Fatigue Performance of a Novel Steel–Concrete Joint of a Long-Span High-Speed Railway Hybrid Girder–Cable-Stayed Bridge
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
The steel–concrete joint (SCJ) of a railway hybrid girder–cable-stayed bridge transmits tremendous internal forces, resulting in complex structure and stress. The existing complex SCJs lead to difficulties in on-site concrete construction, and the complex stress of the SCJ under train load is prone to diseases such as steel concrete fatigue detachment and cracking. To investigate the complex fatigue performance of a novel SCJ for a long-span high-speed railway hybrid box girder–cable-stayed bridge with a main span of 672 m, finite-element analysis (FEA) and a 1:2 scaled fatigue model test with 2.15 million cycles were conducted. The results showed that the numerical fatigue stresses of the SCJ exhibited a significant shear lag effect in the transverse direction with unfavorable fatigue stresses at the side box. After 1.70 million loading cycles, all the steel plates of the test model remained intact, indicating good fatigue resistance during the design life. Cracks appeared at the junction between the horizontal diaphragm and the web of the steel transition segment (STS) after 1.85 million cycles, showing a fatigue life of 118 years. The measured fatigue crack life of the concrete deck over the postanchor position of the prestressed tendons in the STS was 30.5 years for the local concentrated tensile stress, which can be improved by casting the concrete after the tendons are prestressed. No fracture or other abnormalities occurred in the shear studs and perforated rib (PBL) rebars, and the deflection of the test model and the slip between the steel and concrete were insignificant during the fatigue tests, indicating the good fatigue performance of the SCJ, which was better than that of the STS. The thickness of the bearing plate and diameter of the shear studs for the actual SCJ were suggested to be 40–60 and 16–25 mm, respectively, based on a parametric study.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All experimental data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Major Subject of the China Railway's Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program (Grant Number AJZH2020-001).
References
Aas-Jakobsen, K. 1970. Fatigue of concrete beams and columns. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian.
Cachim, P. B., J. A. Figueiras, and P. A. A. Pereira. 2002. “Fatigue behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete in compression.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 24 (2): 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00019-1.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1–2. Eurocode 4 EN 1994-1-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Design of steel structures—Part 1–9: Fatigue. Eurocode 3 EN 1993-1-9. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cheng, X., X. Nie, and J. Fan. 2016. “Structural performance and strength prediction of steel–to–concrete box girder deck transition zone of hybrid steel–concrete cable–stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (11): 04016083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000958.
El-Zohairy, A., H. Salim, and A. Saucier. 2019. “Fatigue tests on steel–concrete composite beams subjected to sagging moments.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (5): 04019029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002326.
Fang, Z. C., H. B. Jiang, G. F. Chen, X. T. Dong, and T. F. Shao. 2020. “Behavior of grouped stud shear connectors between precast high-strength concrete slabs and steel beams.” Steel Compos. Struct. 34 (6): 837–851. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.837.
Gattesco, N., E. Giuriani, and A. Gubana. 1997. “Low-cycle fatigue test on stud shear connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (2): 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(145).
He, J., Y. Liu, and B. Pei. 2014. “Experimental study of the steel–concrete connection in hybrid cable–stayed bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 28 (3): 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000444.
He, J., A. S. H. Suwaed, G. Vasdravellis, and S. Wang. 2022. “Behaviour and design of the ‘lockbolt’ demountable shear connector for sustainable steel–concrete composite structures.” Structures 44: 988–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.062.
He, S., Z. Fang, Y. Fang, M. Liu, L. Liu, and A. S. Mosallam. 2016. “Experimental study on perfobond strip connector in steel–concrete joints of hybrid bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 118: 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.11.009.
Huang, C. P., Z. X. Zhang, and K. L. Chen. 2012. “Model test and transfer mechanism of steel–concrete composite structure for hybrid girder cable-stayed bridges.” [In Chinese.] J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 40 (1): 67–71.
Jawdhari, A., A. Hadhood, and A. Fam. 2021. “Confinement model for FRP-wrapped circular columns when the wraps are subjected to damage.” Constr. Build. Mater. 275: 122101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.122101.
Kadhim, M. M. A., A. Jawdhari, A. H. Adheem, and A. Fam. 2022. “Analysis and design of two-way slabs strengthened in flexure with FRCM.” Eng. Struct. 256: 113983. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2022.113983.
Liu, R., and Y. Liu. 2015. “Analysis of auxiliary ribs in steel–concrete joint of hybrid girder.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 112: 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.015.
Nie, J., J. Wang, S. Gou, Y. Zhu, and J. Fan. 2019. “Technological development and engineering applications of novel steel–concrete composite structures.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0514-x.
NRAPRC (National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2016. Code for train load diagrams. TB/T 3466-2016. Beijing: China Railway Press.
NRAPRC (National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2017. Code for design on steel structure of railway bridge. TB 10091–2017. Beijing: China Railway Press.
Pu, Q., S. Yang, Z. Shi, Y. Hong, and Y. Zhou. 2021. “Fatigue performance of an innovative steel–concrete joint in long-span railway hybrid box girder cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (2): 04020129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001680.
Shen, M.-h., K.-F. Chung, A. Y. Elghazouli, and J.-Z. Tong. 2020. “Structural behaviour of stud shear connections in composite floors with various connector arrangements and profiled deck configurations.” Eng. Struct. 210: 110370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110370.
Shi, Z., J. C. Gu, and Y. C. Zhou. 2022. “Research review on steel–concrete composite joint of railway hybrid girder cable–stayed bridge.” [In Chinese.] China Railway Sci. 43 (2): 48–59.
Shi, Z., S. Yang, Q. Pu, and Y. Zhang. 2019. “Fatigue performance of orthotropic steel decks in long-span cable-stayed steel-box girder railway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (5): 04019035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001399.
Shi, Z., M. Zhong, G. Gu, F. Jiang, and T. Zhang. 2023. “Mechanical behavior of steel–concrete joint in a bidirectional curved pylon of a long-span cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (3): 04023002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5753.
Wen, W., S. Li, A. Yan, and J. Zeng. 2021. “Numerical analysis on the time-varying temperature field distribution patterns of ballastless track steel–concrete composite box girders at ambient temperature based on field measurements.” Adv. Bridge Eng. 2: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-021-00043-w.
Yang, S., Q. Pu, Z. Shi, and Y. Hong. 2020. “Mechanical behavior of steel–concrete composite joints in railway hybrid cable-stayed bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 173: 106242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106242.
Zhang, Q., D. Jia, Y. Bao, Z. Cheng, L. Xiao, and Y. Bu. 2018. “Internal force transfer effect-based fatigue damage evaluation for PBL shear connector groups.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 148: 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.016.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 13, 2023
Accepted: Sep 3, 2023
Published online: Oct 31, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.