Predicting Strength of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Stirrups Using the Indeterminate Strut–Tie Method
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents the proposed indeterminate strut and tie (IST) method to analyze fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-reinforced concrete deep beams with stirrups. The solution of the IST method does not require the assumption of reinforcement yielding and is capable of reflecting the material nonlinearity of concrete. The essential features of the IST methodology for glass FRP-reinforced deep beams are discussed and then analyzed in detail. These features include modeling concrete compressive response, softening concrete compression behavior in struts, and obtaining the depth of compression nodes. For each of these features, several approaches are discussed. The proposed IST methodology is validated by comparing the analysis results with the experimental results, and recommendations for the most suitable modeling methods are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The financial support for this research was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The authors express their gratitude for the received support.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
The following symbols and abbreviations are used in this paper:
- A1–A4
- abbreviations for approaches to compute ζ;
- Abar,f
- area of one flexural rebar;
- Abar,v
- area of one stirrup leg;
- a
- length of the shear span;
- a/d
- shear span-to-depth ratio;
- b
- beam width;
- c
- distance from extreme compression fiber to the neutral axis;
- d
- effective depth;
- dT
- distance between the centroid of the rebars and the extreme tensile fiber;
- modulus of elasticity of concrete based on CSA A23.3:19 (CSA 2019);
- initial tangential modulus of concrete;
- Ef
- elastic modulus of flexural reinforcements;
- elastic modulus of each strut calculated in the nth cycle, (a − 1)th subcycle and used in the nth cycle, ath subcycle during the IST analysis;
- Ev
- elastic modulus of shear reinforcements;
- fc
- concrete compressive stress;
- concrete compressive strength (maximum fc);
- fcu
- limited strength of concrete struts;
- ffu
- ultimate tensile strength of the flexural reinforcements;
- fvu,bent
- ultimate tensile strength of the bent portion of the stirrups;
- g
- parameter used in Approach A2;
- h1, h2, h3
- abbreviations for methods to compute hC;
- h
- beam height;
- hC
- depth of the nodes on the compression side;
- hT
- depth of the nodes on the tension side;
- jd
- lever arm between the resultant compressive and tensile forces, equal to d − hC/2;
- k
- 1.0 for , curve control parameter for the concrete compressive stress–strain model by Thorenfeldt et al. (1987);
- ksize
- size effect parameter from Nehdi et al. (2008), used to compute ζ in Approach A2;
- lC
- horizontal size of the nodes on the compression side;
- lT
- horizontal size of the nodes on the tension side;
- n
- (if not softened), curve control parameter for the concrete compressive stress–strain model by Thorenfeldt et al. (1987);
- nE
- ;
- P
- applied load;
- Pn
- load applied to the nth cycle during the IST analysis;
- Pinc.
- load increased in each cycle during the IST analysis;
- PPredict
- predicted strengths;
- Ptest
- tested strengths;
- Ppredict/Ptest
- ratio between predicted and tested strengths;
- s
- stirrups spacings;
- S1, S2
- abbreviations for methods to soften concrete compression stress–strain models;
- S-1 to S-13
- labels for struts;
- stiffness matrix obtained in the nth cycle, (a − 1)th subcycle and used in the nth cycle, ath subcycle during the IST analysis;
- ST1, ST2, and ST3
- abbreviations for Strut-and-Tie models used in this work;
- T-1 to T-6
- labels for ties;
- wsC
- width of the strut on the compression side;
- wsT
- width of the strut on the tension side;
- x
- variable representing the distance from any point to the neutral axis used in Method h3;
- βs
- parameter from Nehdi et al. (2008), used to compute ζ in Approach A2;
- γc
- concrete density (kg/m3);
- concrete compressive strain corresponding to ;
- principal tensile strain;
- concrete compressive strain;
- tensile strain in the tie bar located closest to the tension face of the beam and inclined at θstrut to the strut;
- strain in the flexural tie of the tie sets inside the projection of the specific strut to compute ;
- maximum tensile strain in the flexural FRP ties inside the projection of the strut;
- compressive strain in the strut, in negative;
- strain in the tie with label T-#;
- strain of the concrete extreme compressive fiber;
- strain in the vertical tie of the tie sets inside the projection of the specific strut to compute ;
- ζ
- softening factor;
- θstrut
- incline of the strut, measured as the smallest angle between the strut and the adjoining ties; and
- ρf
- flexural reinforcement ratio.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2007. Report on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures. ACI PRC-440-07. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2008. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI CODE-318-08. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (reapproved 2022). ACI CODE-318-19(22). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars—Code and commentary. ACI CODE-440.11-22. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Apinis, R., J. Modniks, V. Tamuzs, and R. Tepfers. 1998 “Ductility of hybrid fiber composite reinforcement FRP for concrete.” In Proc., 8th European Conf. on Composite Materials (ECCM8), 89–96. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Chen, H., W.-J. Yi, and H.-J. Hwang. 2018. “Cracking strut-and-tie model for shear strength evaluation of reinforced concrete deep beams.” Eng. Struct. 163: 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.077.
Chen, H., W.-J. Yi, Z. J. Ma, and H.-J. Hwang. 2020. “Modeling of shear mechanisms and strength of concrete deep beams reinforced with FRP bars.” Compos. Struct. 234: 111715.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and construction of building structure with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806:12 (R2021). Mississauga: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Design of concrete structure. CSA A23.3:19. Toronto: CSA.
Hognestad, E., N. W. Hanson, and D. McHenry. 1955. “Concrete stress distribution in ultimate strength design.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 27 (4): 455–479.
Karayannis, C. G., P.-M. K. Kosmidou, and C. E. Chalioris. 2018. “Reinforced concrete beams with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer bars—Experimental study.” Fibers 6 (4): 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib6040099.
Kim, B. H., and Y. M. Yun. 2011a. “An indeterminate strut-tie model and load distribution ratio for RC deep beams—(I) model & load distribution ratio.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 14 (6): 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.6.1031.
Kim, B. H., and Y. M. Yun. 2011b. “An indeterminate strut-tie model and load distribution ratio for RC deep beams—(II) validity evaluation.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 14 (6): 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.6.1043.
Kim, D. J., J. Lee, and Y. H. Lee. 2014. “Effectiveness factor of strut-and-tie model for concrete deep beams reinforced with FRP rebars.” Composites, Part B 56: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.009.
Krall, M. 2014. “Tests on concrete beams with GFRP flexural and shear reinforcements & analysis method for indeterminate strut-and-tie models with brittle reinforcements.” Master’s thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Canada.
Krall, M., and M. A. Polak. 2019. “Concrete beams with different arrangements of GFRP flexural and shear reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109333.
Latosh, F. A. 2014. “Structural behaviour of conventional and FRP-reinforced concrete deep beams.” Ph.D. thesis, Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ.
MacGregor, J. G., and J. K. Wight. 2011. Reinforced concrete mechanics and design. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.
Mihaylov, B. I. 2017. “Two-parameter kinematic approach for shear strength of deep concrete beams with internal FRP reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (2): 04016094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000747.
Mihaylov, B. I., E. C. Bentz, and M. P. Collins. 2013. “Two-parameter kinematic theory for shear behavior of deep beams.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (3): 447–455.
Mohamed, K., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2017. “Effect of vertical and horizontal web reinforcement on the strength and deformation of concrete deep beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 14 (8): 04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001786.
Nehdi, M., Z. Omeman, and H. El-Chabib. 2008. “Optimal efficiency factor in strut-and-tie model for FRP-reinforced concrete short beams with (1.5 < a/d < 2.5).” Mater. Struct. 41: 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9359-9.
Ovitigala, T., M. A. Ibrahim, and M. A. Issa. 2016. “Serviceability and ultimate load behavior of concrete beams reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (4): 757–768. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688752.
Pang, X. B., and T. T. C. Hsu. 1995. “Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear.” ACI Struct. J. 92 (6): 665–677.
Schlaich, J., K. Schafer, and M. Jennewein. 1987. “Toward a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J. 32 (3): 74–150. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150.
Stoner, J. G., and M. A. Polak. 2020. “Finite element modelling of GFRP reinforced concrete beams.” Comput. Concr. 25 (4): 369–382.
Tamuzs, V., R. Apinis, U. Vilks, J. Modniks, and R. Tepfers. 1996 “Ductility of hybrid fiber composite reinforcement FRP for concrete.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure, 196–122. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona.
Teng, J. G., J. F. Chen, S. T. Smith, and L. Lam. 2002. FRP: Strengthed RC structures. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
The MathWorks Inc. 2019. MATLAB version 9.6.0 (R2019a). Natick, MA: MathWorks.
Thorenfeldt, E., A. Tomaszewics, and J. J. Jensen. 1987 “Mechanical properties of high strength concrete and application in design.” In Proc., Symp. on Utilization of High Strength Concrete. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. 83 (2): 219–231.
Yun, Y. M. 2000. “Nonlinear strut-tie model approach for structural concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 97 (4): 581–590.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 30, 2023
Accepted: Jun 4, 2024
Published online: Jul 25, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 25, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Beams
- Building materials
- Composite materials
- Compressive strength
- Concrete
- Concrete beams
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Engineering mechanics
- Fiber reinforced composites
- Fiber reinforced concrete
- Fiber reinforced polymer
- Glass
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Polymer
- Reinforced concrete
- Strength of materials
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Struts
- Synthetic materials
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.