Technical Papers
Oct 20, 2023

Improving the Predictive Analytics of Machine-Learning Pipelines for Bridge Infrastructure Asset Management Applications: An Upstream Data Workflow to Address Data Quality Issues in the National Bridge Inventory Database

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 1

Abstract

The increasing availability of bridge data from the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) offers a great opportunity to perform predictive analytics (such as bridge deterioration prediction) using machine learning (ML) pipelines for supporting bridge asset management. However, data quality issues (e.g., outliers and missing values) can significantly affect ML pipelines, requiring upstream tasks to be performed for ensuring the validity, applicability, and generalizability of pipelines. Among the tasks, outlier removal and missing value imputation are the most challenging due to a highly laborious process, a lack of data governance, and a mixture of heterogenous data quality issues and data types. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an upstream workflow for enhancing the downstream predictive analytics of bridge-related ML pipelines. The proposed upstream workflow was developed based on the NBI data collected for all States in the United States, which includes a total of 617,084 observations/bridges. Existing bridge domain knowledge from multiple sources (such as the bridge design manual and regulations) was leveraged to remove outliers. Then, this study applied and compared 10 statistical and ML-based data imputation techniques to impute missing values. Statistical analysis and imputation evaluation of NBI data indicated that: (1) 19 and 15 out of the total 38 frequently used features or variables had outliers and missing values, respectively; (2) categorical features are generally more prone to data dropping due to inapplicable values, while numeric features are more subjected to outliers; and (3) ML-based data imputation is more suitable than statistical imputation for both numeric and categorical features, especially for features with high missing rate. The proposed workflow was validated on its capability of improving downstream predictive analytics for bridge deck condition prediction, increasing the balanced accuracy by 6.85%–9.76%. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by offering a novel upstream workflow that can be utilized as a benchmark for guiding researchers and bridge engineering practitioners to handle NBI data quality issues for better preforming predictive analytics using ML pipelines.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Adadi, A. 2021. “A survey on data-efficient algorithms in big data era.” J. Big Data 8 (1): 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00419-9.
Alabdulmohsin, I. M., and M. Lucic. 2021. “A near-optimal algorithm for debiasing trained machine learning models.” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34: 8072–8084.
Alogdianakis, F., L. Dimitriou, and D. C. Charmpis. 2022. “Data-driven recognition and modelling of deterioration patterns in the US National Bridge Inventory: A genetic algorithm-artificial neural network framework.” Adv. Eng. Software 171: 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103148.
Andridge, R. R., and R. J. A. Little. 2010. “A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response.” Int. Stat. Rev. 78 (1): 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020a. “Bridge infrastructure asset management system: Comparative computational machine learning approach for evaluating and predicting deck deterioration conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (3): 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000572.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020b. “Evaluation and prediction of the hazard potential level of dam infrastructures using computational artificial intelligence algorithms.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000810.
Assaad, R., and I. El-adaway. 2020c. “Forecasting and modeling bridge deterioration using data mining analytics.” In Construction research congress 2020: Computer applications, edited by P. Tang, D. Grau, and M. El Asmar, 125–134. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Assaf, G., and R. H. Assaad. 2023. “Key decision-making factors influencing bundling strategies: Analysis of bundled infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 29 (2): 04023006. https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2225.
Barker, R. M., and J. A. Puckett. 2021. Design of highway bridges: An LRFD approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Bektas, B. A., A. Carriquiry, and O. Smadi. 2013. “Using classification trees for predicting national bridge inventory condition ratings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (4): 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000143.
BMI (Bridge Maters). 2018. “Record-setting bridges across the globe.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://bridgemastersinc.com/record-setting-bridges-across-the-globe/.
Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Bridgehunter. 2021. “Historic and notable bridges of the U.S.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://bridgehunter.com/nation/report/shortest/.
Brodersen, K. H., C. S. Ong, K. E. Stephan, and J. M. Buhmann. 2010. “The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution.” In Proc., 20th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 3121–3124. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Bu, G. P., J. H. Lee, H. Guan, Y. C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2015. “Prediction of long-term bridge performance: Integrated deterioration approach with case studies.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000591.
Chandola, V., A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar. 2009. “Anomaly detection: A survey.” ACM Comput. Surv. 41 (3): 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882.
Chase, S. B., E. P. Small, and C. Nuttakor. 1999. An in-depth analysis of the national bridge inventory database utilizing data mining, GIS and advanced statistical methods. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Contreras-Nieto, C., Y. Shan, and P. Lewis. 2018. “Characterization of steel bridge superstructure deterioration through data mining techniques.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001205.
de Andrade Silva, J., and E. R. Hruschka. 2013. “An experimental study on the use of nearest neighbor-based imputation algorithms for classification tasks.” Data Knowl. Eng. 84: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2012.12.006.
Das, S., G. R. Abecasis, and B. L. Browning. 2018. “Genotype imputation from large reference panels.” Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 19: 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602.
Din, Z. U., and P. Tang. 2016. “Automatic logical inconsistency detection in the National Bridge Inventory.” Procedia Eng. 145: 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.093.
Du, J., M. Hu, and W. Zhang. 2020. “Missing data problem in the monitoring system: A review.” IEEE Sensors J. 20 (23): 13984–13998.
Dubey, A., and A. Rasool. 2021. “Efficient technique of microarray missing data imputation using clustering and weighted nearest neighbour.” Sci. Rep. 11 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8.
Fereshtehnejad, E., G. Gazzola, P. Parekh, C. Nakrani, and H. Parvardeh. 2022. “Detecting anomalies in National Bridge Inventory databases using machine learning methods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (6): 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221075028.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1994. “Roadway widths for low-traffic volume roads.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/humanfac/94023.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: DOT, Bridge Management Branch, FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022a. “LTBP BridgeInfo.” Accessed August 1, 2022. https://infobridge.fhwa.dot.gov/Home.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022b. “Bridges & structures.” Accessed August 2, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2023. “4.0 geometric and safety design.” Accessed March 16, 2023. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/rpt/tcstoll/chapter443.htm.
FWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 2010. “362 FW2, vehicular bridge design and maintenance.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.fws.gov/policy/362fw2.html.
Galvan-Nunez, S., and N. Attoh-Okine. 2017. “Hybrid particle swarm optimization and k-means analysis for bridge clustering based on national bridge inventory data.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (2): F4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000864.
Ghonima, O., T. Schumacher, A. Unnikrishnan, and A. Fleischhacker. 2018. Advancing bridge technology, task 10: Statistical analysis and modeling of US concrete highway bridge deck performance—Internal final Report. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Gupta, N., et al. 2021. “Data Quality Toolkit: Automatic assessment of data quality and remediation for machine learning datasets.” Preprint, submitted September 5, 2021. http://arxiv.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.05935.
Gyori, N. G., M. Palombo, C. A. Clark, H. Zhang, and D. C. Alexander. 2022. “Training data distribution significantly impacts the estimation of tissue microstructure with machine learning.” Magn. Reson. Med. 87 (2): 932–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29014.
Hapke, H., and C. Nelson. 2020. Building machine learning pipelines. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Hasan, S., and E. Elwakil. 2020. “National Bridge Inventory data-based stochastic modeling for deck condition rating of prestressed concrete bridges.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (3): 04020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000505.
He, H., and E. A. Garcia. 2009. “Learning from imbalanced data.” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21 (9): 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239.
Heinrich, M., A. Gölz, T. Arul, and S. Katzenbeisser. 2020. “Rule-based anomaly detection for railway signalling networks.” Preprint, submitted August 12, 2020. http://10.48550/arXiv.2008.05241.
Hewett, P., and G. H. Ganser. 2007. “A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 51 (7): 611–632.
Himeur, Y., A. Alsalemi, F. Bensaali, and A. Amira. 2021. “Smart power consumption abnormality detection in buildings using micromoments and improved K-nearest neighbors.” Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36 (6): 2865–2894. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22404.
Hong, T.-H., S.-H. Chung, S.-W. Han, and S.-Y. Lee. 2006. “Service life estimation of concrete bridge decks.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 10 (4): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830777.
Hooper, S. M., J. A. Dunnmon, M. P. Lungren, D. Mastrodicasa, D. L. Rubin, C. Ré, A. Wang, and B. N. Patel. 2021. “Impact of upstream medical image processing on downstream performance of a head CT triage neural network.” Radiol.: Artif. Intell. 3 (4): e200229. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2021200229.
Hou, J., H. Jiang, C. Wan, L. Yi, S. Gao, Y. Ding, and S. Xue. 2022. “Deep learning and data augmentation based data imputation for structural health monitoring system in multi-sensor damaged state.” Measurement 196: 111206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111206.
Hu, X., and K. Liu. 2021. “Structural deterioration knowledge ontology for supporting adaptive intelligence-based bridge deterioration prediction.” Comput. Civ. Eng. 2021: 713–720.
Hu, X., and K. Liu. 2023. “Structural deterioration knowledge ontology towards physics-informed machine learning for enhanced bridge deterioration prediction.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 37 (1): 04022051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001066.
Hu, X., and P. Solanki. 2021. “Predicting resilient modulus of cementitiously stabilized subgrade soils using neural network, support vector machine, and Gaussian process regression.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (6): 04021073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002029.
Huang, Y.-H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Hubert, M., and S. Van der Veeken. 2008. “Outlier detection for skewed data.” J. Chemom. 22 (3–4): 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1123.
Ilbeigi, M., and B. Pawar. 2020. “A probabilistic model for optimal bridge inspection interval.” Infrastructures 5 (6): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060047.
Jadhav, A., D. Pramod, and K. Ramanathan. 2019. “Comparison of performance of data imputation methods for numeric dataset.” Appl. Artif. Intell. 33 (10): 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1637138.
Jäger, S., A. Allhorn, and F. Bießmann. 2021. “A benchmark for data imputation methods.” Front. Big Data 48: 693674.
Janitza, S., E. Celik, and A.-L. Boulesteix. 2018. “A computationally fast variable importance test for random forests for high-dimensional data.” Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 12: 885–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-016-0276-4.
Jerez, J. M., I. Molina, P. J. García-Laencina, E. Alba, N. Ribelles, M. Martín, and L. Franco. 2010. “Missing data imputation using statistical and machine learning methods in a real breast cancer problem.” Artif. Intell. Med. 50 (2): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2010.05.002.
Jin, R., Y. Breitbart, and C. Muoh. 2009. “Data discretization unification.” Knowl. Inf. Syst. 19: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0142-6.
Junninen, H., H. Niska, K. Tuppurainen, J. Ruuskanen, and M. Kolehmainen. 2004. “Methods for imputation of missing values in air quality data sets.” Atmos. Environ. 38 (18): 2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.026.
Kim, Y. J., and D. K. Yoon. 2010. “Identifying critical sources of bridge deterioration in cold regions through the constructed bridges in North Dakota.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000087.
Kong, X., Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and S. Das. 2022. “Bridge deck deterioration: Reasons and patterns.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (7): 570–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221080140.
Krawczyk, B. 2016. “Learning from imbalanced data: Open challenges and future directions.” Prog. Artif. Intell. 5 (4): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-016-0094-0.
Längkvist, M., L. Karlsson, and A. Loutfi. 2014. “A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling.” Pattern Recognit. Lett. 42: 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2014.01.008.
Li, M., and G. Jia. 2020. “Bayesian updating of bridge condition deterioration models using complete and incomplete inspection data.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (3): 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001530.
Liu, H., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Bridge condition rating data modeling using deep learning algorithm.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (10): 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712610.
Liu, K. 2019. “Machine learning-based analytics of structured and unstructured data for enhanced bridge deterioration prediction.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2022. “Deep learning–based analytics of multisource heterogeneous bridge data for enhanced data-driven bridge deterioration prediction.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 36 (5): 04022023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001018.
Lu, P., H. Wang, and D. Tolliver. 2019. “Prediction of bridge component ratings using ordinal logistic regression model.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019: 9797584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9797584.
Maletic, J. I., and A. Marcus. 2000. “Data cleansing: Beyond integrity analysis.” In Proc., Conf. on Information Quality, 200–209. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mangalathu, S., S.-H. Hwang, and J.-S. Jeon. 2020. “Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach.” Eng. Struct. 219: 110927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110927.
Marques, H. O., R. J. G. B. Campello, J. Sander, and A. Zimek. 2020. “Internal evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection.” ACM Trans. Knowl. Discovery Data 14 (4): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394053.
Mawson, J., M. Mehr, J. Constant, A. E. Zaghi, and A. Hain. 2022. “Structural performance of acute corners on skewed bridge decks using non-linear modeling of the deck parapet.” Infrastructures 7 (6): 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7060077.
Megeba. 2022. “Verrazzano-narrows bridge.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.mageba-group.com/ru/en/1023/North%20America/USA/42726/Verrazzano-Narrows-Bridge.htm.
MNDOT (Minnesota Department of Transportation). 2017. “LRFD bridge design manual.” Accessed March 19, 2023. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/pdf/lrfdmanual/lrfdbridgedesignmanual.pdf.
MTDOT (Montana Department of Transportation). 2020. “Bridge design memorandum.” Accessed March 16, 2023. https://www.mdt.mt.gov/other/webdata/external/Bridge/Design_Memos/2020-1007_Bridge_Width.pdf.
Nasrollahi, M., and G. Washer. 2015. “Estimating inspection intervals for bridges based on statistical analysis of national bridge inventory data.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (9): 04014104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000710.
Nguyen, T.-D., K. Musial, and B. Gabrys. 2021. “AutoWeka4MCPS-AVATAR: Accelerating automated machine learning pipeline composition and optimisation.” Expert Syst. Appl. 185: 115643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115643.
NJTA (New Jersey Turnpike Authority). 2022. “Strategic plan 2020.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.njta.com/media/4813/strategic-plan.pdf.
Radovanovic, M., A. Nanopoulos, and M. Ivanovic. 2010. “Hubs in space: Popular nearest neighbors in high-dimensional data.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11: 2487–2531.
Radovic, M., O. Ghonima, and T. Schumacher. 2017. “Data mining of bridge concrete deck parameters in the national bridge inventory by two-step cluster analysis.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (2): F4016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000889.
Rahm, E., and H. H. Do. 2000. “Data cleaning: Problems and current approaches.” IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 23 (4): 3–13.
Roth, P. L. 1994. “Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists.” Personnel Psychol. 47 (3): 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x.
Roy, J. 2010. “Rule-based expert system for maritime anomaly detection.” In Vol. 7666 of Sensors, and command, control, communications, and intelligence (C3I) technologies for homeland security and homeland defense IX, edited by E. M. Carapezza, 597–608. Orlando, FL: SPIE.
Sagi, O., and L. Rokach. 2018. “Ensemble learning: A survey.” WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 8 (4): e1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1249.
Schelter, S., T. Rukat, and F. Biessmann. 2021. “JENGA-A Framework to study the impact of data errors on the predictions of machine learning models.” In Proc., 24th Int. Conf. on Extending Database Technology, 529–534. Konstanz, Germany: OpenProceedings.
Sejr, J. H., and A. Schneider-Kamp. 2021. “Explainable outlier detection: What, for whom and why?” Mach. Learn. Appl. 6: 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100172.
Sengupta, A., S. Ilgin Guler, and P. Shokouhi. 2021. “Interpreting impact echo data to predict condition rating of concrete bridge decks: A machine-learning approach.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (8): 04021044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001744.
Smith, B. L., W. T. Scherer, and J. H. Conklin. 2003. “Exploring imputation techniques for missing data in transportation management systems.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1836 (1): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.3141/1836-17.
Soley-Bori, M. 2013. “Dealing with missing data: Key assumptions and methods for applied analysis.” Boston Univ. 4 (1): 19.
Sörensen, R., U. Zinko, and J. Seibert. 2006. “On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: Evaluation of different methods based on field observations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (1): 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-101-2006.
Sterne, J. A. C., I. R. White, J. B. Carlin, M. Spratt, P. Royston, M. G. Kenward, A. M. Wood, and J. R. Carpenter. 2009. “Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls.” BMJ 338: b2393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393.
Sun, X., Z. Zhang, R. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Chapman. 2004. “Analysis of past national bridge inventory ratings for predicting bridge system preservation needs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1866 (1): 36–43. https://doi.org/10.3141/1866-05.
Svetnik, V., A. Liaw, C. Tong, J. C. Culberson, R. P. Sheridan, and B. P. Feuston. 2003. “Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.” J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (6): 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034160g.
TXDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2018. “Bridge project development manual.” Accessed August 6, 2022. http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/bpd/index.htm.
Van Buuren, S., and C. G. Oudshoorn. 2000. Multivariate imputation by chained equations. TNO Rep. PG/VGZ/00.038. Leiden, Netherlands: Public Health.
Wang, F., C.-C. B. Lee, and N. G. Gharaibeh. 2022. “Network-level bridge deterioration prediction models that consider the effect of maintenance and rehabilitation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 28 (1): 05021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000662.
WIDOT (Wisconsin Department of Transportation). 2018. “Design and performance of highly skewed deck girder bridges.” Accessed August 6, 2022. https://wisconsingov/documents2/research/0092-16-05-final-report.pdf.
Wu, N. C., and S. Chase. 2010. An exploratory data analysis of national bridge inventory. Rep. No. UVA-2009-03. Charlottesville, VA: Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center.
Yang, D. Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2018. “Risk-informed bridge ranking at project and network levels.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (3): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000430.
Yang, Y., and G. I. Webb. 2009. “Discretization for naive-Bayes learning: Managing discretization bias and variance.” Mach. Learn. 74: 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-008-5083-5.
Zhang, S., X. Wu, and M. Zhu. 2010a. “Efficient missing data imputation for supervised learning.” In Proc., 9th IEEE Int. Conf. on Cognitive Informatics 10, 672–679. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Zhang, Y., N. Meratnia, and P. Havinga. 2010b. “Outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey.” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 12 (2): 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2010.021510.00088.
Zhu, J., and Y. Wang. 2021. “Feature selection and deep learning for deterioration prediction of the bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (6): 04021078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001653.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Aug 18, 2022
Accepted: Aug 18, 2023
Published online: Oct 20, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xi Hu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, John A. Reif, Jr. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Construction and Civil Infrastructure, Founding Director of the Smart Construction and Intelligent Infrastructure Systems (SCIIS) Lab, John A. Reif, Jr. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-5656. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share