Technical Papers
Jan 17, 2023

Quantifying the Value of Satellite-Based Pavement Monitoring in Partially Observable Stochastic Environments

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 3

Abstract

Accurate and timely assessment of pavement condition is critical to determine optimal maintenance plans. Due to the high costs of ground-based inspections, agencies often limit their monitoring to major roads and the condition of some elements of the road network remains unknown. Satellites, capable of rapidly collecting information over wide areas, can be a cost-effective alternative to monitor pavement condition. This wide coverage, however, comes at the expense of lower levels of accuracy. The objective of this study is to quantify the value of satellite-based information in optimal inspection and maintenance strategies. To account for the uncertainties associated with satellite observations, the system was modeled as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) to determine optimal life-cycle inspection and maintenance policies. To estimate the value of information obtained from satellite inspections, two cases representing current pavement condition practices were simulated: (1) as an alternative to inspect highways, roads that are traditionally monitored with annual automated distress surveys, and (2) as an option to inspect local or ancillary roads, which are not typically monitored. Results indicate that satellite observations result in up to 6.5% reduction in cost if they are used to make maintenance and inspection decisions over the pavement life cycle. Savings are higher for nonmonitored roads compared to major roads that are annually inspected with automated distress surveys. Satellite information was found to become valuable at 70% level of accuracy when used in combination with more accurate systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for their assistance with data inquiry. The contents of this paper do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of CDOT.

References

Amin, S. R., and L. E. Amador-Jiménez. 2016. “Backpropagation neural network to estimate pavement performance: Dealing with measurement errors.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (5): 1218–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1202129.
Andriotis, C. P., K. G. Papakonstantinou, and E. N. Chatzi. 2021. “Value of structural health information in partially observable stochastic environments.” Struct. Saf. 93 (Aug): 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102072.
Arhin, S. A., E. C. Noel, and A. Ribbiso. 2015. “Acceptable international roughness index thresholds based on present serviceability rating.” J. Civ. Eng. Res. 5 (4): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150504.03.
Barnes, G., and P. Langworthy. 2003. The per-mile costs of operating automobiles and trucks. St. Paul: Minnesota DOT.
Bashar, M. Z., M. A. Elseifi, M. R. Mousa, Z. Zhang, and K. Gaspard. 2019. “Optimizing the performance of microsurfacing treatments in flexible pavements and assessing its effects on moisture damage.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (1): 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120986171.
Bashar, M. Z., and C. Torres-Machi. 2022a. “Deep learning for estimating pavement roughness using synthetic aperture radar data.” Autom. Constr. 142 (Oct): 104504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104504.
Bashar, M. Z., and C. Torres-Machi. 2022b. “Exploring the capabilities of optical satellite imagery in evaluating pavement condition.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 108–115. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bellman, R. E. 1957. Dynamic programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Butt, A. A., M. Y. Shahin, K. J. Feighan, and S. H. Carpenter. 1987. “Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1123 (Jun): 12–19.
Carnahan, J. V. 1988. “Analytical framework for optimizing pavement maintenance.” J. Transp. Eng. 114 (3): 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:3(307).
CDOT (Colorado Dept. of Transportation). 2022. “OTIS online transportation information system.” Accessed December 20, 2022. https://dtdapps.coloradodot.info/otis.
Corotis, R. B., J. Hugh Ellis, and M. Jiang. 2005. “Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision processes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1 (1): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470412331289305.
Ellis, H., M. Jiang, and R. B. Corotis. 1995. “Inspection, maintenance, and repair with partial observability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(92).
Emery, W. 2014. Large-area road-surface quality using very-high spatial resolution aerial and satellite data. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Fagrhi, A., and A. Ozden. 2015. Satellite assessment and monitoring for pavement management. Dover, DE: Delaware Center for Transportation.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2015. “Public road length—2015 miles by ownership table HM-10.” Accessed April 23, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2015/hm10.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. Highway performance monitoring system field manual. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Golabi, K., R. B. Kulkarni, and G. B. Way. 1982. “A statewide pavement management system.” Interfaces 12 (6): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.6.5.
Herold, M., and D. Roberts. 2005. “Spectral characteristics of asphalt road aging and deterioration: Implications for remote-sensing applications.” Appl. Opt. 44 (20): 4327–4334. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.004327.
Herold, M., D. Roberts, V. Noronha, and O. Smadi. 2008. “Imaging spectrometry and asphalt road surveys.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 16 (2): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.07.001.
Hicks, R. G., and J. L. Groeger. 2011. Pavement management practices in state highway agencies: Newington, Connecticut peer exchange results. Washington, DC: Office of Asset Management, Federal Highway Administration.
Hoppe, E., B. Bruckno, E. Campbell, S. Acton, A. Vaccari, M. Stuecheli, A. Bohane, G. Falorni, and J. Morgan. 2016. “Transportation infrastructure monitoring using satellite remote sensing.” Mater. Infrastruct. 1 (Jun): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119318583.ch14.
Humplick, F. 1992. “Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 26 (2): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(92)90004-G.
Kamalzadeh, H., and M. Hahsler. 2019. “POMDP: Introduction to partially observable Markov decision processes.” Accessed February 7, 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pomdp/vignettes/POMDP.html.
Kim, J. W., G. B. Choi, and J. M. Lee. 2018. “A POMDP framework for integrated scheduling of infrastructure maintenance and inspection.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 112 (5): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.02.015.
Kurniawati, H., D. H. Wee, and S. Lee. 2008. SARSOP: Efficient point-based POMDP planning by approximating optimally reachable belief spaces. Cambridgem MA: MIT Press.
Li, M., A. Faghri, A. Ozden, and Y. Yue. 2017. “Economic feasibility study for pavement monitoring using synthetic aperture radar-based satellite remote sensing cost-benefit analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2645 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/2645-01.
Madanat, S. 1993. “Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 1 (1): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-090X(93)90021-7.
Madanat, S., and M. Ben-Akiva. 1994. “Optimal inspection and repair policies for infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Sci. 28 (1): 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.28.1.55.
Maxar. 2022. “Earth intelligence & space infrastructure.” Accessed December 20, 2022. https://www.maxar.com/products/satellite-imagery.
Medury, A., and S. Madanat. 2014. “Simultaneous network optimization approach for pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (3): 04014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000149.
Memarzadeh, M., and M. Pozzi. 2016. “Integrated inspection scheduling and maintenance planning for infrastructure systems.” Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 31 (6): 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12178.
Memarzadeh, M., M. Pozzi, and J. Zico Kolter. 2015. “Optimal planning and learning in uncertain environments for the management of wind farms.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (5): 04014076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000390.
Meyer, F. J., O. A. Ajadi, and E. Hoppe. 2020. “Studying the applicability of X-band SAR data to the network-scale mapping of pavement roughness on US roads.” Remote Sens. 12 (1507): 120915. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091507.
Mohammadi, M. 2012. “Road classification and condition determination using hyperspectral imagery.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 7 (Sep): 141–146. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B7-141-2012.
Noronha, V., M. Herold, D. Roberts, and M. Gardner. 2002. “Spectrometry and hyperspectral remote sensing for road centerline extraction and evaluation of pavement condition.” Natl. Consort. Remote Sens. Transp.-Infrastruct. Manage. 2002 (Aug): 12.
Pan, Y., X. Zhang, X. Jin, H. Yu, J. Rao, S. Tian, L. Luo, and C. Li. 2016. “Road pavement condition mapping and assessment using remote sensing data based on MESMA.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 34 (1): 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012023.
Papakonstantinou, K. G., C. P. Andriotis, and H. Gao. 2019. “Quantifying the value of structural monitoring for decision making.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. Application State Probability Civil Engineering, 1–8. Seoul: ICASP.
Papakonstantinou, K. G., C. P. Andriotis, and M. Shinozuka. 2018. “POMDP and MOMDP solutions for structural life-cycle cost minimization under partial and mixed observability.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (7): 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1439973.
Papakonstantinou, K. G., and M. Shinozuka. 2014a. “Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part I: Theory.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 130 (5): 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.005.
Papakonstantinou, K. G., and M. Shinozuka. 2014b. “Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 130 (Apr): 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.006.
Pierce, L., and N. D. Weitzel. 2019. Automated pavement condition surveys. NCHRP Synthesis 531. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Schöbi, R., and E. N. Chatzi. 2016. “Maintenance planning using continuous-state partially observable Markov decision processes and non-linear action models processes and non-linear action models.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2479 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1076485.
Seites-Rundlett, W., M. Z. Bashar, C. Torres-Machi, and R. B. Corotis. 2021. “Combined evidence model to enhance pavement condition prediction from highly uncertain sensor data.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 217 (May): 108031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108031.
Shahi, K., H. Z. M. Shafri, and A. Hamedianfar. 2017. “Road condition assessment by OBIA and feature selection techniques using very high-resolution WorldView-2 imagery.” Geocarto Int. 32 (12): 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1213888.
Smallwood, R. D., and E. J. Sondik. 1973. “The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon.” Oper. Res. 21 (5): 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.21.5.1071.
Smilowitz, K., and S. Madanat. 2000. “Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks.” Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00166.
Sondik, E. J. 1978. “The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over the infinite horizon: Discounted costs.” Oper. Res. 26 (2): 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.26.2.282.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37Issue 3May 2023

History

Received: Jul 24, 2022
Accepted: Nov 18, 2022
Published online: Jan 17, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Bashar, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Faculty, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-4474. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Computer Vision for Infrastructure Health Monitoring: Automated Detection of Pavement Rutting from Street-Level Images, Computing in Civil Engineering 2023, 10.1061/9780784485248.130, (1089-1096), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share