Technical Papers
Jul 25, 2024

Clustering-Based Active-Learning Kriging Reliability Analysis of FRP-Strengthened RC Beams with Random Finite-Element to Model Spatial Variability

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for assessing the reliability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)–strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams in flexure using stochastic nonlinear finite-element (SNFE) analysis and k-w-means clustering, based on active-learning kriging Monte Carlo simulation (AK-MCS), in which spatial variations in the concrete and bond material properties are considered. A computer algorithm was developed to augment commercially available nonlinear finite-element (FE) analysis software and automate the process for conducting the SNFE clustering-based AK-MCS analysis. The k-w-means clustering was based on the U learning function to provide multipoint enrichment to improve convergence of the stopping criteria by allowing parallel computation of the SNFE models. Parametric analysis indicated the accuracy of the reliability prediction of the examined member and proved the efficiency of the proposed analysis in reducing the number of calls to SNFE models compared with data in the existing literature, when using probability-based stopping criteria.

Practical Applications

The quality of the FRP-to-concrete bond is affected by the integrity of the concrete at the interface, which varies across the dimensions of the strengthened member, causing added uncertainty in predicting the structural response, and hence the reliability of the FRP-strengthened member. This study proposes a computationally efficient approach to assess the reliability of FRP-strengthened concrete members by considering the spatial variation in the concrete properties (compressive strength, tensile strength, bulk modulus) and the quality of the FRP-to-concrete bond (shear and normal bond strength) by using an adaptive machine-learning technique. The proposed framework may be utilized by engineers to design FRP-strengthening systems for concrete members experiencing variation in the concrete properties due to poor quality control or active deterioration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. The clustering-based kriging computer code and the random field discretization computer code are restricted.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge financial contributions from Dalhousie University, the Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS) program, and Norlander Oudah Engineering Limited (NOEL).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
ai
ith greatest eigenvalue of the standard normal field (ith out of r);
ax
correlation length in x;
ay
correlation length in y;
az
correlation length in z;
b
unknown coefficient;
bc
width of the concrete beam;
bf
width of the CFRP sheet;
b
vector of regression parameter;
CYY
covariance matrix;
CY,Yi
ith vector of the covariance matrix;
cij
cluster centroid i of iteration j;
Efrp
FRP modulus of elasticity;
F
regression term;
F(b,X)
regression function of the random inputs, X;
fc
concrete compressive strength;
ffrpu
FRP tensile strength;
ft
concrete tensile strength;
fy
steel yield strength;
G
performance function;
G^
surrogate performance function—estimate of G (kriging predictor);
H^(Z,θ)
realization of a Gaussian random field;
Hln^(Z,θ)
realizations of a lognormal random field;
I[G^(X,Y)j]
jth value of the indicator function denoting the sign of the kriging estimated performance function;
K
concrete bulk modulus;
Kmean
number of clusters;
k
dimension;
L
vector of autocorrelation length;
MD
moment due to dead load;
ML
moment due to live load;
MT
transformation of live load to load effects;
Mn
nominal flexural strength;
Ncluster
number of points included in each cluster;
NFLS
concrete–FRP bond normal strength;
n
number of realizations of the random variables;
P
lowest ranked U from UMin;
Pf0
probability of failure;
Pf0
probability of failure calculated using the kriging predictor to evaluate the limit state;
Pf+k
probability of failure corresponding to the mean kriging predictor value, G^(X), plus the MSE, σG^(x), multiplied by a constant, k;
Pfk
probability of failure corresponding to the mean kriging predictor value, G^(X), minus the MSE, σG^(x), multiplied by a constant, k;
Q
load model;
Qt
ratio of the eigenvalues divided by the trace of the covariance matrix;
R
resistance model;
RSNFE
nominal flexural strength of SNFE;
R(S)
correlation between the design sites Si and Sj;
r
number of standard normal variables;
r(X)
correlation between the unknown site, X, and all known design sites, Si;
SFLS
concrete–FRP bond shear strength;
S(X)
set of design sites;
s
conversion factor converting the lognormal field;
t
number of random variables;
U
reliability index of the U-learning function prediction;
UMin
vector of descending order of U;
Uk
U of the kth trial;
u
vector used in forming the kriging predictor;
vi
coefficient of variation of the mesh point, Y(i);
vj
coefficient of variation of the mesh point, Y(j);
vPf0
coefficient of variation of Pf0;
X
vector of resistance random variables;
Xk
vector of inputs for the kth trial;
Y
vector of load random variables;
Y(X)
corresponding outputs of S(X);
Yx
x coordinate of the geometric centroids of the SNFE;
Yy
y coordinate of the geometric centroids of the SNFE;
Yz
z coordinate of the geometric centroids of the SNFE;
Z
vector of spatial coordinates;
z(X)
stochastic process of the random inputs, X;
β
reliability index;
βw
shape factor that depends on the ratio of bf/bc;
ϵSNFE
model error;
εPf
estimator error of the predator;
εstop
stopping criteria for ending enrichment of the kriging predictor using active learning;
θ
independent identifier corresponding to a set of standard normal variables;
μG^
mean of the kriging predictor;
μlny
mean of a lognormally distributed field;
μy
mean;
ξi(θ)
ith randomly generated standard normal variable (ith out of r);
ρij
squared exponential correlation to determine the correlation between two points Y(i) and Y(j);
ρij
correlation for the standard normal field between two points Y(i) and Y(j);
σG^2
standard deviation of the kriging predictor;
σlny
standard deviation of a lognormally distributed field;
σy
standard deviation;
ψi
ith greatest eigenvector of the standard normal field (ith out of r);
Ωcluster
error between the previous and current set of cluster centroids, ci(j) and ci(j+1); and
Ωstop
stopping value of Ωcluster.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2023. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI PRC-440.2-23. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Almusallam, T. H., H. M. Elsanadedy, and Y. A. Al-Salloum. 2015. “Effect of longitudinal steel ratio on behavior of RC beams strengthened with FRP composites: Experimental and FE study.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000486.
Aurenhammer, F. 1991. “Voronoi diagrams—A survey of a fundamental geometric data structure.” ACM Comput. Surv. 23 (3): 345–405. https://doi.org/10.1145/116873.116880.
Bartlett, F. M. 2007. “Canadian Standards Association Standard A23.3-04 resistance factor for concrete in compression.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34: 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1139/l07-034.
Bartlett, F. M., and J. G. MacGregor. 1999. “Variation of in-place concrete strength in structures.” ACI Mater. J. 96 (2): 261–270.
Bartlett, F. M., H. P. Hong, and W. Zhou. 2003. “Load factor calibration for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada: Statistics of loads and load effects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1139/l02-087.
Buckley, E., K. Khorramian, and F. Oudah. 2021. “Application of adaptive kriging method in bridge reliability analysis.” In Proc., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Castaldo, P., D. Gino, and G. Mancini. 2019. “Safety formats for non-linear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures: Discussion, comparison and proposals.” Eng. Struct. 193: 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.029.
CEB-FIP. 1993. Model code 1990: Design code. London: Thomas Telford.
Chai, X., Z. Sun, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Yu. 2019. “A new kriging-based learning function for reliability analysis and its application to fatigue crack reliability.” IEEE Access 7: 122811–122819. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936530.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2017. Design, and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-2017. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-2019. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Echard, B., N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire. 2011. “AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining kriging and Monte Carlo simulation.” Struct. Saf. 33 (2): 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002.
El Haj, A.-K., and A.-H. Soubra. 2020. “Efficient estimation of the failure probability of a monopile foundation using a kriging-based approach with multi-point enrichment.” Comput. Geotech. 121: 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103451.
Elsanadedy, H. M., T. H. Almusallam, S. H. Alsayed, and Y. A. Al-Salloum. 2013. “Flexural strengthening of RC beams using textile reinforced mortar—Experimental and numerical study.” Compos. Struct. 97: 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.053.
Godin-Hebert, E., K. Khorramian, and F. Oudah. 2024. “Recommendations for active-learning kriging reliability analysis of bridge structures.” J. Bridge Eng.
Hassan, A., and F. Oudah. 2022. “Reliability of compression-controlled FRP RC flexural members designed using North American codes and standards: Comparison and FRP material resistance/strength reduction factor calibration.” ACI Spec. Publ. 356: 120–130.
Huang, X., L. Sui, F. Xing, Y. Zhou, and Y. Wu. 2019. “Reliability assessment for flexural FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams based on importance sampling.” Composites, Part B 156: 378–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.002.
Hunter, M. D., A. C. Ferche, and F. J. Vecchio. 2021. “Stochastic finite element analysis of shear-critical concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (3): 71–83.
Kaymaz, I. 2005. “Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems.” Struct. Saf. 27 (2): 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001.
Khorramian, K., A. E. Alhashmi, and F. Oudah. 2023. “Optimized active learning kriging reliability based assessment of laterally loaded pile groups modeled using random finite element analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 154: 105135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105135.
Khorramian, K., and F. Oudah. 2022. “Active learning kriging-based reliability for assessing the safety of structures: Theory and application.” In Proc., Leveraging Artificial Intelligence into Engineering, Management, and Safety of Infrastructure, 184–231. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Khorramian, K., and F. Oudah. 2023. “New learning functions for active learning kriging reliability analysis using a probabilistic approach: KO and WKO functions.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 66 (8): 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03627-4.
Khorramian, K., and F. Oudah. 2024. “Metric systems for performance evaluation of active learning kriging configurations for reliability analysis.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 10 (2): 04024024. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1034.
Lelièvre, N., P. Beaurepaire, C. Mattrand, and N. Gayton. 2018. “AK-MCSi: A kriging-based method to deal with small failure probabilities and time-consuming models.” Struct. Saf. 73: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.002.
Li, C.-C., and A. Der-Kiureghian. 1993. “Optimal discretization of random fields.” J. Eng. Mech. 119 (6): 1136–1154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:6(1136).
Li, Y., K. Liu, B. Zhang, and N. Xu. 2020. “Reliability of shape factors for bearing capacity of square footings on spatially varying cohesive soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (3): 04019195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001614.
Lophaven, S. N., H. B. Nielsen, and J. Søndergaard. 2002a. A Matlab kriging toolbox, s.l. Technical Rep. No. IMM-TR-2002-12. Kongens, Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
Lophaven, S. N., H. B. Nielsen, and J. Søndergaard. 2002b. DACE: A Matlab kriging toolbox. Vol. 2. Kongens, Lyngby, Denmark: Informatics and Mathematical Modelling. Technical University of Denmark.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2007a. LS-DYNA keyword user manual–Theory manual, V3. Version 971. Livermore, CA: LSTC.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2007b. LS-DYNA keyword user manual—Material models (nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures in three dimensions), V2. Version 971. Livermore, CA: LSTC.
Lv, Z., Z. Lu, and P. Wang. 2015. “A new learning function for kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering.” Comput. Math. Appl. 70 (5): 1182–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.004.
MacGregor, J. G., D. J. L. Kennedy, F. M. Bartlett, D. Chernenko, M. A. Maes, and L. Dunaszegi. 1997. “Design criteria and load resistance factors for the Confederation Bridge.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 24 (6): 882–897.
MathWorks. 2022. “MATLAB version: 9.13.0.” MATLAB R2021b. Accessed March 11, 2023. Available https://www.mathworks.com.
Moustapha, M., S. Marelli, and B. Sudret. 2022. “Active learning for structural reliability: Survey, general framework and benchmark.” Struct. Saf. 96: 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102174.
Nataf, A. 1962. “Determination des distribution dont les marges sont donnees.” Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences 225: 42–43.
NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2020. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council.
Neale, K. W., U. Ebead, H. Abdel Baky, W. Elsayed, and A. Godat. 2005. “Modelling of debonding phenomena in FRP-strengthened concrete beams and slabs.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures. Hong Kong, China: International Institute for FRP in Construction.
Nowak, A. S., and M. M. Szerszen. 2003. “Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): Part 1—Statistical models for resistance.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (3): 377–382.
Okeil, A. M., S. El-Tawil, and M. Shahawy. 2002. “Flexural reliability of reinforced concrete bridge girders strengthened with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (5): 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(290).
Oudah, F. 2023. “Time-dependent reliability-based charts to evaluate the structural safety of RC wharf decks exposed to corrosion and freeze-thaw effect.” Eng. Struct. 283: 115887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115887.
Oudah, F., and A. E. Alhashmi. 2022. “Time-dependent reliability analysis of degrading structural elements using stochastic FE and LSTM learning.” In Proc., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Owen, A. B., Y. Maximov, and M. Chertkov. 2019. “Importance sampling the union of rare events with anapplication to power systems analysis.” Electron. J. Stat. 13 (1): 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-EJS1527.
Petrie, C. 2022. “Reliability analysis of externally bonded FRP strengthened beams considering existing conditions: Application of stochastic FE and conditional probability.” Master’s of Applied Science thesis, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ.
Petrie, C., and F. Oudah. 2023. “Stochastic finite element approach to assess reliability of fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 120 (6): 193–204.
Schöbi, R., B. Sudret, and S. Marelli. 2017. “Rare event estimation using polynomial-chaos kriging.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (2): D4016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000870.
Shi, J., Z. Wu, X. Wang, and M. Noori. 2015. “Reliability analysis of intermediate crack-induced debonding failure in FRP-strengthened concrete members.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (12): 1651–1671. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.987302.
Soubra, A.-H., T. Al-Bittar, J. Thajeel, and A. Ahmed. 2019. “Probabilistic analysis of strip footings resting on spatially varying soils using kriging metamodeling and importance sampling.” Comput. Geotech. 114: 103107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103107.
Sudret, B., and A. Der-Kiureghian. 2000. Stochastic finite elements and reliability—A state-of-the-art report. Rep. No. UCB/SEMM-2000/08. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Sun, Z., J. Wang, R. Li, and C. Tong. 2017. “LIF: A new kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 157: 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.09.003.
Teixeira, R., M. Nogal, A. O’Connor, and B. Martinez-Pastor. 2020. “Reliability assessment with density scanned adaptive kriging.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 199: 106908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106908.
Wang, J., Z. Cao, G. Xu, J. Yang, and A. Kareem. 2023. “An adaptive kriging method based on K-means clustering and sampling in n-ball for structural reliability analysis.” Eng. Comput. 40 (2): 378–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-12-2021-0705.
Wang, N., B. R. Ellingwood, and A.-H. Zureick. 2010. “Reliability-based evaluation of flexural members strengthened with externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer composites.” J. Struct. Eng. 136: 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000199.
Wen, Z., H. Pei, H. Liu, and Z. Yue. 2016. “A sequential kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 153: 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.002.
Wieghaus, K. T., and R. A. Atadero. 2011. “Effect of existing structure and FRP uncertainties on the reliability of FRP-based repair.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (4): 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000197.
Xiao, M., J. Zhang, L. Gao, S. Lee, and A. T. Eshghi. 2019. “An efficient Kriging-based subset simulation method for hybrid reliability analysis under random and interval variables with small failure probability.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59 (6): 2077–2092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2176-z.
Xiao-ling, Z., J. Bo-han, H. Yan, C. Shong-loong, and L. Xiu-yu. 2021. “Random field model of soil parameters and the application in reliability analysis of laterally loaded pile.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 147: 106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106821.
Xing, J., Y. Luo, and Z. Gao. 2020. “A global optimization strategy based on the kriging surrogate model and parallel computing.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62: 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02495-6.
Yang, X., X. Cheng, T. Wang, and C. Mi. 2020. “System reliability analysis with small failure probability based on active learning Kriging model and multimodal adaptive importance sampling.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62: 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02515-5.
Zhang, A.-h., W.-l. Jin, and G.-b. Li. 2006. “Behavior of preloaded RC beams strengthened with CFRP laminates.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 7 (3): 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A0436.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28Issue 5October 2024

History

Received: Sep 22, 2023
Accepted: Apr 30, 2024
Published online: Jul 25, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Structural EIT, Norlander Oudah Engineering Ltd. (NOEL), Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 0Z3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-7944. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-286X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • RF-DYNA — Software for optimized random finite element simulation using LS-DYNA, Advances in Engineering Software, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103724, 196, (103724), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share