Technical Papers
Jan 17, 2023

Financial Digital Twin for Public Sector Capital Projects

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 3

Abstract

As facility owners and operators, public sector organizations (such as government agencies) that provide public facilities and services not only maintain the existing capital assets but also plan for future developments on an ongoing basis through a capital improvement program (CIP). The CIP identifies capital projects and is typically funded through several distinct funding sources with specific usage, timing, and reporting restrictions. The continuous nature of capital improvement planning compounded by the potential for scope or funding availability changes further makes it a challenge to retain the flexibility to add new and different funding sources to an existing funding allocation plan. Existing literature about this problem is sparse, and a systemic solution is yet to be proposed that enables an owner organization to meet its goals while maintaining fiscal responsibility toward its funding agencies. The financial digital twin (FinDT) framework developed in this study integrates fund allocation and accounting with project acquisition in real time and enables the owner to automate funding allocation tasks and to synchronize change management while ensuring compliance with funding restrictions. The goal of this framework is to leverage rule-based knowledge management to consolidate and continually optimize the efficient use of accurate financial information at all stages of the capital asset lifecycle. This is accomplished through automation and digital twin (DT) integration. A use case was developed to demonstrate and evaluate the FinDT, which was found to hold potential for more efficient information management and support for decision making through enterprise-level data integration. The framework developed in this study can be used to display other nongeometric attribute information in a building information model for the purposes of visualization and interactive, efficient decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions (e.g., anonymized data). This includes the code for the prototype plug-in and the BIM models used in the simulated case study.

References

Abanda, F. H., C. Vidalakis, A. H. Oti, and J. H. M. Tah. 2015. “A critical analysis of building information modelling systems used in construction projects.” Adv. Eng. Software 90 (Dec): 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.08.009.
Agapaki, E. 2022. “Airport digital twins for resilient disaster management response.” Preprint, submitted May 7, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03739.
Akanmu, A., C. Anumba, and O. Ogunseiju. 2021. “Towards next generation cyber-physical systems and digital twins for construction.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 26 (Jul): 505–525. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.027.
Anumba, C. J., A. Akanmu, X. Yuan, and C. Kan. 2020. “Cyber-physical systems development for construction applications.” Front. Eng. Manage. 8 (1): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0130-4.
Ben Amor, S., A. T. de Almeida, J. L. de Miranda, and E. Aktas. 2020. Advanced studies in multi-criteria decision making: Series in operations research. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Borrmann, A., M. König, C. Koch, and J. Beetz. 2018. “Building information modeling: Why? What? How?” In Building information modeling, edited by A. Borrmann, M. König, C. Koch, J. Beetz, 1–21. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_1.
Bouyssou, D., T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, A. Tsoukias, and P. Vincke. 2006. Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria: Stepping stones for the analyst. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
bSA (buildingSMART Alliance). 2015. National BIM standard United States—Version 3. Washington, DC: bSA.
Casini, M. 2022. “Building digital revolution.” In Construction 4.0: Advanced technology, tools and materials for the digital transformation of the construction industry, 151–186. Duxford, England: Woodhead Publishing.
eCivis. 2020. “How to connect your grant funding to the budgeting process.” Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.ecivis.com/blog/how-to-connect-your-grant-funding-to-the-budgeting-process.
Feng, J., L. Ma, T. Broyd, W. Chen, and H. Luo. 2022. “Digital twin enabled sustainable urban road planning.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 78 (Mar): 103645. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103645.
Ferry, D. J., P. S. Brandon, and J. D. Ferry. 1999. Cost planning of buildings. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Grieves, M. 2015. “How a ‘digital twin’ can warrant products are built as designed.” Accessed June 24, 2022. https://login.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-.
Grieves, M., and J. Vickers. 2016. “Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems.” In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, 85–113. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Häußler, M., and A. Borrmann. 2020. “Model-based quality assurance in railway infrastructure planning.” Autom. Constr. 109 (Jan): 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102971.
Health Facilities Scotland, and Construction Innovation Hub. 2021. “NHSScotland digital twin interactive navigator.” Accessed April 25, 2022. https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/what-we-do/national-digital-twin-programme.
Holmes, C. B., S. Izukanji, R. Roselyne, F. Bethany, W. Inonge, S. Geoffrey, T. Stephanie, C. Roma, and H. German. 2015. “Managing multiple funding streams and agendas to achieve local and global health and research objectives: Lessons from the field.” Supplement, J. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 65 (1): S32–S35. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000043.
Jernigan, F. 2008. BIG BIM, Little Bim: The practical approach to building information modeling: Integrated practice done the right way!. 2nd ed. Salisbury, MD: Site Press.
Jin, R., B. Zhong, L. Ma, A. Hashemi, and L. Ding. 2019. “Integrating BIM with building performance analysis in project life-cycle.” Autom. Constr. 106 (Oct): 102861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102861.
Juszczyk, M., A. Tomana, and M. Bartoszek. 2016. “Current issues of BIM-based design change management, analysis and visualization.” Procedia Eng. 164 (Jun): 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.653.
Kan, C. 2021. A cyber-physical systems and digital twins approach to improving safety of mobile crane operations. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Kritzinger, W., M. Karner, G. Traar, J. Henjes, and W. Sihn. 2018. “Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (11): 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
Liao, L., and E. Teo. 2018. “Organizational change perspective on people management in BIM implementation in building projects.” J. Manag. Eng. 34 (3): 0000604. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000604.
Likhitruangsilp, V., T. N. Handayani, P. G. Ioannou, and N. Yabuki. 2018. “A BIM-enabled system for evaluating impacts of construction change orders.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, edited by C. Wang, C. Harper, Y. Lee, R. Harris, and C. Berryman, 429–438. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481264.061.
Lu, Q., J. Won, and J. C. P. Cheng. 2016. “A financial decision making framework for construction projects based on 5D building information modeling (BIM).” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.004.
Lu, Q., X. Xie, A. Parlikad, J. Schooling and M. Pitt. 2022. Digital twins in the built environment: Fundamentals, principles and applications. London: ICE Publishing.
Mardani, A., A. Jusoh, K. NoR, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, and A. Valipour. 2015. “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications: A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014.” Econ. Res. 28 (1): 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139.
McCuen, T. L., and D. M. Pittenger. 2016. Building information modeling for airports. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Medaglia, A. L., D. Hueth, J. C. Mendieta, and J. A. Sefair. 2008. “A multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 42 (1): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2006.06.009.
Nath, S. V., and P. van Schalkwyk. 2021. Building industrial digital twins. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing.
Nawari, N. O. 2018. Building information modeling: Automated code checking and compliance processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
NBIMS (National BIM Standard). 2015. Building information modelling: What information is in the model? Washington, DC: NBIMS.
Neufville, R. D., and A. R. Odoni. 2003. Airport systems: Planning, design, and management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ngwenya, K. M., R. R. A. Issa, and C. J. Anumba. 2021. “Visualization of cost information in building information models.” In Proc., 2021 ASCE Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE2021)—IT for Smart Infrastructure and Communities, edited by R. R. A. Issa, 8. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Opoku, D. J., P. Srinath, O. K. Robert, and M. Rashidi. 2021. “Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review.” J. Build. Eng. 40 (Aug): 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726.
Ozturk, G. B. 2021. “Digital twin research in the AECO-FM industry.” J. Build. Eng. 40 (Aug): 102730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102730.
Pan, Y., and L. Zhang. 2021. “A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management.” Autom. Constr. 124 (Apr): 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564.
Paris, L., and W. Wahbeh. 2016. “Survey and representation of the parametric geometries in HBIM.” Disegnarecon 9 (16).
Preidel, C., and A. Borrmann. 2015. “Automated code compliance checking based on a visual language and building information modeling.” In Proc., 32nd Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining: Connected to the Future. Oulu, Finland: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2015/0033.
Preidel, C., and A. Borrmann. 2018. Building information modeling: Technology foundations and industry practice. Munchen, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
Rasool, K., and A. S. Bernt. 2022. “Introduction to digital twin, automation and real-time centers.” In Methods for petroleum well optimization: Automation and data solutions, 1. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Roberts, R. 2008. “Planning implementation tools capital improvement plan.” Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.uwsp.edu/cnrap/clue/documents/planimplementation/capital_improvement_plan.pdf.
Röck, M., A. Hollberg, G. Habert, and A. Passer. 2018. “LCA and BIM: Visualization of environmental potentials in building construction at early design stages.” Build. Environ. 140 (Aug): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.006.
Royal HaskoningDHV. 2020. “Take BIM processes to the next level with digital twins.” Building International. Accessed February 2, 2022. https://www.buildingsmart.org/take-bim-processes-to-the-next-level-with-digital-twins/.
Seaton, H., S. Cristina, S. M. E. Sepasgozar, and A. Sawhney. 2022. Digital twins from design to handover of constructed assets. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Seixas, B. V., F. Dionne, and C. Mitton. 2021. “Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks.” Health Econ. Rev. 11 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00300-0.
Seixas, B. V., D. A. Regier, S. Bryan, and C. Mitton. 2021. “Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries.” BMC Health Serv. Res. 21 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06078-z.
Steuer, R. E., and P. Na. 2003. “Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150 (3): 496–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00774-9.
Valinejadshoubi, M., A. Bagchi, and O. Moselhi. 2019. “Development of a BIM-based data management system for structural health monitoring with application to modular buildings: Case study.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (3): 05019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000826.
Wahbeh, W., D. Kunz, and V. Design. 2020. “Digital twinning of the built environment: An interdisciplinary topic for innovation in didactics.” ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 5 (4): 231–237. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2020-231-2020.
Walker and Company, LLP. 2007. “Managing multiple grants.” Accessed August 15, 2019. https://dokumen.tips/documents/managing-multiple-grants-may-10-2007-walker-and-company-llp.html.
Williams, L. M. 2000. Strategic decision support for project portfolio management in the public sector. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Wong, J. K. W., J. Ge, and S. X. He. 2018. “Digitisation in facilities management: A literature review and future research directions.” Autom. Constr. 92 (Aug): 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.006.
Wu, D. 2017. “Airport finance.” Accessed March 10, 2020. https://dwuconsulting.com/Finance101.pdf.
Wu, Z., C. Chen, Y. Cai, C. Lu, H. Wang, and T. Yu. 2019. “BIM-based visualization research in the construction industry: A network analysis.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (18): 3473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183473.
Xu, Z., H. Zhang, X. Lu, Y. Xu, Z. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2019. “A prediction method of building seismic loss based on BIM and FEMA P-58.” Autom. Constr. 102 (Jun): 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.017.
Zanakis, S. H., T. Mandakovic, and S. K. Gupta. 1995. “A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors.” Pergamon Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 29 (1): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)98607-W.
Zellers, S. J. H. 2019. Guidebook for managing small airports. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Zmud, J., M. Miller, M. Moran, M. Tooley, J. Borowiec, B. Brydia, R. Sen, J. Mariani, E. Krimmel, and A. Gunnels. 2018. A primer to prepare for the connected airport and the internet of things. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37Issue 3May 2023

History

Received: Apr 20, 2022
Accepted: Nov 23, 2022
Published online: Jan 17, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kwandokuhle M. Lynch [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, M.E. Rinker Sr. School of Construction Management, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, M.E. Rinker Sr. School of Construction Management, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-3802. Email: [email protected]
Chimay J. Anumba, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Dean, College of Design, Construction and Planning, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share