Technical Papers
Oct 17, 2024

Bayesian Updating of Nonlinear Constitutive Models for Steel–Concrete Composite Girder Bridges Using Large-Scale Load Test Data

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 1

Abstract

Establishing an accurate finite-element (FE) model that faithfully replicates the nonlinear behavior of steel–concrete composite girder bridges is crucially important for effective model-based structural health monitoring (SHM) for this specific bridge type. While Bayesian model updating methodology has gained widespread acclaim for its application in data-driven FE models, apprehensions have emerged regarding the rationality of the updated model parameter values. These concerns predominantly stem from the use of oversimplified FE beam models in model updating studies. This study addressed these concerns by introducing nonlinear constitutive models for the steel–concrete composite girder bridge, as well as comprehensive and detailed three-dimensional (3D) FE model updates. Key parameters for nonlinear constitutive models were estimated based on structural responses from a large-scale static loading test. Bayes’ theorem was employed to infer posterior probability density functions (PDFs) for the model parameters. A transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler was used as a computational tool to generate samples for representing the posterior PDFs. A two-step model updating approach designed to achieve a balance between computational efficiency and simulation accuracy was proposed in the context of nonlinear model updating. Initially, deflection and neutral axis height data were used to update the linear segment of the constitutive model. Load–deflection curves were then used to update the nonlinear segment. Following the model updating with deflection and strain data, the nonlinear simulation results showed improved comparability to the measured data, indicating a significant improvement in the model accuracy. Furthermore, the model update effectiveness was cross verified successfully by comparing load–strain curves of concrete and reinforcing bars obtained during the experiment. The updated model showcases its capability for structural performance evaluation and its potential application in the domain of SHM.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially sponsored by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (B) under Project No. 22H01576. That financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The first author expresses sincere gratitude for the financial support from the China Scholarship Council under Grant No. 202106260039.

References

Alfarah, B., F. López-Almansa, and S. Oller. 2017. “New methodology for calculating damage variables evolution in Plastic Damage Model for RC structures.” Eng. Struct. 132: 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.022.
Beck, J. L. 2010. “Bayesian system identification based on probability logic.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 17 (7): 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.424.
Beck, J. L., and S.-K. Au. 2002. “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (4): 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380).
Beck, J. L., and L. S. Katafygiotis. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455).
Beck, J. L., and K.-V. Yuen. 2004. “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (2): 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192).
Betz, W., I. Papaioannou, J. L. Beck, and D. Straub. 2018. “Bayesian inference with subset simulation: Strategies and improvements.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 331: 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.021.
Betz, W., I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub. 2016. “Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo: Observations and improvements.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (5): 04016016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001066.
Ching, J. Y., and Y.-C. Chen. 2007. “Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging.” J. Eng. Mech. 133 (7): 816–832. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816).
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2013. Model code for concrete structures 2010. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lin, K., Y.-L. Xu, X. Lu, Z. Guan, and J. Li. 2021. “Collapse prognosis of a long-span cable-stayed bridge based on shake table test and nonlinear model updating.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (2): 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3341.
Lye, A., A. Cicirello, and E. Patelli. 2021. “Sampling methods for solving Bayesian model updating problems: A tutorial.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 159: 107760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107760.
Malekghaini, N., F. Ghahari, H. Ebrahimian, M. Bowers, E. Ahlberg, and E. Taciroglu. 2023. “A two-step FE model updating approach for system and damage identification of prestressed bridge girders.” Buildings 13 (2): 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020420.
Martínez-Muñoz, D., J. V. Martí, and V. Yepes. 2020. “Steel-concrete composite bridges: Design, life cycle assessment, maintenance, and decision-making.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020: 8823370. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8823370.
Minh, H. L., S. Khatir, M. A. Wahab, and C. L. Thanh. 2021. “A concrete damage plasticity model for predicting the effects of compressive high-strength concrete under static and dynamic loads.” J. Build. Eng. 44: 103239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103239.
Mustafa, S., and Y. Matsumoto. 2017. “Bayesian model updating and its limitations for detecting local damage of an existing truss bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (7): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001044.
Muto, M., and J. L. Beck. 2008. “Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation.” J. Vib. Control 14 (1–2): 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546307079400.
Ollgaard, J. G., R. G. Slutter, and J. W. Fisher. 1971. “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete.” Eng. J. 8 (2): 55–64.
Ramancha, M. K., R. Astroza, R. Madarshahian, and J. P. Conte. 2022. “Bayesian updating and identifiability assessment of nonlinear finite element models.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 167: 108517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108517.
Ren, W.-X., S.-E. Fang, and M.-Y. Deng. 2011. “Response surface-based finite-element-model updating using structural static responses.” J. Eng. Mech. 137 (4): 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000223.
Ribeiro, D., R. Calçada, R. Delgado, M. Brehm, and V. Zabel. 2012. “Finite element model updating of a bowstring-arch railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters.” Eng. Struct. 40: 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.013.
Shi, Y. J., M. Wang, and Y. Q. Wang. 2011. “Experimental and constitutive model study of structural steel under cyclic loading.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (8): 1185–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.011.
Shi, Z., Y. Hong, and S. L. Yang. 2019. “Updating boundary conditions for bridge structures using modal parameters.” Eng. Struct. 196: 109346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109346.
Simoen, E., G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert. 2015. “Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 56–57: 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001.
Simoen, E., C. Papadimitriou, and G. Lombaert. 2013. “On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating.” J. Sound Vib. 332 (18): 4136–4152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.019.
SIMULIA. 2021. Abaqus 2021 user documentation. Providence, RI: SIMULIA.
Song, M. M., L. Renson, J. P. Noël, B. Moaveni, and G. Kerschen. 2018. “Bayesian model updating of nonlinear systems using nonlinear normal modes.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 25 (12): e2258.
Tang, J., Q. T. Su, H. Su, and J. R. Casas. 2023. “Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical behavior of prestressed continuous composite I-girder bridges with partial connection.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (3): 04022154. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5955.
Vereecken, E., A. Slobbe, A. Rózsás, W. Botte, G. Lombaert, and R. Caspeele. 2022. “Efficient Bayesian model selection and calibration using field data for a reinforced concrete slab bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 20 (5): 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2131847.
Wang, J.-J., C. Liu, X. Nie, J.-S. Fan, and Y.-J. Zhu. 2021. “Nonlinear model updating algorithm for biaxial reinforced concrete constitutive models of shear walls.” J. Build. Eng. 44: 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103215.
Wang, Z.-C., Y. Xin, and W.-X. Ren. 2016. “Nonlinear structural joint model updating based on instantaneous characteristics of dynamic responses.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 76-77: 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.01.024.
Xia, Q., Y. Xia, H. P. Wan, J. Zhang, and W. X. Ren. 2020. “Condition analysis of expansion joints of a long-span suspension bridge through metamodel-based model updating considering thermal effect.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 27 (5): e2521.
Xiao, J.-L., X. Nie, Y.-F. Liu, and J.-S. Fan. 2023. “Structural performance assessment of RC flexural members through crack-based fibre beam-column model updating.” Comput. Struct. 281: 107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107029.
Xu, L.-Y., X. Nie, and M.-X. Tao. 2018. “Rational modeling for cracking behavior of RC slabs in composite beams subjected to a hogging moment.” Constr. Build. Mater. 192: 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.163.
Yang, J.-H., H.-F. Lam, and Y.-H. An. 2022. “Development of a two-phase adaptive MCMC method for efficient Bayesian model updating of complex dynamic systems.” Eng. Struct. 270: 114836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114836.
Zhang, F.-L., Y.-C. Ni, and H.-F. Lam. 2017. “Bayesian structural model updating using ambient vibration data collected by multiple setups.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 24 (12): e2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2023.
Zhang, J., K. Maes, G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert. 2021. “Model updating for a large multi-span quasi-periodic viaduct based on free wave characteristics.” J. Sound Vib. 506: 116161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116161.
Zhou, X., C.-W. Kim, F.-L. Zhang, and K.-C. Chang. 2022. “Vibration-based Bayesian model updating of an actual steel truss bridge subjected to incremental damage.” Eng. Struct. 260: 114226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114226.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 30Issue 1January 2025

History

Received: Jan 5, 2024
Accepted: Aug 27, 2024
Published online: Oct 17, 2024
Published in print: Jan 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Mar 17, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto 615-8540, Japan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3645-6671. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto 615-8540, Japan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-6037. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-8056. Email: [email protected]
Alfred Strauss [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Structural Engineering (IKI), Univ. of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share