012. “The FRP reinforced shear-friction mechanism.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 15 (4): 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.4.615.
Mattock, A. H. 2001. “Shear friction and high-strength concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.14359/10146.
Mattock, A. H., and N. M. Hawkins. 1972. “Shear transfer in reinforced concrete-recent research.” PCI J. 17 (2): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011972.55.75.
Mattock, A. H., L. Johal, and H. C. Chow. 1975. “Shear transfer in reinforced concrete with moment or tension acting across the shear plane.” PCI J. 20 (4): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011975.76.93.
Mattock, A. H., W. K. Li, and T. C. Wang. 1976. “Shear transfer in lightweight reinforced concrete.” PCI J. 21 (1): 20–39. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011976.20.39.
Soltani, M., and B. E. Ross. 2017. “Evaluation of a four-point bending-test method for interface shear transfer in concrete members.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 22 (4): 04017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000325.
Walraven, J., and H. Reinhardt. 1981. Theory and experiments on the mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Wight, J. 2016. Reinforced concrete mechanics and design. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
Zeno, G. 2009. “Use of high-strength steel reinforcement in shear friction applications.” M.S. thesis, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 11, 2023
Accepted: Jul 9, 2024
Published online: Sep 9, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 9, 2025
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.