Technical Papers
Apr 18, 2023

Punching Shear of Flat Slabs with Pultruded GFRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 27, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper examines the punching shear behavior of a new concrete flat slab design, incorporating a glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) stay-in-place (SIP) structural form system and orthogonal GFRP top rebar mesh. The SIP form system comprises I-beams supported on the four sides of a column and flat plates with T-up ribs supported by, and adhesively bonded to, the bottom flanges of the I-beams. The web and top flange of the I-beams are embedded in the slab, thereby providing flexural and shear reinforcement, while the SIP ribbed plates provide the bottom reinforcement. Four full-scale interior slab–column specimens, 2000 × 2000 × 200 mm3, were tested under axial compression applied to the column. The slabs have a central 300 × 300-mm square column extending 300 mm on either side of the slab. The study assessed the contributions to punching shear strength of different components of the GFRP system. The new design experienced a 29% higher punching shear strength than the control slab with GFRP rebar only, and was much more ductile. The load dropped gradually over a large range of deflection, increasing the ductility index from 1.6 in the control slab to 3.1 in the slab incorporating the new design. An analytical model is developed for punching shear strength, accounting for concrete contribution and flexural and web contributions of I-beams. Results agreed with experimental strength, within −6% to +13%. A parametric study examined a range of rebar reinforcement ratios, different GFRP I-beam sizes and a comparable steel I-beam.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the kind support provided by Sika Canada Inc. and V-Rod/Pultral Inc.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Af
cross-sectional area (FRP);
Afs
area of the SIP form within one side of the punching shear perimeter;
Aw
area of the I-beam web within one side of the punching shear perimeter;
amax
maximum aggregate size;
bo
punching shear perimeter;
c
column side length;
d
effective depth to reinforcement;
Ec
concrete modulus;
Ef
Young’s modulus of the flexural FRP reinforcement;
Es
steel modulus;
Ew
transverse Young’s modulus of the web of the GFRP section;
ffu
ultimate tensile strength (FRP);
fc
concrete compressive strength;
ft
concrete tensile strength;
G
shear modulus;
Gf
shear modulus of the web of the GFRP section;
Gfs
shear modulus of the SIP form;
h
sab thickness;
I
moment of inertia;
Vc
concrete contribution in punching shear;
Vcr
cracking load;
Vf f
shear contribution of the flange of the I-beam;
Vf s
shear contribution of the SIP form;
Vf w
shear contribution of the web of the I-beam;
Vfb
GFRP I-beam flexural contribution in punching shear;
Vfw
GFRP I-beam shear contribution in punching shear;
VT
total load;
Vu
peak load;
Δ(cp+sh)
long-term deflection due to creep and shrinkage;
Δ80%
displacement of specimen at 80% of peak load (postpeak);
Δcr
displacement at cracking load;
Δmax
displacement at 80% VT (postpeak);
ΔPmax
deflection at Pmax;
Δu
deflection at Pu;
Δy
displacement at yield;
γ
shear strain of I-beam flange;
ε
axial (vertical) strain in I-beam web;
θ
rotation of I-beam;
ρf
reinforcement ratio (FRP);
ρf′
compression reinforcement ratio;
ρfb
balanced reinforcement ratio;
ρfv
shear reinforcement ratio; and
τc
punching shear strength.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2004. Guide to formwork for concrete. ACI 347-04. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. ACI 440.1 R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ali, A. H., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2016. “Shear behavior of circular concrete members reinforced with GFRP bars and spirals at shear span-to-depth ratios between 1.5 and 3.0.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (6): 04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000707.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Berg, A. C., L. C. Bank, M. G. Oliva, and J. S. Russell. 2006. “Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (8): 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.007.
Boules, P., A. Fam, and A. S. Genikomsou. 2021. “Concrete floor with GFRP-embedded I-beams and stay-in-place structural forms.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (2): 04020089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001109.
Boules, P., A. S. Genikomsou, A. Jawdhari, and A. Fam. 2023. “Modeling of a concrete floor incorporating GFRP stay-in-place structural form.” Eng. Struct. 278: 115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115513.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and construction of building structur with fibre-reinforced polymer. CAN/CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014. Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practices for concrete. CSA A23. 1-14/A23. 2-14. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23. 3-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
El-Gamal, S., E. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2007. “Influence of reinforcement on the behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (5): 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:5(449).
El-Ghandour, A. W., K. Pilakoutas, and P. Waldron. 2003. “Punching shear behavior of fiber reinforced polymers reinforced concrete flat slabs: Experimental study.” J. Compos. Constr. 7 (3): 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(258).
Fernández Ruiz, M., Y. Mirzaei, and A. Muttoni. 2013. “Postpunching behavior of flat slabs.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (Article): 801–812.
Grace, N., J. L. Hanson, and H. I. AbdelMessih. 2004. Inspection and deterioration of bridge decks constructed using stay-in-place metal forms and epoxy-coated reinforcement. Southfield, MI: Lawrence Technological Univ.
Guthrie, W. S., S. L. Frost, A. W. Birdsall, E. T. Linford, L. A. Ross, R. A. Crane, and D. L. Eggett. 2006. “Effect of stay-in-place metal forms on performance of concrete bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1958 (1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106195800104.
Hall, J. E., and J. T. Mottram. 1998. “Combined FRP reinforcement and permanent formwork for concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr. 2 (2): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:2(78).
Harrison, T. 1975. Mechanical damage to concrete by early removal of formwork. London: Cement and Concrete Association.
Hassan, M., E. A. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane. 2014. “Punching-shear design equation for two-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars and stirrups.” Constr. Build. Mater. 66: 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.036.
Hassan, M., E. A. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane. 2015. “Punching shear behavior of two-way slabs reinforced with FRP shear reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000493.
Hassan, M., A. Fam, B. Benmokrane, and E. Ferrier. 2017. “Effect of column size and reinforcement ratio on shear strength of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete two-way slabs.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (4): 937–950. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689869.
Hollaway, L. C., and M. Leeming. 1999. Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures: Using externally-bonded FRP composites in structural and civil engineering. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Honickman, H., and A. Fam. 2009. “Investigating a structural form system for concrete girders using commercially available GFRP sheet-pile sections.” J. Compos. Constr. 13 (5): 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000039.
Khan, Q. S., M. N. Sheikh, and M. N. Hadi. 2015. “Tension and compression testing of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars.” In Proc., 12th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures & the 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures, edited by Z. Wu, G. Wu and X. Wang, 1–6. Nanjing, China: International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC).
Lee, J.-H., Y.-S. Yoon, W. D. Cook, and D. Mitchell. 2009. “Improving punching shear behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced slabs.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (4): 427.
Matta, F., A. Nanni, T. Ringelstetter, L. Bank, B. Nelson, B. Orr, and S. Jones. 2006. “Don’t cross that bridge until we fix it–pultruded FRP reinforcement for bridge repair.” Compos. Manuf. 22: 18–23.
Matthys, S., and L. Taerwe. 2000. “Concrete slabs reinforced with FRP grids. II: Punching resistance.” J. Compos. Constr. 4 (3): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(154).
Muttoni, A. 2003. “Shear and punching strength of slabs without shear reinforcement.” [in German.]” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 98 (2): 74–84.
Nelson, M., and A. Fam. 2013. “Structural GFRP permanent forms with T-shape ribs for bridge decks supported by precast concrete girders.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000418.
Nelson, M. S., A. Z. Fam, J. P. Busel, C. E. Bakis, A. Nanni, L. C. Bank, M. Henderson, and J. Hanus. 2014. “FRP Stay-in-Place structural forms for concrete bridge decks: A state-of-the-Art review.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (5): 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686810.
Nguyen-Minh, L., and M. Rovňák. 2013. “Punching shear resistance of interior GFRP reinforced slab–column connections.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (1): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000324.
Ospina, C. E., S. D. Alexander, and J. R. Cheng. 2003. “Punching of two-way concrete slabs with fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars or grids.” Struct. J. 100 (5): 589–598.
Park, R. 1988. “Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing.” In Proc., 9th World Conf., on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association for Earthquake Disaster Prevention.
Ringelstetter, E., L. C. Bank, M. G. Oliva, J. S. Russell, M. A. Nanni, and T. E. Ringelstetter. 2006. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Trans. Res. Board. 1976 (1): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197600120
Sayed, A. M., X. Wang, and Z. Wu. 2013. “Modeling of shear capacity of RC beams strengthened with FRP sheets based on FE simulation.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (5): 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000382.
Sylaj, V., and A. Fam. 2022. “Structural performance of sandwich wall made of concrete cast in between GFRP facings.” J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 24 (2): 1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362211044745.
Theodorakopoulos, D. D., and N. Swamy. 2007. “Analytical model to predict punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete flat slabs.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (3): 257.
V-Rod Composite Rebar. 2023. “Technical data sheets.” V-Rod Composite Rebar. Accessed February 14, 2023. https://fiberglassrebar.com/en/.
Zou, X., P. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Wu, and Y. Feng. 2018. “FRP stay-in-place form and shear key connection for FRP-concrete hybrid beams/decks.” Compos. Struct. 192: 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.011.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 27Issue 4August 2023

History

Received: Jul 11, 2022
Accepted: Feb 25, 2023
Published online: Apr 18, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Philopateer Boules, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Donald and Sarah Munro Chair Professor and Associate Dean Research, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-0091. Email: [email protected]
Aikaterini Genikomsou, A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-5464
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-5464.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share